DEM not gonna CON dis NATION: Rolling UK politics in the short-lived post-Murdoch era

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6314 of them)

ach gott mein eyes

bob_sleigher (darraghmac), Sunday, 2 June 2013 17:26 (thirteen years ago)

Cameron's wife and Boris is just too hilarious to be true. Also, virtually logistically impossible.

Dream scenario would be Clegg and someone but I understand they're both Tories.

Matt DC, Sunday, 2 June 2013 17:35 (thirteen years ago)

1) pick two random Tories
2) imagine 'scenario'
3) vom

go cray cray on my lobster soufflé (snoball), Sunday, 2 June 2013 17:38 (thirteen years ago)

not in cabinet but important enough to be a big deal? how many candidates can there be?

meanwhile, pro tip for members of the upper house. if a dude you've never met before offers you a bag full of cash to plug his business interests, you might wanna check see if he's wearing a wire.

floored character (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 June 2013 17:39 (thirteen years ago)

Cameron's wife and Nigel Farage?

Why can't the Mail disclose who they are "for legal reasons"? Because no source is willing to speak up and they'd be sued for libel?

Random ASMR Memories (Le Bateau Ivre), Sunday, 2 June 2013 17:39 (thirteen years ago)

implication is there's a superinjunction in place

floored character (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 June 2013 17:41 (thirteen years ago)

which rules out any member of the Cameron household imo

floored character (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 June 2013 17:44 (thirteen years ago)

My first thought was Liam Fox, there's a lot of smoke around that guy at pretty much all times, plus he was running the MoD, although that would be too public-interest for a superinjunction. Maybe Bercow-related?

Boris having an extramarital affair hardly constitutes a 'dynamite revelation' really.

Matt DC, Sunday, 2 June 2013 17:57 (thirteen years ago)

whole thing feels a bit overplayed by the Mail hacks, wonder if there's some actual bad news they want burying

Doctor Who's on first (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:01 (thirteen years ago)

Dream scenario would be Clegg and someone but I understand they're both Tories.

splittin hairs there Matt

waterprick (stevie), Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:05 (thirteen years ago)

x-post

What, that they're all doing the cash for questions fiddle.

not_goodwin, Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:06 (thirteen years ago)

It has been said that they are middle-aged figures and that the affair has now concluded. It does not involve anyone serving in the cabinet.

ghosts of erith spectral crackhouse slain rudeboy (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:07 (thirteen years ago)

Boris having an extramarital affair hardly constitutes a 'dynamite revelation' really.

Yeah, surely Boris having a dalliance is on the dog-bites-man end of the news spectrum?

emil.y, Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:08 (thirteen years ago)

This guy must not think anything of long prison sentences.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jpr7WUf9cyE

not_goodwin, Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:08 (thirteen years ago)

This guy must not think anything

waterprick (stevie), Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:16 (thirteen years ago)

ps is that david quantick y/n?

waterprick (stevie), Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:17 (thirteen years ago)

i want that guy sending down just cos he sets the crepe detector thru the roof tbh

Doctor Who's on first (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:20 (thirteen years ago)

Nathan Barley?

hewing to the status quo with great zealotry (DavidM), Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:24 (thirteen years ago)

I guess we just have to wait for tomorrow's French/Italian/American papers to be published

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:28 (thirteen years ago)

they're not politicians but they're close to the pm

http://orderorder.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/acrb.png

clue's in the link

prolego, Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:41 (thirteen years ago)

Going to spend the rest of my evening watching all that guy's youtube videos.

oppet, Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:41 (thirteen years ago)

(two pairs of initials in the html)

(this is the clue i'm seeing being floated around)

they're not politicians but i guess this posed a conflict of interest?

prolego, Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:42 (thirteen years ago)

OH SHIT.

Matt DC, Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:46 (thirteen years ago)

If it is them, is it really something that could 'bring down Cameron'?

oppet, Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:48 (thirteen years ago)

Alan Carr and Rebecca Black?!?!?!

emil.y, Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:49 (thirteen years ago)

AHAAAHAAAHAHAAH

Too late to never become the story, but still, if that's true....

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:49 (thirteen years ago)

WHO WHO WHO?

waterprick (stevie), Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:49 (thirteen years ago)

I don't see how it could sink Cameron, it's not any worse than anything we already know about these people but fuck it's an unpleasant image.

Matt DC, Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:51 (thirteen years ago)

OH SHIT I JUST FIGURED IT OUT and really what would this have to do with Cameron?

waterprick (stevie), Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:52 (thirteen years ago)

[obv we can't really have this conversation here]

waterprick (stevie), Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:52 (thirteen years ago)

It just further confirms Cameron's lack of judgement in hiring him in the first place. There's also the irony of those associated with the news of the screws having a super injunction out on this. Other than that it's just a distraction.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:53 (thirteen years ago)

Conflict of interest I can see, but yeah, not sure how it's more devastating than anything else?

xp

emil.y, Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:53 (thirteen years ago)

Oh, and here I was, thinking it was the marching powder at a particular wedding that was going to do for DC.

on the sidelines dishing out sass (suzy), Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:54 (thirteen years ago)

Old story, entirely unrelated

Matt DC, Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:55 (thirteen years ago)

TBF these tories are rather vanilla in their sleaziness compared to the early 90s lot.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:56 (thirteen years ago)

okay the furore is making more sense

waterprick (stevie), Sunday, 2 June 2013 18:57 (thirteen years ago)

I have a lazy "tap that" gag ready to go, someone let me know when it's safe to do so

too busy s1ockin' on my 乒乓 (wins), Sunday, 2 June 2013 19:13 (thirteen years ago)

If we said that a certain soap actor cum fake tv hardman had been cuckolded we'd be about right, yes?

Troughton-masked Replicant (aldo), Sunday, 2 June 2013 19:17 (thirteen years ago)

I have a lazy "tap that" gag ready to go, someone let me know when it's safe to do so

I like it.

emil.y, Sunday, 2 June 2013 19:25 (thirteen years ago)

Despite clean-shavenness, always suspected SACTVH had the benefit of a sumptuous ginger beard.

on the sidelines dishing out sass (suzy), Sunday, 2 June 2013 19:28 (thirteen years ago)

I'd always thought they were both bearded.

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Sunday, 2 June 2013 19:30 (thirteen years ago)

This superinjunction shite making all Brits go ohh shhhh all the time cracks me up. What a ridiculous medieval law, Christ.

Random ASMR Memories (Le Bateau Ivre), Sunday, 2 June 2013 19:30 (thirteen years ago)

But then I am a bit sour because i haven't figured out the initials yet :-(

Random ASMR Memories (Le Bateau Ivre), Sunday, 2 June 2013 19:31 (thirteen years ago)

click on Matt DC's old story which has ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with this

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Sunday, 2 June 2013 19:33 (thirteen years ago)

OIC :)

Thanks Ed

Random ASMR Memories (Le Bateau Ivre), Sunday, 2 June 2013 19:34 (thirteen years ago)

(Not the place but this superinjunction just makes me giddy. Would the UK ask for me to be extradited I were to say it out loud here?)

Random ASMR Memories (Le Bateau Ivre), Sunday, 2 June 2013 19:35 (thirteen years ago)

try it and see

too busy s1ockin' on my 乒乓 (wins), Sunday, 2 June 2013 19:36 (thirteen years ago)

the great thing about superinjunctions is they are almost completely unenforceable once their existence becomes known because they don't really bind anyone outside of England and Wales

American Fear of Pranksterism (Ed), Sunday, 2 June 2013 19:37 (thirteen years ago)

oh now you've done it

too busy s1ockin' on my 乒乓 (wins), Sunday, 2 June 2013 19:39 (thirteen years ago)

Yup

Random ACRB.PNG Memories (Le Bateau Ivre), Sunday, 2 June 2013 19:39 (thirteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.