Thats the conversation I mostly have
― I turned away to leave these few in thought and contemplation (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 09:20 (thirteen years ago)
dawkins has become like chomsky where there's two types of conversations you can have about the dude and unfortunately the one you're more likely to have is by far the less interesting― balls, Tuesday, April 23, 2013 7:19 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post PermalinkI much prefer calling him out for being a stupid racist dick tbh.― oppet, Tuesday, April 23, 2013 11:00 AM (33 minutes ago)
― balls, Tuesday, April 23, 2013 7:19 AM (4 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I much prefer calling him out for being a stupid racist dick tbh.
― oppet, Tuesday, April 23, 2013 11:00 AM (33 minutes ago)
both OTM
― My god. Pure ideology. (ey), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 09:36 (thirteen years ago)
Hooray for Florida!
Only 49 more states to go! Hooray for Florida !I-95 and I-75 will be jammed for the next month or so with druggies and deadbeats heading North out of Florida , because this is the first state in the union to require drug testing to receive welfare!Hooray for Florida ! In signing the new law, Republican Gov. Rick Scott said, "If Floridians want welfare, they better make sure they are drug-free."Applicants must pay for the drug test, but are reimbursed if they test drug-free. Applicants who test positive for illicit substances, won't be eligible for the funds for a year, or until they undergo treatment. Those who fail a second time will be banned from receiving funds for three years!Naturally, a few people are crying this is unconstitutional.How is this unconstitutional? It's a legal requirement that every person applying for a job has to pass drug tests in order to get the job, why not those who receive welfare?Forward this if you agree!Let's get welfare back to the ones who need it, not to those who won't get a job.I AGREE, DO YOU?https://www.facebook.com/HitLikeIfAgreed?ref=hlt
I-95 and I-75 will be jammed for the next month or so with druggies and deadbeats heading North out of Florida , because this is the first state in the union to require drug testing to receive welfare!
Hooray for Florida ! In signing the new law, Republican Gov. Rick Scott said, "If Floridians want welfare, they better make sure they are drug-free."
Applicants must pay for the drug test, but are reimbursed if they test drug-free. Applicants who test positive for illicit substances, won't be eligible for the funds for a year, or until they undergo treatment. Those who fail a second time will be banned from receiving funds for three years!
Naturally, a few people are crying this is unconstitutional.How is this unconstitutional? It's a legal requirement that every person applying for a job has to pass drug tests in order to get the job, why not those who receive welfare?
Forward this if you agree!Let's get welfare back to the ones who need it, not to those who won't get a job.I AGREE, DO YOU?
https://www.facebook.com/HitLikeIfAgreed?ref=hlt
― supermassive pot hole (seandalai), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 10:28 (thirteen years ago)
really just judging u for being friends w/whoever posted this
― infirm neophytic child (zachlyon), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 10:34 (thirteen years ago)
How is this unconstitutional? It's a legal requirement that every person applying for a job has to pass drug tests in order to get the job, why not those who receive welfare?
Hahaha fuck your job, dude!
― how's life, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 10:38 (thirteen years ago)
The Venn diagram of "people who believe all welfare recipients should get drug tests" and "people who oppose background checks for buying a gun" is a perfect circle. A circle of stupid, stupid people.
― Huston we got chicken lol (Phil D.), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 10:45 (thirteen years ago)
"because they want to shoot druggies!!! hray!"
― Mark G, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 10:49 (thirteen years ago)
https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/21143_649830845046372_688765536_n.jpg
George TakeiLike This Page · 56 minutes ago
Don't like this unless you laugh within two seconds. If you leave a spoiler comment, others will shame you.
Okay, he's just getting plain smug at this point.
― Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:36 (thirteen years ago)
read a great blog post about how Takei is a patriarchal misogynist dick, despite being forward on some issues
― Dr. Adorbius (mh), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:51 (thirteen years ago)
just like Star Trek TOS
― we're up all night to get picky (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:53 (thirteen years ago)
Oh snap. Also OTM.
― carl agatha, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:53 (thirteen years ago)
wtf at only like if u get it & spoiler comment. are his readers really that stupid that they should feel proud of understanding the "joke" and get to shame those who post it?
― Jibe, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 14:55 (thirteen years ago)
w8 waht is the other kind
― I turned away to leave these few in thought and contemplation (Bananaman Begins), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 15:05 (thirteen years ago)
can't tell you, sorry
― supermassive pot hole (seandalai), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:06 (thirteen years ago)
https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/324802551516106752
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:08 (thirteen years ago)
starting to feel bad for the guy
― we're up all night to get picky (Noodle Vague), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:10 (thirteen years ago)
I'm kind of neutral on Dawkins but "my words mean what I intend" seems like a silly thing for an intelligent person to assert.
― dschinghis kraan (NickB), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:17 (thirteen years ago)
https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/statuses/311802605263273984
"My words mean what I intend", says Dawkins. "CAN PIG FEEL MORE??"
― the kind of man who best draws girls' eyeballs (Merdeyeux), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:24 (thirteen years ago)
Richard Dawkins gives me a headache.
― carl agatha, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:26 (thirteen years ago)
Good old Humpty Dumpty semantics.
― lazulum, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:27 (thirteen years ago)
Richard Dawkins@RichardDawkins5h Easy for Dawkins to criticise the soft target of Christianity. http://bit.ly/15zvscE He doesn't have the guts to take on Islam.Details
It seems pretty apparent that by "Dawkins" in this tweet, he meant "Rowan Atkinson".
― how's life, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:28 (thirteen years ago)
not sure why we're on the facebook thread with this, btw.
― how's life, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:29 (thirteen years ago)
http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BODQxMzY3MTY0MF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNTg2MDgxMQ@@._V1_SY317_CR5,0,214,317_.jpg
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 16:30 (thirteen years ago)
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/399818_603804056297372_914863069_n.jpg
Still trying to work this out...
― Pingu Unchained (dog latin), Wednesday, 24 April 2013 23:07 (thirteen years ago)
http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lji7tbJ3Se1qd47y7o1_500.jpg
― balls, Wednesday, 24 April 2013 23:09 (thirteen years ago)
When the creator of that enters a dark room, he turns the light off switch off
― Bobby McFerrin, Quantum Physicist (Sufjan Grafton), Wednesday, 24 April 2013 23:32 (thirteen years ago)
music on world off makes total sense to me
― Mordy, Wednesday, 24 April 2013 23:49 (thirteen years ago)
You can either switch the world off or switch the music on, but not both at once.
― Aimless, Wednesday, 24 April 2013 23:53 (thirteen years ago)
The meme creator is pointing out that we live in a dark age of neither music nor world.
― lazulum, Thursday, 25 April 2013 00:01 (thirteen years ago)
actually if you assume that world and music only have two, binary states -- off and on - then the only way to read it is that music and world are either both on or both off at the same time.
― huun huurt 2 (Hurting 2), Thursday, 25 April 2013 00:31 (thirteen years ago)
a damning condemnation of world music imo
― infirm neophytic child (zachlyon), Thursday, 25 April 2013 00:34 (thirteen years ago)
hahaha
― Doctor Casino, Thursday, 25 April 2013 01:05 (thirteen years ago)
I think we need a double-pole double-throw switch for this scenario
― noddynadweiner (silby), Thursday, 25 April 2013 01:23 (thirteen years ago)
can pig feel more
― lag∞n, Thursday, 25 April 2013 02:22 (thirteen years ago)
not really, no
― I have many lovely lacy nightgowns (contenderizer), Thursday, 25 April 2013 02:27 (thirteen years ago)
https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/933917_364596206994000_1796912130_n.jpg
― mh mh mh mh (qiqing), Thursday, 25 April 2013 06:15 (thirteen years ago)
Is that Cammie from Street Fighter?
― Fetchboy, Thursday, 25 April 2013 06:20 (thirteen years ago)
Reminds me of that run we had last year where some feeder posted about digging into the folds of fat on his vict^H^H^H^HloverKinda wondering now if that's a thing. "Feeder" texts over "thinspo" pictures.
― Øystein, Thursday, 25 April 2013 18:02 (thirteen years ago)
http://actuallygrimes.tumblr.com/post/48744769552/i-dont-want-to-have-to-compromise-my-morals-in-order
― the pinefox, Thursday, 25 April 2013 19:01 (thirteen years ago)
anyone over 18 posting about not "fitting in" really needs their adulthood credentials revoked
― huun huurt 2 (Hurting 2), Thursday, 25 April 2013 19:13 (thirteen years ago)
http://sphotos-g.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/603851_455530811201294_1318100842_n.jpg
― My god. Pure ideology. (ey), Thursday, 25 April 2013 20:09 (thirteen years ago)
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_vmpSO2BbYCE/TMLqj3TM8kI/AAAAAAAANBU/QXrbovd4RJM/s320/hitler_baby.gif
― huun huurt 2 (Hurting 2), Thursday, 25 April 2013 20:12 (thirteen years ago)
That Grimes post is OTM.
― emil.y, Thursday, 25 April 2013 20:25 (thirteen years ago)
^^
― carl agatha, Thursday, 25 April 2013 20:42 (thirteen years ago)
I also liked the Grimes post
― huun huurt 2 (Hurting 2), Thursday, 25 April 2013 20:46 (thirteen years ago)
I think it is dire
― the pinefox, Thursday, 25 April 2013 20:58 (thirteen years ago)
Exactly which bit of a post that says "I'm sick of female musicians being sexualised, objectified and harassed" do you have a problem with, pinefox?
― emil.y, Thursday, 25 April 2013 21:35 (thirteen years ago)
Presumably he means "female musicians being sexualised, objectified and harassed" is dire, to be fair.
― Eyeball Kicks, Thursday, 25 April 2013 22:51 (thirteen years ago)
its cool except the parts about being taken out of context and being called cute, one should not complain about those things
― lag∞n, Friday, 26 April 2013 01:13 (thirteen years ago)
"im tired of being congratulated for being thin because i can more easily fit into sample sizes from the runway"
stealth brag
most of it seemed right to me though
― huun huurt 2 (Hurting 2), Friday, 26 April 2013 01:20 (thirteen years ago)