that disparity is a killer imo: my reading is decent but my listening is still way too patchy
whatever they were playing sounded like it was recorded on a boombox beside a motorway
that is the worst when you're still learning
― we're up all night to eat biscuits (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 21 April 2013 11:27 (thirteen years ago)
妈了个屄的!
― 乒乓, Sunday, 21 April 2013 12:48 (thirteen years ago)
also we have a ridiculous exam tomorrow and i will fail it so drinking wine atm
some magic happened at some point (probably the wine) because this happened:
1. we knew there would be a 'written' exam first, but we didn't know what was in it, what we had to do, how long &c. it turned out to be 80 minutes long, all chinese questions (no pinyin) and handwritten answers about stuff we haven't even seen since last year. smashed it.
2. that 10 minutes of dialogue i couldn't remember last night somehow became me delivering ~the whole thing~ without a script or cue cards or ANYTHING. smashed it.
― we're up all night to eat biscuits (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 22 April 2013 10:44 (thirteen years ago)
two reasons i'm ditching ios skritter:
1. the guided stroke writing (which you can't turn off) always tells you what the character is, even when you're getting it wrong. the consequence is that you don't learn it using your own brain because there's training wheels are in your face the whole time. (i think this has also damaged the neatness of my handwriting btw.)
2. if i go off and do, you know, ~actual language~ instead of just flashcards for a few weeks, i come back to find 3,930 (i am not kidding) overdue flashcards. right now i could either (a) be wracked and assailed by guilt and hole up with this thing for like a month or (b) just ignore it completely and get on with doing language instead.
pleco's flashcard system is primitive by comparison, but it stays the hell out of my face. if i have no idea what a character is, it lets me make the entire mistake before correcting me (at which point i can open the scratchpad and freestyle the correct character).
― we're up all night to eat biscuits (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 22 April 2013 23:22 (thirteen years ago)
what does "doing language" mean?
congratulations on the exam stuff, too!
are you done/almost done your first year/certificate now? what has the attrition rate of fellow students been?
― dylannn, Tuesday, 23 April 2013 07:01 (thirteen years ago)
thanks! it's actually my third year/certificate, although my complete lack of confidence in speaking/communicating is holding me back a bit.
this year we started (two months ago) with maybe 10 students and we're already down to six. tbh i'm amazed the demand is so flat for a city that's (a) basically in asia and (b) choc full of native chinese. it's not like there are a billion accredited courses running here.
by 'doing language' i meant reading, watching video, listening to podcasts/music &c., i.e. real chinese as opposed to flicking through a load of unconnected words on cards. these days i get far more out of reading 读者 than doing flashcard reps.
― we're up all night to eat biscuits (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 07:23 (thirteen years ago)
http://gbtimes.com/lifestyle/education/dial-beijing/challenging-chinese-language-myths
― dylannn, Monday, 6 May 2013 07:19 (thirteen years ago)
he's a bit glib about the writing system
― great wallogina (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 6 May 2013 07:38 (thirteen years ago)
kind of shooting fish in a barrel or 瓮中捉鳖 if you want
If you visit Spain, it can be easy to pick up common phrases on the street. Is it similar with Chinese?No. The problem is the textbooks teach you certain things, but then maybe you go to Beijing and they speak with a certain kind of accent.
No. The problem is the textbooks teach you certain things, but then maybe you go to Beijing and they speak with a certain kind of accent.
but why wouldnt that be true with spanish, too? and sure, you definitely can pick up common phrases on the street. why couldnt you? come on now.
If you go to Shanghai, for the most part they are going to be speaking ‘Shanghainese’, which is a dialect of Mandarin, but the words they use and the way they use them are very different. My spoken Chinese is okay, but if I go down to Shanghai and someone tries to speak Shanghainese to me then I will probably have no idea what they are saying.
the fact that these two languages are not mutually intelligible should be the first hint that one is not a dialect of the other, i think. theyre both from middle chinese, just like nearly every other sinitic language/dialect spoken in china, and shanghainese and wu dialects as they exist today are influenced by northern languages but shanghainese is not a dialect of mandarin, okay?
Does the Chinese language have any influences from other languages, such as Japanese, Korean or English?No, as far as I can tell. Historically speaking, both Japanese and Korean are derivatives of Chinese to different degrees. When it comes to outside influences, if you look at the actual language, Chinese is the mother language… it came before Japanese and Korean.
No, as far as I can tell. Historically speaking, both Japanese and Korean are derivatives of Chinese to different degrees. When it comes to outside influences, if you look at the actual language, Chinese is the mother language… it came before Japanese and Korean.
i dont know enough about the history of the korean or japanese languages to really go in on this but i korean and japanese fall outside of the sino-tibetan language family and to call them derivatives of chinese is even more than claiming shanghainese as a dialect of mandarin.
also, chinese doesnt have as many loanwords in popular use as english and unlike japanese the writing system and the deep history of the language renders the origins of loanwords opaque in most cases.
if you want to talk about words borrowed from japanese, var qing early republican intellectuals and writers either studied in japan or read japanese texts and took lots of words from japanese that didn't exist in chinese, esp literary , political , philosophical concepts that the japanese were exposed to because of japans intellectual climate and exposure to western philosophical etc works. so, 文化 民主 逻辑 资本主义 共产主义 革命 among many others were borrowed from japanese texts.
― dylannn, Monday, 6 May 2013 08:13 (thirteen years ago)
Do you think that young people will keep using the older, correct language?Yes, they definitely will. Again, if you think about the role of education in Chinese people’s lives… in every public school in China they are all teaching the standard Mandarin, so that is definitely going to be a very strong force in the direction of the language. In the end, when you look at something other than internet slang, there’s really not that big of a difference in the way that the older generation and younger generations speak the language.
Yes, they definitely will. Again, if you think about the role of education in Chinese people’s lives… in every public school in China they are all teaching the standard Mandarin, so that is definitely going to be a very strong force in the direction of the language. In the end, when you look at something other than internet slang, there’s really not that big of a difference in the way that the older generation and younger generations speak the language.
leaving aside the prescriptivist correct language line and leaving aside that he seems to be talking about both nonmandarin languages in china AND "slang," chinese is as dynamic as any other great big modern language-- there are hundreds of millions speaking modern standard mandarin-- the chinese language referring to modern standard mandarin has changed in major ways over the last eighty, ninety years....
― dylannn, Monday, 6 May 2013 08:19 (thirteen years ago)
MANDARIN CHINESE...is over 6,000 years oldhas over a billion native speakersis China's official languagehas over 20,000 characters
mandarin and most other sinitic languages spoken in china are from middle chinese, which isnt even 6000 years old by itself. its position as the standard chinese language is a relatively recent phenomenon.
it only has a billion native speakers if you really stretch the definition. if you run down the other languages spoken in china and assume and i think you can assume that speakers of those languages are native speakers... cantonese sitting at 50something million speakers, min chinese at 50something million speakers, wu / shanghainese at 80 million speakers and those are just the big ones, and then you have non-chinese languages like korean or uighur or uzbek. even if mandarin has a lot of native speakers, its wrong to position it as the native born language of every single citizen of the prc.
and wow, 20000 characters! jeez thats a lot.
― dylannn, Monday, 6 May 2013 08:28 (thirteen years ago)
brb going to burn down a confucius institute
― dylannn, Monday, 6 May 2013 08:29 (thirteen years ago)
expert who are not experts are the best
― great wallogina (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 6 May 2013 10:55 (thirteen years ago)
also lol @ shanghainese being a dialect of mandarin, whichever way you come at it
― great wallogina (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 6 May 2013 10:56 (thirteen years ago)
1. we knew there would be a 'written' exam first, but we didn't know what was in it, what we had to do, how long &c. it turned out to be 80 minutes long, all chinese questions (no pinyin) and handwritten answers about stuff we haven't even seen since last year.
2. that 10 minutes of dialogue i couldn't remember last night somehow became me delivering ~the whole thing~ without a script or cue cards or ANYTHING.
― great wallogina (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 6 May 2013 11:00 (thirteen years ago)
lol and to think i was going to defer this year because i didn't feel up to it
― great wallogina (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 6 May 2013 11:01 (thirteen years ago)
good work, big guy.
for written questions, what sort of material did they ask questions on?
― dylannn, Monday, 6 May 2013 11:16 (thirteen years ago)
i always felt envious of those students in my undergrad chinese classes that spoke another chinese language at home / went to school in canada and got around the rules about not racking up credits in lang courses for languages they were nearfluent in. but they had mostly evaporated, along with the business and international development students, by the final rounds.
― dylannn, Monday, 6 May 2013 11:19 (thirteen years ago)
i am really really really jealous of cantonese speakers
― 乒乓, Monday, 6 May 2013 11:24 (thirteen years ago)
speaking of the beautiful linguistic diversity of china!
http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/phonemica
this a site my friend kellen and other guys interested in chinese languages run (also involved w http://sinoglot.com/blog/): http://phonemica.net/
― dylannn, Monday, 6 May 2013 11:34 (thirteen years ago)
but they had mostly evaporated, along with the business and international development students, by the final rounds.
yeah, we lost most of ours in the first year, probably because they couldn't write and were shitscared of trying
― great wallogina (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 6 May 2013 11:40 (thirteen years ago)
oh i know sinoglot and phonemica, they're great
先/在 "先..., 再..." ?
― dylannn, Monday, 6 May 2013 11:53 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.sinosplice.com/life/archives/2013/03/27/chinese-grammar-funnies old jokezzz
haha yeah, sorry, i didn't check my typing
― great wallogina (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 6 May 2013 11:57 (thirteen years ago)
When it comes to outside influences, if you look at the actual language, Chinese is the mother language… it came before Japanese and Korean.
this is completely wrong
― clouds, Monday, 6 May 2013 13:08 (thirteen years ago)
the claims the author makes regarding the statuses of various languages in china, the relationship between sinitic languages and nonsinitic languages in china, the history of the chinese language, the relationship between chinese and foreign languages, the history of mandarin as the official language-- very few of them stand up to common sense, the most lazy cursory googling, or godforbid actual research, but they've been repeated so many times in the service of nationalist mythmaking that i guess they sound like fact.
― dylannn, Monday, 6 May 2013 17:47 (thirteen years ago)
today i asked someone a question in chinese without thinking about it or even consciously language switching. i don't think that's ever happened before.
also i learned how wechat works (asynchronous voice chat that lets you play each message repeatedly until you understand it) and am so getting on that bus. not wholly keen on giving my phone number to tencent but whatever.
― umair coque (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 18 May 2013 08:31 (thirteen years ago)
my favorite feature of wechat is the find people near you function! good way to make friends.
― dylannn, Saturday, 18 May 2013 08:37 (thirteen years ago)
i also want to say something about the use of weixin for meeting potential sexual partners without being crass.
― dylannn, Saturday, 18 May 2013 08:38 (thirteen years ago)
omggggg i had no idea about this
i'm away from home and my qq user/pass is at home which is driving me insane atm
― umair coque (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 18 May 2013 08:40 (thirteen years ago)
things i like about wechat:
1. proximity list. it's most useful in mainland china but if you're ever out and about and wonder, "hey how close is the nearest chinese person (that also uses wechat)?"
2. the group messaging feature.
3. qq mobile is pretty good now-- i've run it on the most basic phones available and i've run it on new age smartphones, and it works. but wechat is streamlined and built for mobile devices.
4. i have international text messaging in my phone plan but i like wechat because it's easier and cheaper and i don't need phone service to talk to people.
― dylannn, Saturday, 18 May 2013 12:12 (thirteen years ago)
signed up again. good range of people nearby because melbourne has a decent sinosphere/abc population. not contacting strangers yet because i don't know where the crepey line falls.
― umair coque (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 18 May 2013 14:09 (thirteen years ago)
there's an account name and a name and a wechat it and a qq id and a qq name and a qq account name (some of which can only be set once, i don't even remember which) and the qq/wechat values don't match up and i have nfi what i am doing with all this crap
― umair coque (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 19 May 2013 01:59 (thirteen years ago)
chinese social media in general seems to have way too many settings and multiple things that sort of do the same thing and just dumb shit going on
― umair coque (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 19 May 2013 02:01 (thirteen years ago)
right. with most of the chinese blogging platforms, the social networking sites there's a perfect storm of poor design and infinite user customization. qq's qzone is the worst example.
― dylannn, Sunday, 19 May 2013 03:34 (thirteen years ago)
whoa that's just waterfalls of garbage
― umair coque (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 19 May 2013 06:41 (thirteen years ago)
it's p much a generation of users who grew up on pirated copies of windows xp
― 乒乓, Sunday, 19 May 2013 11:55 (thirteen years ago)
starting to forget the basics now. i'm sitting there tonight, talking to a guy, forming like 对…感兴趣 sentences without a problem, and then he asks me how many people are in my class and i have nfi how to form the sentence. so dispiriting.
― the Quim of Bendigo (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 23 May 2013 10:14 (thirteen years ago)
obv i should have spent 20% less time learning new words and more time just using the god damned language
― the Quim of Bendigo (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 23 May 2013 10:15 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.failpix.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bowling_balls_juggle.gif
me learning chinese
― the Quim of Bendigo (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 23 May 2013 10:35 (thirteen years ago)
i'm not sure how helpful this advice is. with elementary conversations, answering those types of questions, the point is to work with your conversation partner's feedback and work off their grammar. so, if the question is "你们班有多少个学生?" go ahead and use that sentence patter, turn it into a statement formulate your response from that sentence pattern, "我们班有三十个学生." or! simply say "三十个"! that works just as well.
when talking to nonnative speakers, there's often the echo response that repeats and corrects your grammar without grinding the conversation to a halt. so, if you said, "三十," you'll likely get back, "哦, 三十个, 好多呀"/"三十个学生!" + leading question. your grammar or phrasing is corrected and the conversation moves on. even if you put your response into a sentence, you'll still get back something like, "啊, 你们班有三十个学生, 不少呀!" and that response will give you a polished, native model, with correct tones, etc.
the value of conversation with a native speaker is 1) hearing back the echo and working from their grammatical structures, 2) developing a feel for how the language is actually used.
― dylannn, Thursday, 23 May 2013 13:27 (thirteen years ago)
thanks heaps for those tips, dylannn. it's an incredible blessing that chinese grammar is usually identical in question and answer form, because as a learner that thinking has already already done for you.
the big problem i had last night (apart from not being good enough at listening to keep up with whole sentences) is that he asked me in english 'how many people are in your class?' and i could not think of the correct word to use. i was struggling rather ineptly with 是 for a minute before he jumped in and said 'it's 有'. i mean obviously it's 有 in hindsight, but it's at this very basic level that i'm stuffing up.
another problem is asking someone to repeat what they said and getting a whole new sentence instead, but wechat should address that.
your second point (developing a feel) is something that will only come if i barrel on through all this ill-confidence and learn through my own mistakes. i don't think there's any other way.
― the Quim of Bendigo (Autumn Almanac), Thursday, 23 May 2013 22:29 (thirteen years ago)
verbal communication has a lot of room for quirky expression, grammatical indecisiveness and inexactness. i feel that in chinese, this is especially true.
there's a lot of room for mixing up word order, especially. "我们班学生有三十个" + "学生我们班有三十个" work in this situation. they might not be what you would find in a textbook and they don't even look great in text but in the flow of conversation, neither pattern would strike me as really strange.
even if you had fumbled out "我们班是三十个学生": it sounds a bit strange, if you take the time to consider it, and it isn't strictly correct grammar, but it also wouldn't bring the conversation to an abrupt halt, especially if spoken with some confidence. and there's the immediate echo effect to correct your phrasing if your partner finds it odd.
one problem is that as a non-native speaker your grammar is listened to a little more closely. the person you're talking to will be struggling to figure out what the hell you're trying to say, listening through all those horrible tones and weird grammatical constructions, and even if they'd forgive it from a native speaker your grammatical quirks aren't immediately taken as linguistic flavor or personal choice but as fucking up in a foreign language.
― dylannn, Friday, 24 May 2013 03:19 (thirteen years ago)
i hate the rah rah BE CONFIDENT / WORK HARD selfesteem attitude of language learners on the internet but that advice is valid sometimes.
― dylannn, Friday, 24 May 2013 03:20 (thirteen years ago)
at the end of the day, you can't even say that 是x个学生 is incorrect.
it does tend to work better when referring to the class more specifically, if that makes sense.
“我们老师挺好的,他那个班有三十个学生。但王老师,我觉得他不怎么样,你看,他那个班才二十个学生。”
"wǒmen lǎoshī tínghǎode, tā nàge bān yǒu sānshí ge xuésheng. dàn wáng lǎoshī, wǒ juéde tā bù zěnmeyàng, nǐ kàn, tā nàge bān cái èrshíge xuésheng." / "our teacher is fuckin great. his class is thirty students. but that mr. wang, he ain't all that. his class only has twenty students."
or the character of the students in the class.
“我们班是十个本地人,三个留学生,还有一些ABC。” or “我们班是三个男生,四个女生。”
"wǒmen bān shì shíge běndìrén, sānge liúxuéshēng, háiyǒu yīxiē ABC" / "our class has ten locals, three foreign exchange students, and a few ABCs." or "wǒmen bān shì sānge nánshēng, sìge nǚshēng" / "my class has three boys and four girls"
or a group of classes.
“在我的学校每个班一般是四五十个学生,学生太多了。”
"zài wǒde xuéxiào měige bān yībān shì sìwǔshíge xuéshēng, xuéshēng tài duōle" / "at my school, every class is usually about forty or fifty students, too many goddamn kids"
― dylannn, Friday, 24 May 2013 03:45 (thirteen years ago)
yo what you got at your housea pigoh cool, me too. you gonna eat it soon?yeahneat― dayo, Wednesday, May 4, 2011 12:48 AM (2 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
a pig
oh cool, me too. you gonna eat it soon?
yeah
neat
― dayo, Wednesday, May 4, 2011 12:48 AM (2 years ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
this is beautiful
― siouxsan sarandon (Stevie D(eux)), Friday, 24 May 2013 03:51 (thirteen years ago)
fuck. i accidentally converted the first example from 是 to 有.
我们老师挺好的,他那个班是三十个学生。但王老师,我觉得他不怎么样,你看,他那个班才二十个学生。”
― dylannn, Friday, 24 May 2013 03:53 (thirteen years ago)
I often think about picking this back up; I bet I could relearn a lot of it really fast if I studied hard.
― siouxsan sarandon (Stevie D(eux)), Friday, 24 May 2013 03:53 (thirteen years ago)
It's so annoying that there's this extra dimension to learn. Like you can read and pronounce French; you just have to know what the words mean. But you have to learn symbols AND pronunciation AND definition, ugh
― siouxsan sarandon (Stevie D(eux)), Friday, 24 May 2013 03:54 (thirteen years ago)