Speaking as someone that's in the doc, I see it as in impressionistic document of the Kubrick research subculture. No conclusions, but that's not what the doc intended. For "case building" seek out, the many self-made youtube docs out there. What's funny about all the extreme reactions to the POVs in the film, is that, in the context of Shining research at large, they are among the more mainstream, reasonable approaches (even Weidner!) The really crazy people didn't make the cut! I know that all of the narrators in the film enjoyed the finished product, and are all kind of surprised by the negative reaction by some of the audience ... just goes to show that different people can see the same thing very differently. Such is ambiguity!
― Ask The Answer Man (sexyDancer), Monday, 15 April 2013 22:19 (thirteen years ago)
okay, so were you the moon landing guy
― gr8 tr∞lls i have known (forksclovetofu), Monday, 15 April 2013 22:35 (thirteen years ago)
i agree with SD, the film works best if you approach the theories a ride you allow yourself to go along on as long as possible until you circle back and realize "oh god i'm in too deep, how far back was the last logical argument, where am i even anymore"
― ְ֮֠֓֟֬֩ (gr8080), Monday, 15 April 2013 22:48 (thirteen years ago)
and "will i ever be able to watch a movie the same way ever again"
― ְ֮֠֓֟֬֩ (gr8080), Monday, 15 April 2013 22:49 (thirteen years ago)
xp: lawls, I'm the forwards/backwards guy with the screaming kid who says "like" all the time.
― Ask The Answer Man (sexyDancer), Monday, 15 April 2013 22:51 (thirteen years ago)
but siriusly ... http://kdk12.tumblr.com/private/40157429425/tumblr_mdm1mzJlgC1qjt9ph
― Ask The Answer Man (sexyDancer), Monday, 15 April 2013 22:53 (thirteen years ago)
ohhhh. good work with forward backwards show, that was a definite high point.
― gr8 tr∞lls i have known (forksclovetofu), Monday, 15 April 2013 22:55 (thirteen years ago)
yeah i big upped you way up thread -- srsly my favorite part of the film
― ְ֮֠֓֟֬֩ (gr8080), Monday, 15 April 2013 23:46 (thirteen years ago)
For the record, I was the moon landing guy
― urine for a treat (latebloomer), Tuesday, 16 April 2013 01:11 (thirteen years ago)
I am the minotaur fwiw.
― Jersey Al (Albert R. Broccoli), Tuesday, 16 April 2013 01:44 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8h_v_our_Q
― Ask The Answer Man (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 16 April 2013 02:35 (thirteen years ago)
Forwards/backwards was effing brilliant. You'd think it would be a mess but all the shots they showed were very beautiful.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 16 April 2013 13:07 (thirteen years ago)
Just watched the doc, pretty decent quality version up on Piratebay btw.Interesting stuff.
Now got to watch the film again
― Stevolende, Thursday, 18 April 2013 14:46 (thirteen years ago)
disclosure, know the room 237 producer, old friend, but yeah Morbs otm. the point of Room 237 is not to say "here's some stuff you may not have noticed." it's about all this insane shit a bunch of people believe about a movie and imo about how the power of Kubrick's technical facility is so great that some people, seeing it, become convinced that some greater truth has to lie underneath these brilliantly-composed shots
Just watched the doc, pretty decent quality version up on Piratebay btw.
I'll tell my dude, I'm sure he'll be super-stoked
― not feeling those lighters (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 18 April 2013 15:27 (thirteen years ago)
Stoked because that's where he got his Shining footage too?
― pplains, Thursday, 18 April 2013 15:39 (thirteen years ago)
also tell him that perfect, hi def ripped copies are all over the internet
― The Great Forgiver (dandydonweiner), Thursday, 18 April 2013 15:41 (thirteen years ago)
you're blowing minds there don
― not feeling those lighters (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 18 April 2013 15:53 (thirteen years ago)
seeing the shining in theaters tonight, bringing a notebook and my tinfoil hat
― H-E-double-s1ockisticks (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 18 April 2013 15:57 (thirteen years ago)
You're so much smarter than me, and you know, connected because you have a producer bro on "Room 237." Sorry, I forgot.
― The Great Forgiver (dandydonweiner), Thursday, 18 April 2013 16:00 (thirteen years ago)
What is that moon city thing from?
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 18 April 2013 16:00 (thirteen years ago)
This is going entirely too far, try Paths of Glory
― Pope Rusty I (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 18 April 2013 16:01 (thirteen years ago)
it's ok, just don't let it happen again
― not feeling those lighters (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 18 April 2013 16:03 (thirteen years ago)
Parts of Paths of Glory were actually filmed on the moon.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 18 April 2013 16:04 (thirteen years ago)
that major battle scene v much looks it.
― Pope Rusty I (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 18 April 2013 16:15 (thirteen years ago)
I really enjoyed Room 237 ( and loved the backwards/forwards bits btw). Reminded me again how awesome Kubrick is and how I miss this kind of filmmaking. I was also put in mind of the book "The Making of Kubrick's 2001" which I read obsessively as a kid when I first saw that movie. It kind of does the same thing for 2001 as Room 237 does for The Shining - catalogues tons of stuff you missed and give numerous perspectives on what it's all about. Kubrick put so much thought and effort into the details so it's fun to have it all laid out.
― everything, Thursday, 18 April 2013 17:30 (thirteen years ago)
I saw the 237 trailer the other night--doesn't appear to have been posted yet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gL1fTlH81gU
Obviously I get the connection to the movie, but I'm not sure why a VCR...is it just that the movie came out around the time videos started to take off? Anyway, great trailer.
― clemenza, Thursday, 25 April 2013 01:54 (thirteen years ago)
it's about people going nuts from watching the shining a billion times on vhs. the frame rate is incompatible with human cognition.
― I have many lovely lacy nightgowns (contenderizer), Thursday, 25 April 2013 02:04 (thirteen years ago)
Okay--that helps explain a few things about mom.
― clemenza, Thursday, 25 April 2013 11:20 (thirteen years ago)
http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-frc1/s480x480/485555_472558386147442_923294254_n.jpg
― brb buying poppers w/my employee discount (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 25 April 2013 13:21 (thirteen years ago)
A few doors down the hall; no big deal.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsGtXCDu48Y
― clemenza, Sunday, 5 May 2013 14:10 (thirteen years ago)
What is up with the music in Room 237? It's really bad.
― MaresNest, Saturday, 11 May 2013 12:16 (thirteen years ago)
whats creepy about that 227 joke is that the other woman is still there behind the curtain
― calstars, Saturday, 11 May 2013 12:29 (thirteen years ago)
i loved the music in room 237, it fit with the film's whole vibe
― gr8080, Saturday, 11 May 2013 12:33 (thirteen years ago)
Yikes, calstars.
― pplains, Saturday, 11 May 2013 15:19 (thirteen years ago)
i know a couple of the people who did the music for room 237 (saw it last night) - i thought it was actually a high point of the film - granted it's almost impossible to compare to Bartok, Ligeti, and Penderecki (from the Shining itself) - but I liked it.
I felt like the structure of the documentary was a bit clunky, and the whole thing was too long, and that it didn't go far enough into absurdity.
― You must be very cold in the sack. (sarahell), Saturday, 11 May 2013 20:10 (thirteen years ago)
your mom didn't go far enough into absurdity
― 乒乓, Saturday, 11 May 2013 20:11 (thirteen years ago)
please post more enlightening comments! you are such a brilliant poster!
― You must be very cold in the sack. (sarahell), Saturday, 11 May 2013 20:14 (thirteen years ago)
YOU'RE such a brilliant poster
― gr8080, Saturday, 11 May 2013 20:26 (thirteen years ago)
didn't read this thread, but feeling hostile vibes from the most recent two comments. fitting, i think.
― Treeship, Saturday, 11 May 2013 20:28 (thirteen years ago)
i wish we could stay in this thread, forever...and ever...and ever.
― (The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Saturday, 11 May 2013 20:30 (thirteen years ago)
xp - one of whom is grady!
― You must be very cold in the sack. (sarahell), Saturday, 11 May 2013 20:32 (thirteen years ago)
whenever i'm in here, and you hear me typing... or whether you DON'T hear me typing, or whatever the FUCK you hear me doing in here, when i'm IN here, that means i am POSTING. THAT means DON'T COME IN.
― the white queen and her caustic judgments (difficult listening hour), Saturday, 11 May 2013 20:38 (thirteen years ago)
make a cartoon of that and get very internet famous overnight and then drink to forget you did that
― not feeling those lighters (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Saturday, 11 May 2013 21:03 (thirteen years ago)
^ warming up the autotune
― balls, Saturday, 11 May 2013 21:07 (thirteen years ago)
how much will you pay me to either name the next aerosmith album that or to not do that
― not feeling those lighters (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Saturday, 11 May 2013 21:09 (thirteen years ago)
haha I will contribute $50 towards that venture
― gr8080, Saturday, 11 May 2013 21:16 (thirteen years ago)
The Shilling
― i gave ten pounds and all i got was a lousy * (darraghmac), Saturday, 11 May 2013 21:17 (thirteen years ago)
Room 237 is quite something. I'd seen a Jay Weidner film/Q&A two summers ago, so I already knew about all that, but you can definitely become immersed in this film at a level apart from the theories themselves. Keeping the interviews in voiceover was a great decision, and I loved the incorporation of non-Shining clips (mostly but not all from Kubrick films); it sets out to be dreamlike, and I think it is. The impressive thing about the theories is how rarely I found myself thinking, "Oh, please" (the rare egregious example was Ullman's deus ex machina erection). The one I liked best was the idea of "pastness." Not saying I buy any of them, but the theorists pull you in. I also thought the backwards/forwards stuff was a trip--realizing you'd undoubtedly turn up the same amazing juxtapositions with any worthwhile film.
I've seen The Shining enough times by now that I don't think the film will necessarily get any better for me: I'll still love the same things, and still be less enthusiastic about others. But these people are impressive.
― clemenza, Wednesday, 15 May 2013 03:58 (thirteen years ago)
the numerology one was my favorite! there were 6 cases of 7-up stacked up in the corridor! And that = 42!!!!
― You must be very cold in the sack. (sarahell), Wednesday, 15 May 2013 04:12 (thirteen years ago)
Did that make the film? (I drifted a couple of times.) I know there was 2 x 3 x 7 = 42.
― clemenza, Wednesday, 15 May 2013 04:13 (thirteen years ago)