just read about pink shirt guy. i don't think any of that exchange had anything to do with the shirt, did it.
anyway, came here to post this week's "what i wore" because it's amazing, check out the photo where is is posing in front of a portrait of herself
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/14/fashion/what-amy-fine-collins-wore.html
My loose rule of thumb: if I don’t know the designer, I don’t wear the clothes.
― seriously, THIS GUY (daria-g), Monday, 15 April 2013 16:01 (thirteen years ago)
where she is posing
Looks like an elf cosplay outfit tbh
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 15 April 2013 16:03 (thirteen years ago)
Oh god oh god oh ewwwwwww
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Monday, 15 April 2013 16:08 (thirteen years ago)
An earlier version of this article misquoted Amy Fine Collins in describing how being a art historian has helped train her eye. She did not say, “I like a strong line versus circus ornamentation.”
― zero dark (s1ocki), Monday, 15 April 2013 17:05 (thirteen years ago)
pink shirt article is deeply disturbing stuff
― gr8 tr∞lls i have known (forksclovetofu), Monday, 15 April 2013 20:28 (thirteen years ago)
Okay, I finally read the pink shirt article and it is two pages about nothing. Next.
― lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Monday, 15 April 2013 20:31 (thirteen years ago)
The citronella article is hilarious, I could only keep thinking "don't worry we're gonna cook and eat you anyway."
― life is good (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 16 April 2013 00:10 (thirteen years ago)
did anyone understand what the initial fight was actually about? Was it just the fact that they were trying to pull out of their spaces at the same time?
― --808 542137 (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 16 April 2013 00:11 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah i didn't quite get it other than like, officious bunghole pushes wrong buttons.
― life is good (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 16 April 2013 00:16 (thirteen years ago)
it just seemed like there was some missing piece of the story, probably in which either he or his wife or their friend was being an asshole. I've been at an awful lot of Jersey gas stations and I've never had anything like that happen.
― --808 542137 (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 16 April 2013 00:17 (thirteen years ago)
and the fact that there were TWO DIFFERENT DRIVERS both cursing him out
no no, must be the $200 pink shirt, sure that's it
― --808 542137 (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 16 April 2013 00:18 (thirteen years ago)
pudendum boy shirt
― HIGH-FIVES TO ALL MY COWORKERS AT THE QBERT SEX SWING (silby), Tuesday, 16 April 2013 00:20 (thirteen years ago)
Ms. Fine Collins, who says she is in her early 50s,
― ARE YOU HIRING A NANNY OR A SHAMAN (Phil D.), Tuesday, 16 April 2013 00:23 (thirteen years ago)
the neglected children of PS 58 in Carroll Gardens finally get some relief:
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/17/public-money-goes-to-school-toilets-brooklyn-voters-decide/
― charlie 4chan, internet detective (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 17 April 2013 21:33 (thirteen years ago)
no. no. NO. NOOOOO. NOOOOOOOO.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/19/nyregion/babys-latest-going-diaperless-at-home-or-even-in-the-park.html?src=me&_r=0
― charlie 4chan, internet detective (Hurting 2), Friday, 19 April 2013 21:15 (thirteen years ago)
Ms. Shapiro, who is a doula, a birth and child-rearing coach, says it is practically now a job qualification to at least be able to offer diaper-free training as an option to clients. Caribou Baby, an “eco-friendly maternity, baby and lifestyle store” on the border of artsy Greenpoint and Williamsburg, has been drawing capacity crowds to its diaper-free “Meetups,” where parents exchange tips like how to get a baby to urinate on the street between parked cars.
we used to go to caribou a lot. so glad we moved and are not raising our child in that area.
― charlie 4chan, internet detective (Hurting 2), Friday, 19 April 2013 21:16 (thirteen years ago)
lol
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 19 April 2013 21:17 (thirteen years ago)
Ms. Shapiro, who is a doula, a birth and child-rearing coach, says it is practically now a job qualification to at least be able to offer diaper-free training as an option to clients.
haha where's yr spirituality now COACH
― j., Friday, 19 April 2013 21:17 (thirteen years ago)
you know what is not fucking eco friendly? PISSING AND SHITTING IN THE STREET!
― charlie 4chan, internet detective (Hurting 2), Friday, 19 April 2013 21:17 (thirteen years ago)
Parents are drawn to the method as a way of preserving the environment from the ravages of disposable diapers, as well as reducing the laundering of cloth diapers and preventing diaper rash. Many of them like the thought that they are rediscovering an ancient practice used in other cultures, though they tend to gloss over the fact that many of those cultures had never heard of Pampers. But mostly, they say, they like feeling more in touch with their babies’ most intimate functions.
chinese parents do that all the time
― 乒乓, Friday, 19 April 2013 21:21 (thirteen years ago)
well how else are they going to get pee pee in all that coke?
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 19 April 2013 21:22 (thirteen years ago)
i'm sorry, it's been a difficult week for everyone.
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 19 April 2013 21:23 (thirteen years ago)
cool joke for you to make
― 乒乓, Friday, 19 April 2013 21:25 (thirteen years ago)
guilty lol, sorry in retrospect
― charlie 4chan, internet detective (Hurting 2), Friday, 19 April 2013 21:26 (thirteen years ago)
but in seriousness, do they do it because it's the old way and diapers are expensive or because they just believe in it?
― charlie 4chan, internet detective (Hurting 2), Friday, 19 April 2013 21:27 (thirteen years ago)
i have seen, in the motherfucking city of new york, mothers and fathers holding their babies over trash cans while the lil' tykes shit away. i assume this is some "when you have a baby you'll understand" type ish but in the middle of a subway station during the summer this is most foul behavior.
― H-E-double-s1ockisticks (forksclovetofu), Friday, 19 April 2013 21:28 (thirteen years ago)
well i would say it's probably just tradition. but you do end up with babies shitting in, say, a wal-mart (i've witnessed this), or on the street, or in a shopping mall
― 乒乓, Friday, 19 April 2013 21:28 (thirteen years ago)
no, having a baby has not increased my understanding of this
― charlie 4chan, internet detective (Hurting 2), Friday, 19 April 2013 21:29 (thirteen years ago)
the owner of caribou is also a big advocate of "baby wrapping" which I don't have a particular problem with (I am lazy and prefer a pre-structured carrier but w/e); however I once saw her carry her very large, then three-and-a-half-year-old son on her back in a wrap and it was a bit strange
― charlie 4chan, internet detective (Hurting 2), Friday, 19 April 2013 21:31 (thirteen years ago)
lol poor kid
― flopson, Friday, 19 April 2013 21:32 (thirteen years ago)
there's this whole thing about how she "apprenticed" to a woman in an "african village" to learn how to do it
― charlie 4chan, internet detective (Hurting 2), Friday, 19 April 2013 21:33 (thirteen years ago)
people who let their kids shit & piss in the street -- especially if they're well-off white hipster douchebags -- are bloody disgusting savages who should be sterilized and have their kids taken away by Child Protective Services.
― marmite christ (Eisbaer), Friday, 19 April 2013 21:43 (thirteen years ago)
Ms. Stare watched for cues that meant her baby needed to go to the bathroom or was going to the bathroom, like a certain cry or squirming or a grimace. Then, she began associating those cues with her own noises, like “sss,” or grunting. After a while she could make those noises — the elimination communication — to the baby while holding him over the toilet or the sink for perhaps 20 seconds, and he would go to the bathroom on command or refuse if he was not ready.
So you hold your baby over the sink (IT IS NOT OKAY TO PEE IN THE SINK, DAMN) and make noises and the baby either pees, waits a little while then pees, or doesn't pee. Yeah, sounds like it totally reliably works.
― carl agatha, Friday, 19 April 2013 21:53 (thirteen years ago)
― marmite christ (Eisbaer), Friday, April 19, 2013 4:43 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
why "especially if they're well-off white hipster douchebags"?
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 19 April 2013 21:54 (thirteen years ago)
Commenter OTM:
I view this particular fad as the frivolity of the upper middle class who can afford to raise their own children. Try taking junior to your neighborhood day care center without diapers and see how long that lasts. Try maintaining that communication with a 6-month old child while telecommuting on your home computer.
Of course he goes on to claim that disposable diapers make parents and children lazy, so grain of salt and all.
― carl agatha, Friday, 19 April 2013 21:57 (thirteen years ago)
just picturing eisbaer taking samples of baby sidewalk poop and running dna tests so he knows how outraged to be
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 19 April 2013 21:58 (thirteen years ago)
Then, she began associating those cues with her own noises, like “sss,” or grunting
this is so creepy
― Number None, Friday, 19 April 2013 21:59 (thirteen years ago)
I'm all for hippie bullshit, seriously (ask me about my cloth menstrual pads!), but I draw the line at eating placenta and letting your child shit in bowls in your living room.
― carl agatha, Friday, 19 April 2013 22:00 (thirteen years ago)
I mean that as two separate activities, not like "How about we eat some placenta and let Jayden shit in a bowl in the living room!"
(a) b/c they are presumably well-educated enough to know that public health and sanitation laws aren't some evil plot by the Big Bad Diaper Industry to stifle their kids' natural industries, and that human waste in public streets is a health hazard; (b) b/c they can afford diapers fer Christ's sake; (c) b/c they're hipsters, they probably have some bullshit pseudo-intellectual/anti-establishment rationale for not buying diapers or being too lazy to potty train their kids; (d) they are wallowing in their privileged societal position (and showing their contempt for public laws and norms) by allowing their kids to shit & piss in the streets.
― marmite christ (Eisbaer), Friday, 19 April 2013 22:01 (thirteen years ago)
natural INSTINCTS, i meant. and lest anyone think that i'm making this "Big Bad Diaper Industry" spiel up, here's an actual comment that was posted about this story:
"The negativity and amusement I am reading in these responses reveal how well we have been conditioned by the diaper industry to fear the waste of our children. This conditioning has led to ignorance about our own infant's instincts. What is being described in this article is not a form of toilet training, but a form of communication. This is not about training a child to hold their waste back, but teaching a child to communicate at a very early age when it needs to go--by capitalizing on the child's natural instincts of not wanting to go in their clothing. My younger child was communicating his need to peepee by 4 months. In a society in which everyone is so obsessed with social and intellectual development, it puzzles me that this practice, which fosters early forms of communication and social interaction, is heartily rejected, simply because it is related to toileting.
Regarding the hygiene issue, although I bought special bowls for my children to go in, and threw them away when they were toilet trained, the suggestion that these bowls can never be clean again is evidence of the paranoia about waste that the diaper industry feeds on. It also suggests ignorance of simple principles of microbiology. Soap and water can get most viruses and bacteria off most surfaces--you don't even need the heavy duty, triclosan laden anti-bacterial soaps that so many of us have in our houses anyway."
― marmite christ (Eisbaer), Friday, 19 April 2013 22:04 (thirteen years ago)
i honestly don't disagree with most of that comment you posted? there actually is a big (not bad unless you're marxist i guess) 16 billion dollar diaper industry that is no doubt VERY aggressive against even the smallest potential threat.my issue is people saying peepee and doodoo, what the fuck is your problem? Defecate and urinate if you must, piss and shit otherwise, c'mon.
― H-E-double-s1ockisticks (forksclovetofu), Friday, 19 April 2013 22:11 (thirteen years ago)
btw isn't "public health and sanitation laws are some evil plot by the Big Bad Diaper Industry to stifle their kids' natural industries" almost exclusively the province of well-off douchebags in any case? You gotta be well-off to have time to worry about those kind of (maybe sorta kinda) non-problems
― H-E-double-s1ockisticks (forksclovetofu), Friday, 19 April 2013 22:13 (thirteen years ago)
forks otm disgusting savagery at its most disgustingly savage
― inste grammophon (rogermexico.), Friday, 19 April 2013 22:20 (thirteen years ago)
Big Bad Diaper Industry totally making up the need to not have children shitting in bowls in your living room. If it weren't for their brainwashing, we'd be happily rolling around in baby crap every night after work.
― carl agatha, Friday, 19 April 2013 22:26 (thirteen years ago)
so its okay for dogs to poop in the street but not babies ; )
― 乒乓, Friday, 19 April 2013 22:27 (thirteen years ago)
Your baby can poop in the street as long as you scoop the poop.
― carl agatha, Friday, 19 April 2013 22:29 (thirteen years ago)