tbf, the illustration of the crotch fire hose is pretty hilaious
― beach situations (Austerity Ponies), Thursday, 11 April 2013 18:31 (eleven years ago) link
stop that pain
― j., Thursday, 11 April 2013 20:22 (eleven years ago) link
http://www.thefrisky.com/2013-04-12/marvel-sells-i-need-a-hero-t-just-for-women/
― Mordy, Monday, 15 April 2013 13:54 (eleven years ago) link
Something about the tone of this article, in which two male economists criticize the arguments of a female treasury under secretary, immediately rubbed me the wrong way. One thing that kept jumping out at me was the use of "Ms. Miller." Would a male undersecretary be referred to as "Mr. ____" in this sort of article? I wasn't sure if maybe it was just because of the direct approach of this article (whereas a reporter speaking in a distant third person might just say "Miller")
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/25/the-treasurys-mistaken-view-on-too-big-to-fail/?ref=business
― huun huurt 2 (Hurting 2), Thursday, 25 April 2013 13:40 (eleven years ago) link
Use of titles is mandatory per NYT style guide.
― my father will guide me up the stairs to bed (anagram), Thursday, 25 April 2013 13:42 (eleven years ago) link
Well I really dislike it in any case. It sounds vaguely condescending.
― huun huurt 2 (Hurting 2), Thursday, 25 April 2013 13:46 (eleven years ago) link
Like "Ms. Miller" doesn't make me think of a treasury undersecretary, it makes me think of a student in an econ seminar or something.
http://testdb.msmagazine.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/154222_146559575391775_107530515961348_233555_2363153_n4.jpeg
― ampersand cooper black (elmo argonaut), Thursday, 25 April 2013 13:47 (eleven years ago) link
Would you find it condescending if it was "Mr Miller"? Not being snarky here, just throwing it out.
xp
― my father will guide me up the stairs to bed (anagram), Thursday, 25 April 2013 13:48 (eleven years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fw07CDid0JM
― emil.y, Thursday, 25 April 2013 13:51 (eleven years ago) link
It's really awkward and distracting, but it's NYT house style.
― media conglomerates are pedaling the same product (stevie), Thursday, 25 April 2013 13:52 (eleven years ago) link
I rather like it. It's old-fashioned and polite.
― my father will guide me up the stairs to bed (anagram), Thursday, 25 April 2013 13:56 (eleven years ago) link
It makes me think of Bohemian Phapsody, just sayin..
― Mark G, Thursday, 25 April 2013 13:57 (eleven years ago) link
― my father will guide me up the stairs to bed (anagram), Thursday, April 25, 2013 9:48 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
I would say yes, but less so.
― huun huurt 2 (Hurting 2), Thursday, 25 April 2013 14:38 (eleven years ago) link
hurting otm that use of 'ms.' is totally condescending and sexist, you can't even tell if the broad is married or not
― balls, Thursday, 25 April 2013 20:32 (eleven years ago) link
If you go to Wikipedia's page for American Novelists, you might notice something strange: Of the first 100 authors listed, only a small handful of them are women. You could potentially blame this on the fact that there simply are more famous male authors than there are female (a-whole-nother can of worms), but the real reasoning is much more intentional. Wikipedia editors have slowly been moving female authors to a subcategory called American Women Novelists so that the original list isn't at risk of "becoming too large."
http://jezebel.com/wikipedia-is-quietly-moving-women-off-their-american-no-481069352
― Huston we got chicken lol (Phil D.), Thursday, 25 April 2013 22:15 (eleven years ago) link
HOLY SHIT
― contenderizer, Thursday, 25 April 2013 22:19 (eleven years ago) link
loool
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:American_men_novelists
― huun huurt 2 (Hurting 2), Thursday, 25 April 2013 22:20 (eleven years ago) link
and yeah also what contenderizer said, wtf
wikipedia is a conspiracy of fuckheads and nobody in 2013 should be taking it seriously as a project
― resulting paste of mashed cheez poops (silby), Thursday, 25 April 2013 22:24 (eleven years ago) link
Judging from the treatment handed out to feminists who try to correct basic facts about themselves on talk pages, Wiki is full of MRA arseholes.
― karl lagerlout (suzy), Thursday, 25 April 2013 22:37 (eleven years ago) link
! haven't heard about that. has it been discussed here?
― contenderizer, Thursday, 25 April 2013 22:42 (eleven years ago) link
i wanna see these juicy wikipedia talk pages
― brony orlando (crüt), Thursday, 25 April 2013 22:59 (eleven years ago) link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2013_April_24#Category:American_women_novelists
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Friday, 26 April 2013 02:34 (eleven years ago) link
http://www.buzzfeed.com/ellievhall/no-seriously-this-guy-is-holding-a-you-deserve-rape-sign
― the bitcoin comic (thomp), Friday, 26 April 2013 19:11 (eleven years ago) link
No, We're Keeping The Night
― goole, Friday, 26 April 2013 19:37 (eleven years ago) link
(sorry)
grim lol
If they can't do anything about that dude and his sign (which let's be honest, if there's a code of conduct at the school I am certain that that level of aggressive speech crosses it and they are just being cowardly), one would hope his Twitter account could get him booted
― Call me at **BITCOIN (DJP), Friday, 26 April 2013 19:38 (eleven years ago) link
calling U of A a school is excessively generous
― four Marxes plus four Obamas plus four Bin Ladens (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 26 April 2013 19:40 (eleven years ago) link
lol
― Call me at **BITCOIN (DJP), Friday, 26 April 2013 19:41 (eleven years ago) link
that dude would be awesome to hit against a pavement repeatedly
― brb buying poppers w/my employee discount (forksclovetofu), Friday, 26 April 2013 19:58 (eleven years ago) link
http://sixyearitch.com/2013/04/get-on-your-knees-for-disney-mom-bloggers/
― Huston we got chicken lol (Phil D.), Friday, 26 April 2013 20:12 (eleven years ago) link
most blogging "conferences" whether involving "mommies" or not are glorified marketing events.. Blogging is only a job for like .00001% of people who do it. That photo is o_O but I'm not really sympathetic to complaints about wanting to be taken more seriously as a blogger.
― huun huurt 2 (Hurting 2), Friday, 26 April 2013 20:26 (eleven years ago) link
xxp Why, in the third picture of that charming gent I can see the top of his boxers and some bare midriff. What does a man deserve for such shameless public flesh- and underwear-baring? Also his mind is showing and it's not so appealing.
― susuwatari teenage riot (a passing spacecadet), Friday, 26 April 2013 20:29 (eleven years ago) link
I mean, the tone of the WSJ piece looks a little insulting too. But let's face it, that's what these conferences really are for most attendees -- a vacation. It's like going to SXSW as an amateur musician -- it's related to your craft, but it's mostly just a good time.
― huun huurt 2 (Hurting 2), Friday, 26 April 2013 20:29 (eleven years ago) link
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump 17h26,000 unreported sexual assults in the military-only 238 convictions. What did these geniuses expect when they put men & women together?
― 'scuse me while i make the sky cum (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 8 May 2013 16:37 (eleven years ago) link
oh dear lord
― far too much asshole flesh (DJP), Wednesday, 8 May 2013 16:37 (eleven years ago) link
Rolling 'this is trump' thread
― ḉrut (crüt), Wednesday, 8 May 2013 16:38 (eleven years ago) link
Playing the trump card ^
― al leong the watchtower (darraghmac), Wednesday, 8 May 2013 16:43 (eleven years ago) link
'To trump' is a British euphemism for farting.
― karl lagerlout (suzy), Wednesday, 8 May 2013 16:51 (eleven years ago) link
http://minnesota.publicradio.org/collections/special/columns/news_cut/archive/2013/05/justices_fume_over_mn_supreme.shtml
can someone read this and let me know wtf is even happening here
― goole, Wednesday, 22 May 2013 19:25 (eleven years ago) link
it seems like the majority opinion is "stfu district court and do yr fukkin job" and the minority opinion is "omg women, I am so sorry the majority is too chickenshit to make a decision on your case"
― they are either militarists (ugh) or kangaroos (?) (DJP), Wednesday, 22 May 2013 19:31 (eleven years ago) link
yeah, i see. "lol".
― goole, Wednesday, 22 May 2013 19:45 (eleven years ago) link
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p019qtxp
rolling "fuck you john humphreys" thread
― nagl dude dude dude (ledge), Thursday, 30 May 2013 11:13 (eleven years ago) link
This was stunning. Have not heard use of word 'feminisation' so often within 5 minutes. Gf was spitting mad, it was terrible, and Humphreys mainly to blame. Do we have a 'Is Today worse than it used to be?' thread? Because it seems to be.
― media conglomerates are pedaling the same product (stevie), Thursday, 30 May 2013 11:33 (eleven years ago) link
Laurie Penny could've been a bit less rambling, she might not have been talked over so much. But at least she gets in a decent fairly snappy final point re: feminism not just being about liberating women.
― nagl dude dude dude (ledge), Thursday, 30 May 2013 11:40 (eleven years ago) link
She was really good on 10 O'Clock Live last night and was pretty much recycling what was said there.
I've been told that Humphrys is incredibly rude to female underlings and those young women who might need something professional from him, but who are not colleagues.
― on the sidelines dishing out sass (suzy), Thursday, 30 May 2013 11:42 (eleven years ago) link
I'm not sure if this is the correct thread, but this article about a man trying to break his ogling habit struck me as deeply weird.
― Moodles, Thursday, 30 May 2013 14:25 (eleven years ago) link
it's being discussed on the marc loi facebook feminist thread
― Eyeball Kicks, Thursday, 30 May 2013 14:28 (eleven years ago) link
which thread is that?
― Moodles, Thursday, 30 May 2013 14:36 (eleven years ago) link