I have a handful but I guess that doesn't help if they're untradeable
― iatee, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 20:16 (thirteen years ago)
a friend i wanted to see how far we could get with the original magic stuff e.g. two tickets + four new player tickets. you can win packs in the new player events so you can presumably get enough to play an M13 draft or sealed, at which point if you won you can then roll into more tickets/packs &c &c. but i only have one new player ticket left on my account so i wanted to buy/trade for some more
― ò_ó, ó_ò, õ_o (Lamp), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 20:30 (thirteen years ago)
my guess would be that playing constructed would be more reliable than sealed if you're trying to do the rags to riches thing. you can probably build a viable mono-green standard deck with 5 tix or so, and standard dailies obviously have better ROI than limited events.
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 20:40 (thirteen years ago)
I'm actually looking to build a standard deck in MTGO but don't wanna spend a lot and I want it to be somewhat competitive if possible. I have access to the shocklands and a lot of the good RTR/GTC cards that aren't big money rares (as I've sold them off already)...what do you think? I'd love to do a B/G thing with Corpsejack/Hydra/Strangleroot/Experiment One...is that viable?
― frogbs, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 20:42 (thirteen years ago)
cider - its less about the rags-to-riches or cheapest way to get into mtgo than the challenge of maxing out the value of the original $10. it basically started as an argument about how far you can get with that or whether it was kindof a scam to charge new players. anyway i made a new mtgo account and going to see how long i can run this $10 for
― ò_ó, ó_ò, õ_o (Lamp), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 20:46 (thirteen years ago)
hydra and corpsejack are just unplayable i think - theres a monogreen revenge of the hunted deck that has 4-0'd pretty often and i think the only kinda valuable card is primal hunter.
― ò_ó, ó_ò, õ_o (Lamp), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 20:51 (thirteen years ago)
ahhh....do post decklist
― frogbs, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 20:53 (thirteen years ago)
i noticed this deck with hydra in the DE results today:http://mtgstats.com/Deck.aspx?DeckID=581415
it's not black though. just about everything is viable in standard right now as long as you're aware of what you're going to be facing and are prepared to face it - just make sure you have plans against burning-tree emissary chains, unburial rites, olivia voldaren, and supreme verdict+sphinx's revelation
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 20:57 (thirteen years ago)
this is the most budget-y list i've seen that can apparently still win:https://twitter.com/jjflipped/status/312018067863502849
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 20:59 (thirteen years ago)
http://wizards.com/Magic/Digital/MagicOnlineTourn.aspx?x=mtg/digital/magiconline/tourn/5125554
Willioufouf's list doesnt even run garruks (which are like 20 tix!)
― ò_ó, ó_ò, õ_o (Lamp), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 21:01 (thirteen years ago)
predator ooze is surprisingly like 6 tix though
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 21:02 (thirteen years ago)
i like that one. Green-based midrange creature clusterfuck decks are generally my wheelhouse.
― frogbs, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 21:06 (thirteen years ago)
yeah i like that list too. i think i'm finally starting to appreciate threat diversity in aggro decks, i used to always want to just play 4-ofs across the board, since that's what we did back in the day when there weren't nearly as many constructed-quality creatures.
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 21:11 (thirteen years ago)
one card that i've been trying to find a home for in standard is Essence Harvest, it seems like an incredibly brutal effect in the right deck
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 21:16 (thirteen years ago)
also is there any way to ship my new account tickets from old account w/o being logged into both at the same time?
― ò_ó, ó_ò, õ_o (Lamp), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 21:19 (thirteen years ago)
so my roguish RTR block deck is currently 3-0 in a daily after facing 3 consecutive esper obzedat decks, not to jinx anything. this is my first real constructed success so i'm pretty excited. foil skyknight c/o ciderpress.
http://imgur.com/ArnOizN
notes:
- mizzium mortars is underwhelming, but that's probably due to my matchups. i've played a bunch in practice room though and it also is underwhelming vs. the other dominant archetype (burning-tree aggro)- hypersonic dragon packs quite the punch. i was iffy on it before inclusion, but it's really quite strong.- i've yet to be disappointed to draw a civic saber. it has a rancor-like effect on this deck.- the charms have been great so far, particularly boros and its burn ability (or DS on a big flyer). i still have yet to pull off the reckoner infinite life combo though.
― cocktail onion (fennel cartwright), Friday, 22 March 2013 03:04 (thirteen years ago)
no frostburn weird :((
― ò_ó, ó_ò, õ_o (Lamp), Friday, 22 March 2013 03:15 (thirteen years ago)
haha! i had 2 before. but i figured i had lots of options against burning-tree. daring skyjek is really nice and versatile, love trading that thing. in the meantime, i just mug the 2 toughness attackers and that usually slows burning-tree decks down enough.
lost in r4 to jund, which is a brutal matchup for me. i'm just glad he didn't drop any golgari charms against all my tiny dorks. still took it to 3 games though.
think i might grind block constructed for s4. i think i have a decent chance of getting 15 QPs with this thing
― cocktail onion (fennel cartwright), Friday, 22 March 2013 04:00 (thirteen years ago)
i don't really like this block format right now, it's kind of warped by sphinx's revelation and is also short a pyroclasm or infest effect to let other colors than UW sweep the burning-tree decks. if dragon's maze has one of those plus a duress effect i think it could shape up a bit.
― ciderpress, Friday, 22 March 2013 05:48 (thirteen years ago)
yeah i havent enjoyed block since AVR came out and made my sweet R/G undying deck bad
― ò_ó, ó_ò, õ_o (Lamp), Friday, 22 March 2013 06:04 (thirteen years ago)
yeah innistrad block constructed was actually sweet with just ISD which is unusual. DKA was fine too after they banned lingering souls, but AVR ruined the format because of Borderland Ranger of all cards (it let green decks play 4 colors and get access to all the powerful cards while every other color combo was stuck with bad mana)
― ciderpress, Friday, 22 March 2013 13:18 (thirteen years ago)
do you think they playtest block constructed at all, or is it a total afterthought?
― iatee, Friday, 22 March 2013 13:21 (thirteen years ago)
I'm sure they do a little. But I'd imagine their testing is like 90% Standard
― frogbs, Friday, 22 March 2013 13:23 (thirteen years ago)
I'm under the impression that a big portion of their testing is Limited rather than Constructed
― Moodles, Friday, 22 March 2013 13:24 (thirteen years ago)
that's definitely true. I mean, out of their constructed testing, it's probably overwhelmingly Standard, plus a little Modern and Block. they've certainly released cards that seemed like they weren't properly tested so maybe I'm overstating this
― frogbs, Friday, 22 March 2013 13:26 (thirteen years ago)
it seems like limited playtesting is a better use of their time, just in that you can get a pretty good sense of how a set plays in limited / what's broken after 20 drafts, but predicting the constructed meta when most of the cards aren't even being played at the moment...
― iatee, Friday, 22 March 2013 13:36 (thirteen years ago)
they playtest limited and standard a ton but don't test block much and don't test eternal formats at all
― ciderpress, Friday, 22 March 2013 13:49 (thirteen years ago)
you know Gatecreeper Vine may be a big card in RTR block
― frogbs, Friday, 22 March 2013 13:50 (thirteen years ago)
i'm thinking of a G/W/B deck with Deathrites/Abrupt Decay/Centaur Healers/Obzedat/Vraska
― frogbs, Friday, 22 March 2013 13:52 (thirteen years ago)
vine gets played in like bant control but in general the mana in the block is much better than in a typical block so that type of effect isn't as powerful in context. borderland ranger was an actual threat with wolf run, sacced to falkenrath aristocrat for a counter, etc. all while fixing your mana. gatecreeper vine just fixes and chumps once and that's not worth 1G unless you're a 3+ color control deck.
― ciderpress, Friday, 22 March 2013 13:54 (thirteen years ago)
here's what a G/W/B block deck looks like at the momenthttp://mtgstats.com/Deck.aspx?DeckID=581570
― ciderpress, Friday, 22 March 2013 13:56 (thirteen years ago)
you don't really have much else to do on turn two tho, at its worst it's just deck thinning
― iatee, Friday, 22 March 2013 13:58 (thirteen years ago)
yeah Alms Beast is something i'd definitely play with. just a deck of big honkers.
true that Borderland has its advantages but Vine can nip Gates, and it does tap for the Grove :)
― frogbs, Friday, 22 March 2013 14:01 (thirteen years ago)
gyre sage, call of the conclave, lotleth troll, abrupt decay their guy are all better things to do on 2 than play vine. i don't think it's terrible, i just don't think the mana in the block is bad enough that you need it
― ciderpress, Friday, 22 March 2013 14:03 (thirteen years ago)
just want to fire off that Obzedat - but yeah Sage/Call are probably better. in fact I would imagine Call of the Conclave plays quite well?
― frogbs, Friday, 22 March 2013 14:09 (thirteen years ago)
it's okay, awkwardly not a creature for domri though so i don't play it in my naya decks
― ciderpress, Friday, 22 March 2013 14:12 (thirteen years ago)
well a card I really want to dick around with is Rootborn Defenses. though it's no good vs. Auger Spree. do people play that?
everything just feels like speculation now - ultimately every block deck I've seen just plays like a really good draft deck. DGM should mix things up.
― frogbs, Friday, 22 March 2013 14:37 (thirteen years ago)
i wouldn't go that far, really good draft decks still don't have 4 sphinx's revelation and 4 wraths
― ciderpress, Friday, 22 March 2013 14:53 (thirteen years ago)
it just depends how good a drafter you are
― iatee, Friday, 22 March 2013 14:59 (thirteen years ago)
yeah but in general the idea is just to play the most powerful stuff within your color pairing, and from what I can see the guild mechanics do come into play
― frogbs, Friday, 22 March 2013 15:13 (thirteen years ago)
from the new Duels game
http://25.media.tumblr.com/5b5da31eb312ae3788455e4e0b96eac9/tumblr_mk2hlzS4aT1rp0rzso1_1280.jpg
could be a spoiler for M14? seems like a good way to either get Griselbrand out early or play your whole hand on turn 3 and lose
― frogbs, Friday, 22 March 2013 15:47 (thirteen years ago)
there was a demon shown in one of those promo videos too - 3BB for 5/6 flying, when it ETB destroy target non-Demon creature, sac it on upkeep if you don't have 6+ creatures in your graveyard. obviously meant to go together. not clear if they are M14 spoilers though or whether they're actually making special cards for duels now
― ciderpress, Friday, 22 March 2013 16:17 (thirteen years ago)
there was also a reaper from the abyss-style demon spoiled in the duels video. although i'd be pretty interested in playing a demon tribal deck for a few months this summer
haha! i had 2 before. but i figured i had lots of options against burning-tree
i havent played a block daily since last year but mono-red was a huge part of that meta and i cant imagine its gone away so i figured it might be a good card against that match-up while still allowing you to be aggressive against the UWx decks. i really like that list though, i should be playing more standard but maybe ill try to put that list together, the only cards i need are reckoners i think
or maybe w/r/b is good? i feel like rakdos return has to be the best answer to sphinx's revelation decks, it can answer an obzedat a couple of ways although it may be too weak to aggro starts? idk
― ò_ó, ó_ò, õ_o (Lamp), Friday, 22 March 2013 16:36 (thirteen years ago)
i wish block was interesting, because its fun to think about playing cards like high priest of penance in a constructed format but rtr only block was actually really narrow
― ò_ó, ó_ò, õ_o (Lamp), Friday, 22 March 2013 16:38 (thirteen years ago)
Next block announced: Theros
Set two: Born of the Gods
Set three: Journey Into Nyx
― Moodles, Saturday, 23 March 2013 18:29 (thirteen years ago)
could use a break from draft. after 0-3'ing a Swiss for the first time in my life (playing 5c green no less), i've gone no better than 1-2 in the last 8 or so events I've done. in the meantime my rating has tumbled nearly 200 points. daaaaamn, what happened
― frogbs, Saturday, 23 March 2013 22:05 (thirteen years ago)
lamp and I were also having pretty shitty days on mtgo, something in the air
― iatee, Saturday, 23 March 2013 22:49 (thirteen years ago)
lost two matches due to misclicks + not realizing I needed to fix my settings w/ stops
― iatee, Saturday, 23 March 2013 22:50 (thirteen years ago)
yeah as of about 9 days ago i had my limited rating over 1900 for the first time and now i'm down at 1768 after going 1-2 in an M13 phantom sealed of all things. also cider my results with that geist list have been terrible. i lent it to a friend for a standard tournament and he went 5-0 with it, so i'm not sure i want to give up on it completely but i've yet to win a match on mtgo with it and went 1-3 at fnm. i'm also irritated because farseek has been one of the fnm promos i've most wanted to get a playset of and i'm stuck w/only one so far this month. i realize how lame this is but it doesn't stop me from being upset by it all the same.
― ò_ó, ó_ò, õ_o (Lamp), Saturday, 23 March 2013 23:57 (thirteen years ago)
i played a couple matches with your list and aggro matchups seemed unwinnable which is not where i want to be on MTGO where there's a higher % of aggro than irl events
― ciderpress, Sunday, 24 March 2013 06:31 (thirteen years ago)