Rolling 'this is sexist' thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2019 of them)

she turned around to engage one dude in a conversation related to the conference and the dude who got fired chimed in with gross dick jokes, which led to her taking the picture if I'm reading the order of events correctly

Darth Icky (DJP), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:09 (thirteen years ago)

i'm sort of lost as to whether she told them to shut up first or just went straight to picture-taking, but my question is if you're going to gather the (considerable!) courage to take the idiot's picture and post it to twitter, why not just turn around and tell him to shut up first? i mean if i were in the audience near them and she told them to grow up or shut up or whatever, i'd be like "otm", but if she just turned around and snapped a picture i'd be more like "huh, that just happened"

xp

k3vin k., Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:11 (thirteen years ago)

right, i just think there's this unjustified assumption that if she said e.g. "excuse me but your jokes are crude and distracting and are making me uncomfortable, please stop" that the dude would have actually stopped, and further that she was somehow *obliged* to do this first before any other response

open the blood gates (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:13 (thirteen years ago)

right maybe not "obliged" in the formal sense but more, you're an adult, come on

k3vin k., Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:15 (thirteen years ago)

and again the details of what actually happened are a little hazy so who knows

k3vin k., Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:15 (thirteen years ago)

like i am fairly confident in assuming certain that she AT LEAST gave him the stink eye

open the blood gates (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:16 (thirteen years ago)

ha yeah

k3vin k., Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:17 (thirteen years ago)

but more, you're an adult, come on

This is exactly the patronizing part. Why is it on an affected bystander to tell someone who is supposed to be "an adult" in a professional environ to stop being unprofessional/offensive/puerile in the "right" way? Even before starting to unpack the part where she's a woman confronting a man in public.

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:19 (thirteen years ago)

her account of what happened is here: http://butyoureagirl.com/14015/forking-and-dongle-jokes-dont-belong-at-tech-conferences/

afaict the dude who got fired is not disputing this order of events, so right now I believe that she was having a conversation with one dude who made a comment that dumbass then used to make a sexual joke off the phrase "forking the repo"; she broke off the conversation and dude continued making dick jokes about dongles while the speaker onstage was talking about reaching out to young women to get them interested in coding at a young age

Darth Icky (DJP), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:29 (thirteen years ago)

not only by telling her to just confront him directly are we making an assumption that it'd do anything, we're ignoring the fact that maybe she's done this in the past, or she wanted to make this a situation more about the tone of the conference than about a particular individual's mediocre judgment. One guy making a comment isn't really an issue, but bringing it to the attention of the conference makes it their call, not her's.

☠ ☃ ☠ (mh), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:33 (thirteen years ago)

fwiw he claims that "I'd fork his repo" or whatever was not a directly sexual joke but rather a slangy approval, but otoh admits to the dongle thing

space phwoar (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:34 (thirteen years ago)

and doing it publicly, like I mentioned before, allows others to see how the conference organizers react and keeps the whole thing above the table

☠ ☃ ☠ (mh), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:34 (thirteen years ago)

fwiw he claims that "I'd fork his repo" or whatever was not a directly sexual joke but rather a slangy approval

it's worth nothing because that is an inherently stupid argument along the lines of saying "*random person or thing* sucks" has nothing to do with oral sex or that saying something is "gay" is unrelated to homosexuality

Darth Icky (DJP), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:36 (thirteen years ago)

I didn't make the connection btwn "sucks" and oral sex for a long, long time

Heyman (crüt), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:39 (thirteen years ago)

sexual innuendo is built into the foundation and structure of the joke, otherwise there wouldn't actually be a joke there but rather someone saying something entirely nonsensical and meaningless

which I mean slang like that does occur but my experience with it has been in the form of taking words like "futon" and making them into general exclamations rather than taking a joke formation explicitly known for having sexual connotations and claiming that your usage of it has none, particularly when the verb you're using sounds like "fuck"

Darth Icky (DJP), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:39 (thirteen years ago)

it's like the conversation we (meaning the 8 black students) had to have with another one of my choir directors about how he really needed to stop telling the group that we were being niggardly with dynamics during rehearsals; we're all at Harvard, we all know what the word means and where it came from, but we all also have vocabularies big enough to avoid the appearance of evil and we're undergrads and he was working on a PhD so what was his excuse

Darth Icky (DJP), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:42 (thirteen years ago)

See I agree that you can't just expect women as a minority-in-tech to have the confidence (in themselves, or in the frankly unlikely chances of the encounter having the desired result) to turn round and explain their dissatisfaction, so I didn't say or think she should have done that

bringing it to the attention of the conference makes it their call, not hers

OK, this makes sense, because that was all I was thinking of! It would be not just more "polite", which I agree is patronising bullshit policing, but also more accessible to confrontation-averse women who might also think they risked physical escalation if they got their camera out, or that Twitter might not be an instant source of yea-sayers for them

I guess I allowed myself to think that because the men were called up for contravening the harrassment rules the conference's call was already the same as hers, but it would have been too easy to ignore before she made it public

and yes I do prefer this to the argument that expressing any doubts about anyone else's actions is entitled and patronising (which it is, and I would do well to remember that more, but it's also what we're all doing here, whichever "side" anyone's on)

susuwatari teenage riot (a passing spacecadet), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:52 (thirteen years ago)

Having doubts about anyone's actions in any scenario ever is not nec patronizing. Making it an ish that a person in a non-priviliged group didn't do a thing the same way a privileged person would have, or thinks they would have, is the problem.

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 16:59 (thirteen years ago)

fwiw here's the conference's official statement regarding the matter:

http://pycon.blogspot.com/2013/03/pycon-response-to-inappropriate.html

open the blood gates (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 17:15 (thirteen years ago)

Lol at the comment

Darth Icky (DJP), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 17:18 (thirteen years ago)

i don't understand why 'don't be an asshole' is such a difficult rule for tech bros to follow. YET IT SEEMS TO BE.

maura, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 17:22 (thirteen years ago)

Growing up developing electronics rather than social skills, a computer won't tell you you are being an asshole. You need to hear that stuff.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 17:46 (thirteen years ago)

I'm glad I was raised by ILX and not some other message board. who knows what sort of jackassery I'd be committing right now.

Heyman (crüt), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 17:48 (thirteen years ago)

btw I got off on the wrong foot w/this because whatever I read first made me think two guys were having a private moronic conversation between friends, not that tweeter + guy 1 were having a perfectly civil conversation when guy 2 started his "huh huh, dicks" routine at both of them and then wouldn't shut up when she signalled her dissatisfaction. when I read this later I was like "well that changes things a bit" when I should actually have thought "well that changes things completely"

also DJP's comment re egos was totally OTM but it pushed a button re something unrelated I've been thinking abt lately plus the implied "unlike some other people here" before "I try very hard not to let my ego make me into a raging dick" rubbed me the wrong way so I apologise for going off on that conflated w/ elmo's "patronising" comment

going to sign up for lessons on not letting my ego make me into a raging dick in future

susuwatari teenage riot (a passing spacecadet), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 18:11 (thirteen years ago)

our jackassery is cheeky and witty xp

btw spacecadet, it's not that it was "harassment" as much as talking like that is inappropriate and contributes to a hostile environment. No one was specifically targeted, as far as I can tell nobody made any comments specifically because they were sitting near someone who might be offended.

☠ ☃ ☠ (mh), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 18:13 (thirteen years ago)

haha I am so sorry, I was going for an implied "despite what my behavior would lead you to believe"!

Darth Icky (DJP), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 18:14 (thirteen years ago)

can we please stop saying "raging dick"

☠ ☃ ☠ (mh), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 18:16 (thirteen years ago)

haha

open the blood gates (elmo argonaut), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 18:21 (thirteen years ago)

DJP don't be sorry, that and your post about expectations of privacy were useful new perspectives on things which had been bothering me lately (or, how I began to realise that howling daily on the IA thread about other people's behaviour is a sign that I need to check my own ego and also calm the hell down)

mh, it's not that after 15 years as an ugly shy woman in the IT industry I have never felt fucking sick of the all-lads-together banter and the big "you don't belong here" flags it puts up but unable to say so: I do totally get that nobody needs to be specifically targeted to feel excluded by that stuff. but I also think you probably don't need to spend very long at a programming conference to hear something worse than dongle jokes, and while it would be great if even the dongle jokes didn't exist, if it had been a private conversation (which it wasn't) I think that would have been a completely different case, yes

obviously there are levels, like of course a "private conversation" of rape jokes behind a woman should still be called out, and no I don't know where I'd draw the line

susuwatari teenage riot (a passing spacecadet), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 18:36 (thirteen years ago)

^ otm font

mister borges (darraghmac), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 18:45 (thirteen years ago)

firing them is obv total overreaction.

The correct pronunciation is "AWESOME overreaction", I think you'll find.

Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 20 March 2013 21:19 (thirteen years ago)

*checks*

no

mister borges (darraghmac), Wednesday, 20 March 2013 21:40 (thirteen years ago)

but dmac a guy who wasn't an internet feminist lost his job

k3vin k., Wednesday, 20 March 2013 21:47 (thirteen years ago)

sorry that was dickish. anyway the weight of the evidence seems to support my original assumption that taking a picture of the idiot was kind of weird

k3vin k., Wednesday, 20 March 2013 21:48 (thirteen years ago)

thanks for not putting me on this thread everyone

maura, Thursday, 21 March 2013 03:35 (thirteen years ago)

Wait til you see how much fun the ones about gender politics are.

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 21 March 2013 04:26 (thirteen years ago)

or the ones where white straighties offer us their moral rubric on hiv disclosure

Woody Ellen (Matt P), Thursday, 21 March 2013 04:30 (thirteen years ago)

We have all of the fun here on the internet.

lets just remember to blame the patriarchy for (in orbit), Thursday, 21 March 2013 04:30 (thirteen years ago)

we do!

Woody Ellen (Matt P), Thursday, 21 March 2013 04:31 (thirteen years ago)

ilx is p tame as far as these things go really

my god i only have 2 useless beyblade (silby), Thursday, 21 March 2013 04:32 (thirteen years ago)

wite straighty is my yahoo handle

mister borges (darraghmac), Thursday, 21 March 2013 08:40 (thirteen years ago)

but on AIM i'm privileged1

mister borges (darraghmac), Thursday, 21 March 2013 08:41 (thirteen years ago)

No, definitely awesome - there are overreactions all over the place (see as noted the comments to this and everything), it's awesome to see one pointing in the right direction.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 21 March 2013 10:19 (thirteen years ago)

Thats not how shitty overreaction aggregation works imo but i can see the point

mister borges (darraghmac), Thursday, 21 March 2013 10:35 (thirteen years ago)

I and two other dad associates got called "wimpy" today by a female partner for wanting to be able to see our kids every day. Like I said, I'm glad that the older generation is going to die.

space phwoar (Hurting 2), Thursday, 21 March 2013 14:00 (thirteen years ago)

have you ever seen the tv show Damages, Hurting?

☠ ☃ ☠ (mh), Thursday, 21 March 2013 14:13 (thirteen years ago)

Should tweet her obv

mister borges (darraghmac), Thursday, 21 March 2013 14:23 (thirteen years ago)

;)

space phwoar (Hurting 2), Thursday, 21 March 2013 14:49 (thirteen years ago)

I and two other dad associates got called "wimpy" today by a female partner for wanting to be able to see our kids every day. Like I said, I'm glad that the older generation is going to die.

― space phwoar (Hurting 2), Thursday, March 21, 2013 10:00 AM (52 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Ugh.

how's life, Thursday, 21 March 2013 14:54 (thirteen years ago)

Yeah sickens me to see that type of ageism on ilx

mister borges (darraghmac), Thursday, 21 March 2013 15:07 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.