WHOOOOOOOO BLOWED UP REAL GOOD
― Tuesdays With Morimoto (Rock Hardy), Monday, 5 February 2007 21:41 (nineteen years ago)
― chap, Thursday, 10 May 2007 21:54 (nineteen years ago)
― StanM, Friday, 11 May 2007 06:07 (nineteen years ago)
― StanM, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 09:34 (nineteen years ago)
― Masonic Boom, Wednesday, 16 May 2007 10:20 (nineteen years ago)
yyyeeeaaaaahhhhhh... APOD delivers. The first strike in an intergalactic war!!!
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0707/lasergalaxy_beletsky_big.jpg
(Not raelly.)
― Masonic Boom, Tuesday, 31 July 2007 10:47 (eighteen years ago)
Anyone have pictures of The Hole yet?
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070823_huge_hole.html
― StanM, Friday, 24 August 2007 11:12 (eighteen years ago)
except, well, this, but I mean a real pic
http://www.nrao.edu/pr/2007/coldspot/void_small.jpg
― StanM, Friday, 24 August 2007 11:14 (eighteen years ago)
"photoshop this hat" competition?
― StanM, Friday, 24 August 2007 11:15 (eighteen years ago)
http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/raw/casJPGBrowseS33/N00091826.jpg
― Stone Monkey, Wednesday, 12 September 2007 15:36 (eighteen years ago)
Yesterday's aurora + meteor was pretty mindblowing. Instant desktop picture.
― Rock Hardy, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 16:18 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, that green was eerie.
― Michael White, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 16:22 (eighteen years ago)
(link for future readers who are too lazy to go look up the date on the nasa site: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap071009.html )
― StanM, Wednesday, 10 October 2007 16:51 (eighteen years ago)
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/0710/aurora_kuenzli_big.jpg
― omar little, Wednesday, 24 October 2007 23:47 (eighteen years ago)
Whoa.
http://imgsrc.hubblesite.org/hu/db/2007/36/images/a/formats/large_web.jpg
More here: http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2007/36/
― caek, Tuesday, 30 October 2007 23:41 (eighteen years ago)
http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/images/2008/details/PSP_007338_2640.jpg
That dust cloud is from an avalanche on Mars, which was imaged as it was happening. Yaow. More: http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_007338_2640
― caek, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 00:47 (eighteen years ago)
wow
― Ste, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 09:28 (eighteen years ago)
Now that is extraordinary...
― Stone Monkey, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 10:46 (eighteen years ago)
We demand live webcamming from Mars!
― StanM, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 11:00 (eighteen years ago)
the subimage on the website it cool, that huge long reef and the tiny little avalanche happening further down.
― Ste, Tuesday, 4 March 2008 11:31 (eighteen years ago)
*is
HOLY CR*P (click the pic for even bigger & sharper - they've applied some fancy new sharpness filtering thing to a picture of a galaxy that's 28 million lightyears away)
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080308.html
― StanM, Saturday, 8 March 2008 18:54 (eighteen years ago)
M104 Hubble Remix
NOIZE
― Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved, Saturday, 8 March 2008 19:02 (eighteen years ago)
on the contrary - they removed all of it! :-)
― StanM, Saturday, 8 March 2008 19:33 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, I turned today's pic into my new desktop image as soon as I saw it.
― Rock Hardy, Saturday, 8 March 2008 19:37 (eighteen years ago)
there's something about this that i like, surface of mars. looks so alien (perhaps unsurprisingly).
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080615.html
― koogs, Wednesday, 18 June 2008 09:41 (seventeen years ago)
i really love astronomy picture of the day, but sometimes i get a bit 'woooaaah!-oh, oh, artists's impression. oh.'
― schlump, Wednesday, 18 June 2008 14:20 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.theonion.com/content/files/images/hubble_article_large.article_large.jpg
― rrrobyn, Wednesday, 16 July 2008 20:49 (seventeen years ago)
<A href=http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080801.html>The Moon is 19 inches across</a>
― Oilyrags, Friday, 1 August 2008 14:48 (seventeen years ago)
i liked the tiny moon. all it needs now is a stick.
today's eclipse picture is nice: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080807.html
am sure this is a repeat though, because i posted it here (somewhere?) the first time. international space station vs the sun: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap080730.html
― koogs, Thursday, 7 August 2008 10:12 (seventeen years ago)
yes: http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap060921.html
― koogs, Thursday, 7 August 2008 10:14 (seventeen years ago)
Ha ha, Moon Games is great.
― Masonic Boom, Thursday, 7 August 2008 11:17 (seventeen years ago)
I have no idea where I found this Roger Blandfoard quote, and it's not a picture, but here seems as good a place as any to put it:
A neutron star is a solar–mass worth of mundane and exotic nuclei and fundamental particles trapped by gravity at supranuclear densities, exhibiting superfluidity and superconductivity. The star is encased within a solid crust, a liquid ocean, a gaseous atmosphere, and a relativistic plasma magnetosphere capable of inducing zettavolt electromotive forces and radiating intense, coherent emission. Neutron stars are used to test general relativity and to search for gravitational radiation. The neutron star in question is also a “magnetar,” which gives it one further remarkable feature. The magnetic field strength is around a petagauss, a billion times larger than can be sustained on Earth and well over the quantum electrodynamic critical field. A magnetar is a star designed by a committee of physicists, each trying to outdo the other. On this occasion, it appears that a stellar flare occurred, released 13 orders of magnitude more magnetic energy than the greatest solar flare, and created a burst of gamma rays intense enough to reach across the galaxy and rattle our atmosphere.
lol stars.
― caek, Saturday, 13 September 2008 14:37 (seventeen years ago)
stellar flare!
― casino royale with cheese (Roz), Saturday, 13 September 2008 15:12 (seventeen years ago)
worst astronomy picture of the day ever!
― koogs, Wednesday, 5 November 2008 10:50 (seventeen years ago)
Agreed.
― AndyTheScot, Wednesday, 5 November 2008 11:11 (seventeen years ago)
Still love the Himalayan Sunrise though...
it is actually quite mind-boggling, a picture of one of saturn's moons. only the fractal nature of such images and the lack of scale means it just looks like a close-up of my back garden after it's rained.
― koogs, Wednesday, 5 November 2008 13:29 (seventeen years ago)
http://i38.tinypic.com/16ke3r7.jpg
― ledge, Wednesday, 5 November 2008 16:30 (seventeen years ago)
wait this one's better
http://i36.tinypic.com/r874lj.jpg
― ledge, Wednesday, 5 November 2008 16:40 (seventeen years ago)
http://imgsrc.hubblesite.org/hu/db/2003/11/images/i/formats/full_jpg.jpghttp://www.j-m-w-turner.co.uk/images/The_fighting_Temeraire.jpg
Left: The Fighting Temeraire, tugged to her Last Berth to be broken up, 1838, 91 x 122 cm. Right: The mother-fucking Helix Nebula, a trillion mile long tunnel of glowing gas
― caek, Monday, 24 November 2008 00:22 (seventeen years ago)
More Helix nebula http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2003/11/image/
aren't all the hubble pictures artificially coloured anyway?
http://hubblesite.org/gallery/behind_the_pictures/meaning_of_color/
"The colors in Hubble images, which are assigned for various reasons, aren't always what we'd see if we were able to visit the imaged objects in a spacecraft. We often use color as a tool, whether it is to enhance an object's detail or to visualize what ordinarily could never be seen by the human eye."
― koogs, Monday, 24 November 2008 09:57 (seventeen years ago)
Kinda. That image was taken with three different filters on two cameras, which allows them to make a pretty good colour version.
The most reliable images colourwise are the old school ones taken with photographic plates, e.g. http://www.aao.gov.au/images/general/emission.html
― caek, Monday, 24 November 2008 14:34 (seventeen years ago)
In space, no one can see you colour.
― StanM, Monday, 24 November 2008 16:02 (seventeen years ago)
Does anyone here do DIY astronomy imaging? I've seen some stuff recently and you can take some amazing pictures with digital camera technology (multiple exposures, adding the light in layers, using filters, etc.).
― Adam Bruneau, Monday, 24 November 2008 19:19 (seventeen years ago)
Holy mother...http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
― not_goodwin, Tuesday, 25 November 2008 13:28 (seventeen years ago)
Thats the greatest!
― MaresNest, Tuesday, 25 November 2008 13:35 (seventeen years ago)
fucking amazing.
is this the first time they've had a video up on apod?
― Disco/Very (Roz), Tuesday, 25 November 2008 18:25 (seventeen years ago)
Seriously cool
― jmm, Wednesday, 10 April 2019 13:35 (seven years ago)
This album, FYI:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superunknown
― dinnerboat, Wednesday, 10 April 2019 13:59 (seven years ago)
Check the simulation
There's a brief write-up at @PhysicsWorld here: https://t.co/dqI3RoCjuL with more images. Here's the image seen (left) compared with a simulation (middle) and the simulation blurred to the expected resolution of the telescope (right). (Image via Akiyama et al & ApJL) pic.twitter.com/UqAVdUtndK— Katie Mack (@AstroKatie) April 10, 2019
― lukas, Wednesday, 10 April 2019 17:04 (seven years ago)
livestream here of Jupiter-Saturn conjunction...this last happened (w/ this visibilty) 800 years ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0799Kmke-k
― early-Woolf semantic prosody (Hadrian VIII), Monday, 21 December 2020 14:14 (five years ago)
would wear on a t-shirt. (would make a perfect autechre cover also)
https://eventhorizontelescope.org/blog/astronomers-image-magnetic-fields-edge-m87s-black-hole
― koogs, Thursday, 25 March 2021 12:08 (five years ago)
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html
― koogs, Monday, 16 June 2025 10:07 (eleven months ago)
^ oh, that's the main page, which will be different tomorrow. this is today's
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap191023.html
which is the 30th anniversary.
― koogs, Monday, 16 June 2025 10:10 (eleven months ago)
(and that second one is wrong too, a link to a previous entry.
but this one is correct https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap250616.html )
― koogs, Monday, 16 June 2025 10:12 (eleven months ago)
awesome, though i'd like a 64 gigapixel zoomable version.
― the wrong witch roams the earth (ledge), Monday, 16 June 2025 11:36 (eleven months ago)