― CAss (CAss), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 22:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 22:10 (twenty-two years ago)
Compared to the book, now, the only thing I miss is any sort of balance to Jack - even the minor moments of being a loving/caring human being. Everything else Kubrick changed or eliminated seem right on, though.
Seriously one of the most chilling movies right up through meeting Grady in the ballroom/bathroom - that kills all the momentum and drama (poss. I just know what's going to happen). The disassociation caused by the overacting music and framing create tension even in innocuous scenes, but it doesn't work when Kubrick tries to be more traditional, you just start noticing that Shelley Duvall has huge fucking eyes.
The naked black women in Scatman Crothers' bachelor pad are almost as great as the masked biker men in The Royal Tenenbaums.
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Sunday, 9 May 2004 08:14 (twenty-two years ago)
And yeah, the aniaml-outfit-fellatio thing is really really freaky. In the book, it turns out the guy he's sucking off is the owner of the hotel. The owner of the hotel is called Horace Derwent. He's got the same (not particularly common) surname as me. So I shat myself when I read that.
― JimD (JimD), Sunday, 9 May 2004 10:07 (twenty-two years ago)
yeah, i think it actually works better in the movie because its so inexplicable.
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 10 May 2004 00:04 (twenty-two years ago)
Well, I just disagree. I liked it because it was just a really creepy update of the monkey's paw. the parts with dead children and the nightime journey to the indian burial ground were really effective to me.
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 10 May 2004 00:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 10 May 2004 00:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mädchen (Madchen), Thursday, 29 September 2005 14:33 (twenty years ago)
― James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Thursday, 29 September 2005 16:02 (twenty years ago)
― Jeff-PTTL (Jeff), Thursday, 29 September 2005 16:05 (twenty years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 29 September 2005 17:45 (twenty years ago)
― Mädchen (Madchen), Thursday, 29 September 2005 18:06 (twenty years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 29 September 2005 18:28 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 29 September 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 29 September 2005 18:59 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:00 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:01 (twenty years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:01 (twenty years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:02 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:03 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:06 (twenty years ago)
― Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:09 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)
Also, this made the rounds WAY fast... everyone's seen this today (not on ILX, I mean)
― Jimmy Mod Loves Alan Canseco (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Thursday, 29 September 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)
― Austin Still (Austin, Still), Thursday, 29 September 2005 20:01 (twenty years ago)
― Douglas (Douglas), Thursday, 29 September 2005 20:28 (twenty years ago)
― O'so Krispie (Ex Leon), Thursday, 29 September 2005 20:32 (twenty years ago)
― kingfish superman ice cream (kingfish 2.0), Friday, 30 September 2005 05:02 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 October 2005 00:52 (twenty years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 October 2005 01:05 (twenty years ago)
― s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 3 October 2005 02:52 (twenty years ago)
Yeah, but the end results!
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 October 2005 03:00 (twenty years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Monday, 3 October 2005 03:10 (twenty years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 3 October 2005 03:11 (twenty years ago)
http://www.boingboing.net/2005/09/30/west_side_story_beco.html
http://www.boardsmag.com/articles/magazine/20050601/aice.html
http://www.aice.org/ ('Trailer Park' section)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 October 2005 19:12 (twenty years ago)
The Shining Revised....oh my!
― Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 03:10 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 03:11 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 03:17 (twenty years ago)
― Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 4 October 2005 04:03 (twenty years ago)
someone needs to remix this movie. here's what to do:
- remove 80% of the music. too many times this movie spills into overkill because of the combination of jack nicholson + crazy modern classical music. I think nicholson by himself = already spooky (plus also funny, which is another thing the shining should have exploited more)
- ...which means you need to hire an editor to make this movie happen in under 2 hours, so all dialogue and extended pan shots of (admittedly beautiful) scenery don't go stale
- structure the movie around the bar scenes. these move at a good pace, don't have a bunch of dramatic overkill, are funny, nice to look at, and give a great idea of jack's motivation to kill, are good barometers for his madness.
- hold off on the scariest images until the end. dropping the blood coming out of elevators in the first 20 minutes is bad pacing for a movie that in general takes its time getting to the finish line
― Dominique, Monday, 26 November 2007 02:35 (eighteen years ago)
You're silly in the head.
― Alex in NYC, Monday, 26 November 2007 12:05 (eighteen years ago)
someone needs to remix this movie.
I mean, did you SEE that awful miniseries?!
― Eric H., Monday, 26 November 2007 12:17 (eighteen years ago)
"remixing"/"re-imagining"/"tweaking" this film would be like taking a runny, pungent dump on "The Mona Lisa." Don't fuck with it.
― Alex in NYC, Monday, 26 November 2007 12:31 (eighteen years ago)
Maybe they could CGI Shelly Duvall out of the film and put Winona Ryder in instead, as a way of appealing to the young people. Also, they could get Greedo to shoot first.
― The Real Dirty Vicar, Monday, 26 November 2007 13:19 (eighteen years ago)
i agree with this, jack's descent into madness happens too suddenly - you don't get much of a sense of what he's actually like before he goes crazy so there's no counterpoint. then, when he does, it goes on for too long. really great movie but it's totally improvable.
― jed_, Monday, 26 November 2007 13:27 (eighteen years ago)
I'm not so sure about holding it off until the end, though. The first shining that Danny has in the bathroom (about the elevator and the split-second splice of the twins) is very effective for presaging/foreshadowing and captures the viewer's attention quickly.
I do think when Shelly Duvall finally sees the elevator, though, it's been shown too many times by that point and not effective.
― Joe, Monday, 26 November 2007 13:34 (eighteen years ago)
I'm trying to think if any other Great Director's Worst Film has inspired such slavish devotion...
― Dr Morbius, Monday, 26 November 2007 14:01 (eighteen years ago)
I can only assume you've seen Fear and Desire. And A Clockwork Orange.
― Eric H., Monday, 26 November 2007 17:47 (eighteen years ago)
slavish = people like it?
― remy bean, Monday, 26 November 2007 17:48 (eighteen years ago)
Other things and scenes that struck me this time around: -The magical negro trope -Halloran on the airplane asking what time they arrive in Denver and in the airport calling his friend to get the snowcat ready-Exactly which column Jack is hiding behind when Halloran walks through the lobby and the yell that precedes his attack-when Grady unlocks the storage closet for Jack and says that he “and others” are concerned that Jack won’t follow through
― calstars, Saturday, 12 October 2024 15:29 (one year ago)
“midnight…with the stars and youuu”
― calstars, Saturday, 12 October 2024 15:30 (one year ago)
I watched it with my 14 yo and the two scenes that made him jump were 1 - the transformation in room 237 (of course) and 2 - toward the end when the party guest greets Wendy in the hallway
― calstars, Saturday, 12 October 2024 15:35 (one year ago)
https://www.taschen.com/en/books/film/08085/stanley-kubrick-s-the-shining?utm_campaign=item_availability&utm_source=tas&utm_medium=nlpre order up
― calstars, Friday, 18 October 2024 16:52 (one year ago)
https://i.imgur.com/FzDgSJK.jpeg Someone found the original ballroom photo in a Getty archive
― Alba, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 12:54 (one year ago)
https://bloody-disgusting.com/movie/3863263/original-stock-photo-used-for-the-shining-ending-discovered/
― Alba, Wednesday, 9 April 2025 12:56 (one year ago)
Woman at bottom right needs her own movie
― heckling in Kobaïan (Matt #2), Wednesday, 9 April 2025 13:30 (one year ago)
https://i.postimg.cc/4xVSCgv3/IMG-3036.jpg
― calstars, Sunday, 6 July 2025 02:51 (eleven months ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vd7x_FlahKQ
― Maresn3st, Sunday, 6 July 2025 11:22 (eleven months ago)