your favorite little computer program hoonja-doonja (mac version)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1739 of them)
Anyone know of a way to prevent sleep when you close the lid of a portable? There's a program called InsomniaX which doesn't work with 10.4.8, and another called Sleepless, which only works halfway.

def zep (calstars), Monday, 15 January 2007 04:19 (nineteen years ago)

I thought that since most Mac laptops dissipate heat through their keyboards, keeping them awake while closed would be a bad idea.

max (maxreax), Monday, 15 January 2007 04:20 (nineteen years ago)

grr and realizing that quicksilver won't search mail anyway.

i guess the other solution is to enable spotlight and restrict it from indexing anything but my email. email searching totally shouldn't have to be this complicated. back in terminal days when i had a whole buncha folders and stuff i could just grep thru it all like presto.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 15 January 2007 04:25 (nineteen years ago)

could always switch to thunderbird i guess. just want a low memory footprint and basic filtering and searching... actually i really miss just using a nice setup of mutt now that i think about it.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 15 January 2007 04:27 (nineteen years ago)

this is awesome:

http://harnly.net/software/letterbox/

much better way to view messages in mail. You see more emails and more of the selected email.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 15 January 2007 04:57 (nineteen years ago)

looking at my activity monitor...

why does Safari take 342 meg of memory and 963 megs of virtual?

what is Kernel Task?

I look at the activity monitor but I don'd know what most of it is/means!

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 15 January 2007 05:14 (nineteen years ago)

wow, letterbox is awesome! thanks a load for that.

i guess i need to try to get myself to obey tracer's 10% rule - my bittorrent addiction means i tend to have about 300 megs free on a 100 gig drive, and i'm sure that's not doing me any good.

toby (tsg20), Monday, 15 January 2007 08:58 (nineteen years ago)

Haha yeah toby that's a great way to make an expensive computer feel like it's 10 years old. It's crazy what a difference it makes. I think it's because virtual memory - "swap" space on your hard drive, essentially - is so built in to the way OS X operates that it thrashes interminably if it doesn't have the breathing room it needs.

Dan, I dunno why Safari takes up so much memory. You'll find that if you quit Safari and restart it, it's much nicer. Over time it develops this gargantuan appetite for RAM. Kernel Task is the central, core OS task, I believe. I read somewhere that if you've got a gig of memory and stuff is eating up a bunch of memory, that's OK, because you want your computer to actually USE all the memory available to it, rather than just letting it go to waste - i.e. if you only have Mail and Safari running, you could expect each of them to be using far more RAM than they would if other programs were open, too. So I don't know - it's hard to assess when it's a moving target.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 15 January 2007 10:04 (nineteen years ago)

There are lots of programs like that but I can't tell they do much that OS X doesn't just do all by itself.

hmmm. X only runs its maintenance scripts if it happens to be switched on at 3am (or whenever), and they're not a patch on some of the deep cleaning onyx can do. sure, you can do all of it from the command line too, but why bother? onyx rocks.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Monday, 15 January 2007 10:24 (nineteen years ago)

why does Safari take 342 meg of memory and 963 megs of virtual?

!!? What Tracer says is true about RAM usage creeping up with time but no matter how long I've had it running, I've never had it get up to anything like those figures. I use Opera more than Safari, but mostly it only uses about a tenth of what you're reporting (and when it's freshly launched it only grabs 13MB and 132MB virtual.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 15 January 2007 10:40 (nineteen years ago)

It's to do with Safari's memory cache, if I remember correctly (which is why it creeps up the more pages you open). I think you can disable it caching in memory.

you win again, gravity! (tissp), Monday, 15 January 2007 10:52 (nineteen years ago)

Anyone know why WebKit is supposed to be a good alternate to Safari?

def zep (calstars), Monday, 15 January 2007 14:01 (nineteen years ago)

def zep, I'm looking for the same thing. And their laptops run fine with the lid closed. When I'm at home, I leave my macbook closed in the corner of the room connected to a monitor and my stereo, and I use it with the remote and a mouse. Thing is, you need to have the power and an external monitor connected for this to work.

five roses (Elliot), Monday, 15 January 2007 16:31 (nineteen years ago)

looking for the same thing = way to not sleep on close

five roses (Elliot), Monday, 15 January 2007 16:32 (nineteen years ago)

Close the lid until it's just a couple of millimeters from closing and leave it there? A la the new James Bond in Judy Dench's place innit.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 15 January 2007 16:54 (nineteen years ago)

I thought you could specify a behaviour in System Preferences for when the lid was closed? Or did I make that up?

you win again, gravity! (tissp), Monday, 15 January 2007 17:03 (nineteen years ago)

apparently not, but I just tried and noticed how cool it looks when you search in system prefs!

five roses (Elliot), Monday, 15 January 2007 17:18 (nineteen years ago)

(ahh apple.. it doesn't do what I want, but it sure looks cool while not doing it!)

five roses (Elliot), Monday, 15 January 2007 17:19 (nineteen years ago)

just remembered a great one...

appzapper

http://www.appzapper.com/

pre osX, I always knew where everything was and which extensions and control panels and prefs belonged to what, but OSX befuddles me. This is basically an uninstaller for anything, just drag the app to it's window and it finds all it's related files.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 14:11 (nineteen years ago)

Nice! I used to use this thing called Yank but then I realized I had to pay for it.

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 16:14 (nineteen years ago)

appzapper does 10 for free then it's like 14 dollars. I actually paid for it this morning, which is very rare around these parts!

It's funny, I also bought DiskWarrior....so the only two things I've ever paid for are programs to fix the problems created by installing tons of illegal software!

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 16:19 (nineteen years ago)

SSHFS for Darwin: http://mac.pqrs.org/sshfs/

Mount arbitrary remote filesystems over SSH. Doesn't work with Finder yet, but fine from the command line.

caek (caek), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 22:52 (nineteen years ago)

Also, http://code.google.com/p/macfuse/ does speak Finder, but its installation is a bit more involved.

caek (caek), Tuesday, 16 January 2007 22:55 (nineteen years ago)

Hi dere! I hate Quicksilver (after using it for 2.5 years!)

http://wizardishungry.com/blog/archive/why_i_uninstalled_quicksilver_dashboard_and_spotlight

Anyone with a less manly machine than mine who is using Quicksilver for anything successfully must have like 10 files in the catalog and no plugins. I've actually found that Spotlight does a better job than Quicksilver as an app launcher if you trim down what it will search in preferences (mainly, no music files). I *may* try quicksilver again, but it seems kind of pointless to use it if you're limited to using it as a glorified application launcher.

UART variations (ex machina), Friday, 19 January 2007 23:39 (nineteen years ago)

to whoever wants to run it closed: plug in a usb mouse or keyboard. close the lid. click on the mouse or press a button on the keyboard. there ya go.

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 19 January 2007 23:50 (nineteen years ago)

I keep meaning to learn Quicksilver's extras, but beyond triggers to control iTunes, the calculator and app-launching I don't bother.

Especially not all the select-file->select-task shit. I also stripped the catalog down, so it's sitting at 36mb of real memory right now. Still way faster than Spotlight/Launchbar for starting apps.

stet (stet), Saturday, 20 January 2007 00:00 (nineteen years ago)

YOU PEOPLE WHO OBSESS OVER HAVING THE LID CLOSED ARE CRAZY INSANE! HAVEN'T YOU EVER HEARD OF MONITOR SPANNING?

Keeping the lid closed is a disastrous and utter waste of potential screenspace. This is how I work the majority of the time: use big external monitor for whatever file I'm working on and then put iTunes, system monitor, email windows over on the lid's LCD.

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Saturday, 20 January 2007 00:36 (nineteen years ago)

Its a little awkward to use spanning sometimes

UART variations (ex machina), Saturday, 20 January 2007 00:49 (nineteen years ago)

dude if you want an app launcher just put yr apps folder in the dock?

oh yeah tabmixplus' session manager for firefix is k-awesome for quitting and restarting to kill memory bloat and keeping yr. ridiculous list of stuff still open -- i have zillions of tabs most of the time as todos or reminders or whatever. probably would be better off stashing the urls with an app or bookmarking or some junk but...

also jon i haven't ever really seen dashboard as a memory hog if yr careful with whats in it?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Saturday, 20 January 2007 00:55 (nineteen years ago)

Yea, well, what's the point in running Dashboard if it can't do shit?

UART variations (ex machina), Saturday, 20 January 2007 01:05 (nineteen years ago)

pearlyrics and the albumart widget for itunes, the weather widget, shellwatcher for uptime, and one or two worldclocks for difft timezones.

hardly any footprint at all, and rilly useful.

also, yeah, using audioscrobbler with growl = k-essential.

growl is actually way cooler than quicksilver.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Saturday, 20 January 2007 01:16 (nineteen years ago)

I installed quicksilver, thought the idea was cool, then found it to be a huge pain in the ass and uninstalled it promptly.

Then for app launching I invented my own genius thing.

I already had two folders in my dock, Apps and Utilities, filled with aliases to all my most used programs, and usually control/right click on them to bring up a menu and select them. But when I'm in that quicksilver "I don't wanna use a mouse" mood, I came up with my own version. Made a folder who's name is just two spaces. Put it on the desktop. Filled it with aliases to all my major apps and folders. Edited the names of aliases to make sense (so...InDesign instead of Adobe InDesign)

Now when I want to launch something, I just click on the desktop, hit the space bar once, hit control down arrow to open that folder, then type the first letters of the program I want, and control down arrow again.

This is often faster and more comfortable for me then using the trackball. Don't ask me why, but it's not too different from how Quicksilver works as a launger.

(in other news...can anyone help me with a copy of Quark 6.5 or 7?)

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Saturday, 20 January 2007 08:03 (nineteen years ago)

That's basically how I had things set up in System 7!

Casuistry (Chris P), Saturday, 20 January 2007 08:19 (nineteen years ago)

comparing Growl and Quicksilver is apples and oranges, SC!

UART variations (ex machina), Sunday, 21 January 2007 00:05 (nineteen years ago)

Jon: did you try Launchbar like I suggested in your comments. Keyboard access, lightning fast even on my G3 iBook, and it doesn't overreach in the way QS does.

caek (caek), Sunday, 21 January 2007 14:16 (nineteen years ago)

There was something I hated about it... I forget!


http://www.mikeash.com/software/qtamateur/

^ full screen quicktime player!

UART variations (ex machina), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 05:19 (nineteen years ago)

^ full screen quicktime player!

How is this any better than going cmd-F in regular QuickTime Player?

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 07:14 (nineteen years ago)

OK, I'm gonna rant here.

Quark 6 stopped working. And I had a job to do. I downloaded and borrowed Quark from people, installed again and again and it wouldn't work. Booted under safe mode and it did work. Tried to think what was installed that was making it not work. Couldn't figure it out. Did some more research. Found people moaning, mostly about how terrible Quark 7 is. So I booted in Safe Mood. Opened Quark File. Saved it down to Quark 5. Then I opened Quark 5 in classic to save the file down to Quark 4. Then I opened file in InDesign CS2.

Then I used the Ink Preview feature on InDesign as discussed elsewhere and discovered that elements of the supplied photoshop had too high an ink density. Which was a great catch.

And that, if I can help it, was the last time I'll ever use Quark Xpress.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 07:21 (nineteen years ago)

How is this any better than going cmd-F in regular QuickTime Player?

-- Elvis Telecom (quartzcit...), January 23rd, 2007 7:14 AM. (Chris Barrus) (later)

only qt pro has full-screen

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 07:26 (nineteen years ago)

Everyone I work with hates Quark.

UART variations (ex machina), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 07:42 (nineteen years ago)

only qt pro has full-screen

And you can't get a serial number from one of the 10,000 w@r3z sites?

Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 07:50 (nineteen years ago)

quark has two things going for it...

people like me have been using it for 1,000 years and are REALLY fast. I can layout a magazine with just using key commands.

it doesn't have a million palettes.

InDesigns method at beating quark was to make every feature available on a palette, so you could just click on everything instead of knowing the key commands to bring up whatever menu item you needed. Also, with the palettes, you can click on options while still basically being in your document, as opposed to Quark's method of making you open a dialogue window, clicking "preview", making changes, clicking apply.

Only problem is InDesign becomes a mess of palettes, and if you just click them all off, it can be easy to not know where to find the functions, especially if you're still accidently using quark key commands (and yes I know indesign can use quark key commands, but I don't want to do that, I want to get used to adobe so I can more seamlessly switch to photoshop/illustrator.)

The cure is to re-arrange your workspace which I just did. Basically, hiding palettes I'm not going to use, changing which palettes are group with which and putting them in good places. I now feel so much better. And you can save and copy the workspace, so like, I can copy my workspace to my iDisk and if I go to a freelance job, upload the workspace and everything is where I want it to be. That's nice. I know quark has this now, but fuck 'em.

Anyway, quark has been buggy as hell for as long as I can remember, and they spent the last several versions adding features so you could make websites with quark (who does that?) while Adobe was clearly adding features that print and design pros want.

it just sucks because like, half of how I'm able to make any money is because I know printing and general production issues, the other half is because I'm fast at Quark. Still, at this point, more and more places are switching to InDesign and there aren't as many freelancers who've made the switch, so that's something.

What would be nice would be to make money selling music and never have to use Quark or InDesign ever again. Wait, what were we talking about?

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 07:59 (nineteen years ago)

And you can't get a serial number from one of the 10,000 w@r3z sites?

You can (I have), but it's idiotic for Apple not to bundle it with Macs. One of the first things people see when they buy a new Mac is those awful greyed out menu items with "FREE" next to them, which look so cheap and Windows. Such a bad impression. FFS, $30 is a rounding error on the price of a Mac. They include much more valuable software (e.g. iMovie). Just bundle it already.

caek (caek), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 12:11 (nineteen years ago)

i agree. it's really annoying.

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 23 January 2007 14:35 (nineteen years ago)

come anticipate Sound About with me

http://www.audioease.com/Pages/Soundabout/SoundaboutMain.html

PRKLTR (flezaffe), Thursday, 1 February 2007 12:18 (nineteen years ago)

"Additional Quicktime software is necessary to view this movie. Unfortunately it is not available on the Quicktime server." F******CK YOU

What I want to know is what the hell is up with FileRun, it's like the coolest thing that never actually came out. http://filerun.info

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Thursday, 1 February 2007 12:43 (nineteen years ago)

soundabout looks cool!

VIDEOABOUT too please

s1ocki (slutsky), Thursday, 1 February 2007 15:49 (nineteen years ago)

Okay, that does look nice, but dude showing off the software = UH.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 1 February 2007 16:04 (nineteen years ago)

someone should make him a woebot monitor mask.

PRKLTR (flezaffe), Thursday, 1 February 2007 16:12 (nineteen years ago)

one month passes...
My mac is so zoomy right now.

First of all, got more ram...up to 3 gigs now. That was nice.

Then I downloaded these:

Monolingual
Which deletes all the foreign language nonsense you've accidently installed.

Shadowkiller
Which kills the dropshadows from your windows, makes things much faster supposedly. Also makes screen kinda ugly because all the grey blends into each other. Still fun.

System Optimizer
A nice system optimizer clean-up type utility.

dan selzer, Thursday, 8 March 2007 03:01 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.