Thanks to your clever sleuthing, gabbneb, you've uncovered my status as an imposter of the original pillbox. The jig is up, then, I suppose.
― Pillbox, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 22:17 (eighteen years ago)
well I took that pillbox, didn't I
― gabbneb, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 22:18 (eighteen years ago)
hahaha that foodies thread
― HI DERE, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 22:24 (eighteen years ago)
The key difference between food bores and other art bores is that their field of snobbery is a regularly repeated biological necessity, so it's much more likely to infringe on normal everyday life.
If you've got friends who're music bores, you can just avoid going to shows with them. Spend any time with a foodie and you'll find yourself being diverted twenty miles out of your way so you can be sure you're having only the most exquisite grilled cheese sandwich available in all of St. Louis, never mind that now you're late for the movie.
It's like hanging out with someone who refuses to urinate in anything but cut-glass goblets.
-- Stephen X (Stephen X), Wednesday, April 12, 2006 5:43 PM (2 years ago) Bookmark Link
― Abbott, Tuesday, 10 June 2008 22:33 (eighteen years ago)
Both of these threads are good sources for finding old insanity:
THIS IS THE THREAD WHERE WE SUM UP ILX CLUSTERFUCK THREADS SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO READ THEM. nominations for amazing ILX threads that are over 400+ posts and serve as a brilliant shining monument to the narcissism of small differences
― The Yellow Kid, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 02:33 (eighteen years ago)
Abbot, thanks for those. Def. hil-ar-i-ous. dan m, nice to know the origins of the wall-o-vag. Damn, that Photoshop "auto adjust color balance" version is.. I don't really have the proper adjective for that.
One more inquiry and I'll shut up: what is the title of the original Mari$$a thread?
― Pillbox, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 02:37 (eighteen years ago)
probably deleted. there are others around though.
― sleeve, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 03:07 (eighteen years ago)
(I don't know where)
― sleeve, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 03:08 (eighteen years ago)
This one never fails:
Gear!'s new Craig's List experiment: men submitting haikus in hopes of random sex
― clotpoll, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 03:13 (eighteen years ago)
yeah, that one!
Oh god, a simple ILX Search for "marissa" leads to the vortex of insanity. Proceed at your own risk.
― sleeve, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 03:14 (eighteen years ago)
Pillbox, the first one I remember is abusive comments, but in that original post she says that her name "comes up a lot on these boards", so I'm sure there are earlier ones.
― Mr. Snrub, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 03:18 (eighteen years ago)
the vortex of insanity - yeah, that's what I was hoping to avoid. A little marissa goes a long way, but I think it's worth looking at for the uninitiated.
Thanks people. I'll check these out / forward them to my girlie.
― Pillbox, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 04:11 (eighteen years ago)
help me find the poll thread i started about how smart ILXors think they are, ranked by like the proportion of the population people thought they were smarter than
it's impossible to search for threads i started, as far as i can tell
― n/a, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 15:38 (eighteen years ago)
How smart are you, relative to everyone else in the world?
― carne asada, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 15:43 (eighteen years ago)
thanks!
― n/a, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 15:43 (eighteen years ago)
not the first Marissa thread but very close:
HELP ME I AM ADDICTED TO MARISSA MARCHANT
― HI DERE, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 16:00 (eighteen years ago)
the thread where we made fun of this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why%27s_%28poignant%29_Guide_to_Ruby
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Thursday, 12 June 2008 19:33 (eighteen years ago)
truth bombs
― caek, Thursday, 12 June 2008 19:39 (eighteen years ago)
Where is that goddamn mid-80's R&B thread (I thought it was a You Tube thread??) that had like Alexander O'Neal on it and shit. Where is that fucking thread?
― Bimble, Saturday, 14 June 2008 16:56 (eighteen years ago)
thread where people made lots of puns on other musicians to turn their names into "wolf" band names, example: Wolfney Houston
― The Reverend, Sunday, 15 June 2008 06:04 (eighteen years ago)
probably not it, but maybe PICK ANOTHER F*CKING ANIMAL ALREADY!?
― Tape Store, Sunday, 15 June 2008 06:30 (eighteen years ago)
no not that one
― The Reverend, Sunday, 15 June 2008 06:58 (eighteen years ago)
already looked thru that thread
i really need the thread were we discussed the oasis video that had hilarious singing from liam
it was called something like "watch this film and tell me wtf is happening at the 4 minute mark"
or something
― roxymuzak, Sunday, 22 June 2008 00:21 (eighteen years ago)
this is the video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipXqS0JnYz0
oops, haw
I remember someone posting a very good Slate or Salon piece about the section of the constitution that makes clear that there are additional rights beyond the constitution and that the constitution is basically not the be-all end-all. I think it may have been a gun control/second amendment thread.
― Hurting 2, Thursday, 26 June 2008 17:17 (seventeen years ago)
anyone?! stanm?!!?!?!?!
the one i posted just above
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 26 June 2008 17:39 (seventeen years ago)
on November 7 2006 you posted something that got Excelsiored last month, so maybe J0rdan S. knows?
i dunno, that's actually pretty LOL. maybe it could become my new default EXCELSIORbation fantasy.
― StanM, Thursday, 26 June 2008 17:50 (seventeen years ago)
someone help me out - it's for an important online argument?
― Hurting 2, Thursday, 26 June 2008 17:53 (seventeen years ago)
roxy: the only mention of abominable, oasis and rappinghood is in that Excelsior thread, according to Google Search, so the original thread either doesn't exist anymore or it's de-indexed :-(
― StanM, Thursday, 26 June 2008 17:56 (seventeen years ago)
Hurting: can you look up a sentence or some specific words that are literally in that "section of the constitution that makes clear that there are additional rights beyond the constitution" ?
― StanM, Thursday, 26 June 2008 18:00 (seventeen years ago)
(more specifics = easier)
― StanM, Thursday, 26 June 2008 18:01 (seventeen years ago)
jesus!!!
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 26 June 2008 18:01 (seventeen years ago)
somebody find the thread where morbz argues that norm macdonald is a homophobe
― and what, Thursday, 26 June 2008 18:01 (seventeen years ago)
Roxy, found it!
Oasis - Classic or Dud?
― StanM, Thursday, 26 June 2008 18:05 (seventeen years ago)
(only found by guessing it was updated on or after May 9th, because J0rdan excelsiored it on that date - why can't ILX search or Google search find it?)
― StanM, Thursday, 26 June 2008 18:06 (seventeen years ago)
and thanks for the anyone?! stanm?!!?!?!?! ^_^
― StanM, Thursday, 26 June 2008 18:08 (seventeen years ago)
stanm u, as usual, are totally my fact checkin cuz
<3
― roxymuzak, Thursday, 26 June 2008 18:17 (seventeen years ago)
why will no one find norm macdonald thread
its not either of the two threads with "norm macdonald" in the title
― and what, Thursday, 26 June 2008 18:21 (seventeen years ago)
I mean it was about the 9th Amendment, I'm pretty sure, but there was just a link to an ARTICLE about the 9th Amendment
― Hurting 2, Thursday, 26 June 2008 18:23 (seventeen years ago)
and what: not this, I suppose? (that's about letterman or o'reilly, but the thread also contains a link to a sketch where norm plays letterman - or something)
― StanM, Thursday, 26 June 2008 18:28 (seventeen years ago)
what is the trick to google search the posts that are skipped?
― carne asada, Thursday, 26 June 2008 18:28 (seventeen years ago)
Hurting, could it be this Slate article? http://www.slate.com/id/2186750/ - (can't seem to find the discussion here at the moment, but maybe the article is what you need?)
― StanM, Thursday, 26 June 2008 18:36 (seventeen years ago)
xpost: huh? doesn't google search search complete threads?
― StanM, Thursday, 26 June 2008 18:39 (seventeen years ago)
i don't think it does.
― carne asada, Thursday, 26 June 2008 18:41 (seventeen years ago)
Google is pretty crap at indexing long threads. Even if its spider navigated through the "Skipping x messages at this point. Click here if you want to view them all" page (which I'm not sure it does), Google only ever indexes the first 101K of a web page's text, so it will always miss stuff lower down.
― Alba, Thursday, 26 June 2008 22:06 (seventeen years ago)
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that Google doesn't search any messages hidden in those middle "Skipping" sections. And since ILX Search only searches thread titles, there's no way to search for things in those gaps.
― The Yellow Kid, Friday, 27 June 2008 05:25 (seventeen years ago)
why will no one find norm macdonald thread Here it is: The Daily Show
― The Yellow Kid, Friday, 27 June 2008 05:33 (seventeen years ago)
Please point me in the direction of the thread dedicated to photos of eerie abandoned buildings, amusement parks and other various spectacles of urban decay.
― Pillbox, Saturday, 5 July 2008 22:14 (seventeen years ago)