Todd Haynes

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (422 of them)
please let it be Beyonce.

ryan (ryan), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:11 (twenty-one years ago)

im v. v. v. excited about the new one, even more if it is oprah

anthony easton (anthony), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:14 (twenty-one years ago)

i could definitely go for of those buttercrackers with some cream cheese right now.

ie am hungry., Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)

oh wait.

yes, beyonce. what a terrible idea. it is a pointless, and obscene, gimmick.

i am still hungery., Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:17 (twenty-one years ago)

he is the only one who can convert well-learned "film theory" into an actual real unexpected film, i think: i guess i felt w.far from heaven that he confused his fondness for sirk with studious reverence for "sirk theory" and never shimmied out of that overcareful trap --- less mise-en-scene than mise-en-prison

(but if you swap sirk for glam, and VG for FFH, i wd probably be defendin it, so maybe it's just that i'm not really THAT big on sirk myself)

the person i wz with - unrepentent sexual pirate and general tomboy activist - knew nothing abt sirk or sirk theory and wz emotionally overwhelmed, except in a bad way: we had to go straight to a gay bar after and have several drinks

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I think liking Far From Heaven hinges heavily on liking Sirk (which I do luckily.)

I'd rather he get Venus Williams (or Lisa Leslie) than Beyonce though!

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:35 (twenty-one years ago)

oprah would be more interesting. beyonce is too robotic.

jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:40 (twenty-one years ago)

one of the answers in today's nytimes crossword is "okra winfrey"

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)

you can't BE "too robotic"!!

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)

TOM CRUISE

jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:46 (twenty-one years ago)

*unable to think of response*

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 17:49 (twenty-one years ago)

yes, beyonce. what a terrible idea. it is a pointless, and obscene, gimmick.

If it were Todd Solondz behind the camera, I'd agree with you. (Actually, wait, doesn't his new film Palindromes do the whole multiple-actors-playing-the-same-character thing, too? That's weird.) But Haynes truly does have the ability to transcend his conceits. That combination of intellectual cleverness and genuine, overwhelming emotion is why Far From Heaven and Eternal Sunshine are two of my favorite films of this decade.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 18:20 (twenty-one years ago)

That makes it sound like Haynes directed Eternal Sunshine -- no, I'm just saying that I respond to that combination, and there's another film that has it.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 18:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I still like Velvet Goldmine goddammit!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 18:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Way to spoiler, Tracer.

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 18:41 (twenty-one years ago)

i love the beyonce casting but i hope the "inner blackness" line was just something he came up with on the fly

jones (actual), Wednesday, 23 March 2005 18:48 (twenty-one years ago)

i like the sound of this film far more than haynes' others. 'far from heaven' was as good as 'psycho 98', make of that what you will (ie, would have made a good gallery piece); 'safe' i liked but i think that mark s possibly points to a problem in haynes: imo haynes' knowledge of film theory outstrips his knowledge of the lives of suburban women 1950-1990.

N_RQ, Thursday, 24 March 2005 09:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I spoke with Todd about this around five years ago, and as I dimly recall, one of the seven characters was always going to be black.

Casuistry (Chris P), Thursday, 24 March 2005 09:38 (twenty-one years ago)

I think FFH getting Oscar nominations -- ie, went over with many ppl whose Sirk knowledge / sense of film history is nil -- shows it's not dependent on knowing DS's stuff. I know civilians who liked it who've never seen Sirk either.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Thursday, 24 March 2005 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)

was i the only one who actually really liked van sants pyscho--i mean liked it almost as much as the janet leigh---does that make me perverse?

anthony, Friday, 25 March 2005 12:25 (twenty-one years ago)

& wasnt todd haynes new movie similar in its conceits

anthony, Friday, 25 March 2005 12:26 (twenty-one years ago)

todd soldnz

anthony, Friday, 25 March 2005 12:28 (twenty-one years ago)

it doesn't make you perverse, it just means you liked the movie!

i think the conceit is sort of similar, but haynes's film was much more imaginative in its reworking of the source materials and much more rigorous in its evocation/replication of the style of said materials.

i don't know, i think van sant is gifted but not very smart, honestly. haynes could not be accused of not being smart, i suspect.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 15:02 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe that's snotty (about van sant), i don't know. and to be honest i haven't seen all his films. maybe the early ones have more spark. but "elephant" and "gerry" struck me as films that didn't have a thought in their heads, despite having a stylistic flair.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 15:07 (twenty-one years ago)

the french loved "elephant," probably because it showcased americans shooting each other and had a patina of artistic seriousness.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 15:10 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm a fan of van sant's psycho and have said so a fair bit around here. i've probably mentioned this before too, but it seems like some of the most interesting things (to me) about van sant's stuff often don't seem to have occured to him – i don't think this diminishes it tho. at any rate i don't really think he and haynes are mining very similar territory.

jones (actual), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Elephant was terribly stupid.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 25 March 2005 17:55 (twenty-one years ago)

(i thought its shallowness made it a lot more genuinely troubling as a film than it could have been otherwise – to me that's not the same as being stupid, but i know what you mean)

jones (actual), Friday, 25 March 2005 18:10 (twenty-one years ago)

i thought it was an irresponsible film that hid behind its "daring". i don't think van sant ever owned up to the real motivations behind the film, which i think were largely opportunistic. i'm not even sure he's smart (or whatever) enough to recognize the nature of his own motivations and ambitions. although obviously he's articulate in a certain sense (not a profound one).

i guess the most interesting part about "elephant" was the degree of human sympathy it elicited for characters not often seen in films (NOT the killers, but some of the students introduced in the first half ), but that was ultimately sort of incidental to the film and its main reason for being. i've written about this on an "elephant"-specific thread.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 18:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I still like elephant a whole lot.

cozen (Cozen), Friday, 25 March 2005 18:44 (twenty-one years ago)

that elephant thread is more interesting than the film

jed_ (jed), Friday, 25 March 2005 18:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I've read Haynes' Dylan script (which he co-wrote with Oren Moverman) and it's fucking genius. It's like finding yourself suddenly in the cover in the Basement Tapes and then having that world explode outward a thousand times. I can't believe the studio is backing it, even though it is an authorized Dylan project. It's incredibly strange. Dylan fans will love it, others will probably scratch their heads.

shookout (shookout), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, i think the studios may regret giving haynes a bunch of movie to make a movie.

what's funny is that haynes seems such an unlikely person to be obsessed with bob dylan. in the sense that dylan's legacy has been "owned," or rather leased, of late by the sort of rock critics who emphasize his folk roots and so on. to the point where there isn't a pervasive sense of dylan as a pop persona, as a modernist figure. so i'm very interested to see where haynes goes with this. (i mean, it's hard to imagine haynes making a movie that concerns itself with, uh, different versions of "st james infirmary," simply because that's a strain of american culture the celebration of which takes on a certain role that seems anathema to haynes's own self-fashioned role in the culture. if that makes sense.)

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)

also the title of this film is rancid. but so was "velvet goldmine."

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:31 (twenty-one years ago)

whats the title? must have missed that bit.

jed_ (jed), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm Not There: Suppositions on a Film Concerning Dylan

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:34 (twenty-one years ago)

that title screams "I HAVE AN MFA FROM BROWN!"

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:34 (twenty-one years ago)

or Francis Bacon!

jed_ (jed), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:35 (twenty-one years ago)

It's called "I'm Not There," which is a Dylan tune from the Basement Tapes era (on the bootleg but not the official release). There's a lenghtly subtitle which is something like "suppositions on a film about Bob Dylan" but the script I have has "inspired by the life and work of Bob Dylan" as the subtitle (it's a Sept. '04 draft).

shookout (shookout), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:35 (twenty-one years ago)

obvs. i didnt realise what either an MFA or BROWN was, my bad!

xp

jed_ (jed), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:37 (twenty-one years ago)

i think the title is cute

jones (actual), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)

amt i think that's a reductive readin of all the wird-old-america folk culture that went into that (and one that dylan has ALWAYS somewhat been fightin)

eg the gap between dylan (in toto) and glam (in toto) is smaller than dave van ronk wants it to be

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)

velvet goldmine is the name of a hyper-queer bowie b-side (as you all probably know)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:42 (twenty-one years ago)

FUCK I simply cannot do html.

shookout (shookout), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:44 (twenty-one years ago)

all u need is an i before the addy, shookout, tho i think there are probs linking to amazon images at the mo.

jed_ (jed), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:46 (twenty-one years ago)

er, anyway I cannot wait to read this book.

shookout (shookout), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:47 (twenty-one years ago)

eg the gap between dylan (in toto) and glam (in toto) is smaller than dave van ronk wants it to be

i agree, i was trying to say (i think i failed) that the reigining dylan paradigm doesn't really involve much glam and doesn't really evoke anything that haynes has previously been known to be interested in. that doesn't mean that dylan himself, or his music or pop persona, doesn't have affinities with what haynes has previously been known to be interested in.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:49 (twenty-one years ago)

i guess my "ruling paradigm" is kogan/marcus in ref.this topic (ie between them they made me not bored abt zimmie)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:51 (twenty-one years ago)

that elephant thread is more interesting than the film

I can't think of a single thread/discussion/reaction that I've ever found more interesting than the film it's discussing.

Eric H. (Eric H.), Friday, 25 March 2005 19:59 (twenty-one years ago)

This movie is so exquisitely awkward

Marten Broadcloak, mild-mannered GOP congressman (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 9 January 2024 22:55 (two years ago)

Yeah, between this and Showing Up it was a good year for awkward.

a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, 9 January 2024 23:04 (two years ago)

Showing Up is awkward, and is a remarkable film about a small local community of people (an arts community in Portland OR) trying to navigate the world, with all of the frustrations and divided feelings that come with it. It is my favorite movie so far from this year.

May December is also a favorite film this year, but it seems very slippery and knowing and almost conniving, and is almost the opposite of awkward to me, although there are some moments in it that are cringy

Dan S, Wednesday, 10 January 2024 01:34 (two years ago)

six months pass...

In a surprising move to just about everyone involved in the project, Joaquin Phoenix abruptly walked away from starring in the untitled Todd Haynes film that he's been developing with the director for years just five days before filming commenced in Mexico, sources tell Entertainment Weekly.

Reps for Haynes and indie production company Killer Films declined to comment, while Phoenix's reps did not immediately respond to EW's requests for comment. IndieWire was the first to report the news.

Phoenix, who will be seen on screen this year in Joker: Folie à Deux, was set to star in the lead role of the movie, described as an explicit gay romance set in 1930s Los Angeles and Mexico. Danny Ramirez of Top Gun: Maverick and Captain America: Brave New World had been cast in a supporting role. Based on Haynes' previous comments to the press, the story revolved around a corrupt L.A. cop and a Native American who are forced to flee Los Angeles for Mexico......

.....This film would have marked Phoenix's first gay role on screen. Haynes was open about making the sex scenes as explicit as possible. "Joaquin was pushing me further and going, 'No, let’s go further,'” the filmmaker told IndieWire in May 2023. “This will be an NC-17 film." He then told the same outlet later last year, "The whole experience was prompted by Joaquin. It was prompted by his daring, his desire to push through barriers and to really get into the uncomfortable places about this relationship. And yet it felt like a very organic process."

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 9 August 2024 20:12 (one year ago)

Could Colin Farrell be subbed in for the now-uninsurable Joaquin Phoenix? He’s fearless. He’s a total pro. They’re almost the same age. And Farrell’s already done publicity for “The Penguin,” which starts streaming in a month, so he might be able to do it.

— Janet Maslin (@JanetMaslin) August 9, 2024

bratwurst autumn (Eazy), Friday, 9 August 2024 20:14 (one year ago)

Stunned. Really sucks, I hope it isn't too damaging to the project.

birdistheword, Saturday, 10 August 2024 00:29 (one year ago)

seven months pass...

Have a trial Apple subscription, so I rewatched the VU documentary. The other time was from a digital file my friend got hold of somehow when it came out--one thing I remember was that the speaker's names got cut off. I carped about a couple of minor things at the time; can't find the post and can't remember what they were (one was Mary Woronov's East Coast snobbishness).

Anyway, really loved it this time. The ending, when all those deaths are noted within a few seconds, and then moving into the '70s clip of Reed/Cale/Nico performing "Heroin," is so moving. One thing I noticed this time was how perfect the assemblage of interviewees is; there's not a single person of the 20+ where you wonder why that person is there (i.e., no Bono, no Johnny Depp, etc.). And with the exception of maybe Gerard Malanga, still alive at 82, if Haynes missed somebody important who he could have conceivably spoken to, I don't know who that would have been.

clemenza, Monday, 24 March 2025 03:07 (one year ago)

five months pass...

Some good news it seems..

EXCLUSIVE: Todd Haynes’ gay romance ‘De Noche,’ which shut down about a year ago, is being revived, with Pedro Pascal circling.

This is a great ray of sunshine for a production which was long considered kaput after Oscar winner Joaquin Phoenix left the production.

Pascal would… pic.twitter.com/PvCPrkZD5s

— Deadline (@DEADLINE) August 27, 2025

piscesx, Wednesday, 27 August 2025 18:44 (nine months ago)

Joaquin and Pedro seems pretty much interchangeable, right? Pop out the old one, plug in the spare, and you're good to go!

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Wednesday, 27 August 2025 19:03 (nine months ago)

"Pascal would show more"

Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 27 August 2025 23:56 (nine months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.