just bought some six year russell's reserve rye
― mh, Tuesday, 22 January 2013 23:48 (thirteen years ago)
File under non-story clearly written to get free Pappy: http://ideas.time.com/2013/01/25/is-the-bourbon-boom-for-real/
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 28 January 2013 22:44 (thirteen years ago)
what does ilx thing of tyrconnell anyway
― Why they hide the bodice under décolletage? (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Monday, 28 January 2013 22:45 (thirteen years ago)
xp for christs sakes basically all american whiskey is sour mash. that drives me nuts (re the first graph).
― an eagle named "small government" (call all destroyer), Monday, 28 January 2013 22:47 (thirteen years ago)
Ozersky, author of The Hamburger: A History, is a James Beard Award–winning food writer. His most recent book, Colonel Sanders and the American Dream, was published in May 2012. The views expressed are solely his own.
heh
― every hippie that goes home bloody feels like a martyr back in the city (dan m), Monday, 28 January 2013 22:49 (thirteen years ago)
omg so many lies in that article
― an eagle named "small government" (call all destroyer), Monday, 28 January 2013 22:54 (thirteen years ago)
dammit the connemara startin to grow on me
― b'hurt's tauntin' (darraghmac), Wednesday, 30 January 2013 01:43 (thirteen years ago)
I was drinking tallishker.
― Say Bo to a (Fizzles), Wednesday, 30 January 2013 02:12 (thirteen years ago)
After a few weeks off the sauce I picked up a bottle of standard-issue Four Roses today, looking forward to tasting something new (to me).
― every hippie that goes home bloody feels like a martyr back in the city (dan m), Thursday, 7 February 2013 18:58 (thirteen years ago)
Standard issue Four Roses is one of those nice mid-priced go-tos of which there seem to be (thankfully) so many these days.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 7 February 2013 19:47 (thirteen years ago)
marker's mark is going to be going down from 45% abv to 42% abv for anyone who cares about that kinda stuff
― call all destroyer, Sunday, 10 February 2013 16:28 (thirteen years ago)
haha i also misspell it now, same as 'chris markers'
― every soulless meta poster is a ✰ (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Sunday, 10 February 2013 16:33 (thirteen years ago)
oh lol
― call all destroyer, Sunday, 10 February 2013 16:41 (thirteen years ago)
http://qz.com/52478/makers-mark-waters-down-its-bourbon-to-meet-rising-demand/
lmao
― 乒乓, Tuesday, 12 February 2013 13:22 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah, that does not pass the smell test. Methinks it a) saves them a bunch of money and b) allows them to redirect those with a slightly more cash to spend to the "46" bottling, which is still going to be 47% ABV.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 12 February 2013 13:52 (thirteen years ago)
Chris Markers, me too.
― Zero Dark 33⅓: The Final Insult (Eric H.), Tuesday, 12 February 2013 13:54 (thirteen years ago)
After a night of hitting the Chris Marker bourbon too hard:http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRZ9hMZdiOEKpEcsrtUN2nmXkSYKRUmoq0p0yvSSpGg5wqrlbQ9
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 12 February 2013 13:57 (thirteen years ago)
http://farm1.staticflickr.com/94/238172642_bf5cbcd696_z.jpg?zz=1
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 12 February 2013 13:59 (thirteen years ago)
Real whiskey. Real cats.
― Zero Dark 33⅓: The Final Insult (Eric H.), Tuesday, 12 February 2013 13:59 (thirteen years ago)
sakebottleswhiskey bottles signed by francis ford coppola, zhang yimou, wim wenders, jim jarmusch, vittorio storaro.others in the bar included chris marker, and one time godard collaborator jean-pierre gorin.
whiskey bottles signed by francis ford coppola, zhang yimou, wim wenders, jim jarmusch, vittorio storaro.
others in the bar included chris marker, and one time godard collaborator jean-pierre gorin.
so is this purported whiskey shortage for real or what
― Welcome to my world of proses (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 15 February 2013 23:28 (thirteen years ago)
I drank it all
― mh, Friday, 15 February 2013 23:54 (thirteen years ago)
you monster
― Welcome to my world of proses (Shakey Mo Collier), Saturday, 16 February 2013 00:03 (thirteen years ago)
depends on what you mean by shortage. but yeah, in general there aren't enough barrels at certain ages to support demand.
― call all destroyer, Saturday, 16 February 2013 01:26 (thirteen years ago)
we're probably going to get flooded in a couple years
― mh, Saturday, 16 February 2013 01:27 (thirteen years ago)
http://qz.com/54762/makers-mark-learns-a-painful-social-media-lesson-wont-dilute-its-bourbon/
― just sayin, Monday, 18 February 2013 07:12 (thirteen years ago)
some weird german dude insisted on buying me a neat knappogue irish whiskey - really nice & smooth
― buzza, Monday, 18 February 2013 07:24 (thirteen years ago)
And how was the whiskey?
― NWOFHM! Overlord (krakow), Monday, 18 February 2013 08:50 (thirteen years ago)
good for maker's; it was a dumb idea all around
― call all destroyer, Monday, 18 February 2013 20:07 (thirteen years ago)
"new coke" move, imo
― every hippie that goes home bloody feels like a martyr back in the city (dan m), Monday, 18 February 2013 20:33 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah, a lot of people have joked that Maker's gets to introduce its Coke Classic without ever having produced its New Coke, but New Maker's Mark definitely made it to stores. I saw it with my own eyes last week. What a boneheaded folly and PR fuck up all around though. If there's high demand and low supply, then you don't lower the quality. Simple economics dictates that you raise the price. If anything, the outcry was fans and detractors calling the company on its BS buff. Maker's has since, post compromise, promised the occasional shortage in the future - you know, to keep quality so high - but even those threats are hard to buy when they sell Maker's Mark at Costco in 1.75 liter jugs.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 18 February 2013 20:44 (thirteen years ago)
Simple economics dictates that Jack Daniels sells a metric fuckton and they've lowered their alcohol content twice
Kind of think that someone sold the MM owners on the idea that they could have a premium brand (46) and expand their following by having the original product be even more widespread. Not really the vision they're aligned with, imo.
― ☠ ☃ ☠ (mh), Monday, 18 February 2013 22:03 (thirteen years ago)
Well, yeah. But JD never claimed a global whiskey shortage was forcing them to weaken the product to meet demand.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 18 February 2013 22:09 (thirteen years ago)
their claim was that "marketing had found that customers preferred a lower proof whiskey"
which is kind of worse, imo
― ☠ ☃ ☠ (mh), Monday, 18 February 2013 22:33 (thirteen years ago)
But JD isn't even proper bourbon. It's been compromised since birth. Maker's Mark, otoh, was the epitome of disingenuous, especially for a company the coasts on "tradition."
http://spiritsjournal.klwines.com/storage/mmark%20257.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1360955255028
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 18 February 2013 22:51 (thirteen years ago)
I'd agree with the latter but not with the former. Tennessee Whiskey is nearly functionally identical to bourbon, although the last step does give it a different flavor. Dickel for life, fuck the haters.
― ☠ ☃ ☠ (mh), Monday, 18 February 2013 22:54 (thirteen years ago)
jack daniels could legally call itself a bourbon iirc
― call all destroyer, Monday, 18 February 2013 22:57 (thirteen years ago)
Charcoal filter, no? Doesn't that mess it up?
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 18 February 2013 23:05 (thirteen years ago)
"Charcoal Filtering" and Charcoal Mellowing are TOTALLY differnt processes. To begin with, "charcoal filtering" is only called that because it takes the "charcoal" out of ready to bottle Bourbon that has been aged in the required new charred oak barrels--it is not passed through charcoal. The entire process happens in minutes and is simply so you don't have black floaty bits of charred tree in your Manhattan. The Lincoln County Process, Charcoal Mellowing, happens before the whiskey touches a barrell and if you ever go to Lynchburg, the folks at Jack Daniel's will proudly explain how it takes hours and hours for their whiskey to leach through the the ten plus feet of maple charcoal they use for the mellowing process. It is exactly the fact that this happens prior to aging and clearly effects the flavor (as noted above, Bourbon law allows no additives, even if that additive might be darn near the same thing you get from a new charred oak barrel) that disqualifies JD from ever being able to be called Bourbon.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 18 February 2013 23:11 (thirteen years ago)
From straightbourbon.com"
Is Jack Daniel's a bourbon?Jack Daniel's is not considered a bourbon because it is charcoal-mellowed -- slowly, drop by drop, filtered through sugar-maple charcoal -- prior to aging, which many experts say gives it a different character. The process, called the Lincoln County Process, infuses a sweet and sooty character into the distillate as it removes impurities. But up to and after the charcoal filtering, the Jack Daniel's production is much the same as any other Bourbon. Jack Daniel's and George Dickel are two fine Tennessee Whiskeys though neither can be called bourbon.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 18 February 2013 23:13 (thirteen years ago)
knappogue still otm
― lance armstrong will have been delighted (darraghmac), Monday, 18 February 2013 23:17 (thirteen years ago)
oh my b xpost
― call all destroyer, Tuesday, 19 February 2013 01:58 (thirteen years ago)
Via Binny's:
Makers Missed the Mark.Don't miss your chance to grab this COLLECTABLE BOTTLE.If you missed this story, here's what happened. Maker's Mark announced that they would lower the alcohol of their beloved bourbon from 90 to 84 proof. It took less than a week for public outrage to reach such a fervor that they doubled back on their decision, promising to stick with the original recipe. We don't mean to wax poetic, but this may be one of the biggest beverage missteps since New Coke. One that will leave its mark on the industry for generations.That makes the low proof Maker's Mark an instant collector's item for whiskey enthusiasts.The distillery is busy reclaiming cases from wholesalers, but we're holding our allocation for you. We want to offer you the chance to buy this bottle of history. Remember, it's a limited product, production had a life measured in hours instead of days or weeks. Once it's gone, it's gone for good.
If you missed this story, here's what happened. Maker's Mark announced that they would lower the alcohol of their beloved bourbon from 90 to 84 proof. It took less than a week for public outrage to reach such a fervor that they doubled back on their decision, promising to stick with the original recipe. We don't mean to wax poetic, but this may be one of the biggest beverage missteps since New Coke. One that will leave its mark on the industry for generations.
That makes the low proof Maker's Mark an instant collector's item for whiskey enthusiasts.
The distillery is busy reclaiming cases from wholesalers, but we're holding our allocation for you. We want to offer you the chance to buy this bottle of history. Remember, it's a limited product, production had a life measured in hours instead of days or weeks. Once it's gone, it's gone for good.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 21 February 2013 21:40 (thirteen years ago)
I was at a Binny's earlier today and thought about it. Then I bought a bottle of Eagle Rare instead.
― every hippie that goes home bloody feels like a martyr back in the city (dan m), Thursday, 21 February 2013 21:47 (thirteen years ago)
got a third party bottling of highland park 21 yr, pretty nice, fairly smooth as u would expect but with a taliskerish heft and piquancy
― Like Poto I don't Cabengo (Nilmar Honorato da Silva), Thursday, 21 February 2013 21:54 (thirteen years ago)
I enjoyed reading this:
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/02/11/130211fa_fact_sanneh?currentPage=all
I got my old man a wee pack of different Bruichladdich expressions (a ten, a fifteen and an eighteen I think?) for his birthday one year but he never did get to drink them. Now they're sitting in my kitchen cupboard, waiting for the right time. Think maybe I'll open one!
― sktsh, Thursday, 21 February 2013 22:42 (thirteen years ago)
just drank a .375ml of jameson, this stuff goes down pretty smooth. i'm a little concerned i'm not drunk off it, honestly
― Spectrum, Saturday, 23 February 2013 06:44 (thirteen years ago)
that's only ten shots tbf
― lance armstrong will have been delighted (darraghmac), Saturday, 23 February 2013 09:58 (thirteen years ago)
Bottle of green spot to report on, gimme a half hour
― lance armstrong will have been delighted (darraghmac), Saturday, 23 February 2013 16:13 (thirteen years ago)
I'd be a little concerned if 375ml/ten shots of whiskey did not make me drunk. Do you weight 350 pounds?
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 23 February 2013 16:49 (thirteen years ago)