i think that seattle guy wants to 'scoop and score' i.e. have intercrosse with you
xpost
― bed raggled (qiqing), Friday, 11 January 2013 09:14 (thirteen years ago)
Had date with a comedian last night. It was mostly excruciating - comedo-persona ordered drinks, told me about his career, etc. - but when he lapsed out of comedo-man, I learnt all this really interesting stuff about Canadian politics and the unions! However, NO.
― ljubljana, Friday, 11 January 2013 11:51 (thirteen years ago)
Uuugh. I think that might be an anomaly, fwiw. I can't imagine anyone I personally know in the comedy community endeavouring to act like anything but a human being on a first date. Or maybe I'm just really lucky to know mostly unbroken (relatively unbroken, let's be straight) people in the comedy community.
― The Poston & Henning Variety Jamboree (Old Lunch), Friday, 11 January 2013 15:35 (thirteen years ago)
He wasn't being his 'stage' persona, I don't think, but he was playing up the 'I'm THIS sort of EXTROVERTED PERSON who is ANIMATED, DO YOU SEE???' type... deal... I certainly won't judge a whole community based on 3 hours with an individual! Anyway, when he quit all that, he was very intelligent and interesting to listen to. He just didn't quit it often enough.
― ljubljana, Friday, 11 January 2013 16:06 (thirteen years ago)
And that is why no theater people.
― grossly incorrect register (in orbit), Friday, 11 January 2013 16:09 (thirteen years ago)
comedo-persona ordered drinks
oh my god i am so sorry
― goole, Friday, 11 January 2013 17:29 (thirteen years ago)
no churchfaces, no theater people, no one who is disturbingly enthusiastic
― mh, Friday, 11 January 2013 20:49 (thirteen years ago)
the more i hear about ok cupid the more i think it is just sociopath training
― maura, Friday, 11 January 2013 23:39 (thirteen years ago)
sorry everybody
except not really
basically i think you're describing the internet.
― s.clover, Saturday, 12 January 2013 01:03 (thirteen years ago)
or that portion of it populated by young people. young people are terrible! i'm ashamed that i was one.
― s.clover, Saturday, 12 January 2013 01:04 (thirteen years ago)
sociopath in seatt.... nevermind.
― the girl from spirea x (f. hazel), Saturday, 12 January 2013 02:10 (thirteen years ago)
churchfaces?
― Una Stubbs' Tears (Trayce), Saturday, 12 January 2013 02:35 (thirteen years ago)
http://achewood.com/index.php?date=09282009
― mh, Saturday, 12 January 2013 02:38 (thirteen years ago)
If you rate someone what exactly are you rating? Their looks? Their profile? I really need a primer on OKC, sometimes I have no idea what I'm supposed to be doing.
― Yo Leon, what's this all about? (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Sunday, 13 January 2013 06:57 (thirteen years ago)
ICE CREAM SUNDAE. NOT SUNDAY. JESUS CHRIST.
― grossly incorrect register (in orbit), Sunday, 13 January 2013 07:27 (thirteen years ago)
I can't go out with these people. I just can't.
:D
― Una Stubbs' Tears (Trayce), Sunday, 13 January 2013 07:33 (thirteen years ago)
If you rate someone what exactly are you rating? Their looks? Their profile?
Generally speaking, I think the stars are just there for you to utilize as you will. However, users can receive a notification if you give them four or five stars. However however, this is an optional feature so maybe hardly anyone receives those notifications. Who can say?
― Shields & Yarnell Present: The Perils of Puberty (Old Lunch), Sunday, 13 January 2013 14:51 (thirteen years ago)
I get them.
― ljubljana, Sunday, 13 January 2013 15:47 (thirteen years ago)
It's optional? I didn't realize that. Sometimes I get them but they're never from anyone good.
― grossly incorrect register (in orbit), Sunday, 13 January 2013 16:14 (thirteen years ago)
when you first sign up one of the hoops you have to jump through is to rate a certain number of people I think? to get 100% completion
I rate people when I like their profile but can't think of anything to say (like maybe they're one of those people who only puts one word or one sentence responses)
also I think OKCupid tiers or used to tier their users - if your average star rating was in the top 50% of OKC's population, then you would be shown more attractive users (i.e. users who were also had a higher starred rating)
― 乒乓, Sunday, 13 January 2013 16:18 (thirteen years ago)
a mutual 4/5 star rating is also a good way to kick off a conversation I guess?
The flip side is that if you use the site less or something you can drop out of tiers due to a lack of ratings, I think.
― mh, Sunday, 13 January 2013 16:22 (thirteen years ago)
also apparently the data reveals that men and women rate each other differently? http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/your-looks-and-online-dating/
― 乒乓, Sunday, 13 January 2013 16:28 (thirteen years ago)
http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/the-mathematics-of-beauty/
― 乒乓, Sunday, 13 January 2013 16:29 (thirteen years ago)
crazy. when I was on OKC I got a lot of 4-5 stars from women and put in the "most attractive" pile, but personally I'm not all that great looking or anything. on dates what women said they liked was the way my profile was written. so prob more than just looks going on.
― Spectrum, Sunday, 13 January 2013 16:33 (thirteen years ago)
Sooo I should go back to rating ppl, I guess. It's such a flat, commercial way to...ah fuck it.
― grossly incorrect register (in orbit), Sunday, 13 January 2013 16:53 (thirteen years ago)
http://fedorasofokc.tumblr.com/
― #YOLO magic orchestra (clouds), Sunday, 13 January 2013 19:04 (thirteen years ago)
It'sOKC's such a flat, commercial way to...
― 乒乓, Sunday, 13 January 2013 19:04 (thirteen years ago)
there's a tophat in that tumblr I want my money back xp
― 乒乓, Sunday, 13 January 2013 19:05 (thirteen years ago)
http://24.media.tumblr.com/84dbe4a09032dde98a31d1e32e7018fe/tumblr_mgcjbrTsyA1rlesyoo1_500.jpg
Profile pics on a dating site of you w/ previous girls - is this some kind of OKC PUA thing?
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Sunday, 13 January 2013 19:08 (thirteen years ago)
Its an immediate NO THANKS in my books. Why do people do this?
― Una Stubbs' Tears (Trayce), Sunday, 13 January 2013 20:51 (thirteen years ago)
seem to remember Slipknot having some sort of answer to that question
― non-elitist melted poo (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 13 January 2013 21:12 (thirteen years ago)
I found a profile I like quite a bit but dude is 2 yrs younger than I am. It's a dumb personal defense mech but I assume 34-yos are interested in 30-yos and immediately mentally rule them out. That's dumb, right?
― grossly incorrect register (in orbit), Sunday, 13 January 2013 21:14 (thirteen years ago)
y
― mookieproof, Sunday, 13 January 2013 21:15 (thirteen years ago)
y def
― non-elitist melted poo (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 13 January 2013 21:17 (thirteen years ago)
i mean obv there are gonna be people with strict age fetishes but i guess those people are likely to be obviously horrible anyway?
― non-elitist melted poo (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 13 January 2013 21:20 (thirteen years ago)
― 乒乓, Sunday, 13 January 2013 21:22 (thirteen years ago)
Well, there's that answered. Now I just have to be willing to engage with the idea of dating for long enough to write...something...respond-to-able. In theory, only of course he won't because they never do.
― grossly incorrect register (in orbit), Sunday, 13 January 2013 21:39 (thirteen years ago)
Now I just have to be willing to engage with the idea of dating for long enough to write...something...respond-to-able
otm
― mookieproof, Sunday, 13 January 2013 21:40 (thirteen years ago)
No, you know, that was glib and not true. I like dating when it means meeting people I might want to make out with, to consume alcohol and pay attention to each other. I just hate dangling myself in front of ppl I don't know, puffing up THEIR egos and yet apparently not being impressive enough to write back to.
― grossly incorrect register (in orbit), Sunday, 13 January 2013 21:43 (thirteen years ago)
haha well if it makes you feel any better I only ever got responses to like, 10% of the messages I sent out? puffed up a lot of egos I imagine
― 乒乓, Sunday, 13 January 2013 21:48 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah Ive had zero response to any messages ive sent out, its only when I reply to ppl who message me that things go somewhere. Right now my heart's not in it all anyway as I got feels for u-kno-who that ain't going away so I'm kind of keeping okc at arms length, it seems fair.
― Una Stubbs' Tears (Trayce), Sunday, 13 January 2013 22:23 (thirteen years ago)
To celebrate the launch of Crazy Blind Date (our new app)we’ve removed all photos from OkCupid today.
― ❏❐❑❒ (gr8080), Tuesday, 15 January 2013 16:30 (thirteen years ago)
I was wondering! I went to respond to a msg and CONFUSION!
― grossly incorrect register (in orbit), Tuesday, 15 January 2013 16:30 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah, that seems like a super successful endeavor, OKC. As if the entire premise of your site isn't blind date-ish enough as is.
― Shields & Yarnell Present: The Perils of Puberty (Old Lunch), Tuesday, 15 January 2013 16:49 (thirteen years ago)
I am seriously grossed out by the age thing sometimes - dudes who are 45-50 think I am appropriate for them. WTF!? I am sure they message women younger than me, too.
― homosexual II, Tuesday, 15 January 2013 21:13 (thirteen years ago)
wtf@ the blind date shit. There is NO way I'd want to meet someone site unseen from ANYWHERE. I have actually done that once or twice in my very distant past and it was ABYSMAL BEYOND WORDS.
― Una Stubbs' Tears (Trayce), Tuesday, 15 January 2013 21:16 (thirteen years ago)
Er, sight unseen even, haha, pardon the pun.