Duh, iceberg, I'm sure that's what he was going for. Dunno why that didn't occur to me. Which comes from berg = mountain anyway.
― Sailor-neighbor of Chaucer's wife (Tubby) (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 10 January 2013 21:43 (thirteen years ago)
Sad news about Araucaria. Although I still don't get 90% of his clues.
― kinder, Friday, 11 January 2013 22:20 (thirteen years ago)
yeah, was almost getting a bit weepy about that. bit pissed too, mind. felt there was a touch of larkin's going, going about it in a way. last of an old world that wasn't the horrible old ersatz tory world we seem to see being ressurected in rhetorical stone around us. he wasn't averse to unfuddyish pop culture refs either. that said, lex's want to modernise cryptic crosswords is an interesting path into
it's something i've periodically thought about, as probably anyone has who has thought like NV 'tar wtf'. so evocative of a period yet has become an abstract knowledge set. how to update? how do we define a common educated xword lexicon? with educated not being, surely, 'type of school' educated. it needs to be open to a wide set of populist and high subjects, so to take two examples - sport... um... what's 'high' but not public school these days? not classics, obv. history is surely still available. periodic table can stay (I learnt more it from crosswords than chemistry).
Pop charts would have felt fair game at a time when they were more central than they are now, but it's hard to see where pop can get a look in, unless it's pop-beyond-pop - Superbowl Beyonce level, but that's not going to provide a set of terms. other sorts of 'pop', like high-street shops maybe. modern slang could probably come in. i don't do crosswords regularly, but surely 'lol' has made an appearance.
what other new areas provide large amounts of well-known technical terms and abbreviations? (Cricket being the best example from current crosswords).
Got to go to bed. Seeing my nan in the morning, still a demon whist and crossword fiend at Araucaria age - see if she's got any ideas.
― Fizzles, Saturday, 12 January 2013 01:04 (thirteen years ago)
interesting path into...
um
modern stuff
― Fizzles, Saturday, 12 January 2013 01:05 (thirteen years ago)
One for lex in today's Guardian...
Temporary suspension gives a diva a change of heart (8)
― jlgt, Saturday, 12 January 2013 17:46 (thirteen years ago)
I liked that.
Teared up at the Araucaria news too. He's one of the greatest setters, and for every clue where there's a warped surface or liberty with 'the rules', there are a dozen that are ingenious, dazzling, entertaining, unexpected, neat – he's the most fun.
He's also lured a lot of people in I think – he's the one occasional solvers remember, partly for the name, and partly for those elliptical alluring (2,3,3,4,5,6,2, 7,3,4) type clues, or the mad interlocking multiple x-ref ones. There's a real sense of accomplishment when you realise you're getting him and solving his grids - reach a point where you really look forward to his name appearing. As I've said before he (with Paul) remains my favourite Guardian setter.
It will not be the same without him, at all.
― woof, Saturday, 12 January 2013 21:04 (thirteen years ago)
― jlgt, Saturday, January 12, 2013 5:46 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
the sad thing is i still can't solve this
― lex pretend, Sunday, 13 January 2013 12:27 (thirteen years ago)
starts with an a
― non-elitist melted poo (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 13 January 2013 12:28 (thirteen years ago)
abeyance!!!!!!!
beyoncé reference! yes!
― lex pretend, Sunday, 13 January 2013 12:52 (thirteen years ago)
Help! Two I do not understand even when I have the answer:
Sort of this to a sort of 13, worn by some men. (7) (13 was "Flower pots tie in a better arrangement, possibly = POINSETTIA)
The answer is TIEPINS. Why?
Republicans not about to be hosts, perhaps. (10) = INNKEEPERS. How does this work?
― Sailor-neighbor of Chaucer's wife (Tubby) (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 17 January 2013 15:01 (thirteen years ago)
first one is an anagram with "to a" removed, feels badly clued but i'm pretty hungover/drunk
Republicans without "about" = -re = publicans = innkeepers
― non-elitist melted poo (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 17 January 2013 15:04 (thirteen years ago)
is the first one "Short of this" or "sort of this"?
first one kinda works, anag of 'this to a' where 'this' = 'tiepins'. although two 'sorts' seems superfluous.
― ledge, Thursday, 17 January 2013 15:07 (thirteen years ago)
So, on the first one they're using one "sort" to mean anagram, which is common, and a second to mean discard? Which I've never seen.
― Sailor-neighbor of Chaucer's wife (Tubby) (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 17 January 2013 15:16 (thirteen years ago)
i don't like the first clue at all, can't make it work properly
― non-elitist melted poo (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 17 January 2013 15:17 (thirteen years ago)
Second one is pretty simple when it's explained to me, but "not about" meaning there is no "RE" seems clumsy to me too. Didn't care for either of those.
― Sailor-neighbor of Chaucer's wife (Tubby) (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 17 January 2013 15:19 (thirteen years ago)
you don't like that, how about this:
A pious type, Winston, fit to move the queen (10) = CHURCHGOER - winston fit = churchill - ill
― ledge, Thursday, 17 January 2013 15:21 (thirteen years ago)
(today's grauniad)
Wow, that's a stretch, and I have to admit I still dont get where GOER comes from. Move = GO and ER = ?
― Sailor-neighbor of Chaucer's wife (Tubby) (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 17 January 2013 15:29 (thirteen years ago)
Elizabeth Regina, our Queen
― non-elitist melted poo (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 17 January 2013 15:29 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah, I just used Wiki. I've never seen that one before.
― Sailor-neighbor of Chaucer's wife (Tubby) (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 17 January 2013 15:30 (thirteen years ago)
iirc king/queen can also be just r for rex/regina.
― ledge, Thursday, 17 January 2013 15:31 (thirteen years ago)
guardian prize:
Buggery? It's a personal matter (7,8)
ans: nobody's business. what's it got to do with buggery?
― ledge, Monday, 28 January 2013 14:08 (thirteen years ago)
bugger all
― koogs, Monday, 28 January 2013 14:10 (thirteen years ago)
two meanings of "nobody's business"
literal - "this is nobody's business but my own"idiomatic - "he drank that pint like nobody's business"
idiomatic meaning of "nobody's business" = idiomatic meaning of "buggery"
― Hermann Hesher (Noodle Vague), Monday, 28 January 2013 14:11 (thirteen years ago)
not super familiar with that idiom but i can see that.
― ledge, Monday, 28 January 2013 14:17 (thirteen years ago)
both mean "vigorously" if you look it up, cdn't think of what the equivalence was for a sec
― Hermann Hesher (Noodle Vague), Monday, 28 January 2013 14:18 (thirteen years ago)
both feel like they're probably regional usages to me tho, slightly old-fashioned too
― Hermann Hesher (Noodle Vague), Monday, 28 January 2013 14:19 (thirteen years ago)
Enjoyable theme in today's Guardian, actually allowed me to finish more than half of it already, a rarity!http://www.guardian.co.uk/crosswords/cryptic/25860
― Neil S, Friday, 1 February 2013 11:43 (thirteen years ago)
Safeguard of present containing gold and silver hidden in vault (7)
― ledge, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 12:01 (thirteen years ago)
Finished the Guardian (Paul) pretty swiftly, after getting the theme. Moved on to the Times and managed to get one single bloody clue. Looking at all of them thinking "I just don't know where to begin".
― ledge, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 14:12 (thirteen years ago)
Theme of Grauniad of interest to ILMers btw.
― ledge, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 14:14 (thirteen years ago)
couldn't deal with the theme today, gave up as soon as i realised what it was
yesterday's grau crossword was literally impossible
enjoyed saturday's araucaria v much though
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 14:24 (thirteen years ago)
except for obscure liberian, malaysian, and shetland-isms.
― ledge, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 14:29 (thirteen years ago)
the liberian/malaysian one was hilariously obscure
― lex pretend, Wednesday, 6 February 2013 14:31 (thirteen years ago)
---r-g-
― ledge, Friday, 8 February 2013 12:57 (thirteen years ago)
Storage
― ailsa, Friday, 8 February 2013 13:32 (thirteen years ago)
"or" being gold "ag" being silver, etc.
and the other 3 letters?
― koogs, Friday, 8 February 2013 13:33 (thirteen years ago)
Ach, trifling things like accuracy matter not (i.e. was skimming and not reading properly).
― ailsa, Friday, 8 February 2013 13:35 (thirteen years ago)
ah, ok, stage + or AND store = ag
― koogs, Friday, 8 February 2013 13:35 (thirteen years ago)
store + ag
yep two wordplays for price of one, this clue is value for money.
― ledge, Friday, 8 February 2013 13:36 (thirteen years ago)
"Ag" in "store", and "or" in "stage". how's that?
bah, xposts while I got my reasoning straight.
― ailsa, Friday, 8 February 2013 13:43 (thirteen years ago)
Not sure I like that very much. "Safeguard of present containing gold" would have been fine on its own. Never heard of two subsidiary indicators in one clue before.
― my father will guide me up the stairs to bed (anagram), Friday, 8 February 2013 13:45 (thirteen years ago)
it happens from time to time. i just liked the gold + silver connection although doubtless could have worded it more elegantly.
― ledge, Friday, 8 February 2013 13:50 (thirteen years ago)
oh sorry, did you make it up yourself? wouldn't have criticized it if I'd known. thought it was from a newspaper.
― my father will guide me up the stairs to bed (anagram), Friday, 8 February 2013 13:53 (thirteen years ago)
no need for kid gloves here.
― ledge, Friday, 8 February 2013 13:53 (thirteen years ago)
A bad time for gulls? (5,5,3)
Checking letters if you need them, with which I got the answer fairly easily, but I don't understand it.
― Nataly Dawn's echoey swamp sound (Dan Peterson), Friday, 8 February 2013 15:01 (thirteen years ago)
April Fool's Day. Gull = a gullible person.
― my father will guide me up the stairs to bed (anagram), Friday, 8 February 2013 15:18 (thirteen years ago)