A number of people were gathered
― Revivalist (Revivalist), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 12:31 (nineteen years ago)
Thanks.
(I am interested in the underlying grammar of this, though, if anyone else is still awake.)
― Jamie T Smith (Jamie T Smith), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 12:32 (nineteen years ago)
I suppose 'a number' is acting as a collective noun there, though.
I think much/many is different.
― Jamie T Smith (Jamie T Smith), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 12:35 (nineteen years ago)
Much of these two cities was destroyed.
There's an implied noun after much, IMO, e.g. "Much architecture of these two cities etc." or something similar, because the cities themselves weren't destroyed, but something in them was.
How about "most" instead of "much" in your NOC example, which I read as being a relative majority issue?
― c('°c) (Leee), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 15:49 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 17 October 2006 17:48 (nineteen years ago)
― toby (tsg20), Wednesday, 25 October 2006 06:39 (nineteen years ago)
meanwhile, here's the copyediting story of the week.
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Wednesday, 25 October 2006 06:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Winterland (winterland), Friday, 27 October 2006 12:23 (nineteen years ago)
― ledge (ledge), Friday, 27 October 2006 12:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Friday, 27 October 2006 13:32 (nineteen years ago)
― surfer_stone_rosa (surfer_stone_rosa), Friday, 27 October 2006 15:12 (nineteen years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 10 January 2007 20:06 (nineteen years ago)
― Laurel (Laurel), Wednesday, 10 January 2007 20:10 (nineteen years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 10 January 2007 20:14 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 10 January 2007 20:56 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 10 January 2007 20:56 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 10 January 2007 21:00 (nineteen years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 10 January 2007 21:11 (nineteen years ago)
(Ha, although I think we all get snobby on this topic when it comes to whatever we personally do: I am that way people describing themselves as "writers.")
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 10 January 2007 21:22 (nineteen years ago)
― lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 10 January 2007 21:32 (nineteen years ago)
― Maria :D (Maria D.), Friday, 12 January 2007 03:57 (nineteen years ago)
It makes more sense for a longer event with many bands, especially something like All Tomorrow's Parties where it's a specific artist's vision of what's teh hotness in music at the moment.
― A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Friday, 12 January 2007 04:14 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 12 January 2007 04:55 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 12 January 2007 04:57 (nineteen years ago)
Why? If you book a night of five bands, surely you then book a weekend of them, too?
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Friday, 12 January 2007 10:44 (nineteen years ago)
So: Messrs Schroeder's horse.
― Mädchen (Madchen), Friday, 12 January 2007 11:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Friday, 12 January 2007 11:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Friday, 12 January 2007 11:31 (nineteen years ago)
eh? but there's more than one schroeder, and you'd say "the schroeders' horse" ... nah, i'm with nabisco.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 12 January 2007 16:57 (nineteen years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Friday, 12 January 2007 16:58 (nineteen years ago)
Well, maybe if you're choosing artists on more than just "a bunch of bands that will please a certain demographic and bring people to the festival." Even then, "curated" is a bit pretentious.
― A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Friday, 12 January 2007 17:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Friday, 12 January 2007 17:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Maria :D (Maria D.), Saturday, 13 January 2007 00:33 (nineteen years ago)
the crowd's horse the messrs schroeder's horse
it's the presence of the "the" which rescues it from impossible eccentricity -- it pushes it over into extreme formality
but if formality is the order of the day, you shd probably opt for "the horse of the messrs schoeder" -- which handily pussies out of the prob
― mark s (mark s), Saturday, 13 January 2007 02:30 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Saturday, 13 January 2007 04:07 (nineteen years ago)
― Maria :D (Maria D.), Saturday, 13 January 2007 05:11 (nineteen years ago)
"sixfold" vs. "six-fold" (et al)
Is there a rule on these? One right, one wrong, acceptable alternatives, different uses? Months ago my boss indicated what he felt was correct - I think one was an adjective and one an adverb - and as it seemed perfectly clear and self-evident at the time, no one wrote it down. And of course I can't find it discussed authoritatively on the internet.
― i'll mitya halfway (mitya), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 12:25 (nineteen years ago)
best thing to do is get yourself a good dictionary - i always recommend the oxford dictionary for writers and editors - and make that your style bible: ie try to ensure everyone you're working with sticks to it. but that's easier said than done, as i know only too well :(
i can e-mail you a copy of my legendary 1996 undergraduate dissertation on punctuation if you want, but you'll need a) pagemaker 5 and b) a really, really high tedium threshold.
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 13:12 (nineteen years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 13:13 (nineteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 13:27 (nineteen years ago)
― stet (stet), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 13:36 (nineteen years ago)
xpostno dissertations, thanks :)
― i'll mitya halfway (mitya), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 13:41 (nineteen years ago)
― Mädchen (Madchen), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:22 (nineteen years ago)
Our style is to use one word wherever possible, including some instances where a word might be hyphenated by other publications. Hyphens tend to clutter up text (particularly when the computer breaks already hyphenated words at the end of lines).Inventions, ideas and new concepts often begin life as two words, then become hyphenated, before finally becoming accepted as one word. Why wait? "Wire-less" and "down-stairs" were once hyphenated. In pursuit of this it is preferable to go further than Collins does in many cases: eg trenchcoat is two words in Collins but one under our style; words such as handspring, madhouse and talkshow should all be one word, not two words, and not hyphenated.Do use hyphens where not using one would be ambiguous, eg to distinguish "black-cab drivers come under attack" from "black cab-drivers come under attack".Do not use after adverbs ending in -ly, eg politically naive, wholly owned, but hyphens are needed with short and common adverbs, eg ill-prepared report, hard-bitten hack, much-needed grammar lesson, well-established principle of style (note though that in the construction "the principle of style is well established" there is no need to hyphenate).Finally, do use hyphens to form compound adjectives, eg two-tonne vessel, three-year deal, 19th-century artist.
― Mädchen (Madchen), Wednesday, 7 February 2007 14:24 (nineteen years ago)
sixfold = adverb e.g. "Their numbers increased sixfold."six-fold = adjective e.g. "This is a six-fold napkin." (I don't know what a "six-fold napkin" is, I just made something up.)
___fold = one word, whereas "six-fold" is just two words crammed together that you use as an adjective to describe something that has six folds in it.
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:15 (nineteen years ago)
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 8 February 2007 09:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Thursday, 8 February 2007 09:15 (nineteen years ago)
i don't just make this shit up, you know :(
― grimly fiendish (grimlord), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:18 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Nathalie (stevie nixed), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:26 (nineteen years ago)