The official thread for Lord Of The Rings - The Return Of The King [LOTR ROTK TROTK ROK] (NOW CONTAINS SPOILERS)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (647 of them)
yahoo pics from the premiere today [warning: photo-links will eventually expire]

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 1 December 2003 20:32 (twenty-two years ago)

i looking forward to some good finger biting off action.

BiLBo (jackcole), Monday, 1 December 2003 20:54 (twenty-two years ago)

NO SPOILERS!!

mark s (mark s), Monday, 1 December 2003 20:56 (twenty-two years ago)

really! i mean... SHEESH!

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 1 December 2003 20:59 (twenty-two years ago)

what? i can't bite off my finger(s) do to the suspense? what sort of world is this where i can't gnaw off my own digits?!?!? *crunch*

Gollum Should Rule Middle Earth (jackcole), Monday, 1 December 2003 21:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Take it to ilm.

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Monday, 1 December 2003 21:02 (twenty-two years ago)

take it to the fiery pit of mt. doom.

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 1 December 2003 21:05 (twenty-two years ago)

yessssss, massssssster.

jack cole (jackcole), Monday, 1 December 2003 21:06 (twenty-two years ago)

The fact that it's still fifteen days away from release isn't affecting me at all. As you can see from this photo of me taken this morning:

http://www.ortadunya.com/dbimage/client/gollum.gif

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 1 December 2003 21:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I watched the Two Tower extended edition twice this weekend, I am in a bad way.

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Monday, 1 December 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)

I've been having fucking LoTR dreams.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 1 December 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Note: not LoTR fucking dreams. Dan Perry.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 1 December 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)

yahoo pics from the premiere today

And for that alone, I could kiss you.....but I'll just send flowers.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Monday, 1 December 2003 21:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Note: not LoTR fucking dreams. Dan Perry.

You know you've been around too long, when we can second guess your dreams.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Monday, 1 December 2003 21:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Gah, now all I can picture is nickalicious having sex dreams about Dan Perry in LOTR gear.

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Monday, 1 December 2003 21:23 (twenty-two years ago)

I pictured that too, though. Is that some sort of reverse nymphomania?

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Monday, 1 December 2003 21:29 (twenty-two years ago)

"Return of the Bootyflakes"

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Monday, 1 December 2003 21:30 (twenty-two years ago)

The thing that was so fucked up about Lee's footage being cut out is... originally, he was given to believe he wouldn't be in the film, as the scouring bit was omitted. Then he was told he would be in it after all (since the division between films and books differs)... THEN he was called out to film some extra stuff back in July (of this year, yes). So you can understand him being pissed off/baffled by it all. This is stuff they should've had planned out long ago.

Piss-up, brewery, etc.

ChrissieH (chrissie1068), Monday, 1 December 2003 21:30 (twenty-two years ago)

My thought is that given the scope of the enterprise -- seven years work, any amount of visual effects deadlines on top of the overall film deadlines, constant revision and fine tuning and so forth -- trying to expect Jackson and company to have figured out everything perfectly in advance is asking far too much. Your description, Chrissie, could just as easily be read this way -- they figured it wouldn't be included, a chance came to test it out another way, it didn't work, they decided not to go for it in terms of the theatrical cut. Personally I don't see any problem with that at all.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 1 December 2003 21:46 (twenty-two years ago)

it's possible also that lee and jackson, from difft generations, take a difft view of the relative importance of the theatre release and the (longer) DVD release: ie lee, being an old-skool movie star, thinks the first is the real deal and the DVD is an add-on, whereas jackson sees the DVD as the "thing itself" and the film-on-release as a kind of nice warm-up taster

mark s (mark s), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:09 (twenty-two years ago)

ooh awesome, im seeing it either tomorrow or thursday!

phil-two (phil-two), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Hm. Do you prefer being killed with hot oil or sharp spikes?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Ned, I didn't realize til now how Wormtongue-like you are!

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Wow, Nicole. How long have you known Ned again?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Ned, I didn't realize til now how Wormtongue-like you are!

THAT is a LIE. I'm weary of your malcontent.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Ned, I didn't realize til now how Wormtongue-like you are!

Lars, you've never seen him without makeup, however.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Haha yes, without makeup he looks like Pete Burns.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:22 (twenty-two years ago)

I watched the Two Tower extended edition twice this weekend, I am in a bad way.

Wait, only twice? Tsk. (Two times through as it is, four further times through for each of the commentaries.)

Haha yes, without makeup he looks like Pete Burns.

"AND I!"

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Then again, it's more likely Jackson is just another DVD ho'.

I'm not very cool about multiple DVD releases myself. Particularly not when they're carefully timed so that people desperate for it will buy the regular version first. Cynical cynical cynical.

I still think it's a bit shambolic.

ChrissieH (chrissie1068), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Particularly not when they're carefully timed so that people desperate for it will buy the regular version first. Cynical cynical cynical.

To my mind, cynical would have been not telling anyone there was going to be an extended version and then releasing one later.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Or not releasing a trilogy on dvd so that you can wait and force fans to buy it as a set with a vastly inferior trilogy.

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Particularly not when they're carefully timed so that people desperate for it will buy the regular version first.

If you got wise after Fellowship, you knew patience is your friend. (And no, I STILL don't have the Extended Edition yet. I'm thinking of my own solo marathon before the 17th)

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:29 (twenty-two years ago)

i'll let you know how it is, ned :)

phil-two (phil-two), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Or not releasing a trilogy on dvd so that you can wait and force fans to buy it as a set with a vastly inferior trilogy.

Hm, couldn't imagine what you mean...

i'll let you know how it is, ned :)

Yes, you will.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:30 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't have a patience issue, to be honest. The extended DVDs are too expensive and I can't be bothered until I see 'em on sale somewhere. I don't need two extra discs of boring extras. Others will also have a cost issue and others will simply not be patient enough. 'Tis a rip-off.

ChrissieH (chrissie1068), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:33 (twenty-two years ago)

maybe Lee wz rubbish and they are too embarrassed to tell him

mark s (mark s), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:34 (twenty-two years ago)

i think they concocted the shambles story to spare his blushes

mark s (mark s), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Others will also have a cost issue and others will simply not be patient enough. 'Tis a rip-off.

Not if they just rent it.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:37 (twenty-two years ago)

The extended DVDs are too expensive

I bought extended boxes for FOTR for $25.99 (which included a free pass to see T2T) and T2T for $26.99.

That's 8 DVDs for $50.98 at a cost of $6.37-ish per. Not sure how much cheaper it can get frankly.

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:40 (twenty-two years ago)

error: T2T for $24.99 ^^^

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:41 (twenty-two years ago)

make copies and email them to me for free and i will show you gygax!

mark s (mark s), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Found Twin Towers (Extended) for $25.47, in WalMart of all places. If you're going to buy the movie at all, Chrissie, tis worth it to get the extras, IMHO

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, that sounds about right.

I'm actually not convinced Jackson himself has much to offer as a director, really. Sure, this was a tremendously ambitious project, but beyond getting the project supported and having a decent cast, who could go wrong? The cast are mostly great. Otherwise, it lives on the back of the FX (which are brilliant) and the scenery.

I realised watching The Two Towers how repetitious and banal the directing actually was. I got thinking, 'This has a lot of great things in spite of the direction, not because of it.' Those bloody endless, interminable fight scenes... incredibly boring, drawn-out stuff, in spite of the excelent visual quality. So they (originally) cut a seven-minute scene that was probably quite interesting so we can have more SLASH! CUT! THRUST! WAM! BAM! It could stand to lose more than seven minutes of that junk.

I think it was after the 3,000th identical tracking shot that I started feeling that, beautiful scenery or not, this is a director with a small bag or tricks and not much imagination. Lose the cast. Lose the locations. Lose the FX. What remains is actually kinda crap, and that's PJ's contribution.

He ain't no Orson Welles. [cue abuse!]

ChrissieH (chrissie1068), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Lose the cast. Lose the locations. Lose the FX. What remains is actually kinda crap

WELL DUH.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:45 (twenty-two years ago)

The prices you're giving in dollars here, BTW, is LESS than the price of it over here in UK pounds. Obviously, everything over here is more expensive. Go figure.

And as to renting: who wants to rent stuff these days?

ChrissieH (chrissie1068), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, Dan, so DUH, the books had those things did it? Double fucking DUH.

ChrissieH (chrissie1068), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:46 (twenty-two years ago)

mark s, i just may take you up on that!

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:46 (twenty-two years ago)

A book != a movie, braniac.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:47 (twenty-two years ago)

but braniac(TM) does clean out your colon.

jack cole (jackcole), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, brainiac, seems you're the one who thinks a movie = cast, FX and scenery. If I'm talking about DIRECTION specifically, those things are irrelevant to what I'm saying. Important to the film as a whole, but if they're the things that actually make it, then obviously there are other factors that are failing somehow (i.e. the direction).

The book was great just on story and characters. The film has those things too. It practically doesn't need anything else to be good if a good director's making it happen. Really. I'm not convinced these films have a particularly good director. I know, this is rocket science. Never mind, eh.

ChrissieH (chrissie1068), Monday, 1 December 2003 22:56 (twenty-two years ago)

I AM NO MAN. I AM IRONMAN!
snaps fingers

scanner darkly, Monday, 10 June 2024 19:16 (two years ago)

"I AM NO MAN" works as a more iconic moment than the wordy banter imo

― assert (matttkkkk), Sunday, June 9, 2024 9:17 PM

otm

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 10 June 2024 21:14 (two years ago)

Needless to say we've talked about this film (and the Rankin-Basses) on the podcast. Another thing that Rankin-Bass does that Jackson didn't was have the proper faceoff between the Lord of the Nazgul and Gandalf at the ruined gate right before the Rohirrim arrive -- the Jackson version was in the extended cut and didn't have anywhere as much impact as the book, due to changing when and where it happened.

― Ned Raggett, Sunday, June 9, 2024

It made sense to cut it given how it's directed. The Witch King is about to strike, the horns blow, and he turns around and goes, "Uh, brb, I left the oven on" and flies away.

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 10 June 2024 21:15 (two years ago)

and due to his lack of intervention w/the Rohan charge, that's apparently what he went off to do.

the wordy banter could have really worked, if directed and staged well. just to return some supernatural menace to the Nazgul. and you could have still ended on the same verbal coup de grâce from Eowyn. but it's all good, she took down that Witch-King hard, damn.

omar little, Monday, 10 June 2024 22:37 (two years ago)

My preferred version is the one in Tolkien's third manuscript, reprinted in one of the oversized folio editions, but I admit it might work better on the page than on the screen:

'Hinder me? Thou fool. No living man may hinder me!'

Then Merry heard of all sounds in that hour the strangest. It seemed that Dernhelm laughed.... 'But no living man am I! You look upon a woman. Éowyn I am, Éomund's daughter. You stand between me and my lord and kin. Begone, if you be not deathless! For living or dark undead, I will smite you, if you touch him.'

The winged creature screamed at her, but then the Ringwraith was silent, as if in sudden doubt. Eowyn, daughter of Théodwyn, had torn him open. His guts had fallen out.

not the one who's tryin' to dub your anime (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 11 June 2024 02:45 (two years ago)

He was naked to the Lidless Eye, and his terror was extreme.

difficult listening hour, Tuesday, 11 June 2024 08:40 (two years ago)

Hell yeah

not the one who's tryin' to dub your anime (Doctor Casino), Tuesday, 11 June 2024 13:48 (two years ago)

even the lord of the Nazgul sometimes must have to stand naked

the talented mr pimply (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 11 June 2024 13:58 (two years ago)

two months pass...

Connecting the Ukraine war to LOTR

https://open.substack.com/pub/counteroffensive/p/lord-of-the-rings-in-ukraines-war

that's not my post, Thursday, 29 August 2024 15:34 (one year ago)

three months pass...

I still really love all the stuff w Shelob, it looks so fucking great

and when Sam unwraps Frodo from the cocoon & Frodo fully looks like Lilian Gish all ghosty white with those big sunken eyes lol

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 27 December 2024 05:17 (one year ago)

http://middle-earth-history.weebly.com/uploads/2/5/1/5/25157259/5905731.jpg?720

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 27 December 2024 05:18 (one year ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.