Zero Dark Thirty - Anticipation/Discussion Thread

And as I may have mentioned, I'm ambling through that Hoberman book so this seems relevant to that.

so...am i a terrorist if I want to see this y/n

Filmcrits starved for prodigious action sequences, that's what

you've declared a jihad on taste xpost

xpost Action sequences that aren't connected with Dredd, yes.

(Armond excepted, of course.)

aw man Dredd was pretty sweet

Also, I genuinely unsure whether mentioning the truth about the raids violates a daily.paper 's guidelines about keeping "politics" out of content

Like being a college freshman again.

congrats, condescending O-bots with Aspergers usually say "child."

Everyone remember: respect for international law and expectations of due process are unseemly in anyone out of their teens; that's what Hope and Change were all about.

I figure it's best to fight condescension with condescension

To clarify: It's not your position that is childish, it's your expression of that position.

"with Aspergers"

Classy.

It's being downgraded in DSM-V so that remark isn't as offensive as it used to be

Summation of ZDTGREENWALDGATE: http://www.vulture.com/2012/12/does-zero-dark-thirty-endorse-torture.html

hopefully armond white will wait this time to find out if ZDT is loved or reviled before reviewing it, that early 'hurt locker' rave was awkwaaaard in hindsight whenever everyone else started liking it. i think it was rough on him.

When a movie like this comes so soon after the events it depicts, and when the filmmakers are utilizing non-public inside information directly given to them by the White House and the CIA, it's really hard not to look at this film in a propagandistic light.

otm

haha

xp

"the now-overrated Zero Dark Thirty"

As I said, if it's a process movie, I'm up for that. If it's flag-waving bunk, less so.

i really don't see this as a binary - a process movie from the government is flag-waving bunk

Yep

Not necessarily. I hate to fall back on the old "not what it's about but how it's about it" routine but there's ways in which this can be problematic from a political standpoint but brilliant from a filmmaking one. The same goes for badly made films with politics that I generally agree with (anyone else want to puke at the last scene in In the Valley of Elah?).

This is all silly to talk about considering a number of people (including on this board) have seen it so I'm theorizing about what it *could* be, but I generally don't like to dismiss films out of hand.

yeah it could be brilliant filmmaking, but if it's well-crafted, gripping, thoughtful, full of the grim, determined faces of our favorite characters, it's all in the service of telling the story the government wants told. This isn't a dismissal, but an acknowledgement of its origins.

ha i meant to write "favorite character actors"

As that vulture article I linked to indicated, there seems to be room for interpretation on some of these issues, but just because it depicts the US Government killing Bin Laden doesn't necessarily mean "propaganda". A lot will come down to depictions of characters as heroes or morally good or what have you. I know a number of pro-military people who loved the depiction of soldiers in The Hurt Locker, while I think they came off very, very poorly.

"propaganda" that allows for nuance, consideration, grudging acceptance, disagreement, etc is still propaganda if the mission is to provide the narrative

I can't speak for others but I have grown less...patient with movies that elide or obscure the deaths of real people for the same of suspense and A Good Time. To put it another way, why would Bigelow change the truth -- already gripping enough -- if she wasn't interested in giving the audience a.doseof electrical shockers? It's porn.

I think there's some room between Born on the Fourth of July and Triumph of the Will. xpost

Alfred sounding like Haneke, which is not an unworthy position.

The propaganda angle is the main reason I even want to watch this movie tbh

no one's saying there isn't room, and obviously one could say "well if Zero Dark Thirty is in poor taste for providing a streamlined, cinematic This Is What Had To Be Done narrative in support of the government, then so is Lincoln." It's a matter of degree, and when those in power are still in power, and letting us know they've given their tacit approval to the movie, one has to assume it doesn't include anything they're not comfortable with.

the administration benefits from this movie being as gripping, issue-acknowledging intelligence-respecting as possible - it suggests they were aware of the issues and a bunch of Friday Night Lights coaches when they made the choices shown in the film. if it was just USA! USA! they wouldn't get as many people to accept their pov

I thought Haneke relished porn

I guess the trick here is to not be a dumb viewer.

I know a number of pro-military people who loved the depiction of soldiers in The Hurt Locker, while I think they came off very, very poorly.

Thought THL unambiguously portrayed Jeremy R's character as an adrenaline addict, not someone who is glad for war but someone who nonetheless finds a reason for being because of it.

Haneke talked about depicting real life people and situations in an extended interview with the Hollywood Reporter alongside the guys who wrote ZDT and Argo (as well John Krasinski and Judd Apatow). Haneke was disgusted by Downfall and in particular Schindler's List (using the mystery over what would come out of the shower for suspense was beyond the pale). xposts

to be clear, i'm not saying this is evil, or that people who enjoy the movie are sheep. you can like mulholland dr but if you tell me it's a masterpiece of dream logic i'm going to point out that it was a TV pilot with an "all a dream" ending attached by request of the producers for cinematic release. but if you think this isn't inherently a propaganda film meant to instill a respect for american foreign policy, you're kidding yourself.

The fact that Boal and Bigelow acknowledge that torture was *not* instrumental in catching bin Laden, but they put it in the movie anyway, is troubling.

I did too, Eric, but my sister among many others saw it as a beautiful ode to bravery and sacrifice. xposts

I guess the trick here is to not be a dumb viewer.

Always a tricky balance when dumb action is thrown into the mix, but then again, some don't know how to trust anything in movies other than tedium.

Honestly I'm interested to figure out what the hell the story is, and how there's action in it.

I did too, Eric, but my sister among many others saw it as a beautiful ode to bravery and sacrifice. xposts

I don't think that showing how soldiers can be suckered/seduced/hypnotized/brainwashed into suckling from their own mythos = them coming off very, very poorly

They're not portrayed as victims, just victims of circumstance. Win-win.

amidst all of this, i'm kind of bummed that Generation Kill seems largely forgotten.

Hoberman may also have said the same about Schindler

i was bothered by that scene too, though i think SL is (mostly) a great film.

Haneke talked about depicting real life people and situations in an extended interview with the Hollywood Reporter alongside the guys who wrote ZDT and Argo

yeah i really enjoyed that

Mr Haneke engineers some dubious moral puppeteering in his films too, in the name of spanking the audience.

yeah but they look at the audience and tell them so that makes it better (no it doesn't)

Audiences should be on their guard when they feel flattered. Audiences should be on their guard when they're getting spanked.

What a minefield.

There’s definitely a pre and post prestige Bigelow shift beginning with Hurt Locker. I liked that and ZDT both but kind of wish she’d back to being an advanced genre stylist.

I always kinda hated Strange Days. it's so relentlessly humorless and sadistic and bleak in that tired 90s way. Verhoeven would have had some fun with it.