food issue seems ok so far, i think i am tired of the new yorker doing the whole hmmm there is a trendy restaurant out in los angeles now how fascinating thing
― Author ~ Coach ~ Goddess (s1ocki), Sunday, 9 December 2012 07:06 (thirteen years ago)
Football radio guy piece I guess pointless but very entertaining. Homeless runaway teen story is extremely well written.
Food issue I thought was a let down, but I did like the underground dining piece, if only for the way it casually drops the fact that the subject was the personal chef for Nicolas Cage and his family for two years, which immediately made me go, what? I want to read a story about THAT.
― Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 9 December 2012 14:37 (thirteen years ago)
i dont really tbh
― Author ~ Coach ~ Goddess (s1ocki), Sunday, 9 December 2012 15:10 (thirteen years ago)
Anyone read any of the books by the guy who wrote the Mao review?
― Tomb Of Spatula (Jon Lewis), Sunday, 9 December 2012 17:07 (thirteen years ago)
get dexter filkins to write it, considering the ramificationsxp
― ~bacon trailblazer~ (schlump), Sunday, 9 December 2012 17:14 (thirteen years ago)
xp nah but he had a great back & forth with niall fergusson in the london review of books after writing a harsh (but otm) review of his most recent book basically calling him racist & then laughing off nf's responses with quotes of him saying super racist shit. i recommend it
― flopson, Sunday, 9 December 2012 20:56 (thirteen years ago)
btw since my friend giving me a free subscription to lrb (and the same friend passing me old copies of nyrb) i am totally becoming tom townsend from metropolitan, like i could even tell you about the review of pankaj mishra's newest book
― flopson, Sunday, 9 December 2012 20:58 (thirteen years ago)
whole thing is here: http://www.lrb.co.uk/v33/n21/pankaj-mishra/watch-this-man
― flopson, Sunday, 9 December 2012 20:59 (thirteen years ago)
Got a notice in the mail saying that my sub will automatically renew at the low-low price of $60.00 next year. WTF? I know that per issue that's a great deal, but damn, I think my introductory offer was something like $40 for two years.
― I was in this prematureleee air-conditioned supermarket (Leee), Monday, 10 December 2012 00:30 (thirteen years ago)
that's an amazing deal imo (I'm paying about the same for a digital subscription)
― 炒面kampf (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 10 December 2012 00:55 (thirteen years ago)
You mean the 1 year @ $60?
― I was in this prematureleee air-conditioned supermarket (Leee), Monday, 10 December 2012 01:13 (thirteen years ago)
I recently let my New Yorker sub lapse because at the rate they came I barely had time to read anything else. The LRB is better in that regard.
― Zelda Zonk, Monday, 10 December 2012 01:18 (thirteen years ago)
― 炒面kampf (Autumn Almanac), Sunday, 9 December 2012 20:55 (28 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
yeah otm, there is literally nothing in my life that is as good value-for-money as the nyer. cheap at twice the price &c.
― what is google (schlump), Monday, 10 December 2012 01:25 (thirteen years ago)
yep
― 炒面kampf (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 10 December 2012 03:19 (thirteen years ago)
fwiw I combine it with itms gift card discounts, so it's closer to us$50
― 炒面kampf (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 10 December 2012 03:22 (thirteen years ago)
Man, it's not just that the New Yorker is a weekly, it's that it's a weekly with a significant, huge number of beautifully written, interesting and informative pieces nearly every single weekthat often take months to get around to. $60 is a bargain.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 10 December 2012 03:45 (thirteen years ago)
/spoiled
― I was in this prematureleee air-conditioned supermarket (Leee), Monday, 10 December 2012 04:45 (thirteen years ago)
one advantage of the digital subscription is that this week's edition is available exactly right now
― 炒面kampf (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 10 December 2012 05:00 (thirteen years ago)
my print subscription lapsed months ago but i can still access the digital edition iirc
― ❏❐❑❒ (gr8080), Monday, 10 December 2012 05:03 (thirteen years ago)
my subscription is up in a month, planning to go digital-only at that point. It just works really well on the Nook for me.
― Tomb Of Spatula (Jon Lewis), Monday, 10 December 2012 16:00 (thirteen years ago)
I paid $29.99, I think, a few weeks ago. Educator's discount?
― the little prince of inane false binary hype (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 10 December 2012 16:14 (thirteen years ago)
Isn't digital only just a little bit less than the magazine, which also gives you digital?
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 10 December 2012 17:05 (thirteen years ago)
i somehow got a $25 "professional discount" in 07
― ❏❐❑❒ (gr8080), Monday, 10 December 2012 17:06 (thirteen years ago)
xpost yes. It's really a tiny NYC apartment problem. The physical pile-up.
― Tomb Of Spatula (Jon Lewis), Monday, 10 December 2012 17:12 (thirteen years ago)
and an international subscription problem (us$112/yr for the print edition)
― 炒面kampf (Autumn Almanac), Monday, 10 December 2012 19:49 (thirteen years ago)
runaways piece is just arresting; making me look around more openly and less jaded at kids i see on the street
― THE NATIONS YOUTH DANCED TO THE MACARANA (innocent) (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 01:12 (thirteen years ago)
On the plus side, this week's issue has a fantastic piece about a guy who tested chemical weapons on military personnel. Pretty nuts.
On the minus side, it has one of the worst Shouts & Murmurs in recent history, and it's four times longer than normal too.
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 03:04 (thirteen years ago)
Why do you torture yourself by reading S&M?
― I was in this prematureleee air-conditioned supermarket (Leee), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 03:19 (thirteen years ago)
I only actually read a tiny bit of it but the shtick was so dreadful that I had to mention it.
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 03:27 (thirteen years ago)
I have laughed at Shouts and Murmurs at least one time
― wongo hulkington's jade palace late night buffet (silby), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 03:28 (thirteen years ago)
I'm such a glutton for punishment that I always read the S&M in the hopes that, oh yeah, THIS week will be the funny one.
― HAPPY BDAY TOOTS (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 03:46 (thirteen years ago)
http://i50.tinypic.com/5z4ftj.jpg
― dexpresso (Z S), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 03:54 (thirteen years ago)
needs the statue of liberty weeping
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 03:56 (thirteen years ago)
it doesn't matter who holds the football - woody allen, jack handey, steve martin, david sedaris, bob odenkirk - they all fuck you in the end
― dexpresso (Z S), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 04:03 (thirteen years ago)
wait does that mean Lucy was into pegging
― wongo hulkington's jade palace late night buffet (silby), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 04:17 (thirteen years ago)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/27/Peppermint_Patty.jpg
― THE NATIONS YOUTH DANCED TO THE MACARANA (innocent) (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 05:12 (thirteen years ago)
I don't read the New Yorker so idk but can anyone tell me anything about Margaret Talbot?
― jawn valjawn (Stevie D(eux)), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 05:59 (thirteen years ago)
Haven't read shouts and murmurs this week, but too bad for Simon rich, a previous ILX favorite.
― Sax Blatterday (jaymc), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 06:10 (thirteen years ago)
chemical warfare guy article is super-disturbing so far
but also haha:
He was known for his affectations, including a pink convertible—which he drove with the top down, rain or shine—and a silver-tipped swagger stick made of a human fibula. A master parachutist, he sometimes jumped out a second-floor window after lunch.
― dell (del), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 13:54 (thirteen years ago)
The most interesting man in the world.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 14:56 (thirteen years ago)
yes that quote jumped out at me too. it's a disturbing article but full of weird characters too.
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 17:09 (thirteen years ago)
https://subscribe.newyorker.com/subscribe/newyorker/76255?source=NYR_global_rightRail_Ajust re: all the subscription talk, i'd bite
― what is google (schlump), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 18:23 (thirteen years ago)
The pretty run of the mill Trent Reznor profile was like listening to someone trying to awkwardly teach a new language to millions of people who already speak it.
"And instead of guitars, he used synthesizers and other electronic instruments, which when pressed produced all manner of sound. Sometimes, Reznor invoked a technique known to fans of industrial music as 'potty mouth.' Oh, you guys already know that? Hrm. Well, he was also in Nine Inch Nails, a popular rock and roll act. Oh, you knew that, too? Blast. Did you know he is full of rage? You did? Hrm. Did I mention the synthesizers?"
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 11 December 2012 22:49 (thirteen years ago)
hey did you guys read that new Kent Razorblade profile in the new yorker? apparently he's using the internet to distribute music
― dexpresso (Z S), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 22:59 (thirteen years ago)
Air Conditioning Scion Invents 'Musical' Computer
― the clown's reflection is incorrect (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 23:09 (thirteen years ago)
I love his work on the popular electronic divertissement "Quaken"
― THE NATIONS YOUTH DANCED TO THE MACARANA (innocent) (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 11 December 2012 23:22 (thirteen years ago)
chemical warfare piece is freaking me the fuck out
― 乒乓, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 15:04 (thirteen years ago)
Nussbaum strikes again: her piece ostensibly on "The Hour" mentions no less than 22 other TV shows, many unrelated. Has she ever written an essay that is not a glorified list?
― Josh in Chicago, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 15:24 (thirteen years ago)
i like nussbaum
― max, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 16:09 (thirteen years ago)
her name means 'nut tree' doesn't it?
― the clown's reflection is incorrect (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 12 December 2012 16:44 (thirteen years ago)