Rolling US Economy Into The Shitbin Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (10701 of them)

Dems' perfidy knows no end, and Krugman says why:

the Democrats appear to have buckled in the face of the Bush administration’s ideological rigidity, dropping demands for provisions that would have helped those most in need. And those happen to be the same provisions that might actually have made the stimulus plan effective.

...the plan gives each worker making less than $75,000 a $300 check, plus additional amounts to people who make enough to pay substantial sums in income tax. This ensures that the bulk of the money would go to people who are doing O.K. financially — which misses the whole point.
...If the money the government lays out doesn’t get spent — if it just gets added to people’s bank accounts or used to pay off debts — the plan will have failed.

...The words of Franklin Delano Roosevelt come to mind: “We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics.”

And the worst of it is that the Democrats, who should have been in a strong position — does this administration have any credibility left on economic policy? — appear to have caved in almost completely.

Yes, they extracted some concessions, increasing rebates for people with low income while reducing giveaways to the affluent. But basically they allowed themselves to be bullied into doing things the Bush administration’s way.

Dr Morbius, Friday, 25 January 2008 14:59 (eighteen years ago)

i'm 100% in agreement with you on this one, morbius. that the dems signed off on this "stimulus" bill is disgraceful on a number of levels.

Eisbaer, Friday, 25 January 2008 15:14 (eighteen years ago)

http://media.townhall.com/Townhall/Car/b/ca0123cd.jpg

kingfish, Friday, 25 January 2008 15:43 (eighteen years ago)

i imagine the republicans said "fine, if you won't budge we won't pass the bill - how will your constituents like that?" to which the democrats said "yeah well what about YOUR constituents??" to which the republicans said "we've convinced them they can't count on the govt for anything so why should we even care"

Tracer Hand, Friday, 25 January 2008 15:52 (eighteen years ago)

re that cartoon i cannot wait until these bizarre antigovernment zealots are exposed for the toadying, complacent elites that they are

Tracer Hand, Friday, 25 January 2008 15:54 (eighteen years ago)

Chuck Asay makes me want to throw up my hands and say fuck it.

"Hail, holy Ass!" the quiring angels sing;

"Priest of Unreason, and of Discords King!" Great co-Creator, let Thy glory shine: God made all else, the Mule, the Mule is thine!"

--Ambrose Bierce

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Friday, 25 January 2008 16:00 (eighteen years ago)

http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/images/2008/01/23/wheres_the_bottom.png

El Tomboto, Saturday, 26 January 2008 01:38 (eighteen years ago)

they should issue the rebates as visa gift cards, in which case people would have to spend them.

not actually kidding.

John Justen, Saturday, 26 January 2008 01:41 (eighteen years ago)

Where's the bottom? As in my aunt Fanny?

Aimless, Saturday, 26 January 2008 01:42 (eighteen years ago)

Haha, I can clearly hear the six different variations on meaningless bullshit coming out of that CNBC screen

Hurting 2, Saturday, 26 January 2008 18:30 (eighteen years ago)

today bernanke injected more crack into the system ...

http://mechapixel.com/slags/329/2285EyAN.jpg

Eisbaer, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 19:55 (eighteen years ago)

is that would just happened up there at the 2pm mark? I was getting actual work done

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:02 (eighteen years ago)

ritholtz called it at 10 am

El Tomboto, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:04 (eighteen years ago)

don't see why you don't stay a little longer

Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:17 (eighteen years ago)

so we get our stimulus checks by what, August? I NEED NOW

Dr Morbius, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:21 (eighteen years ago)

Instead of taking a stand and recognizing the serious errors made in this little economic situation, once again it's ... easy solutions that'll lead to the same problems again.

Who are these people running our country? Man alive.

burt_stanton, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:27 (eighteen years ago)

And down it goes....

Eazy, Wednesday, 30 January 2008 20:46 (eighteen years ago)

So money is basically free now.

Hurting 2, Thursday, 31 January 2008 01:00 (eighteen years ago)

This intraday and day-to-day volatility in stocks is just INSANE. Makes 1999 look stable.

wanko ergo sum, Thursday, 31 January 2008 01:26 (eighteen years ago)

My totally inexpert guess is that you're seeing push/pull between fear of recession and people thinking "gee, this is a great buy-in point" (who are presumably also ignoring/downplaying the fear). I'd also bet you'd see a similar pattern right before past recessions.

Hurting 2, Thursday, 31 January 2008 01:47 (eighteen years ago)

Hello everyone when is the next cut?

laxalt, Thursday, 31 January 2008 03:08 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/28b464a2-cf50-11dc-854a-0000779fd2ac.html

The US should face its need for adjustment with courage and reason, not fear. It should stop behaving as the whiner of first resort, ready to waste all its dry powder on a short-sighted attempt to prevent a 2008 recession. Many poorer countries with weaker markets and institutions have survived and benefited from an adjustment that involves a year of negative growth. Faster bank recapitalisation, fiscal investment stimulus and international co-ordination should be first on the ­policy agenda.

webber, Thursday, 31 January 2008 03:53 (eighteen years ago)

OTM--the U.S. seems to've got itself locked into a boom-bust cycle again through short sighted monetary policy.

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, Thursday, 31 January 2008 07:29 (eighteen years ago)

My totally inexpert guess is that you're seeing push/pull between fear of recession and people thinking "gee, this is a great buy-in point" (who are presumably also ignoring/downplaying the fear). I'd also bet you'd see a similar pattern right before past recessions in the history of capitalism, cause that's what capitalism is.

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, Thursday, 31 January 2008 07:31 (eighteen years ago)

boom-bust cycles as we know them today are around 300 years old

laxalt, Thursday, 31 January 2008 10:01 (eighteen years ago)

the graph at the top of this thread was a brilliant move

Tracer Hand, Thursday, 31 January 2008 17:38 (eighteen years ago)

I'd also bet you'd see a similar pattern right before past recessions in the history of capitalism, cause that's what capitalism is.

I mean the unusual volatility of the market right now. I mean I'd guess that before recessions you tend to see big ups and downs with an overall downward trend, the greater downward force being fear of recession and the lesser upward force being denial

Hurting 2, Thursday, 31 January 2008 23:22 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h3/Current/

can anyone explain why the 'reserves of non-borrowed reserves' rapidly went into negative territory in January? Am i misreading this? How can reserves be negative??

laxalt, Thursday, 7 February 2008 10:14 (eighteen years ago)

So I couldn't find any other thread to put this in but surely this is the kind of thing to make Tombot point and laugh. Favorite part:

After a month of heartbreak and frustration, I finally decided to suck it up and ask my contacts for assistance. They tried, but to no avail. I then asked my White House intern friends for help, but since I had changed political sides after my internship, they were not willing to help me.

From a Dartmouth grad, ladies and gentlemen.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 9 February 2008 18:26 (eighteen years ago)

"Euros Accepted" signs in NYC

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN0655798320080206

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Saturday, 9 February 2008 18:30 (eighteen years ago)

Talking about retail on CNN: "...worst January in forty years."

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN0655798320080206

Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Saturday, 9 February 2008 18:37 (eighteen years ago)

I scored a temporary job long enough to pay my phone bill.

articles like that always leave a lot to the imagination.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Saturday, 9 February 2008 18:38 (eighteen years ago)

It's a little hard for me to believe that int'l relations-related entry level jobs would suffer that significantly from the current economic downturn, at least so soon. More likely it's just a highly competitive field - low demand, lots of highly educated people wanting to do it.

Hurting 2, Saturday, 9 February 2008 19:34 (eighteen years ago)

"If I can't even find a job the economy must be really bad"

Hurting 2, Saturday, 9 February 2008 21:07 (eighteen years ago)

actually I would say underemployment around here is hitting pretty much every stripe and maybe even my crowd (the cleared people) - I'm on a program that's going nowhere but up, but I keep hearing from everybody else that they're worried/looking around

El Tomboto, Saturday, 9 February 2008 21:16 (eighteen years ago)

When you wet, it's slippery (yeah)
When it damp, it crampin
If you slidin', you're tumblin' down
Don't want you on the ground!

I am kind of amazed I still have a job, especially since I work for a real estate company. At least once a day I take a minute to count my blessings. Then I count again to make sure that my blessings will still cover my rent.

kenan, Saturday, 9 February 2008 21:21 (eighteen years ago)

I do my best not to take my job for granted, that's for sure.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 9 February 2008 21:23 (eighteen years ago)

xxpost - even if that's true, I don't think that article is representative. Although she was a fulbright scholar and all that, underneath it just sounds like the same "I just got out of college and life isn't as easy as I thought," article I've been reading every year for as long as I can remember.

Hurting 2, Sunday, 10 February 2008 04:31 (eighteen years ago)

that said, of course, I'm REALLY lucky to have my job (I'm no Fulbright scholar), and really glad to be going back to school next year.

Hurting 2, Sunday, 10 February 2008 04:32 (eighteen years ago)

laxalt, somebody pointed me toward this link today, about "non-borrowed reserves".. i can't say i understand it though -

http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2008/02/borrowed-reserves-and-tin-foil-hats.html

Tracer Hand, Monday, 11 February 2008 17:51 (eighteen years ago)

Well, I guess we are going to find out sooner or later whether negative non-borrowed reserves are as bad a thing as they would appear to be!

It would be interesting to see what the equivalent figures in the UK and Euro would be (and is that Iceland sailing into the same murky waters?)

laxalt, Monday, 11 February 2008 18:11 (eighteen years ago)

that chick must be doing something wrong--my school has a big I.R. program and isnt anywhere near as good as dartmouth and large portions of its graduates get jobs pretty easily w/ the govt and NGOs

max, Monday, 11 February 2008 18:14 (eighteen years ago)

After a month of heartbreak and frustration, I finally decided to suck it up and ask my contacts for assistance.

ok someone who doesnt use any connections theyre lucky enough to have as an opening strategy is prob just a retard or rich enough that they have the luxury to prove it to themselves and the world that they can make it on their own

jhøshea, Monday, 11 February 2008 18:19 (eighteen years ago)

i mean do they not teach you this shit in college?

jhøshea, Monday, 11 February 2008 18:23 (eighteen years ago)

my friend went to Dartmouth--she just has to breath and she has jobs thrown at her in NYC. I went to a shitty state college ... took about 7 months to find anything, with 90% of the interviews starting with, "so, where did you go to school?... really?" and ending with, "you really don't like Perec?"

aka, people who don't use their school connections are dinguses.

burt_stanton, Monday, 11 February 2008 18:57 (eighteen years ago)

weren't you not going to post here anymore or something?

bell_labs, Monday, 11 February 2008 19:00 (eighteen years ago)

I don't think you "get it"

burt_stanton, Monday, 11 February 2008 19:03 (eighteen years ago)

(tips a wink at burt, who covertly signals thumbs up)

Aimless, Monday, 11 February 2008 19:07 (eighteen years ago)

Aw, you're in love.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 11 February 2008 19:08 (eighteen years ago)

In love with life, Ned. With life!

Aimless, Monday, 11 February 2008 19:11 (eighteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.