I am beginning to become scared that Romney/Ryan will win. Can smart people please post here and say reassuring things to convince me that he won't?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2289 of them)

that gels with everything i've been hearing the last 20 years about there not being enough information

down w/ obana...he is the reson were in dept (Z S), Friday, 19 October 2012 04:47 (thirteen years ago)

bespeaks an electorate mostly overworked, overstimulated, + alienated from meaningful civic/political performance i think

Mordy, Friday, 19 October 2012 04:49 (thirteen years ago)

the fact that due to the electoral college only 10 states get to really participate doesn't help either

johnathan lee riche$ (mayor jingleberries), Friday, 19 October 2012 05:23 (thirteen years ago)

http://www.trbimg.com/img-5080dda5/turbine/la-154360434.jpg-20121018/600

buzza, Friday, 19 October 2012 05:49 (thirteen years ago)

As an American, I resent the idea of government forcing me to learn about government in one of their government-run education centers. Liberty from learning is the greatest liberty of all. You can pry my willful ignorance from my cold, dead hands!

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 19 October 2012 11:40 (thirteen years ago)

Bet those two jowlies sitting behind the Three Stooges have had same seats at the Smith dinner for 50 years.

cancer, kizz my hairy irish azz (Dr Morbius), Friday, 19 October 2012 11:46 (thirteen years ago)

matt stoller said the high debate ratings reflected an electorate starved of info, watchu think abt that

― zvookster, Thursday, October 18, 2012 11:43 PM (7 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

that gels with everything i've been hearing the last 20 years about there not being enough information

― down w/ obana...he is the reson were in dept (Z S), Thursday, October 18, 2012 11:47 PM (7 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

bespeaks an electorate mostly overworked, overstimulated, + alienated from meaningful civic/political performance i think

― Mordy, Thursday, October 18, 2012 11:49 PM (7 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

most people who watch are just partisans watching it like a sports game.

for the low info people it's like reading the election sparknotes the day before the test.

iatee, Friday, 19 October 2012 12:00 (thirteen years ago)

but the legit low info people watch american idol instead and wait for the aol news homepage to tell them who won

iatee, Friday, 19 October 2012 12:04 (thirteen years ago)

Silver's post about Gallup polling is really interesting. Huge samples but a regular source of zany swings (something like 26pts over a few weeks during the summer of Bush/Gore? Wildly overestimated Obama's winning margin in '08 and GOP's Congressional gains in '10) and no real explanation why. So he's not weighting it very heavily in this latest update. Which is good cos on its own it's basically MOVE TO CANADA, FRIENDS.

Michael Jones, Friday, 19 October 2012 12:10 (thirteen years ago)

but if we moved to Canada clemenza would still worry about polls ;)

the ones that I'm near most: fellow outcasts and ilxors (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 19 October 2012 13:03 (thirteen years ago)

Imagine having to become a blue jays fan.

one bad call from barely losing (Nicole), Friday, 19 October 2012 13:13 (thirteen years ago)

Pure suffering.

One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF), Friday, 19 October 2012 13:55 (thirteen years ago)

Feel like this election has crossed some sort of final threshold where now even polls are explicitly politicized and mistrusted (and that's always seemed to me to be the big effect of partisanship: a sort of fundamental defensiveness against information that doesn't conform to your ideology. It's putting some real sense of yourself at stake in political outcomes.)

ryan, Friday, 19 October 2012 13:55 (thirteen years ago)

on one hand, yeah, having so many polls has made me aware of how one's skepticism is related to how much an outcome relates to what one wants to be true. on the other, having so many polls (and poll analysts) has made clear just how arbitrary and questionable the methods behind them can be.

da croupier, Friday, 19 October 2012 14:00 (thirteen years ago)

but if we moved to Canada clemenza would still worry about polls ;)
― the ones that I'm near most: fellow outcasts and ilxors (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn)

Imagine having to become a blue jays fan.
― one bad call from barely losing (Nicole)

Pure suffering.
― One bad call from barely losing to (Alex in SF)

Ambiguous sequence...well played, Alex; well played.

clemenza, Friday, 19 October 2012 14:02 (thirteen years ago)

Can someone explain why Romney would even atend a Smith dinner? I can't say that Smith and Romney were exactly on the same page.

The windiest militant trash (Michael White), Friday, 19 October 2012 14:33 (thirteen years ago)

Both candidates always go, every election.

cancer, kizz my hairy irish azz (Dr Morbius), Friday, 19 October 2012 14:34 (thirteen years ago)

It has escaped my radar. What's the significance of it?

The windiest militant trash (Michael White), Friday, 19 October 2012 14:36 (thirteen years ago)

An excuse to show the world that candidates can get on.

the ones that I'm near most: fellow outcasts and ilxors (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 19 October 2012 14:38 (thirteen years ago)

Kissing the ring of NY Catholic power, that's pretty much it. Arguably less relevant now, but old habits die hard.

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1185943.1350512545!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/gallery_635/john-f-kennedy-richard-nixon-alfred-e-smith-memorial-dinner-1960.jpg

cancer, kizz my hairy irish azz (Dr Morbius), Friday, 19 October 2012 14:39 (thirteen years ago)

Franny Cardinal Spellman above, bomb-blesser and boy-toucher.

cancer, kizz my hairy irish azz (Dr Morbius), Friday, 19 October 2012 14:40 (thirteen years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/CwrwT.png

so eeeeevil

--bob marley (lag∞n), Friday, 19 October 2012 14:41 (thirteen years ago)

seriously, hope that fucker goes to jail for awhile

beef richards (Mr. Que), Friday, 19 October 2012 14:56 (thirteen years ago)

for the haircut alone.

the ones that I'm near most: fellow outcasts and ilxors (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 19 October 2012 15:07 (thirteen years ago)

Measuring-the-drapes dept:

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/ap-romney-transition-team-working-on-fiscal-cliff

I'm sure I won't be the only one to find it galling if Romney wins and is able to glide past negotiations that would have been a major ordeal for Obama--not because he's a bipartisan guy who knows how to "bring people together," but because, you know, he's not Barack Obama. I have a feeling, though, that this is part of the recent movement towards Romney: a recognition that he will have an easier time with such things.

clemenza, Friday, 19 October 2012 15:37 (thirteen years ago)

i love that this dude is charged with tossing 8 forms in a dumpster, but takes a mug shot like we're going to all know his middle name soon

da croupier, Friday, 19 October 2012 15:46 (thirteen years ago)

x-post to Clemenza

Plus the Repubs in Congress will be more ruthless and show more backbone and unity than the Dems tent of libs, centrists,& blue-dogs. The latter may not fight the uh power if Romney wins, they filibustering Repubs have for 4 years.

curmudgeon, Friday, 19 October 2012 15:49 (thirteen years ago)

the way that fibustering Repubs have

curmudgeon, Friday, 19 October 2012 15:50 (thirteen years ago)

someday I will proofread

curmudgeon, Friday, 19 October 2012 15:50 (thirteen years ago)

Yeah, I thought about that after I posted--Democrats will be much more accomodating (i.e., spineless or responsible, depending upon your viewpoint).

clemenza, Friday, 19 October 2012 15:50 (thirteen years ago)

Haven't yall been watching the debates? Republicans are the only party that wants to work in a bipartisan fashion! j/k

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 19 October 2012 15:52 (thirteen years ago)

Kind of curious about the claims of the republicans keeping it together in their big tent - I know it's one of their superpowers, but it's getting pretty crazy in there. What would happen if Pres. Romney comes to them with talk of raising the debt ceiling?

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 19 October 2012 16:11 (thirteen years ago)

republicans don't have a big tent ideologically anymore but they're always pretty keynesian when they run things

iatee, Friday, 19 October 2012 16:13 (thirteen years ago)

also

Nate Silver ‏@fivethirtyeight

National polls published in past 24 hours: Obama +3.2, Obama +3, Obama +3, Obama +1, Obama +0.6, Obama +0.5, TIE, Romney +7.
Expand

iatee, Friday, 19 October 2012 16:15 (thirteen years ago)

Josh Robin ‏@joshrobin
Obama has a new zinger: says his "flip-flopping" opponent has "Romnesia."

Talking Points Memo ‏@TPM
Obama: Mitt has "Romnesia" http://tpm.ly/OOBjDh

NEW ZING ALERT

--bob marley (lag∞n), Friday, 19 October 2012 16:15 (thirteen years ago)

literal back2back tweets^

--bob marley (lag∞n), Friday, 19 October 2012 16:15 (thirteen years ago)

there should be zing think tanks that come up w/ these things

iatee, Friday, 19 October 2012 16:16 (thirteen years ago)

dream job

--bob marley (lag∞n), Friday, 19 October 2012 16:16 (thirteen years ago)

zink tanks

iatee, Friday, 19 October 2012 16:17 (thirteen years ago)

Man, tying it all up in a taut catchphrase will do the work of ten debate wins wrt a lot of the electorate.

Burgled Hams (Old Lunch), Friday, 19 October 2012 16:17 (thirteen years ago)

zing thanks

--bob marley (lag∞n), Friday, 19 October 2012 16:17 (thirteen years ago)

Man, tying it all up in a taut catchphrase will do the work of ten debate wins wrt a lot of the electorate.

according to the model at the american zing institute it has the potential to do the work of 2.3 +/- debate wins

iatee, Friday, 19 October 2012 16:18 (thirteen years ago)

the dream job belongs to david taintor (tpm)

it appears that all he does is cover what stewart and colbert said last night and expand on tweets to make them full sentences that can be published on TPM as breaking news.
AND his name is david taintor

down w/ obana...he is the reson were in dept (Z S), Friday, 19 October 2012 16:30 (thirteen years ago)

romnesia? p sure thats called zingbabwe now

--bob marley (lag∞n), Friday, 19 October 2012 16:38 (thirteen years ago)

bump for anxiety

Mordy, Wednesday, 24 October 2012 13:15 (thirteen years ago)

this thred doesn't do much to quell anxiety

Grimy Little Pimp (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 24 October 2012 13:47 (thirteen years ago)

O has been dropping like a stOne over at intrade

http://www.intrade.com/v4/markets/contract/?contractId=743474

though he's up a bit at the moment

reggie (qualmsley), Wednesday, 24 October 2012 13:51 (thirteen years ago)

Watched a few minutes of gloating Joe Scarborough on Morning Joe offering his cliched conservative rhetoric and talking to Chuck Todd about state polling. One of the good things that will occur if Obama wins, is that Joe and his not always helpful co-host Mika Brzezinski, will have to for a day or 3, at least, be defensive.

curmudgeon, Wednesday, 24 October 2012 13:52 (thirteen years ago)

I posted some stuff on that on other threads. I am convinced this is a campaign stunt – or at least one rich dude w/ an agenda. If you are in Europe where it’s easy to get money on intrade you should buy some bamstock. At the very least it will go up before election day and you can sell it then.

xp

iatee, Wednesday, 24 October 2012 13:53 (thirteen years ago)

Adelsons and Koch Bros gaming InTrade? Who knew?

ella fingerblast hurls forever (suzy), Wednesday, 24 October 2012 13:55 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.