yeah i don't really buy the 'gawker is just as sketchy' argument, call me back when gawker has forums encouraging insecure college-age girls to post naked pics of themselves for internet karma points
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 17:00 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.reddit.com/r/gonewildrequests/comments/101khq/rbuttsharpies_needs_new_life_gwers_of_the_world/
― let's have sex and then throw pottery (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 17:00 (thirteen years ago)
I don't know why buttsharpies is as awesome is it is, I just know that it's damn sexy!
― let's have sex and then throw pottery (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 17:01 (thirteen years ago)
Nick Denton actually spends part of his time making sure Max and company don't post child porn and delete the posts where they do
― ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 17:01 (thirteen years ago)
funny i kept thinking there was a usenet joke to be made about this being a fight b/n alt.binaries.nude.celebrities and alt.photography.creepshots
― bnw, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 17:01 (thirteen years ago)
no usenet humor allowed
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 17:02 (thirteen years ago)
meow
― The Owls of Ja Rule (DJP), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 17:03 (thirteen years ago)
alt.barney.dinosaur.die.die.die
― Mordy, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 17:03 (thirteen years ago)
usenet was more fruitful than reddit for non-creepy strange forums
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 17:04 (thirteen years ago)
gawker too!
― let's have sex and then throw pottery (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 17:05 (thirteen years ago)
bet that creeping on celebs takes up more of gawker then creepshots to reddit.
― bnw, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 17:09 (thirteen years ago)
(not that it proves anything, just sayin')
very useful comparison
― 乒乓, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 17:09 (thirteen years ago)
i had never seen this video before some blog linked to it this week
http://www.youtube.com/v/2-avakrRUaU&fs=1&hl=en
― Mordy, Wednesday, October 17, 2012 12:50 PM (56 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
yeah me either until yesterday, kind of a complete sleazeball
― jon and kate catch h8 (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 17:56 (thirteen years ago)
i mean the 2 big differences btw reddit creepshots and gawker publishing celeb sex tapes that seem to get lost on reddit are 1) the distinction between public figures & private citizens (or generally between "news" and "not news") and 2) gawker writers publish this stuff under their irl names
distinction 1 is "real" but arguable i guess, theres a legal distinction and it seems to have been more or less settled in the court of public opinion anyway
distinction 2 strikes me as more important and yet even more ignored
― max, Wednesday, October 17, 2012 12:09 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
what is the legal distinction? i seriously don't know
― jon and kate catch h8 (k3vin k.), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:02 (thirteen years ago)
w/r/t to libel and slander lawsuits, if the plaintiff is a 'public figure' they have to prove actual malice
irl lawyers feel free to correct me if im wrong
― max, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:06 (thirteen years ago)
so do the sex tape people involved have to know they are being filmed at the time for it to be okay to subsequently 'broadcast' or not?
― pandemic, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:30 (thirteen years ago)
max are you a 'public figure'?
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:32 (thirteen years ago)
If 'this is legal' is Reddit's main defense in standing up against DOXers, then surely it can be a defense for Gawker who doesn't seem to appear to be doing anything illegal either.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:33 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah, but they don't know who any of the people in their pictures are. They're anonymous people without thoughts and feelings and jobs, not like their moderator.
― ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:36 (thirteen years ago)
yeah like I said the whole 'legal/illegal' part is a huge strawman
― 乒乓, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:36 (thirteen years ago)
doesn't gawker media own reddit or something? or at least have investors in common?
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:37 (thirteen years ago)
No, you're thinking of Digg.
― ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:40 (thirteen years ago)
that would explain a rivalry...
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:42 (thirteen years ago)
I'm just spreading misinformation, there's no commonality
― ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:42 (thirteen years ago)
there's got to be some commonality -- everyone owns everyone else to some degree.
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:44 (thirteen years ago)
yeah... no, not really
― ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:44 (thirteen years ago)
bigger than Obama
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/z1iiy/i_am_blogger_max_read_ama/
― sanskrit, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:50 (thirteen years ago)
TmZ exclusive: secretive Reddit owner Eustace Tilley Reddit revealed to also be Gawker owner Eustace Tilley Gawker III by citizen journalists who noticed the similar names.
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:50 (thirteen years ago)
how come there isnt a gawker subreddit
― --bob marley (lag∞n), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:53 (thirteen years ago)
i have facebook shots of max r3ad if anyone wants to share hit me up on email. me too.
― bnw, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:54 (thirteen years ago)
i have pix of m-x r--d drinking in college
― --bob marley (lag∞n), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:54 (thirteen years ago)
Big fan of the FFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUU concept and subreddit.
― let's have sex and then throw pottery (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:55 (thirteen years ago)
lol @ that gawker chcik
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:56 (thirteen years ago)
wow, lagoon - please post them to /r/r--dshots, tnx (I think you know what the -- stands for ;) )
― 乒乓, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:56 (thirteen years ago)
where's markers when you really need him for the easy slamdunk display name
― let's have sex and then throw pottery (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:57 (thirteen years ago)
― 乒乓, Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:56 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
hah pitch perfect
― --bob marley (lag∞n), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 18:59 (thirteen years ago)
[–]wheelchairgurl 2 points 1 month agohow can i see a tity?
this was never answered max why are you silent on this subject
― Grimy Little Pimp (Jimmy The Mod Awaits The Return Of His Beloved), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 19:01 (thirteen years ago)
[–]malcolmread[S] 1 point 1 month agoi dont know can you?
― mookieproof, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 19:08 (thirteen years ago)
Haven't these people heard of, i don't know, the rest of the internet?
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 19:13 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/11n38d/i_am_andrea_seabrook_host_of_decodedc_former_npr/
this is not getting very much response, to the point where it's become a customer service line -- one guyis asking how come he never got his scrabble deluxe edition for winning the weekly puzzler.
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 19:16 (thirteen years ago)
isn't the purpose of reddit to consolidate/replace the internet for you
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 19:17 (thirteen years ago)
i still type URLs into my browser's address bar, how oldschool does this make me
― ciderpress, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 19:18 (thirteen years ago)
i just use AOL shortcuts
― 1staethyr, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 19:20 (thirteen years ago)
was that actually max??
― (♥___♥) (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 19:32 (thirteen years ago)
oh, definitely
― ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 19:41 (thirteen years ago)
did i just accidentally doxxxx?
― sanskrit, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 19:49 (thirteen years ago)
who doxxed
― Author ~ Coach ~ Goddess (s1ocki), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 20:03 (thirteen years ago)
so do the sex tape people involved have to know they are being filmed at the time for it to be okay to subsequently 'broadcast' or not?― pandemic, Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:30 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― pandemic, Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:30 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
no... well it depends on what you mean by "okay." my understanding is that the *legal* issues (which i think are generally regarded as decent proxy for the "moral" issues among journalists) are, was the tape/photo obtained legally -- for paparazzi shots in the US the answer is almost always "yes" -- and does its reproduction constitute "fair use," a question that in some cases might hinge on the public figure distinction. most journalists would argue that a celebrity sex tape constitutes news, whether its fact or the story of its leaking, and justify publishing on those grounds.
AGAIN THOUGH im probably getting some/all of this wrong so lawyers shd feel free to correct.
max are you a 'public figure'?― mookieproof, Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:32 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― mookieproof, Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:32 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
heh if i were suing someone for defamation my lawyer would argue that i am not. cant really say till im in court though.
If 'this is legal' is Reddit's main defense in standing up against DOXers, then surely it can be a defense for Gawker who doesn't seem to appear to be doing anything illegal either.― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:33 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:33 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
yes, tho, also, the legal public figure thing is kind of a distraction, i just brought it up to emphasize that this is a widely-recognized distinction
― max, Wednesday, 17 October 2012 20:03 (thirteen years ago)
omg max totally doxxxed himself his real name is malcolm read
― (♥___♥) (roxymuzak), Wednesday, 17 October 2012 20:04 (thirteen years ago)