everybody on ilx complains about reddit

guys we're all horrible

otm

"hahahaha, oh you're visibly intoxicated"
"that may be funny to you..."
"okay, sorry"

it reminds me of when gawker published that long piece about romney's finances in offshore cayman accounts and ppl responded by pointing out that gawker is also invested in similar accounts.

I kind of can't get over the fact that there was an entire buttsharpie subreddit

seems super Usenet-y to me in its weird specificity

lol at jimmy kimmel too: "i don't know why anyone would buy internet advertising"

"there's this shifting definition of privacy with the internet, blogs, myspace"
myspace!

alt.sex.binaries.pictures.butts.sharpies

We also think that if someday, in the far future, we do become a universal platform for human discourse

this is fascinating. what on earth does it mean? that the entire internet will be Reddit? do all these guys (tech/web guys, i guess) think like this?

oh well, this is from 2007

i participated once in gawker stalker and immediately felt bad afterwards. i saw kaavya viswanathan on the subway after the whole plagiarism thing broke and snapped a pic w/ my iphone and sent it in. :/ i censure young mordy's privacy invading decisions.

lol elmo EXACTLY

god I can visualize the RFD for that, urgh

yeah i don't really buy the 'gawker is just as sketchy' argument, call me back when gawker has forums encouraging insecure college-age girls to post naked pics of themselves for internet karma points

http://www.reddit.com/r/gonewildrequests/comments/101khq/rbuttsharpies_needs_new_life_gwers_of_the_world/

I don't know why buttsharpies is as awesome is it is, I just know that it's damn sexy!

Nick Denton actually spends part of his time making sure Max and company don't post child porn and delete the posts where they do

funny i kept thinking there was a usenet joke to be made about this being a fight b/n alt.binaries.nude.celebrities and alt.photography.creepshots

no usenet humor allowed

meow

alt.barney.dinosaur.die.die.die

usenet was more fruitful than reddit for non-creepy strange forums

gawker too!

bet that creeping on celebs takes up more of gawker then creepshots to reddit.

(not that it proves anything, just sayin')

very useful comparison

i had never seen this video before some blog linked to it this week

http://www.youtube.com/v/2-avakrRUaU&fs=1&hl=en

― Mordy, Wednesday, October 17, 2012 12:50 PM (56 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah me either until yesterday, kind of a complete sleazeball

i mean the 2 big differences btw reddit creepshots and gawker publishing celeb sex tapes that seem to get lost on reddit are 1) the distinction between public figures & private citizens (or generally between "news" and "not news") and 2) gawker writers publish this stuff under their irl names

distinction 1 is "real" but arguable i guess, theres a legal distinction and it seems to have been more or less settled in the court of public opinion anyway

distinction 2 strikes me as more important and yet even more ignored

― max, Wednesday, October 17, 2012 12:09 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

what is the legal distinction? i seriously don't know

w/r/t to libel and slander lawsuits, if the plaintiff is a 'public figure' they have to prove actual malice

irl lawyers feel free to correct me if im wrong

so do the sex tape people involved have to know they are being filmed at the time for it to be okay to subsequently 'broadcast' or not?

max are you a 'public figure'?

If 'this is legal' is Reddit's main defense in standing up against DOXers, then surely it can be a defense for Gawker who doesn't seem to appear to be doing anything illegal either.

Yeah, but they don't know who any of the people in their pictures are. They're anonymous people without thoughts and feelings and jobs, not like their moderator.

yeah like I said the whole 'legal/illegal' part is a huge strawman

doesn't gawker media own reddit or something? or at least have investors in common?

No, you're thinking of Digg.

that would explain a rivalry...

I'm just spreading misinformation, there's no commonality

there's got to be some commonality -- everyone owns everyone else to some degree.

yeah... no, not really

bigger than Obama

http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/z1iiy/i_am_blogger_max_read_ama/

TmZ exclusive: secretive Reddit owner Eustace Tilley Reddit revealed to also be Gawker owner Eustace Tilley Gawker III by citizen journalists who noticed the similar names.

how come there isnt a gawker subreddit

i have facebook shots of max r3ad if anyone wants to share hit me up on email. me too.

i have pix of m-x r--d drinking in college

Big fan of the FFFFFFFUUUUUUUUUUUU concept and subreddit.

lol @ that gawker chcik

wow, lagoon - please post them to /r/r--dshots, tnx (I think you know what the -- stands for ;) )

where's markers when you really need him for the easy slamdunk display name

wow, lagoon - please post them to /r/r--dshots, tnx (I think you know what the -- stands for ;) )

― 乒乓, Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:56 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

hah pitch perfect

[–]wheelchairgurl 2 points 1 month ago
how can i see a tity?

this was never answered max why are you silent on this subject

[–]malcolmread[S] 1 point 1 month ago
i dont know can you?