Peanuts: Search and Destroy

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (801 of them)

What'll be 'great' is showing how Snoopy stays on top of the doghouse.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 14:22 (thirteen years ago)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3227/2885793176_32155de961.jpg

Old Lunch, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 14:31 (thirteen years ago)

I thoroughly expect it to be an amped-up and unfaithful and awful adaptation. Like, with a big musical sequence featuring Lucy singing "Lady Marmalade" and Linus doing a little rap interlude.

― Old Lunch, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 14:16 (20 minutes ago)

I'm gathering that you have not seen the spectacularly awful late-period TV specials? Definitely a rap interlude in one of those.

sleeve, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 14:38 (thirteen years ago)

Seeing the late period tv specials is what makes me very pessimistic about this 3D project.

controversial cabaret roommate (Nicole), Wednesday, 10 October 2012 14:47 (thirteen years ago)

I hate the way oldschool cartoon greats look w/ even shadows and "depth" in 2D -- I couldn't make it thru that last looney Tunes feature -- but I did have the Peanuts Viewmasters as a kid.

cancer, kizz my hairy irish azz (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 10 October 2012 15:12 (thirteen years ago)

not sure why computer animation is any more or less 'legitimate' than hand-drawn cel animation, tho' i can see how the peculiar dimensions of the characters cld look v weird rendered in three dimensions.

bill melendez told a great story about how schulz once came to his animation studio and flipped through a stack of cels with drawings of snoopy dancing and went 'that's good...that's not so good...ugh, that's awful!' so melendez handed him a pen and asked him to redraw it. schulz's answer was 'i can't, you never see snoopy from that perspective.' then schulz looked embarrassed and never made any comments about the quality of the animation again.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 10 October 2012 19:04 (thirteen years ago)

perhaps when the technologically improved Linus says, "Lights, please,"

what strip or storyline is this from?


What'll be 'great' is showing how Snoopy stays on top of the doghouse.

as an ice skater, he has excellent balance. or, if you really need it,

http://www.iwatchstuff.com/2008/12/30/george-michael-cera.jpg

fistula-la-la (sic), Wednesday, 10 October 2012 22:58 (thirteen years ago)

"Lights, please" is Linus's short request before the reading of the Bible passage in A Charlie Brown Christmas.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 23:20 (thirteen years ago)

And I just KNEW someone would post that image.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 23:21 (thirteen years ago)

john hughes tried to make a live-action 'peanuts' movie back in 1992: http://www.variety.com/article/VR100425?refCatId=13

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 10 October 2012 23:27 (thirteen years ago)

i can't imagine how they'll write the screenplay for this, schulz wrote all the animated specials himself and the ones that aired after his death were all taken verbatim from actual strips. i can't imagine anyone but schulz writing convincing dialogue for the characters.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 10 October 2012 23:28 (thirteen years ago)

oh I can totally imagine how they'll write the screenplay

stop swearing and start windmilling (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 10 October 2012 23:32 (thirteen years ago)

i wish schulz's actual heirs had taken a cue from schulz's (arguably) greatest artistic heir:

It is 1988. The strip has been going for three years. The phone rings at Universal Press Syndicate. It is Steven Spielberg's assistant. Mr. Spielberg would very much like to speak to Mr. Watterson.

Lee Salem, the syndicate's president, is ecstatic. Two creative minds like that getting together! The Wizard of Oz! Winnie the Pooh! Peter Pan! Excited, he calls Watterson at home in Chagrin Falls, a leafy suburb of Cleveland. Would he talk to Spielberg?

No, Watterson says.

"Bill simply was not interested," Salem remembers now, the sound of lost millions in licensing revenue like so much static down the phone line.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Wednesday, 10 October 2012 23:33 (thirteen years ago)

Wow, that's classic

Raymond Cummings, Wednesday, 10 October 2012 23:47 (thirteen years ago)

Watterson is a hero imho

stop swearing and start windmilling (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 10 October 2012 23:49 (thirteen years ago)

and yeah he is easily Schulz' greatest heir

stop swearing and start windmilling (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 10 October 2012 23:49 (thirteen years ago)

(Mutts dude a close second)

stop swearing and start windmilling (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 10 October 2012 23:50 (thirteen years ago)

Augh (re Mutts dude, who drives me up the wall)

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 11 October 2012 00:03 (thirteen years ago)

Mutts is pretty to look at but also pretty terrible.

Old Lunch, Thursday, 11 October 2012 00:03 (thirteen years ago)

Mutts started out promisingly because the art is so good, but pretty quickly got stuck in mush and will never get out.

Cul de Sac was closest in recent years, but just reached its own sad end.

something of an astrological coup (tipsy mothra), Thursday, 11 October 2012 00:07 (thirteen years ago)

This film will give us a new medium in which to engage consumers globally and showcase the power of the Peanuts brand.

a hauntingly unemployed american (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 11 October 2012 00:25 (thirteen years ago)

i was going to say go fuck yrselves but it just seemed totally inadequate

a hauntingly unemployed american (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 11 October 2012 00:25 (thirteen years ago)

(to be clear tho this is entirely schulz' fault, as he made it quite clear snoopy would do anything for money)

a hauntingly unemployed american (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 11 October 2012 00:30 (thirteen years ago)

He's a dog, different work standards. Also those Sopwith Camels don't fund themselves.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 11 October 2012 00:32 (thirteen years ago)

certainly not at the rate he went through them

a hauntingly unemployed american (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 11 October 2012 00:33 (thirteen years ago)

Precisely. It's like Berke Breathed and speedboats.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 11 October 2012 00:33 (thirteen years ago)

While I agree that Schulz is totally responsible for Peanuts becoming a "brand" in the first place, the branded stuff still maintained the general tenor of the strips (while he was alive, anyway). I have very little confidence that the movie is going to be very faithful to the source material. Thoroughly expecting a frenzied pace, double entendres, farts, and lots of Poochie-style attitude.

Old Lunch, Thursday, 11 October 2012 00:53 (thirteen years ago)

yeah, probably true.

a hauntingly unemployed american (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 11 October 2012 00:57 (thirteen years ago)

plus tremendous poshlost sentimentality, in excess even of post-67ish peanuts' already significant quotient of same

a hauntingly unemployed american (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 11 October 2012 00:59 (thirteen years ago)

what if wes anderson directs and michael cera gets weird botox to make his head completely spherical?

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 11 October 2012 01:05 (thirteen years ago)

Thoroughly expecting a frenzied pace, double entendres, farts, and lots of Poochie-style attitude.

Poll: Who Will Fart in the Peanuts Movie?

cwkiii, Thursday, 11 October 2012 01:28 (thirteen years ago)

haha there is a peanuts character named poochie! see:

http://c0389161.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/dyn/str_strip/245714.full.gif

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 11 October 2012 01:29 (thirteen years ago)

Particularly funny because Snoopy's "Joe Cool" persona may well be a prototype for the Simpsons' Poochie!

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 11 October 2012 01:35 (thirteen years ago)

Mutts started out promisingly because the art is so good, but pretty quickly got stuck in mush and will never get out.

I have books of the first three years and those are all great. haven't read anything else, apart from a few of his children's books.

stop swearing and start windmilling (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 11 October 2012 02:33 (thirteen years ago)

Watterson is a hero imho

― stop swearing and start windmilling (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, October 10, 2012 7:49 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

otm otm otm otm

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 11 October 2012 02:35 (thirteen years ago)

Mutts looks great, but it's just not funny, not even a little.

WmC, Thursday, 11 October 2012 02:44 (thirteen years ago)

Second from the left in that last one has been on a Barenaked Ladies album cover, I'd stake my life on it.

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:20 (thirteen years ago)

girl i went to senior prom w was a very vaguely obscene sally in my hometown production of that

a hauntingly unemployed american (difficult listening hour), Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:22 (thirteen years ago)

lmao whiney

flopson, Thursday, 11 October 2012 03:27 (thirteen years ago)

1. "you're a good man charlie brown" is actually kind of a great musical
2. watterson was v good but to mention him in the same breath with the greatness of peanuts is insulting -- peanuts was humane in a way c&h never attained, c&h smarmy in a way peanuts never sunk to
3. agreed there is little chance this movie is good though

opinions registered

Guayaquil (eephus!), Thursday, 11 October 2012 04:50 (thirteen years ago)

Not sure I buy #2 - I get that there's a certain edge or meanness about C&H that Peanuts will depict but not embody...but it was hardly devoid of humanity, and to say that Peanuts lacked "smarm" is to forget the last, what, two decades of the strip? With numerous exceptions, of course! But it's not like Schulz never swung for Hallmark territory - just that in his long heyday he did avoid it by sheer quality and honesty of observation.

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 11 October 2012 05:44 (thirteen years ago)

this is a little smarmy, but i approve!
http://mikemarsonats.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/peanuts-nov-6-1974.jpg
but besides the social commentary let's look at how ruthlessly peppermint patty just crushes franklin's dreams.
both peanuts and calvin and hobbes are totally of a kind when it comes to the casual cruelty of childhood.

Philip Nunez, Thursday, 11 October 2012 05:57 (thirteen years ago)

Even though this strip has a happy ending the "I should hope so" is hilarious

http://28.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lqv7y6Aexa1qe1xvbo1_400.png

Some of the cruelty took on pretty hysterical forms in the earlier strips

http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_l86ad2czk71qc7rw2o1_400.jpg

abcfsk, Thursday, 11 October 2012 06:16 (thirteen years ago)

hahaha that is wonderfully OTM

Doctor Casino, Thursday, 11 October 2012 06:48 (thirteen years ago)

50's Peanuts was fuckin' dark as dark ever could get

the max in the high castle (kingfish), Thursday, 11 October 2012 07:37 (thirteen years ago)

Although back then Charlie Brown retaliated.

http://c0389161.cdn.cloudfiles.rackspacecloud.com/dyn/str_strip/238312.full.gif

abcfsk, Thursday, 11 October 2012 08:28 (thirteen years ago)

love how in that Poochie strip Poochie clearly does not give a shit about seeing Charlie Brown again

gesange der yuengling (crüt), Thursday, 11 October 2012 09:00 (thirteen years ago)

50's Peanuts was fuckin' dark as dark ever could get

from the very first strip

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/69/First_Peanuts_comic.png

stop swearing and start windmilling (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 11 October 2012 15:42 (thirteen years ago)

that peppermint patty/franklin one has always really unsettled me.

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Thursday, 11 October 2012 20:57 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.