Symmetry required it: 2012 american general election thread #2

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4793 of them)

Morbs thinks most americans would love to see Kiarostami movies if only we'd let them

Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 7 October 2012 04:33 (thirteen years ago)

Actually I think Mitt enjoyed a bump just prior to the first debate

Raymond Cummings, Sunday, 7 October 2012 04:37 (thirteen years ago)

yeah polls were narrowing beforehand

balls, Sunday, 7 October 2012 04:52 (thirteen years ago)

He sure acted like he had just enjoyed a bump before the debate.

pplains, Sunday, 7 October 2012 05:12 (thirteen years ago)

Maybe Obama should have enjoyed one too.

pplains, Sunday, 7 October 2012 05:12 (thirteen years ago)

they're probably some of both but if i had a candidate who lied like that i would be more turned off to voting for them, not more excited!

― Mordy, Saturday, 6 October 2012

obama told a bunch of lies tho. he said he'd repeal nafta. he said he'd hike and index the minimum wage. he said his team would use every avenue to block AIG bonuses. he said he wouldn't unilaterally authorize a military attack without imminent threat. he said health care negotiations would be transparent. & if we include his administration over the last four years they told a bunch of lies.

zvookster, Sunday, 7 October 2012 10:37 (thirteen years ago)

saying youll do something and then not accomplishing it isnt necessarily a lie, its a lie if you never planned to do it in the first place, otherwise its just a failure or changing yr mind

romney lied because he claimed to have never said things that he said

lag∞n, Sunday, 7 October 2012 12:28 (thirteen years ago)

He sure acted like he had just enjoyed a bump before the debate.

― pplains, Sunday, October 7, 2012 1:12 AM (7 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol

lag∞n, Sunday, 7 October 2012 12:28 (thirteen years ago)

i dont think obama ever said hed repeal nafta

max, Sunday, 7 October 2012 12:35 (thirteen years ago)

there's good evidence these were lies. repealing nafta - his aide went to canada to ensure them it was pure posturing with no intention beyond it. plus anti-nafta feeling was high, nothing happened.

on AIG, christopher dodd told cnn obama officials sought to keep AIG's bonuses. plus he filled his admin with bankers.

on healthcare, he made no discernable effort at transparency that i know of

unilateral attack with no imminent threat, he "changed his mind" i guess

minimum wage, he changed his mind having promised something with 70% public support.

zvookster, Sunday, 7 October 2012 12:37 (thirteen years ago)

he promised to renogegotiate it

zvookster, Sunday, 7 October 2012 12:38 (thirteen years ago)

maybe his aid was renegotiating nafta

lag∞n, Sunday, 7 October 2012 12:39 (thirteen years ago)

well now YOU'VE lied

max, Sunday, 7 October 2012 12:39 (thirteen years ago)

I MISPOKE

zvookster, Sunday, 7 October 2012 12:40 (thirteen years ago)

for anyone who cares, the O'Reilly-Stewart "debate":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A051B-uPopM

the ones that I'm near most: fellow outcasts and ilxors (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 7 October 2012 13:29 (thirteen years ago)

Gibbs was actually good for a change on Meet the Press this morning. Said some things his boss should have said the other night.

clemenza, Sunday, 7 October 2012 13:50 (thirteen years ago)

heavens zvookster, don't EVER suggest Obama lies

cancer, kizz my hairy irish azz (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 7 October 2012 14:11 (thirteen years ago)

dont worry no one around here would EVER engage in sloppy self righteous political grandstanding

lag∞n, Sunday, 7 October 2012 14:13 (thirteen years ago)

or reality

cancer, kizz my hairy irish azz (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 7 October 2012 14:16 (thirteen years ago)

Watched 15 minutes of the O'Reilly thing, couldn't take anymore...painful

Iago Galdston, Sunday, 7 October 2012 14:19 (thirteen years ago)

Obama's denials/distortions/omissions of fact on drone warfare alone are legion, but they're not "lies" I bet.

cancer, kizz my hairy irish azz (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 7 October 2012 14:22 (thirteen years ago)

i wasnt saying obama never lies, i was saying zoodawgs accusation and conflation w/romneys thing was sloppy

lag∞n, Sunday, 7 October 2012 14:30 (thirteen years ago)

probably some good reasons to not raise the minimum wage in the middle of the biggest recession in a century. min wage affects food service jobs the most and I think there are a lot of people who can/will be replaced by machines @ mcdonalds et al. I remember seeing this in france, where the min wage is higher - you order at screens and pick up your food at lots of american chains. I don't think min wage = higher unemployment is a universal truth but I think the context matters but its something you push for during good economic times not bad and that's probably why it's been a non-issue. 70% support exists for lots of things that haven't been recently politicized - half of those people haven't been told what their opinion is yet.

iatee, Sunday, 7 October 2012 14:31 (thirteen years ago)

I know the Sunday-morning panels are all buddy-buddy when the cameras are turned off, but you could see Mary Matalin's genuine contempt for Paul Krugman on full display this morning--or, as she kept hissing at him, "Doctor-Professor Krugman."

clemenza, Sunday, 7 October 2012 15:11 (thirteen years ago)

doctor-professor-blogger-nobel laureate krugman hiss hiss

lag∞n, Sunday, 7 October 2012 15:12 (thirteen years ago)

Her bangles are jangling!

the ones that I'm near most: fellow outcasts and ilxors (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 7 October 2012 15:14 (thirteen years ago)

Whenever Alfred argues with me about Rod Stewart in the '80s, or Raging Bull, I'll henceforth be referring to him as Doctor-Professor Sotosyn.

clemenza, Sunday, 7 October 2012 15:19 (thirteen years ago)

"My colleague, the Canadian, insists on civility..."

the ones that I'm near most: fellow outcasts and ilxors (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 7 October 2012 15:22 (thirteen years ago)

herr professor doktor doktor.

s.clover, Sunday, 7 October 2012 15:22 (thirteen years ago)

watching the connecticut US senate debate now, and so help us god if linda mcmahon wins

la goonies (k3vin k.), Sunday, 7 October 2012 15:33 (thirteen years ago)

I saw a commercial for her in spanish at my laundromat in ny. she seems like a very inspiring woman.

iatee, Sunday, 7 October 2012 15:34 (thirteen years ago)

She married into a family of glorified carneys

johnathan lee riche$ (mayor jingleberries), Sunday, 7 October 2012 15:38 (thirteen years ago)

not the right kind either

http://image2.findagrave.com/photos/2003/314/8077835_1068591668.jpg

cancer, kizz my hairy irish azz (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 7 October 2012 15:43 (thirteen years ago)

i have no idea how that was "self righteous political grandstanding", lag. i guess it must be sloppy because if there are no weaselly semantic outs for those claims, like romney has for his, they aren't really lies. it seems more rational to argue the opposite tho.

iatee obama was promising this in like Oct 2008 when ppl were writing "what went wrong" economy articles in major newspapers. and he was gonna raise it not just once, he said, and "not every ten years, but every year" thru linking it to inflation. if the state of the economy occured to him as relevant, we didn't hear it. it doesn;t sound to me like you even believe the argument that it's not for down times (poor people put their money straight back into the economy) or that it raises unemployment. it's been a non-issue i guess because triangulation points to the middle classes, funding points to the rich.

zvookster, Sunday, 7 October 2012 16:17 (thirteen years ago)

whereas in 2008 it sounded pretty inspirational

zvookster, Sunday, 7 October 2012 16:20 (thirteen years ago)

self righteous political grandstanding was of course aimed at morbs, but anyway lol at calling difference between broken promises and lying a weaselly semantic out

lag∞n, Sunday, 7 October 2012 16:27 (thirteen years ago)

man the way stewart and o'reilly just steam-rolled over e.d. hill was pretty obnoxious

well if it isn't old 11 cameras simon (gbx), Sunday, 7 October 2012 16:59 (thirteen years ago)

whereas in 2008 it sounded pretty inspirational
--zvookster

lol to you I guess?

even if you believe increasing min wage is likely to be stimulative rather than v. possibly counterproductive atm there are lots of very-clearly-stimulative policies that are/were/will be a better use of political capital and better for poor people. like extending unemployment benefits.

iatee, Sunday, 7 October 2012 17:00 (thirteen years ago)

Was extending unemployment benefits better for poor people or middle class people?

riding old whitey (Zachary Taylor), Sunday, 7 October 2012 17:14 (thirteen years ago)

when you've been out of work for more than a year the distinction gets pretty fuzzy. in any case, poor people.

iatee, Sunday, 7 October 2012 17:20 (thirteen years ago)

http://chzmemebase.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/internet-memes-obama-the-king-of-america.jpg

the ones that I'm near most: fellow outcasts and ilxors (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Sunday, 7 October 2012 17:22 (thirteen years ago)

hey iatee watch these http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/as-candidate-obama-promised-to-raise-the-minimum

zvookster, Sunday, 7 October 2012 17:35 (thirteen years ago)

ya go find where I said 'Obama never said that'. I said it would have been a stupid use of political capital.

iatee, Sunday, 7 October 2012 17:38 (thirteen years ago)

this is why it's a bad idea to get yr political news from buzzfeed

iatee, Sunday, 7 October 2012 17:39 (thirteen years ago)

xxpost. I always saw it more like "If you don't extend my unemployment benefits, I'll end up like all those poor people making minimum wage." Good for the economy maybe, but stimulating the already stimulated.

It's probably because I was working for minimum wage at the time, and the papers were full of sob stories of people getting unemployment checks double anything I've ever earned.

riding old whitey (Zachary Taylor), Sunday, 7 October 2012 17:40 (thirteen years ago)

lotsa people on unemployment get less than they would at a 40h min wage job.

iatee, Sunday, 7 October 2012 17:41 (thirteen years ago)

iatee do u work or volunteer with the campaign? yr mad hacky. point is this was part of the inspiring hope rhetoric & it was bullshit.

zvookster, Sunday, 7 October 2012 17:41 (thirteen years ago)

maybe you shouldn't believe the hope changey shit then you can be less bitter afterwards

iatee, Sunday, 7 October 2012 17:42 (thirteen years ago)

obama lied, zvookster cried

zvookster, Sunday, 7 October 2012 17:44 (thirteen years ago)

Obama didn't keep promises and maybe never intended to, but I don't think that's in the same ballpark as Romney's lying at the debate. Suddenly saying that your healthcare plan covers pre-existing conditions, and then having your campaign forced to concede that it doesn't the very next day, is flagrantly (and perhaps rightly) presuming that you can say whatever you want on the night and not enough people are going to pay attention the next day for it to matter.

Legendary General Cypher Raige (Gukbe), Sunday, 7 October 2012 17:46 (thirteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.