Conservapedia - An encyclopedia you can trust

my gf wants to homeschool eventual kids and it terrifies me

5. Homeschoolers form fewer cliques and gangs than public schoolers

man the gangs h/s'ers DO get around to forming must be seriously rugged

hoos that's a 'troubling indicator' i believe

It would flummox me to spend ALL DAY EVERY DAY with kids and even if they were mine, that would probably apply. School is not just an education and social skills, it's at least eight hours where children cannot make a mess/break shit in the home and you pay for it in taxes already so just go, OK?

http://www.conservapedia.com/images/5/59/Atheism.png

otm

hahahaha this is awesome, the only home-schooled kid I ever knew really well was raised a totally lefty hippie who didn't celebrate christmas *and* was a complete horndog and got with plenty of teh girlz

http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Gardasil&diff=next&oldid=609636

rape: less likely than being struck & killed by lightning

Whereas the chance of being killed by a terrorist is, like, 1 in 3, right, Schlafly?

4. Homeschoolers engage in less deceit than public schoolers, and are less easily amused by it

There's a whole lot of something behind this sentence.

Genesis 19:4-8
But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter:And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them.
And Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him,And said, I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly.Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof.

MAKES PERFECT SENSE.

Reading the Conservapedia entry on Wikipedia is one thing.

Reading the Wikipedia entry on Conservapedia is wau lulz

wau lulz @

On June 9, 2008, New Scientist published an article describing Richard Lenski's 20-year E. coli experiment, which observed that bacteria evolve the ability to metabolize citrate – a rare and complex mutation. Schlafly contacted Lenski to request the data. Lenski explained that the relevant data was in the paper and that Schlafly fundamentally misunderstood it. Schlafly wrote again and requested the raw data. Lenski replied again that the relevant data was already in the paper, that the "raw data" were living bacterial samples, which he would willingly share with qualified researchers at properly equipped biology labs, and that he felt insulted by letters and comments on Conservapedia, which he saw as brusque and offensive, including claims of outright deceit. The exchange, recorded on a Conservapedia page called "Lenski dialog", was widely reported on news-aggregating sites and weblogs. Carl Zimmer wrote that it was readily apparent that "Schlafly had not bothered to read [Lenski's paper] closely", and PZ Myers criticized Schlafly for demanding data despite not having a plan to use it nor the expertise to analyze it.

the full dialog is still online: Conservapedia - An encyclopedia you can trust

(oops, that's a link to a post in this very thread that contains a link to the Lenski Dialog page)

I see that Schlafly is a homeschool tutor himself. Now, that is frightening.

I like to think of him as the science experiment gone wrong.

bbbbbut he's a B.S.E!

"Wikipedia does not poll the views of its editors and administrators. They make no effort to retain balance. It ends up having all the neutrality of a lynch mob."

stay classy Conservapedia founder Andrew Schlafly

bbbbbut he's a B.S.E!

Sadly, I initially read this as 'butt sex experiment.' I fear I am not ashamed.

"bovine spongiform encepalopathy" also applies

xxxxxxxp people who still claim atheism is a belief are so fucking deluded/disingenuous

Well it kind of is in the "I believe in nothing" sense, I guess.

More 'I don't believe in anything' than 'I believe in nothing' though.

"No, Donny, these are nihilists; there's nothing to be afraid of."

An atheist believes that there is no god.
An agnostic claims not to have beliefs.

that's not true. non-belief is not a belief. agnostics generally believe that some things are unknowable, which is a belief.

a-theism as in no theism

weak vs strong atheism, innit.

lets have this argument again, good call

OUR BEAUTIFUL CONSERVAPEDIA THREAD LOOK WHAT YOUVE DONE

lets have this argument again, good call

max IOU 1 lol

THEY STARTED IT

5. Homeschoolers form fewer cliques and gangs than public schoolers

just hang out with your mother all day instead.

For college, Obama initially attended Occidental College in Los Angeles, California, before transferring to Columbia University in New York, New York and graduating without honors with a Bachelor of Arts degree, majoring in political science.

This is my favorite part.

Although evolutionists deny that men and dinosaurs coexisted, they are unable to provide proof of such a hypothesis. It is probable that the 'behemoth' was what we now call a dinosaur.

calling that a hypothesis is truly hilarious.

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/files/2007/jesus_dinosaur.jpg

"flesh of christ"

hahah.

BUT HE PROBABLY DID!

it really reads like "omnipotent yellow flesh of christ"

^ dibs for Blossoming Noise album title

you see when they say He rode into the city on a donkey they mean he rode in on a velociraptor

Reading the Conservapedia entry on Wikipedia is one thing.

Reading the Wikipedia entry on Conservapedia is wau lulz

― Ashee Bolanalli (Mackro Mackro), Wednesday, January 28, 2009 3:30 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

how 2 parse

Another bit of kerfuffle going on the last few days, apparently... (link is to blog with overview of what happened)

http://www.conservapedia.com/Assassin%27s_Creed

...and enforce radical Islam and other liberal ideals on the people who play it.

Despite their differences the main character and his allies could have just knocked the innocent man down or stun him and continue their mission. This shows liberal bias and inclination to unnecessary violence. lulz for the ages

xpost

Don't you know that radical Islam is famous for it's toleration of homosexuality, women's rights, freedom of expression and other ideals liberals hope for.

Sigmund Freud (1856–1939) was the founder of psychoanalysis, an atheist and pseudoscientist. Despite the scientific rejection of most if not all of his theory, Freud remains powerfully influential among amoral and atheist scientists.

"Freud did more than perhaps any other man to insidiously conflate atheism with science, religion with mysticism, more than LaPlace, Darwin, or even Marx... While groundbreaking, his theories set back psychoanalysis for more than half a century.[1]

[1]Gregory Zilboorg, Freud and Religion: a Restatement of an Old Controversy, 118. Statement written in the 1950s; Freud's psychoanalysis continues to be applied to the detriment of patients.

:D:D:D