everybody on ilx complains about reddit

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6111 of them)

nice foxes

call all destroyer, Thursday, 27 September 2012 02:13 (thirteen years ago)

r those the foxes that were bred to be tame

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 September 2012 02:15 (thirteen years ago)

that looks like a fleet... of foxes

barthes simpson, Thursday, 27 September 2012 02:16 (thirteen years ago)

i was just gonna say i posted those foxes and they got like 3000 upvotes

the most astonishing writer on ilx (roxymuzak), Thursday, 27 September 2012 02:26 (thirteen years ago)

god damn it roxy

lag∞n, Thursday, 27 September 2012 02:58 (thirteen years ago)

haha

pplains, Thursday, 27 September 2012 03:13 (thirteen years ago)

Reddit Users Attempt to Shame Sikh Woman, Get Righteously Schooled

JuliaA, Thursday, 27 September 2012 03:53 (thirteen years ago)

i found that story kinda strange to consider - in that i think it's really profound & so my reflex 'ha OWNED reddit' response feels p insufficient - but it does sorta illuminate the different plains of existence you can occupy, as a computer user chuckling in the basement or as someone religious & content

let's get the banned back together (schlump), Thursday, 27 September 2012 03:57 (thirteen years ago)

sorta

planes too

mookieproof, Thursday, 27 September 2012 04:21 (thirteen years ago)

that sikh story is heartwarming right up until the part where the o/p turns around and starts being like "this isnt what reddit is about" when its like uhhhhh pointing and laughing at women and religious ppl? p sure this is exactly waht reddit is abt

max, Thursday, 27 September 2012 11:09 (thirteen years ago)

redditors glorifying the magic of reddit is a top five worst thing

zachylon (zachlyon), Thursday, 27 September 2012 11:13 (thirteen years ago)

upvote

stet, Thursday, 27 September 2012 11:18 (thirteen years ago)

hey, ilx was down about 9 months ago! anybody, you know, fuck? *wink*

die face down in some dude's pool (how's life), Thursday, 27 September 2012 11:24 (thirteen years ago)

OP's conversion on the "Sikh woman" story seems somewhat unconvincing to me

like in my mind someone who posts that pic (i.e. sees someone they think is ugly and/or ambiguously gendered in public, thinks "this is hilarious!", takes a clear and recognisable photo, and posts it to the internet for bros to lol at and upvote the poster's genius for capturing the hilarity of) is not someone who suddenly has a sincere and lasting epiphany about the equal personhood/rights/feelings of people even if they look funny and possibly even if they don't post eloquent and politely educational responses on the internet

but maybe I am kidding myself if I don't think everyone who grew up in the cameraphone era is in the "funny-looking strangers are totes cool to upload photos of to the internet for lulz" camp by default, even those decent enough to change their mind if called on it

still small voice of clam (a passing spacecadet), Thursday, 27 September 2012 11:45 (thirteen years ago)

Well his apology seems more like "sorry for bringing the quality of reddir down" than for what he actually did wrong

the most astonishing writer on ilx (roxymuzak), Thursday, 27 September 2012 12:29 (thirteen years ago)

I looked at it. Seems to be the kind of LCD thing that becomes addictive to some people. Internet obsession is very old for me - like I had it a zillion years ago, in college, when I was semi-addicted to e-mail.

โตเกียวเหมียวเหมียว aka Italo Night at Some Gay Club (Mount Cleaners), Thursday, 27 September 2012 12:48 (thirteen years ago)

http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/10msh0/reddit_will_you_help_me_play_a_game_that_is/c6ez9jr

since i quit my job i've spent most of my time hate-reading reddit so i might post here often. here's the post that sums it up^^^

zachylon (zachlyon), Saturday, 29 September 2012 08:47 (thirteen years ago)

you have my upvote kiddo

lag∞n, Monday, 1 October 2012 21:15 (thirteen years ago)

And my axe, lol.

turds (Hungry4Ass), Monday, 1 October 2012 21:26 (thirteen years ago)

I haven't read this thread but just coming in to say I don't complain about reddit, so

┐(´ー`)┌ (sic), Tuesday, 2 October 2012 00:22 (thirteen years ago)

we're gonna need u to start

johnny crunch, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 00:23 (thirteen years ago)

seems like the best place for this:

http://boingboing.net/2012/10/02/why-the-fedora-grosses-out-gee.html

caek, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 17:49 (thirteen years ago)

there are threads for both tumblr and boing boing!

how's life, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 17:57 (thirteen years ago)

ok this is definitely the best place for it.

caek, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 18:11 (thirteen years ago)

hope that 'you own a fedora' becomes a lasting insult

would also love dom's take on this phenom

barthes simpson, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 18:29 (thirteen years ago)

a fedora is a fine sort of hat. sharp, stylish, classic. but do not attempt a fedora until you are 55 or older. 65 is even better.

Aimless, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 18:32 (thirteen years ago)

it's a flashy statement worn by people who don't seem to understand how aesthetic things work and so look silly. made worse by a "i know better than you" refusal to follow general opinion that it looks terrible. its social fail mixed with hubris or simply not knowing any better. never seen anyone like this, personally.... young dorky people do weird things, i guess.

Spectrum, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 18:44 (thirteen years ago)

.. it's just a hat.

zappi, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 18:48 (thirteen years ago)

^^ fedora wearer exposed

she started dancing to that (Finefinemusic), Tuesday, 2 October 2012 18:55 (thirteen years ago)

http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/fedora3.jpg

BIG HOOS????

gesange der yuengling (crüt), Tuesday, 2 October 2012 19:02 (thirteen years ago)

it's just a hat... that was popular at a time when men who did not wear overalls wore suits at all times. Try wearing your fedora with overalls. It's a hell of a look!

Aimless, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 19:03 (thirteen years ago)

i know, i know, easy target, but holy shit that xkcd comic linked in the boingboing article

fadanuf4erybody, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 19:45 (thirteen years ago)

those pictures, just brutal

goole, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 19:48 (thirteen years ago)

what about the xkcd comic?

barthes simpson, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 19:50 (thirteen years ago)

i'm getting there, hang on

goole, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 19:52 (thirteen years ago)

ok yup, super gross.

goole, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 19:54 (thirteen years ago)

oh, I just meant that, as much as I loathe xkcd, I don't see what's O_o about it

barthes simpson, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 19:54 (thirteen years ago)

Not to be all cap'n-save-an-xkcd here, but you guys are getting the very obvious thing that that strip is criticising that sort of behaviour, not recommending it, right?

emil.y, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 19:55 (thirteen years ago)

the #1 pua forum link is making it hard for me to breathe, shiiiiiiiit

xp emil.y i wondered that but i'm not giving that guy the benefit of the doubt tbf

goole, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 19:56 (thirteen years ago)

yeah, basically what emil.y said

barthes simpson, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 19:57 (thirteen years ago)

emil.y: yeah, i get that's the intent, but it's just knowing enough--taken with other stuff i've seen of that comic--to just kinda make me think he is that guy all the time, y'know? i have trouble divorcing it from "creepy xkcd guy"

fadanuf4erybody, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 19:57 (thirteen years ago)

maybe you guys read too much xkcd

barthes simpson, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 19:58 (thirteen years ago)

only via ilx! so yeah true

goole, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 19:59 (thirteen years ago)

jim davis gets a lot of hate but i never heard him referred to as that "creepy garfield guy"

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 19:59 (thirteen years ago)

dave sim though...

Philip Nunez, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 20:01 (thirteen years ago)

i wondered that but i'm not giving that guy the benefit of the doubt tbf

But... it's not even hidden in subtext. It's very very blatant.

it's just knowing enough--taken with other stuff i've seen of that comic--to just kinda make me think he is that guy all the time, y'know? i have trouble divorcing it from "creepy xkcd guy"

Well, maybe it's a behaviour he recognised in himself and was a piece of self-criticism, but at least that shows a level of self-awareness beyond what most creepy-nice-guys have.

He still writes terrible comics, though.

emil.y, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 20:02 (thirteen years ago)

"maybe you guys read too much xkcd"

couple friends link me to this shit alllll the time so yeah, guilty

fadanuf4erybody, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 20:09 (thirteen years ago)

http://i34.tinypic.com/2dtztee.jpg

max, Tuesday, 2 October 2012 20:10 (thirteen years ago)

ewwww

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 2 October 2012 20:15 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.