before the carpenters came the origamists
― syntax evasion (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 11:14 (thirteen years ago)
Lao-Tzu was the chief origamist, he came to earth earlier
― syntax evasion (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 11:15 (thirteen years ago)
When I watched the movie I hadn't read that interview, so the idea of Jesus being an Engineer never even crossed my mind, I don't think there's any hints to that direction in the text itself. Also, that idea just raises more questions... Why did an Engineer pose as a religious leader? How come none of the historical documents on Jesus mention that he was a hairless eight-foot albino? Why did him getting killed make the Engineers think the whole human race should be exterminated?
(xxx-post)
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 11:15 (thirteen years ago)
tuomas i think it is possible you're not taking this seriously enough
― paradiastole, or the currifauel, otherwise called (thomp), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 11:21 (thirteen years ago)
so sorry i yet again fell into the trap of trying to make sense of of the deranged ramblings of an idiot.
fwiw all the parent/child stuff in yr original post that makes so much sense to you is only your own kind of wild speculation.
― ledge, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 11:22 (thirteen years ago)
I don't think it's just wild speculation, I'm pretty sure the "every child wants to kill his parents" and the "a king has his reign, then he dies" lines weren't in the movie for no good reason at all. The latter one was even used in the trailer, IIRC.
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 11:28 (thirteen years ago)
ok i retract the 'wild'.
― ledge, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 11:31 (thirteen years ago)
And pretty much every important scene of death/violence in the movie involves a parent killing/trying to kill its children, or vice versa (except for the first scene where a parent dies for its children). I mean, this is a movie in whose most memorable scene the main character, who's explicitly said to be unable to have kids, gives herself a Caesarean to get out a mutant kid that she then tries to kill. So I'd say parenthood is a pretty important theme in Prometheus.
(x-post)
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 11:37 (thirteen years ago)
hey guys, i have this cheeto we could be discussing instead. I think it represents the hunger for greater representation, both politically and socially, by all the children of god. Let's talk about that.
― EVERYONE COOKING SCMABLED EGGS,CHEESE WITH TOASTER!! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 13:16 (thirteen years ago)
What's a cheeto?
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 13:22 (thirteen years ago)
accept the mystery
― DG, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 13:23 (thirteen years ago)
Actually, I'd like to retract what I said above... I guess an extended cut could explain all the irrational behaviour by having the opening scenes on Earth, where we learn that no respectable scientist would take a 5 year trip to a planet they know nothing about, for a reason that can't be disclosed to them, so Weyland has no other alternative but to hire wackos and stoners desperate for money. But I suspect such a scene was never scripted or filmed.
I kind of like it as a comment on leader-driven companies, particularly those where the leader has enough of a hold that he can both keep it until he dies, and give it to his kids (hi dere News Corp). The scientists aren't there to be the best, they're there because Weyland liked them, and it's Weyland's company paying for the mission, and unfortunately Weyland is a stupid dying fool.
― Andrew Farrell, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 15:04 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah, actually everything goes wrong specifically because he's a parent who won't let the children grow up and decide things for themselves. I don't think Tuomas is flailing wildly to come up with this theme, especially given that all the Alien pictures have attempted to thematized parent-child stuff (in various directions with various degrees of success). It's just that Prometheus doesn't do it well, or coherently. As with The Dark Knight (which I did like much more than this), the lack of competence in delivering basic story mechanics and characterization makes me less willing to give anybody involved credit for purposeful thematic ambiguity. It just looks like a mess on multiple fronts.
I think right after I saw it I was still riding the entertainment factor of the parts that worked, but man, relative to the excitement provoked by the trailer, this had to be one of the most disappointing movies I've ever seen.
― Doctor Casino, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 15:08 (thirteen years ago)
i recently rewatched alien (and alien iii) but even in alien it was kind of hard to follow what was happening, but maybe in alien you could ascribe that to only showing as much of the alien as was prosthetically feasible at the time. we're not given much character motivation in alien either. maybe it's just a much better movie for its constraints rather than the director's abilities?
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 17:20 (thirteen years ago)
He did have some wacky ideas even then
Scott had wanted the Alien to bite off Ripley's head and then make the final log entry in her voice, but the producers vetoed this idea as they believed that the Alien had to die at the end of the film.
― Number None, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 17:22 (thirteen years ago)
yeesh!
a lot of the effects hold up really well, especially the organ dissection stuff (that apparently used real organs), but the part where the chestburster wheels off is so puppet-like, it reminds me of the parody scene in spaceballs.
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 17:25 (thirteen years ago)
even in alien it was kind of hard to follow what was happening
haha waht
― a shark with a rippling six pack (Phil D.), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 17:27 (thirteen years ago)
i think tuomas readings are spot on but they're not very deep (movies' fault not tuomas') and they're not executed that well in the movie and they're pretty obvious on top of that
i think the third one is the most religious and the most thematically inscrutable
― the late great, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 17:31 (thirteen years ago)
alien3 = most religious and inscrutable
― the late great, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 17:32 (thirteen years ago)
re: hard to follow -- well for example, without looking for model photos, can you draw what the nostromo looked like? what was ripley's job -- was she a navigator or something?
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 17:33 (thirteen years ago)
What does drawing what the Nostromo looked like have to do with following the plot of the movie? Do you mean, like, the interior spaces? Yeah, I could probably come up with a reasonable approximation, but what relevance it has is beyond me.
Ripley's job is clearly akin to a kind of XO or CPO job in the Navy. (She identifies herself as "Warrant Officer Ellen Ripley" at the end. Based on what's seen in the movie she supervises the engineering staff and serves as ranking officer when the Captain and First Officer are not on board.
― a shark with a rippling six pack (Phil D.), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 17:38 (thirteen years ago)
how did the alien grow from chestburster to hunter -- does it actually eat the humans? the scene where veronica cartwright is stunned between yaphet kotto's flamethrower and the alien, why can't yaphet kotto move around her, was there something blocking movement?
the relevance re: being able to draw nostromo is that it's emblematic of the rest of the movie where they don't show in clear enough detail what is going on in order to have a grounding (which might be a horror movie move but still)
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 17:41 (thirteen years ago)
i also don't remember seeing jonesy in the initial hypersleep wake scene -- was he just mousing about for 8 months or whatever?
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 17:44 (thirteen years ago)
Why did an Engineer pose as a religious leader?
If someone asks if you're a god, say yes!
― Elvis Telecom, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 17:54 (thirteen years ago)
alien3 had similar "what the hell is going on" but it was restricted to the alien tunnel scenes and ended up being more disorienting than anything. at least the characters seemed much more grounded. there's also plot problems in how the alien infested the colony, but seeing how they were shooting without a script, the whole production seems like a miracle. it looks really pretty! i think it's the prettiest of all the alien movies.
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 18:01 (thirteen years ago)
like if you were going to make an alien-themed bread and breakfast inn, definitely go for alien3.
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 18:03 (thirteen years ago)
and when you kill a man, you're a murdererkill many, and you're a conquerorkill them all... ooh ... ooh ... you're a god!
― the late great, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 18:13 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYW_lPlekiQ
― Legendary General Cypher Raige (Gukbe), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 18:18 (thirteen years ago)
Kind of thought Jesus was supposed to be the end-run of earth's evolution, humans reaching ascendance engineer-style (although not necessarily as engineers) and we fucked it up by killing him, so the engineers were coming back to terminate a failed experiment.
― ɥɯ ︵ (°□°) (mh), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 18:31 (thirteen years ago)
it was probably just a coincidence, just look miss vickers getting squashed and noomi surviving, unless you believe in miracles DO YOU SEE
― the late great, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 18:37 (thirteen years ago)
i dunno that stuff felt a lot like george lucas-style "rhyming"
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 18:41 (thirteen years ago)
I don't think Tuomas is flailing wildly to come up with this theme, especially given that all the Alien pictures have attempted to thematized parent-child stuff (in various directions with various degrees of success). It's just that Prometheus doesn't do it well, or coherently.
Well yeah, that was exactly the point was I was trying to make, if they'd taken these themes that clearly were there in the material, and done them more coherently, and scrapped some other themes that only confused things (seriously, what was the point of the crucific xenomorph?), they might've gotten a good movie out of it. As such, it's only an good-looking, semi-interesting mess.
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 18:54 (thirteen years ago)
a good-looking, semi-interesting mess
rowr
― the late great, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 19:00 (thirteen years ago)
did you guys liked the way it looked? the apple store in space look?
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 19:04 (thirteen years ago)
yeah i thought the ship design + 3d cameras was a masterclass
― the late great, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 19:21 (thirteen years ago)
beats the apple store on earth at least right?
yeah say whatever you want about it but it's beautifully shot and designed
― vincent black shadow giallo (Edward III), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 19:23 (thirteen years ago)
particularly the "flight deck". that was the sickest shit ever (ok stolen from halo but whatever)
― the late great, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 19:26 (thirteen years ago)
i think i liked the fake david ad more than the look of the movie. something about putting it in space makes it look really hilarious, like there should be a tiffany's deck as well, with a frozen yogurt pod upstairs. did the aesthetic carry over to the look of the engineers as well? i don't remember, but did they iDesign their nipples away?
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 19:32 (thirteen years ago)
uh, isn't that vicker's cabin
― the late great, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 19:34 (thirteen years ago)
Life lessons from Prometheus
-Ultimately, we're all working/dying for some rich asshole's vanity project -The sought-after Answers to Life's Big Questions are unsatisfying and nearly incomprehensible.-the only ones thriving in the modern work environment are psychopaths (androids)-don't ever let Damon Lindelof near a computer again
― let's keep this board about feet, please. (latebloomer), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 19:49 (thirteen years ago)
i can't argue with any of that
― EVERYONE COOKING SCMABLED EGGS,CHEESE WITH TOASTER!! (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 26 September 2012 20:03 (thirteen years ago)
Re: the last: he is far too self-aware now:
https://twitter.com/DamonLindelof/status/251043815576711168
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 20:27 (thirteen years ago)
hahahahahaha A+++ summation of life lessons
― the late great, Wednesday, 26 September 2012 20:28 (thirteen years ago)
― Philip Nunez, Wednesday, September 26, 2012 3:32 PM (3 days ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
otm, the david commercial was so much better than the movie
― Author ~ Coach ~ Goddess (s1ocki), Saturday, 29 September 2012 22:54 (thirteen years ago)
it had that in common with that ben stiller joint
― Randy Carol (darraghmac), Saturday, 29 September 2012 23:12 (thirteen years ago)
one day we will all evolve to be giant pale bald gym bros
― Matt Armstrong, Saturday, 29 September 2012 23:25 (thirteen years ago)
in space no one can hear you max out your delts
I enjoy this movie immensely. I don't understand taking apart the movie to see if it works or fit together, I wouldn't enjoy hardly any movies if I did that regularly.
― JacobSanders, Sunday, 30 September 2012 00:09 (thirteen years ago)
that's cuz most movies are terrible
― Matt Armstrong, Sunday, 30 September 2012 00:14 (thirteen years ago)