Favorite poster from NR's "The Corner"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (3156 of them)

uh

Barack You Like A Husseincane (HI DERE), Monday, 26 January 2009 20:57 (seventeen years ago)

"We learn, second, that this president’s guiding light in matters of national security is not a realistic assessment of the national interest but personal concern for what kind of figure he is cutting in the international eye."

3 sentences later

"Moreover, it is a mistake to think that people in most other nations love, honor, and respect the secularist preoccupation with abortion."

¯\(º o)/¯

bnw, Monday, 26 January 2009 20:58 (seventeen years ago)

Remind me, is Steyn still arguing that there were no gay people involved with the golden age of the Broadway musical?

Ned Raggett, Monday, 26 January 2009 20:58 (seventeen years ago)

The first week did not have to begin this way. These first steps were unworthy of a great nation and unworthy of a serious leader. These decisions humiliated those who voted for President Obama because they had been assured, and assured others, that the new president would take seriously the culture of life. It is now clear that the new president was willing to allow those who risked their moral reputations to support him to feel in retrospect like liars.

I thought all pro-life people thought Obama wanted to abort living babies????

Mordy, Monday, 26 January 2009 20:59 (seventeen years ago)

unlikely, sky-is-falling worst case scenarios and "stuff white people like" mixed in with received wisdom = a+ corner post

the gush of yesterday (omar little), Monday, 26 January 2009 21:01 (seventeen years ago)

"Stand idly by while those goofy foreigners slaughter everyone in Sudan and I promise to sign up for an authentic African-style interpetative dance fundraising event commemorating the Rwandan genocide."

had to be intentional, right????

bnw, Monday, 26 January 2009 21:01 (seventeen years ago)

i can understand African-style interpretative dances, i think...but how is fair-trade coffee something evil & liberal?

Vichitravirya_XI, Monday, 26 January 2009 21:03 (seventeen years ago)

as if all the 'pro-lifers' or catholics who voted for O were all fanatics like novak who somehow got fooled. no dummy, they thought he'd be a good, if pro-choice president. who has been SuRpRiSeD, exactly, by obama's reversal of bush policy on this?

love when these dudes dramatically pull away the curtain on shit everyone can already see plainly

MIRV Griffin (goole), Monday, 26 January 2009 21:03 (seventeen years ago)

eh that "fair trade" kinda shit is just liberal strawman stuff. if i was a liberal columnist i might start up some strawman campaign about how conservatives only drink coffee made from crystals or specifically seek out coffee made by companies whose workers are paid not with money but with the promise of fewer beatings.

the gush of yesterday (omar little), Monday, 26 January 2009 21:06 (seventeen years ago)

steyn's choice of opponent is kinda hilarious. like, "TAKE THAT you harried mom from Danvers, MA. you can stick your reader's digest sentimentality up your ass! oo, burn!"

fight the power, yeah.

obi don quixote (elmo argonaut), Monday, 26 January 2009 21:07 (seventeen years ago)

i mean these dbags have no actual rational ideas so they bust out the starbucks and "these people actually are interested in other cultures, what useless assholes" argument.

the gush of yesterday (omar little), Monday, 26 January 2009 21:08 (seventeen years ago)

well they must be hard up for arguments because dude is squaring off against a letter 7 year old kid wrote to the prez

obi don quixote (elmo argonaut), Monday, 26 January 2009 21:14 (seventeen years ago)

in related news, mild righty culture blog Culture11 is out of money but goldberg fave, david horowitz style Big Hollywood seems to be going strong... gop votes all-0 against the stimulus... a republican rep tries to put some distance between the gop and rush limbaugh, and a day later is forced to genuflect before the man. i think these ppl are just going to get more and more rancid, and, one day, for some reason, return to power exactly as they always were. i don't think there's any 'reforming' the gop.

don't really know why i'm writing this here.

MIRV Griffin (goole), Thursday, 29 January 2009 15:04 (seventeen years ago)

Fair amount of the tone is insufferable but the anecdotes are good:

It is into this new world order, this Washington version of an existential whorl, that a steadfastly loyal group of Republicans descend this week, skidding into an iced-over landscape and holing up at the Capital Hilton beginning yesterday for a four-day winter meeting of the Republican National Committee. (Not to be missed on the restorative agenda: a "Reboot the RNC" open house.) They've themed the whole get-together "Republican for a Reason," and left it at that.

"Republican for a reason?" says Stephen Scheffler, a committeeman from Iowa, pausing before a banner carrying the slogan. "I don't know what that means."

...

All the Obama love in the air isn't helping their moods, either. Jim Bopp, a committeeman from the Great State of Indiana, grumbled before coming into town that "there's kind of a 'Kumbaya' feeling in the country."

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 January 2009 15:07 (seventeen years ago)

(Also not-Corner but hey, it's good for a baseline indicator.)

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 29 January 2009 15:07 (seventeen years ago)

I didn't wanna start a new thread for this, and I could think of a better place to post this. Think of it as a NRO thread/ILM crossover!

http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/dtennapel/2009/01/31/republican-is-the-new-punk/#more-36278

The real gold is in the comments.

Mordy, Sunday, 1 February 2009 20:12 (seventeen years ago)

This is the mainstreaming of the bad boy, complete with rat-pack suit and cigarette in hand. A snappy skin spread over the boring, failed, liberal Democrats of the sixties.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 1 February 2009 20:17 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.variety.com/graphics/photos/variety100/sinatra_kennedy.jpg

Peter "One Dart" Manley (The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics), Sunday, 1 February 2009 20:20 (seventeen years ago)

Maybe we need a Big Hollywood thread. That place is a huge trainwreck.

Mordy, Sunday, 1 February 2009 20:27 (seventeen years ago)

Earthworm Jim was shit btw

McAlmont and I'll Get You Butler (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 1 February 2009 20:28 (seventeen years ago)

?

Mordy, Sunday, 1 February 2009 20:30 (seventeen years ago)

Doug TenNapel is a graphic novelist, video game designer and writer. His
video game creation EARTHWORM JIM enjoys unmerited respect in the world of gaming.

McAlmont and I'll Get You Butler (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 1 February 2009 20:32 (seventeen years ago)

Please No More Super Bowls for NBC [Andy McCarthy]

A game so fantastic it even overcame the coverage by the awful NBC — Al Michaels and John Madden honorably excepted.

People tuning in to football for an escape were treated, as they have been all season, to Keith Olbermann. I used to like Olbermann as an ESPN sportscaster when sports was all he did, but that was a long time ago. Now, just the sight of him turns off a lot of the audience — though I am nut for football, I generally just don't watch, turn off the sound, or switch to something else when he's on, and I know I'm not alone. If I'm stupid enough to watch his nightly rant on MSNBC and succeed in getting myself aggravated, then fine — he's got a right to his views, they have a right to put him on the air for the 15 or so people who evidently watch, and everyone knows what the deal is, so I should just change the channel or not turn on the TV in the first place. But the Super Bowl is a national event and (is supposed to be) a non-political event for a captive audience. Why Olbermann?

But even he was not as blood-boiling as Matt Lauer's cloying interview with President Obama. It would have been mildly annoying, but par for the course, if we had only had to endure Dear Leader's views on football (Matt Lauer's he's-so-cool gape as POTUS wows us with his intimate knowledge of flaws in the BCS system, his breakdown of the Steelers/Cardinals, and Look, mom, he even uses his own Blackberry!). But lapdog Matt, of course, couldn't leave it at that. So minutes before gametime, we were treated to the correspondent's observation that "many people were disappointed" when not a single one of those awful Republicans voted for the "stimulus" bill in the House — remarkably, of the two guys in the room, Obama was the only one who approached fair-and-balanced, telling a seemingly incredulous Lauer that Republicans had "a lot of good ideas" which he hoped to incorporate. (I found myself cheering when NBC had technical trouble and lost the audio feed for stretches of the interview.)

Years ago, before Fox started and NBC finally dove headlong to the Left — to the point that they are more agitprop than news network anymore — NBC did nearly half of all pro-football coverage (the old AFL and, after the two leagues merged, the NFL's American Conference) and they were just terrific — all game no politics. They then dropped football for many years and they haven't been missed because all their best people got snapped up by other networks. They had also dropped baseball, so for the past several years, as they've hyper-politicized, we've only needed to endure their making the Olympics unwatchable every couple of years. But now they've got a slice of the football coverage pie back. Again, the Madden/Michaels duo that calls the game is great, and I guess that's the important thing. As for the rest, though — yuck! Fox may be the conservative news network, and CBS obviously leans Left, but when they do football, they do football. For NBC, it's just part of the permanent campaign.

Pancakes Hussein Obama (Pancakes Hackman), Monday, 2 February 2009 15:44 (seventeen years ago)

So did Andy give up on the 'he wasn't really born here' crusade, then?

Ned Raggett, Monday, 2 February 2009 15:51 (seventeen years ago)

remarkably, of the two guys in the room, Obama was the only one who approached fair-and-balanced, telling a seemingly incredulous Lauer that Republicans had "a lot of good ideas" which he hoped to incorporate.

lol at this, it's like they've never actually seen or heard Obama speak and just know him from the "most liberal liberal who ever liberalled" propaganda

HI DERE, Monday, 2 February 2009 16:05 (seventeen years ago)

I imagine they hop around the room with their hands clapped over their ears, chanting "I can't hear you! I can't hear you!" when he's on tv.

Nicolars (Nicole), Monday, 2 February 2009 16:09 (seventeen years ago)

I also love this backhanded rhetoric where they get to grudgingly praise Obama while still maintaining an appropriate level of frothing outrage

HI DERE, Monday, 2 February 2009 16:10 (seventeen years ago)

Al Michaels and John Madden honorably excepted

^^ all you need to know, really

obi don quixote (elmo argonaut), Monday, 2 February 2009 16:12 (seventeen years ago)

Oh boy:

Obama's Cool Clothes [Michael Ledeen]
He lectured us about "virtue" in his Inaugural Address, and he was quite right to do it. But ever since, he has thrown virtue under the campaign bus—an attorney general who lied under oath, tax cheats at Treasury and HHS, and now (h/t Instapundit), despite all the pious talk about putting an end to torture, he seems to be retaining what is arguably the worst component of our "interrogate the terrorist" programs: rendition.

I well remember the first time I heard about this noxious practice. An intelligence-community official told me, with evident satisfaction, "We're sending these guys to places where they don't have Miranda rights. Or lawyers." I didn't like it then, and I don't like it now. It's a total moral copout: We enable torture while claiming to have abolished it.

This is what appears to be the SOP of the Obama administration—moral lectures, immoral practices. They pose as virtuous citizens and tell us what to do in myriad ways, and then install serial offenders in the highest positions. They pose as human-rights defenders, and then turn over our prisoners to some of the worst human rights offenders.

This is a prescription for moral and political disaster, because either the electorate will figure it out, and deliver a stinging rebuke to Obama and his people (with considerable disruption at a time when we need to seriously address our many problems), or there will be an immoral free-for-all, to the ruin of the common good.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Monday, 2 February 2009 16:36 (seventeen years ago)

...sounds more like Morbsy than the Corner, wtf.

i fuck mathematics, Monday, 2 February 2009 16:38 (seventeen years ago)

loldeen

goole, Monday, 2 February 2009 16:52 (seventeen years ago)

Return to Render [Mark Steyn]
I agree with Michael re rendition, and the President's newfound enthusiasm for it. He won't abolish torture, but he's happy to outsource it, and make it one of those jobs Americans won't do. And everyone else seems content to be governed by moral poseurs: Re that Human Rights Watch flip-flop—"Under limited circumstances, there is a legitimate place" for rendition—the circumstances seem to be limited to when there's a Democrat in the White House.

On balance, I prefer an Administration with the cojones to waterboard you themselves rather than stick a bag on your head and ship you to some Third World genital-clampers.

I PREFER AN ADMINISTRATION WITH THE COJONES TO WATERBOARD YOU THEMSELVES
I PREFER AN ADMINISTRATION WITH THE COJONES TO WATERBOARD YOU THEMSELVES
I PREFER AN ADMINISTRATION WITH THE COJONES TO WATERBOARD YOU THEMSELVES
I PREFER AN ADMINISTRATION WITH THE COJONES TO WATERBOARD YOU THEMSELVES
I PREFER AN ADMINISTRATION WITH THE COJONES TO WATERBOARD YOU THEMSELVES
I PREFER AN ADMINISTRATION WITH THE COJONES TO WATERBOARD YOU THEMSELVES

Mordy, Monday, 2 February 2009 17:59 (seventeen years ago)

"Rendition" Revisited [Michael Ledeen]
An author I don't know, writing at The Washington Monthly, which I have long considered one of this city's minor cesspools, argues that "rendition" would not permit CIA to transfer terrorists to foreign countries that practice torture. I hope he's right, and I'll try to follow it, although it's not at all easy. Anyway, thanks to an alert reader who was kind enough to call my attention to the article.

02/02 02:32 PM

I was that alert reader!! Woo!

Mordy, Monday, 2 February 2009 19:34 (seventeen years ago)

TEh Corner <3's me!

Mordy, Monday, 2 February 2009 19:34 (seventeen years ago)

i think alert could also = 'not a histrionic righty loon' but good work nonetheless~

steve goldberg variations (omar little), Monday, 2 February 2009 19:35 (seventeen years ago)

Of course, they still can't get Hilzoy's gender right, but anyway...

carson dial, Monday, 2 February 2009 19:58 (seventeen years ago)

Somebody clarify the rendition thing for me?

I thought O said he was shutting down the black sites?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 2 February 2009 20:00 (seventeen years ago)

yeah he's pretty racist :/

steve goldberg variations (omar little), Monday, 2 February 2009 20:01 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/world/stories/DN-renditions_01int.ART.State.Edition2.4c55e62.html

Obama's decision to preserve rendition has not drawn major protests, even among human rights groups. Leaders of such organizations said that reflects a sense that the U.S. and other nations need certain tools to combat terrorism.

"Under limited circumstances, there is a legitimate place" for renditions, said Tom Malinowski, the Washington advocacy director for Human Rights Watch. "What I heard loud and clear from the president's order was that they want to design a system that doesn't result in people being sent to foreign dungeons to be tortured."

I don't know how much of this I buy/believe (or in which direction).

HI DERE, Monday, 2 February 2009 20:05 (seventeen years ago)

there's this from "the opinionator" blog at the new york times re the rendition issue. make of it what you will.

Ein kluges Äpfelchen (Eisbaer), Monday, 2 February 2009 20:13 (seventeen years ago)

On rendition and stupid conservatives:

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/02/02/renditions/

Alex in SF, Monday, 2 February 2009 20:39 (seventeen years ago)

you made history mordy!

goole, Tuesday, 3 February 2009 16:48 (seventeen years ago)

Reefer Madness [Andrew Stuttaford]
Look, I don't blame Michael Phelps for apologizing. He has a living to earn, so he did what he had to do.

In the meantime, I merely note that this broken wreck of a man's failure to win any more than a pathetic fourteen Olympic gold medals (so far) is a terrifying warning of the horrific damage that cannabis can do to someone's health—and a powerful reminder of just how sensible the drug laws really are.
02/03 09:37 AM

Sorta OTM?

Mordy, Tuesday, 3 February 2009 19:16 (seventeen years ago)

ha no kidding. have we talked about l'affaire phelps anywhere? what a fucking crock, leave the kid alone

goole, Tuesday, 3 February 2009 19:17 (seventeen years ago)

the corner would be the place where stoner conservatives chil

LOOK WHAT I BRING TO THE TABLA (deej), Tuesday, 3 February 2009 19:18 (seventeen years ago)

which Cornerite inherited William F. Buckley's pot-smokin' yacht?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Tuesday, 3 February 2009 19:19 (seventeen years ago)

"Sorta OTM?"

What sorta? Totally OTM. Never thought I'd agree with a Corner writer, but there ya go.

Alex in SF, Tuesday, 3 February 2009 19:20 (seventeen years ago)

Except for K-Lo the disapproving old-maid schoolmarm. xxpost

WmC, Tuesday, 3 February 2009 19:20 (seventeen years ago)

i don't even want to think about some of those ppl high

goole, Tuesday, 3 February 2009 19:21 (seventeen years ago)

She's never had an ounce of fun in her whole life. xp

Nicolars (Nicole), Tuesday, 3 February 2009 19:21 (seventeen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.