#GawkersNextArticle
― pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Saturday, 8 September 2012 23:53 (eleven years ago) link
This is hilarious. http://gawker.com/5943828/13-powerful-images-of-muslim-rage
― gyac, Monday, 17 September 2012 17:56 (eleven years ago) link
I loved that.
― controversial cabaret roommate (Nicole), Monday, 17 September 2012 18:47 (eleven years ago) link
Ha
#snowrage
― Fiendish Doctor Wu (kingfish), Monday, 17 September 2012 18:58 (eleven years ago) link
apparently j0rdan s. wrote pretty much every single story on gawker today
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 19 October 2012 14:10 (eleven years ago) link
That was very nice.
― one bad call from barely losing (Nicole), Friday, 19 October 2012 14:53 (eleven years ago) link
Is Everybody Who Edits Gawker Really This Stupid?
; )
― buzza, Saturday, 20 October 2012 19:48 (eleven years ago) link
superstorm outage?
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 30 October 2012 00:43 (eleven years ago) link
Still down!
― Manchild in Beantown (stevie), Wednesday, 31 October 2012 08:26 (eleven years ago) link
"The Vatican Is Really Butthurt About U.S. Citizens Approving Gay Marriage"
such a Gawker headline
― crüt, Sunday, 11 November 2012 22:35 (eleven years ago) link
I say that with love btw.
what the fuck is wrong with this site
http://kotaku.com/5960657/metacritic-refuses-to-pull-negative-review-that-gamespot-admits-was-factually-inaccurate
― ya bish called wanda (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 15 November 2012 01:24 (eleven years ago) link
what, gamespot for running a shitty un-fact-checked review, or kotaku for being interested?
thread's about gawker, I think you might want the "wtf is up with metacritic" thread
― under minnesota shakedown (mh), Thursday, 15 November 2012 01:27 (eleven years ago) link
metacritic's terrifying new math
― buzza, Thursday, 15 November 2012 02:36 (eleven years ago) link
It'd make sense to change their policy, but their policy does make sense -- sites were changing shit all the time, especially on video games, a couple years ago due to pressure. Real question is why gamespot is publishing shitty reviews
― under minnesota shakedown (mh), Thursday, 15 November 2012 03:27 (eleven years ago) link
assume whiney's saying wtf is up with kotaku caring abt that
― just sayin, Thursday, 15 November 2012 07:35 (eleven years ago) link
"We'll continue to follow and update this story as we hear more."
― Matt Armstrong, Thursday, 15 November 2012 07:43 (eleven years ago) link
True, maybe if we stopped talking about meta critic it'd go away
― under minnesota shakedown (mh), Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:44 (eleven years ago) link
The review, scored 60/100 and written by a freelancer named Eric Neigher, had been eviscerated by readers and commenters who pointed out a number of mistakes—for example, the review said the recently-released indie game was $30, when it actually costs $25.
― ya bish called wanda (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:46 (eleven years ago) link
:O
― 乒乓, Thursday, 15 November 2012 13:46 (eleven years ago) link
http://i.imgur.com/rUD8O.png
http://i.imgur.com/YHgmy.png
http://i.imgur.com/2IILx.png
aargh too early in the morning to be confronted by this many awful ppl at once
― dell (del), Thursday, 29 November 2012 15:09 (eleven years ago) link
2ILX4U.png
― bnw, Thursday, 29 November 2012 15:11 (eleven years ago) link
ha
― dell (del), Thursday, 29 November 2012 15:15 (eleven years ago) link
"myles tanzer"http://i.imgur.com/KnbD1.gif
― bnw, Sunday, 2 December 2012 21:39 (eleven years ago) link
http://gawker.com/5967960/how-much-time-would-you-save-if-pepsi-and-chicken-were-combined-into-a-single-chip-flavor
fwiw coca cola chicken wings are pretty good
― 乒乓, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 23:46 (eleven years ago) link
http://i.imgur.com/KZnlF.jpg
http://appetiteforchina.com/recipes/coca-cola-chicken-wings/
― 乒乓, Wednesday, 12 December 2012 23:49 (eleven years ago) link
Yeah, they're crazy. Cola ingredients are not really removed from what you'd find in marinades
― mh, Thursday, 13 December 2012 01:39 (eleven years ago) link
http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18g5em3mcetgzjpg/original.jpg
― goole, Friday, 1 March 2013 16:29 (eleven years ago) link
wtf gawker, make it a doritos taco ffs - or does uk not have those?
― johnny crunch, Friday, 1 March 2013 16:51 (eleven years ago) link
http://deadspin.com/welcome-to-the-new-deadspin-451606944
― iatee, Monday, 11 March 2013 23:44 (eleven years ago) link
lol i remember kinja
― mookieproof, Monday, 11 March 2013 23:46 (eleven years ago) link
oh I didnt see ice cube bumped the other gawker thread
― iatee, Monday, 11 March 2013 23:48 (eleven years ago) link
I think via ilx law priority is passed to the first bumped
― iatee, Monday, 11 March 2013 23:49 (eleven years ago) link
The new Deadspin layout is the absolute worst.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 28 March 2013 21:00 (eleven years ago) link
agreed
― balls, Thursday, 28 March 2013 21:04 (eleven years ago) link
i think it looks fine, i just love the gawker layout that allows you to read every post w/o having to open new tabs and/or click the back button
― A$AP Rovi (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 28 March 2013 21:12 (eleven years ago) link
also i think it's kinda weird that they made HUGE PHOTOS the emphasis of the new layout but then made it so the photos are covered in black dots
― A$AP Rovi (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 28 March 2013 21:13 (eleven years ago) link
huge photos tiny text blocks is terrible designside-panel w/ other stories was great for navigation, I'm not going to scroll backward in Gawker Media's timeline like some tumblr-using savage
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Thursday, 28 March 2013 21:16 (eleven years ago) link
i blame sandy
― balls, Thursday, 28 March 2013 21:20 (eleven years ago) link
do we have another thread for other big-blog-hitters?
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BGMFFmYCEAAw0Yc.jpg:large
― Chuck E was a hero to most (s.clover), Friday, 5 April 2013 17:28 (eleven years ago) link
I didn't realize Buzzfeed had original content until recently, I thought it was all just meme aggregations and listicles.
― Kiarostami bag (milo z), Friday, 5 April 2013 19:12 (eleven years ago) link
They (very) occasionally produce a good article or two, it must be by accident.
― rallying against young people who wear hats (Nicole), Friday, 5 April 2013 19:16 (eleven years ago) link
buzzfeed has a really high quality tech section, maybe the best on the internet in terms of intelligent coverage
― max, Friday, 5 April 2013 19:17 (eleven years ago) link
http://kotaku.com got the same makeover
― am0n, Friday, 5 April 2013 19:18 (eleven years ago) link
not that anyone reads that ; )
― am0n, Friday, 5 April 2013 19:20 (eleven years ago) link
yeah buzzfeed is really really good except when it's awful, it's so weird
― caek, Friday, 5 April 2013 20:14 (eleven years ago) link
they are paying writers good $$ too or so i heard
― ❏❐❑❒ (gr8080), Friday, 5 April 2013 20:17 (eleven years ago) link
http://img.gawkerassets.com/img/18k07f5pvksvijpg/xlarge.jpg
― am0n, Monday, 8 April 2013 16:56 (eleven years ago) link
buzzfeed pays pretty well for freelance
― J0rdan S., Monday, 8 April 2013 16:57 (eleven years ago) link
http://critical-theory.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/buzzfeed-image.jpg
― rather ugged man (zvookster), Wednesday, 10 April 2013 19:11 (eleven years ago) link