the myth of foster wallace is p gross to me
*shifts gaze uncomfortably*
It seems like it was to him too in many ways, and became more so over time; iirc from the bio he called it "the statue." (Cf. the psychopharmacologist[?] in one of the footnotes to "Octet.") Yet of course this kind of mythologizing reads as entirely comprehensible and foreseeable and even forgivable if you take his thematic stuff about loneliness and isolation and the role of art in assuaging and overcoming it seriously, as it seems a lot of his readers have. I sure as fuck did.
― *sad hug eomticon* (Control Z), Saturday, 8 September 2012 08:10 (thirteen years ago)
I hadn't known that Wallace was as out-of-control addicted to ALL THE THINGS as he evidently was, nor the intensity of his personal brand of douchiness. It saddens me, though it rings entirely true and unsurprising. :/
― *sad hug eomticon* (Control Z), Saturday, 8 September 2012 08:18 (thirteen years ago)
the most disappointing part of that has to be 'his friend Jonathan Franzen' tho right?
― Lamp, Friday, September 7, 2012 10:00 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
hahaha exactly
― Mr. Que, Friday, September 7, 2012 10:04 AM Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
<3
― *sad hug eomticon* (Control Z), Saturday, 8 September 2012 08:21 (thirteen years ago)
how excited must Franzen have been to share a quote that unflattering w/ a biographer
― manic pixie, mercy, yo chick she's so quirky (some dude), Saturday, 8 September 2012 11:12 (thirteen years ago)
yeah, rly
― *sad hug eomticon* (Control Z), Saturday, 8 September 2012 11:16 (thirteen years ago)
another reminder, if one were necessary, that the artist and the work may be closely connected, but are two entirely separate things
― Aimless, Saturday, 8 September 2012 14:40 (thirteen years ago)
btw, wanting to put his penis in every possible vagina simply means that he was following in the wake of Genghis Khan, who appears to be a progenitor of several million modern descendants.
― Aimless, Saturday, 8 September 2012 15:08 (thirteen years ago)
honestly if he was enjoying serious lit-groupie love that just means he wasn't as miserable about attaining the fame and success he'd pursued as he seemed to want people to believe, which is kinda nice imo
― manic pixie, mercy, yo chick she's so quirky (some dude), Saturday, 8 September 2012 15:10 (thirteen years ago)
The serious lit-groupie love in itself doesn't seem to me to have been the issue, exactly. Hate to be that person, but I seriously wonder if dude was ever diagnosed with borderline personality disorder.
― *sad hug eomticon* (Control Z), Saturday, 8 September 2012 16:03 (thirteen years ago)
lol u all really want to go down the rabbit hole http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/i_know_why_bret_easton_ellis_hates_david_foster_wallace
― lag∞n, Saturday, 8 September 2012 16:10 (thirteen years ago)
Both went on to publish culture-shaking novels. “American Psycho,” a macabre put-on that amplified every cliché about yuppie scum to Grand Guignol volume, created a firestorm when the literal minded (of whom there are so many) failed to get the joke.
o rly
― lag∞n, Saturday, 8 September 2012 16:11 (thirteen years ago)
I truly believe that David was the finest writer of his generation, but his design for living seems to me naive and likely to collapse at the first impact of life’s implacable difficulties. It badly needed an injection of Montaigne or Marcus Aurelius.
WOW
Me, I find Bret Ellis’ scalding, cynical, brittle, savagely unillusioned worldview curiously refreshing. He is the Loki or Trickster of the literary world (or maybe the Lou Reed), poking sharp sticks in our eyes and daring us to figure out if he could possibly mean that.
Double WOW.
― Mr. Que, Saturday, 8 September 2012 17:40 (thirteen years ago)
The Loki of the literary world
― Mr. Que, Saturday, 8 September 2012 17:42 (thirteen years ago)
maybe I'm just too much of a DFW stan, but im having difficulty seeing how a savagely unillusioned worldview (wake up sheeple!) could be considered bracing nowadays. I get it, ppl are horrible, that is not interesting.
"could he possibly mean that?" = "oh no you DIDN'T... you just WENT THERE."
― catbus otm (gbx), Saturday, 8 September 2012 17:50 (thirteen years ago)
^^^agreed.
Aimless OTM: another reminder, if one were necessary, that the artist and the work may be closely connected, but are two entirely separate things
― Mr. Que, Saturday, 8 September 2012 17:52 (thirteen years ago)
i don't care about the artist so much, i care about the work
― Mr. Que, Saturday, 8 September 2012 17:53 (thirteen years ago)
my WOWs up there=can't believe Gerry Howard wrote such a silly article about those two
― Mr. Que, Saturday, 8 September 2012 17:54 (thirteen years ago)
that someone decided to write this and didnt immediately die of shame is more illuminating of the eternal darkness of the human soul than any stupid ellis book about killing prostitutes
― Lamp, Saturday, 8 September 2012 17:54 (thirteen years ago)
every time i say i play pool in my head its going to be amazing like im playing pool in a leather jacket in new york with lou reed and a snake
― thomp, Saturday, 8 September 2012 17:57 (thirteen years ago)
he is the table
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Saturday, 8 September 2012 18:20 (thirteen years ago)
Hate to be that person, but I seriously wonder if dude was ever diagnosed with borderline personality disorder.
Naaahhh. Dude was way too empathetic and too easily able to put himself in other headspaces for that to be the case. I mean, I'm no clinician, but I've had enough intimate exposure to BPD cases to spot 'em a mile away.
― This Whole Fridge Is Full Of (Old Lunch), Saturday, 8 September 2012 18:27 (thirteen years ago)
and the old "people just like him to feel smart" canard -- you can just as easily throw that at ANY literary author, hell, at the entire idea of "literary authors."
Haha um, this is basically how I feel about "literary authors" and a large part of why I only read tacky sf/fantasy.
― DARING PRINCESS (DJP), Saturday, 8 September 2012 18:30 (thirteen years ago)
sux 4 u
― lag∞n, Saturday, 8 September 2012 18:33 (thirteen years ago)
literally nothing about DFW says "borderline personality disorder"
― catbus otm (gbx), Saturday, 8 September 2012 18:45 (thirteen years ago)
Well obviously I don't know, and I don't mean to speculate irresponsibly or to offend. Having just read the Max bio and gotten what I think is reasonably clear/reliable idea of how extremely fragile Wallace was in terms of baseline mental health a lot of the time, as well as having read a bunch of stuff about BPD recently-ish, it struck me that DFW might well have hit more than a few of the diagnostic criteria. BPD != evil, obv, more like "painfully fucked up in a way that's p difficult to fix."
― *sad hug eomticon* (Control Z), Saturday, 8 September 2012 19:01 (thirteen years ago)
gbx otm re dfw bpd
― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 8 September 2012 19:16 (thirteen years ago)
̅ \(o_º)/ ̅
Read the bio, & then look at the BPD criteria. I could well be wrong.
― *sad hug eomticon* (Control Z), Saturday, 8 September 2012 19:21 (thirteen years ago)
i'm familiar with the bpd criteria, and have just re-read them. i haven't read the bio. the problem with the bpd criteria is that, like a lot of dsm criteria, they read a little like horoscopes, and can be massaged over anyone's shoulders.
being "fragile" doesn't quite cut it. i've only seen borderlines (i'm using that as shorthand, not pejoratively) in inpatient settings, so maybe i'm biased to the margins, but i've rarely seen the kind of crippling insight that dfw seemed to have; most of them literally did not realize ~how~ their behavior was destructive. that isn't to say that bpd renders a person insensitive or anything, just that i think it might make writing lots of words and having lots of thoughts about being really considerate somewhat difficult, certainly as a profession. otoh maybe dfw was sublimating and writing was a way to redress his mistakes or something. personality disorders are...difficult, and getting a whiff of one from a bio is like diagnosing a heart attack when you see an old guy clutch his chest in a restaurant.
/tl;dr - i get a little invested when ppl bring up personality disorders
― catbus otm (gbx), Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:05 (thirteen years ago)
dfw was p throughly diagnosed irl no
― lag∞n, Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:07 (thirteen years ago)
stop it--not tl at all, this is interesting stuff. he was diagnosed but i don't recall with what exactly
― Mr. Que, Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:09 (thirteen years ago)
bi polar no
― lag∞n, Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:09 (thirteen years ago)
i think so? man googling this dude brings up lots of sad shit
― Mr. Que, Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:12 (thirteen years ago)
"most of them literally did not realize ~how~ their behavior was destructive."
i take this back. the difficulty was with understanding how they ended up doing what they did (getting blackout drunk when they were scolded at work, torching a friendship after a slight, etc), not with how it was harmful to them and others. some bpds get that, others don't. but, again, the trouble with personality/developmental disorders is that most ppl that have them ("have them") carry (or could carry) 4 or 5 other personality disorder diagnoses, and then your Venn diagram turns into big smudgy blob and fuck it i'm going home
xp i thought with major depression? i know he was on medication for a very long time, weaned off of it, changed his mind, went back on but found it ineffective, etc. never struck me as bipolar (i don't know of any manic episodes), but maybe. then again, i'm leery of most bipolar diagnoses since every kid that comes through the hospital with behavioral issues is on an anti-psychotic and i am like 'you have got to be kidding me'
― catbus otm (gbx), Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:14 (thirteen years ago)
mdd afaik
― all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:16 (thirteen years ago)
I don't know a lot about this kinda stuff, but do these diseases really have to fit in a certain box? like couldn't somebody be effectively 80% depressive 20% borderline or something.
― iatee, Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:16 (thirteen years ago)
ya it couldve been depression, i pulled that diagnosis from a v hazy iirc
― lag∞n, Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:17 (thirteen years ago)
okay reading gbx's last post he basically says what i said
― iatee, Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:20 (thirteen years ago)
His diagnosis seems to have been atypical/treatment-resistant major depressive.disorder, along with the whole substance abuse/addiction situation. Acc. to Max he also self-diagnosed at one point at least as a sex addict, apparently in earnest.
― *sad hug eomticon* (Control Z), Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:21 (thirteen years ago)
iatee did you just ask if it's possible to be borderline borderline?
― manic pixie, mercy, yo chick she's so quirky (some dude), Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:22 (thirteen years ago)
A pervasive pattern of instability of interpersonal relationships, self-image and affects, as well as marked impulsivity, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:
Frantic efforts to avoid real or imagined abandonment. Note: Do not include suicidal or self-injuring behavior covered in Criterion 5
A pattern of unstable and intense interpersonal relationships characterized by alternating between extremes of idealization and devaluation.
Identity disturbance: markedly and persistently unstable self-image or sense of self.
Impulsivity in at least two areas that are potentially self-damaging (e.g., promiscuous sex, excessive spending, eating disorders, binge eating, substance abuse, reckless driving). Note: Do not include suicidal or self-injuring behavior covered in Criterion 5
Recurrent suicidal behavior, gestures, threats or self-injuring behavior such as cutting, interfering with the healing of scars or picking at oneself (excoriation).
Affective instability due to a marked reactivity of mood (e.g., intense episodic dysphoria, irritability or anxiety usually lasting a few hours and only rarely more than a few days).
Chronic feelings of emptiness
Inappropriate anger or difficulty controlling anger (e.g., frequent displays of temper, constant anger, recurrent physical fights).
Transient, stress-related paranoid ideation, delusions or severe dissociative symptoms
― *sad hug eomticon* (Control Z), Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:24 (thirteen years ago)
wait for suicide people... wait for it
― lag∞n, Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:26 (thirteen years ago)
someone please make a new thread for diagnosing artists
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:27 (thirteen years ago)
would it even be possible for someone to be 100% 'borderline' and 0% anything else? it just seems like such a vague disease
― iatee, Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:28 (thirteen years ago)
― iatee, Saturday, September 8, 2012 3:16 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
well, yeah. psych diagnoses are pretty soft, if anyone's being honest about it, i mean consider that basic life stuff like being in love with a certain kind of other person was 'pathological' up until pretty recently. we don't ~actually~ know why ppl with mdd have depressive episodes that are deeper and more recurrent than most ppl, but the patterns of presentation seem sufficiently stereotyped that giving it the status of 'diagnosis' is ok. that someone's symptoms improve with medication (half the time) doesn't really tell us a whole lot about what's going on, physiologically. cuz in a way, as soon as a psychiatric condition is found to have an organic cause ("your irritability is actually because of your hyperthyroid, your personality changes are because you have Pick's disease"), it ceases to be psychiatric. lotta tautology over on the psych ward.
― catbus otm (gbx), Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:31 (thirteen years ago)
I guess it was mostly the recurrent suicidality (inc. srs attempts) starting in late adolescence & on into adulthood, along with the substance abuse and intense/poss. compulsive relationship stuff, as far as actual behaviors, that sent up that flag in my head. The mood stuff seemed to me to fit, too, as well as a baseline super-negative and rather...wobbly sense of self. But I do not know.
― *sad hug eomticon* (Control Z), Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:33 (thirteen years ago)
BPD isn't a disease, nor, really, is any kind of personality disorder. they're generally assumed to be developmental, which is both accurate as well as a bit of hand-waving; if you want to be waggish, it's a way of saying "we can't find anything ~wrong~ with you, but..."
there are no neuroanatomical findings, no presumed synaptic imbalances (so to speak), just...something didn't go as planned while you were growing up. nb - shooting from the hip here, i have like six weeks of psychiatric experience and only one personal diagnosis, so salt shakers all around
xp i didn't know about the recurrent suicidality and relationship stuff, maybe you're right, who knows
― catbus otm (gbx), Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:39 (thirteen years ago)
yeah I want a pocket version of you to come out when my mom decides people in our family are bipolar or ADD and that explains all their problems
― iatee, Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:40 (thirteen years ago)
ha, i prob shouldn't be explaining anything to anyone, but ok when's dinner
― catbus otm (gbx), Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:44 (thirteen years ago)
its at 6 but you only get a pocket-sized portion
― iatee, Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:45 (thirteen years ago)
p.s.: srs q: have yall read the bio
― *sad hug eomticon* (Control Z), Saturday, 8 September 2012 20:47 (thirteen years ago)