Symmetry required it: 2012 american general election thread #2

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4793 of them)

http://i.imgur.com/V2rFT.png

otm

lag∞n, Thursday, 6 September 2012 18:46 (thirteen years ago)

money matters a lot in certain elections, just not really in presidential elections, and not in the way that people tend to think it does ie lobbyist buys yr congressman's vote vs lobbyist has a job because of that money and donates to his friend and gives him some useful briefings on energy policy

iatee, Thursday, 6 September 2012 18:54 (thirteen years ago)

ya i mean i generally agree that fundraising disparities dont matter as much as people think but of course thats all sort of vague

lag∞n, Thursday, 6 September 2012 18:56 (thirteen years ago)

recently read something re the corrupting effect of campaign donations arguing that it was more of a gift economy type situation rather than straight up quid pro quo that i thought rang p true

lag∞n, Thursday, 6 September 2012 18:58 (thirteen years ago)

yup

and w/ political ads / yard signs etc the fact that there are diminishing marginal returns to that kinda spending doesn't mean that every campaign hits the diminishing marginal returns. but presidential elections def do. if that weren't the case there would be a lot more than a billion dollars being spent on this. that's chump change.

iatee, Thursday, 6 September 2012 19:05 (thirteen years ago)

i still believe <conspiracytheory> romney is planning to steal a bunch of the money in the chaos of his landslide loss </conspiracytheory>

well, this is essentially his modus operandi

stop swearing and start windmilling (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 6 September 2012 19:06 (thirteen years ago)

That's probably true even if he wins.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 6 September 2012 20:41 (thirteen years ago)

romney will be hired by his erstwhile super pac

"Pffft" --buddha (silby), Thursday, 6 September 2012 20:57 (thirteen years ago)

Saw a new one this morning re health care and how a Canadian woman saved her life by coming to the US for treatment, rather than waiting for a months later and she would be dead calendared appointment in the Canuck version of Obamacare!

Link? In ~2009 there was a woman who did the rounds with a story of headaches and blurred vision that she blamed on a brain tumor. Turned out she had a Rathke's cleft cyst, probably an incidental finding. Her case was properly triaged to low priority. She paid out of pocket to go to Mayo for (unnecessary) surgery then sued the provincial govt for the expense. Is this the same story?

Plasmon, Thursday, 6 September 2012 23:53 (thirteen years ago)

Those job numbers

Legendary General Cypher Raige (Gukbe), Friday, 7 September 2012 14:01 (thirteen years ago)

Pretty sad that the only thing that seems to reduce the unemployment numbers is unemployed people simply giving up the search for work. That's why I'm not so confident the economy will improve anytime soon. Employment is key. Though of course, we have a long way to go to catch up to Spain, who is at, what, 25% unemployment or something?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:21 (thirteen years ago)

deep

lag∞n, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:34 (thirteen years ago)

deep?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:37 (thirteen years ago)

If you want to criticize something I said, dude - which you often seem to do - then just do it.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:37 (thirteen years ago)

in re this excellent conspiracy theory about Romney absconding with campaign funds, a question. If I run for office & I'm collecting donations and instead of just housing them in a savings/checking account, I put the bulk of the money in high-yield 7-day bonds, can I pocket the profit I turn on the bonds - am I only required to spend the amount donated on the campaign? Can I, somewhat more easily, just put the donations in the highest-yielding interest account I can find and keep the interest?

we don't wanna miss a THING!!! (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Friday, 7 September 2012 14:39 (thirteen years ago)

I don't think the FCC allows you to pocket or profit from it. You can save it indefinitely, or donate it, or roll it into another campaign, but you can't keep it.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:42 (thirteen years ago)

NO MORE SUNDAY MORNING NETWORK ROUNDTABLES FOR YOU:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/05/ann-coulter-sandra-fluke-democratic-national-convention_n_1859677.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular

timellison, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:44 (thirteen years ago)

x-post

Saw a new one this morning re health care and how a Canadian woman saved her life by coming to the US for treatment, rather than waiting for a months later and she would be dead calendared appointment in the Canuck version of Obamacare!
...
Link?

I saw it on tv in Virginia. Not sure if it was a Karl Rove super-pac one or a Romney one. I saw another Romney tv ad on welfare where they list the right-wing Heritage Foundation on the screen in small type as the authoritative source for the statement that Obama is gutting welfare work requirements.

Ridiculous.

curmudgeon, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:45 (thirteen years ago)

What exactly is the Clinton=rapist line I keep seeing about? Is it just that Monica Lewinsky must've been coerced sex?

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:46 (thirteen years ago)

I think the rapist allegation was in response to another woman's charges.

x-post-Coulter will probably get on more Sunday roundtables with tweets like that.

curmudgeon, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:48 (thirteen years ago)

josh i think if you thought abt it for like two seconds youd see that increased employment isnt like some discrete prerequisite for improving the economy, its actually you know a big part of the over all process, and somewhat of a lagging indicator, so saying that i dont think the economy will improve unless we get this employment thing figured out has aspects of truism and nonsense

also yr denial cyclical nature of the economy upthread isnt the most insightful reading

lag∞n, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:48 (thirteen years ago)

That would be an awesome point if it was what he said,

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:52 (thirteen years ago)

it is what he said

lag∞n, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:52 (thirteen years ago)

That's why I'm not so confident the economy will improve anytime soon. Employment is key.

lag∞n, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:53 (thirteen years ago)

Just saw the jobs numbers--disappointing. I thought after hearing yesterday that there were 200,000 private-sector jobs created, the report would be good. Probably the conventions are yesterday's news already.

clemenza, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:54 (thirteen years ago)

IE he is using employment as an indicator of the economy.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:54 (thirteen years ago)

ive said this before but while important i do think people overrate the importance of any single job report

lag∞n, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:55 (thirteen years ago)

what josh said is like saying im not sure the economy will improve any time soon, the economy is key

lag∞n, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:57 (thirteen years ago)

It's okay to admit you misread him.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:58 (thirteen years ago)

or its like saying, i dont think the economy will improve any time soon, because the economy is bad now

lag∞n, Friday, 7 September 2012 14:58 (thirteen years ago)

It's okay to admit you misread him.

― Andrew Farrell, Friday, September 7, 2012 10:58 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

or you or josh are welcome to expound on yr economic theory of job numbers as a leading indicator of economic recovery years into the future

lag∞n, Friday, 7 September 2012 15:00 (thirteen years ago)

xp no no I get it, it'd be a neat loop.

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 7 September 2012 15:01 (thirteen years ago)

IE he is using employment as an indicator of the economy.

― Andrew Farrell, Friday, September 7, 2012 10:54 AM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

he is using job numbers as an indicator of THE FUTURE of the economy, eagerly await your apology *sniff*

lag∞n, Friday, 7 September 2012 15:02 (thirteen years ago)

He needs to take the curl of the jobs vector to predict future economy, yeah.

Sufjan Grafton, Friday, 7 September 2012 15:05 (thirteen years ago)

What exactly is the Clinton=rapist line I keep seeing about? Is it just that Monica Lewinsky must've been coerced sex?

No- Juanita Broaderick, most prominently among others.

we don't wanna miss a THING!!! (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Friday, 7 September 2012 15:16 (thirteen years ago)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/images/clinton_banner.gif

lag∞n, Friday, 7 September 2012 15:17 (thirteen years ago)

i love finding remnants of old sites lying around!

lag∞n, Friday, 7 September 2012 15:18 (thirteen years ago)

holy crap!

Newgod joins this board, and quickly he's some dude (goole), Friday, 7 September 2012 15:21 (thirteen years ago)

he had meat in his cheeks!

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 September 2012 15:23 (thirteen years ago)

So did she!

pplains, Friday, 7 September 2012 15:24 (thirteen years ago)

ha

lag∞n, Friday, 7 September 2012 15:25 (thirteen years ago)

http://health.malaxi.com/irritable_bowel_syndrome/images/groan.jpg

a regina spektor is haunting europe (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Friday, 7 September 2012 15:27 (thirteen years ago)

http://www.playahata.com/images/celebpics/jayleno1.gif

pplains, Friday, 7 September 2012 15:30 (thirteen years ago)

that's funnier with images off!

goole, Friday, 7 September 2012 15:32 (thirteen years ago)

eh unemployment is also considered a coincident indicator in some metrics. furthermore as change in employment figures may contribute to consumer expectations, which are a leading indicator, i sorta expect a contribution to positive outlook in a period of declining unemployment or full employment if wages are rising, too. im no economist but i dont think unemployment is irrelevant to economic outlook. xpost

backed by regular small people (Hunt3r), Friday, 7 September 2012 15:38 (thirteen years ago)

its part of the economy, its not predictive of long term economic performance, or of itself for that matter

lag∞n, Friday, 7 September 2012 15:47 (thirteen years ago)

wondering how down-ticket races specifically will be affected by what will (probably) be a pretty decent turnout for Obama. obviously it won't be like 2008, but i assume the sea change in 2010 had a lot to do with large parts of Obama's coalition not showing up like they did 2 years before. (i guess?)

it's smdh time in America (will), Friday, 7 September 2012 15:58 (thirteen years ago)

After a week of trying to figure out what his address would be about, Eastwood had only figured out by Thursday morning, the day of the speech, what the issue outline of the speech would be. It was then right before his appearance, when he was backstage and about to go on, that the inspiration hit.

“There was a stool there, and some fella kept asking me if I wanted to sit down,” Eastwood said. “When I saw the stool sitting there, it gave me the idea. I’ll just put the stool out there and I’ll talk to Mr. Obama and ask him why he didn’t keep all of the promises he made to everybody.”

http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/09/eastwood-when-i-saw-the-stool-sitting-there-it-gave-me-the-idea.php

whoa

lag∞n, Friday, 7 September 2012 16:07 (thirteen years ago)

wow^^^

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/romney-defends-not-mentioning-war-troops-in-convention

^^i am soooo excited for the debates.

Mr. Que, Friday, 7 September 2012 16:11 (thirteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.