Canadian Politics Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2045 of them)

For whatever reason (that someone else can probably elucidate better than I could), the unions and activist groups - the constituencies that would support the NDP anywhere else in Canada - have traditionally got behind the PQ, at least since the 70s, as I understand it. Could a social democratic federalist party be at all feasible on the provincial level?

EveningStar (Sund4r), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 02:19 (thirteen years ago)

quebec solidaire?

reductio ad burzum (flopson), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 16:12 (thirteen years ago)

Quebec Solidaire is sovereignist, but they are probably what comes closest to a provincial ndp party.

aspiring barkitect (silverfish), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 17:08 (thirteen years ago)

o sorry federalist gotcha

reductio ad burzum (flopson), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 17:26 (thirteen years ago)

See, this is the sort of thing that doesn't make me feel so great about the PQ:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/08/07/quebec-votes-2012-day-7-promises.html?cmp=rss&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

(Where in QC is it very hard to be served in French btw?)

EveningStar (Sund4r), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 22:23 (thirteen years ago)

ugh, quebec politics, just ugh

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 22:40 (thirteen years ago)

keeps the place exciting tho

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Tuesday, 7 August 2012 22:43 (thirteen years ago)

on the plus side wrt the PQ, though: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/elections/election-blog/pqs-marois-attacks-useless-harper-institutions-royalty/article4466841

pauls00, Tuesday, 7 August 2012 23:19 (thirteen years ago)

I could give two shits about the Royal Family but something tells me that Ms Marois is not about to propose a very constructive alternative constitutional arrangement.

EveningStar (Sund4r), Wednesday, 8 August 2012 01:52 (thirteen years ago)

"La reine, c'est moi!"

pauls00, Wednesday, 8 August 2012 01:58 (thirteen years ago)

so as anglophone(ilx poster)s, who do you vote for and does it matter?

mookieproof, Wednesday, 8 August 2012 02:01 (thirteen years ago)

QS is stressing their sovereigntist leanings (also kicking around helpless beavers): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVSXILDtly8&feature=player_embedded

I get that CAQ is pretty wishy-washy and uninspiring, and backed the tuition hike to boot, but they're neither separatist nor corrupt (so far). Do any Quebec posters see them as a potential 'least bad' option?

EveningStar (Sund4r), Wednesday, 8 August 2012 04:15 (thirteen years ago)

I could give two shits about the Royal Family but something tells me that Ms Marois is not about to propose a very constructive alternative constitutional arrangement.

ha ha!

Porto for Pyros (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 8 August 2012 04:16 (thirteen years ago)

caq say then want to raise tuition 1000$ instead of the planned 1778$, pretty naive of them to have thought that would get them any student votes as it is i don't think i'll consider voting for them

reductio ad burzum (flopson), Wednesday, 8 August 2012 17:51 (thirteen years ago)

CAQ seem like real bumblers, but at least without the (public) xenophobia of the PQ. I'm predicting a liberal landslide and, err, Amir Khadr.

fields of salmon, Friday, 10 August 2012 00:51 (thirteen years ago)

Caq seems like it should be the logical choice for lots of people but lots of people don't really trust them. They seem to just make up stuff as they go along. Like that $1000 seems to have mostly been chosen because it's halfway between what the pq and plq are proposing. And lots of caq candidates are ex-action démocratique, which was the right wing party of quebec.

I really have no idea what a caq government would look like.

aspiring barkitect (silverfish), Friday, 10 August 2012 02:09 (thirteen years ago)

Thankfully, we'll never have to find out.

fields of salmon, Saturday, 11 August 2012 23:12 (thirteen years ago)

So I did CBC's Vote Compass for the QC election, leaving aside any questions about specific parties or leaders. A bit surprisingly, it has me at 59% Liberal, 51% Green, 49% PQ. I'm roughly in the same place as the PQ on the socio-economic scale (not too surprising) but further to the bottom on 'identity' than any of the parties, given that I hate Bill 101 and strongly oppose decentralization, let alone sovereignty.

EveningStar (Sund4r), Monday, 13 August 2012 17:52 (thirteen years ago)

When I weight my answers by importance, I'm 57% Liberal, 52% PQ, 49% Green.

Interesting, since I kind of hate the Liberals.

EveningStar (Sund4r), Monday, 13 August 2012 17:57 (thirteen years ago)

i didn't even know what the vote compass was so looked it up and found http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/quebecvotes2012/story/2012/07/30/quebecvotes-2012-votecompass-faq.html and haha comment #2: "I stopped doing the Compass when no matter what you chose it would portray you as a Liberal."

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Monday, 13 August 2012 18:02 (thirteen years ago)

Ha ha I'm gonna get my ultra-partisan NDP housemate to take that test

Ówen P., Monday, 13 August 2012 18:31 (thirteen years ago)

99% Rhinoceros?!

Porto for Pyros (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Monday, 13 August 2012 20:08 (thirteen years ago)

Voter suppression case to be heard in Dec:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2012/08/15/pol-council-canadians-court-date.html

EveningStar (Sund4r), Thursday, 16 August 2012 17:20 (thirteen years ago)

December?! jesus shit justice is slow up here.

Porto for Pyros (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Thursday, 16 August 2012 17:24 (thirteen years ago)

Marois is achieving self-parody:
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/quebecvotes2012/story/2012/08/21/parti-quebecois-non-french-speakers.html?cmp=rss

EveningStar (Sund4r), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 16:45 (thirteen years ago)

Seriously, is that constitutional?

EveningStar (Sund4r), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 16:46 (thirteen years ago)

"allophones"?!

Porto for Pyros (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 17:26 (thirteen years ago)

first/home language neither French nor English

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 17:34 (thirteen years ago)

People whose first language is neither French nor English; thought it was the common term?

xpost

EveningStar (Sund4r), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 17:35 (thirteen years ago)

My French is rusty enough that I had to refer to Google Translate several times (or else I'm overrating how good it ever was):

http://www.lapresse.ca/debats/chroniques/vincent-marissal/201208/21/01-4567058-planchers-flottants.php

Addresses the question of constitutionality (answer: no):
Cette loi de Mme Marois, si elle est adoptée, s'en va directement à la Cour suprême, qui, indubitablement, la déclarera illégale en vertu de l'article 3 de la Charte (Tout citoyen canadien a le droit de vote et est admissible aux élections législatives fédérales ou provinciales), article qui n'est pas assujetti à la clause dérogatoire

EveningStar (Sund4r), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 17:42 (thirteen years ago)

Correct me if I'm wrong but Rene levesque was never a signator to the constitution act of '82. (in reply to EveningStar)

to welcome jer.fairall, pie is served. (jer.fairall), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 19:08 (thirteen years ago)

That does not make Quebec exempt from it.

EveningStar (Sund4r), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 19:10 (thirteen years ago)

It was never a legal necessity for every single province to sign. It was, however, perceived as an insult and sign of alienation by Quebecers, that the federal government and other provinces passed the Constitution Act without Quebec's signature. While I would actually agree that it would have been a good idea to wait until a Quebec government was willing to sign on, this does not invalidate the Constitution Act or Charter or exempt Quebec from it.

I'm guessing that Marois's strategy, in the event that the PQ wins, is going to be to propose something blatantly unconstitutional, have it go to the Supreme Court, and then declare something along the lines of "Aha! Quebec's aspirations are being suppressed because of this oppressive consitution we never signed on to! Yet again we see that Quebec and Canada are incompatible!"

EveningStar (Sund4r), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 19:22 (thirteen years ago)

xps

The whole thing to me is not actually a language issue but a culture issue - which has been said before, and yes obv language and culture are tied - of course people should be able to manage at a decent working level in French if they're working in a system that functions primarily in French, I mean, no one is going to be translating email and every meeting for you. Hell, go to the provincial dept of health as a regular ol citizen and they will only speak French to you. This is just the way it goes. But if we all had translation devices implanted in our ears, would language still be a political issue? Partly yes, because language and culture are deeply linked via history and meaning, and partly no, because "people are people," deeply linked via humanity, etc etc - yet regardless, culture and the promotion/protection of it still would be an issue. The bigger question, outside of how to make rich people richer, in Quebec today is accepting that cultures merge and change and that's a good thing if balanced representation is maintained. But lol my small-l liberal leanings... conservatives aren't so into that...

Rant part: It's also kind of funny that a lot of what makes Quebec interesting is the ~struggle~ for representation. I'm kind of like Move On!! Grow Up! but I've also gotten kind of used to the atmosphere of struggle and what comes out of that. Old-school artist way and whatever + often a desire to win, to show 'em - it's a weird, interesting, exciting even blend of lefty politics and capitalist desires. Certain people get the accolades in whatever it is they're doing and keep at it; some people don't and keep at it, some move away, get sick of the fight and sick of being poor, whether they're Anglo or Franco. I guess this is part of a rant about what Success means in Quebec (and by extension, Canada.)

Anyway, I feel like none of the parties running in this election speak to or for me, and I'm a pretty engaged citizen.

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Wednesday, 22 August 2012 20:01 (thirteen years ago)

Yeah I feel pretty alienated in this election. My friend and I both did the CBC vote compass thing the other day and landed squarely in the lower left corner where no parties reside. I joked that we should start our own party. He said we could call it the NDP.

sofatruck, Wednesday, 22 August 2012 20:38 (thirteen years ago)

Potential good news in the future for QC voters?: http://www.cbc.ca/thehouse/2012/08/18/ndp-prepares-to-run-in-next-quebec-election/

EveningStar (Sund4r), Friday, 24 August 2012 17:40 (thirteen years ago)

lol sofatruck

after reading about Mulcair on NDP's direction re: environment and industry, i'm even more skeptical of the NDP as actually upholding values they once claimed at least sort of to have. but hell, maybe that's just politics, eh? always and forever... so much trickiness. hrm.

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Friday, 24 August 2012 18:02 (thirteen years ago)

Mulcair on NDP's direction re: environment and industry

Link?

EveningStar (Sund4r), Friday, 24 August 2012 18:05 (thirteen years ago)

You'd think the NDP would be smart enough to not jump into provincial politics in Quebec ... oh I forgot, it's the NDP, of course they're not smart enough! They fluke out on a bunch of seats in the federal election (not because of merit but because voters were sick of all the other parties), haven't even had a provincial caucus in nearly 20 years ... maybe they see opportunity with the way parties come and go in Quebec, but I call it overreaching.

NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 24 August 2012 18:08 (thirteen years ago)

i still take this reportage with a dose of salt, of course. and it seems Mulcair is trying to appeal to a broader demographic, but...
http://www2.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=7111773
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/can-mulcairs-new-approach-complete-jack-laytons-revolution/article4492580/

from articles earlier in the summer, when he talked about the environment the focus was on sustainable development and protective measures. but what do those phrases really mean? different things to different powers that be, as we've seen.
xp

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Friday, 24 August 2012 18:12 (thirteen years ago)

yeah i call it overreaching too. i get why they'd want to extend, but at the same time, it seems kind of gimicky at the moment - i'm not altogether sure what a prov NDP would stand for in Quebec. and also, there are enough federal issues for the NDP to focus on right now! i'd say they need to gain strength on that level before doing anything else.

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Friday, 24 August 2012 18:15 (thirteen years ago)

yeah i call it overreaching too

Even though none of the current parties speak to you? Most QC anglophones I know have been expressing a wish that there was a federalist social democratic party, ideally one that is not corrupt.

EveningStar (Sund4r), Friday, 24 August 2012 19:25 (thirteen years ago)

http://www2.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=7111773

I agree with what Mulcair has to say here, and don't see how it's a change of direction for the NDP at all.

EveningStar (Sund4r), Friday, 24 August 2012 19:31 (thirteen years ago)

yeah i actually really hate talking politics, but try to pay attention even though it pains me. i don't think i'm alone in this feeling at all. i'm just talking about my impressions and am cool with dialogue, of course. i don't know every party's platform; i know what i know via news and friends who are into politics like it's a sport, which is how i think it's treated by a lot of people, media included. i just can't get into it that way. so anyway, this to say that i suppose i'd over-idealized the NDP in a way - I think a lot of people did and do, which therefore makes me more skeptical of them, funny how that works... i know that Canada's economy is based in resources, esp energy resources, and international interest in those resources, but i looked to the NDP as a party that wanted to change that in the near future, so what i read into that article is that that isn't the case. but articles are articles and don't contain all the info. kinda wish they would on occasion.

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Friday, 24 August 2012 20:12 (thirteen years ago)

whoops, i mean i do know the parties' platforms, just not every detail

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Friday, 24 August 2012 20:15 (thirteen years ago)

The NDP's announcement that they will be wading into Quebec provincial politics brought to mind Mulcair in a pith helmet, pointing at a thicket, declaring: "We're heading into the vipers' nest!" IE: makes me as nervous as it does excited.

sean gramophone, Friday, 24 August 2012 20:21 (thirteen years ago)

and provincially, it's not like we don't have a tonne of parties running: http://electionsquebec.qc.ca/english/provincial/rapeq/political-parties.php though, haha, not exactly all viable choices. if the fed NDP can figure out a way to get a prov NDP going and keep its profile high enough, well, cool - i just see the provincial political and cultural landscape as rather different than the federal one when it comes to representation, so i can see problems with the NDP being successful by the time the next election occurs!
xp

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Friday, 24 August 2012 20:30 (thirteen years ago)

well there's definitely a problem with the current provincial parties - they're all a fucking shit show, none of them rallying to the progressivist consensus that Montreal (for example) reached earlier this summer, at the height of the anti-78 casseroles.

sean gramophone, Friday, 24 August 2012 20:56 (thirteen years ago)

Yeah, I do get your guys' point that this is a very risky move + QC provincial politics involves a lot of sensitive issues that could make things tricky for a federal party. Maybe it is wisest to stay out of it for a little longer.

Robyn: Didn't mean to come off as belligerent/over-argumentative, sorry. I mostly follow via news and surfing the net at work too. I think the NDP does favour diversification of the economy and increased investment in manufacturing. However, I definitely don't think they've ever really been opposed to resource extraction, including oil. As I understand, their concerns are that: i) this sector not be over-subsidized at the expense of others ii) appropriate environmental oversight should be applied and iii) the government should not actively muzzle scientists who are doing environmental research, even if it's not in the industry's interests. So I think Mulcair is actually reaffirming those priorities.

2xpost: Right, I think the issue is that with all those parties, there's not really a left federalist praty (even though there are three left-wing sovereigntist parties).

EveningStar (Sund4r), Friday, 24 August 2012 20:56 (thirteen years ago)

Most QC anglophones I know have been expressing a wish that there was a federalist social democratic party, ideally one that is not corrupt.

Depends on the QC anglo. Over half the other QC anglos I know live in the West Island, Brossard, Laval. They're suburbanite commuters and de facto federalists, but couldn't give a damn about 78 or anything else. All they care about is their fucking commutes and their condo fees or whatever it is.

Sometimes I think the idea of a "federalist social democratic party" [read left-leaning anglo] is really just another way of saying Plateau Party. All the suburban anglos don't give a fuck. But here in the Plateau we nurse our beers and think about how we're in a jam. There's enough of us that if a party came along that wasn't racist or xenophobic mais quand même était capable de faire que nous les anglophones sentaient accueilli à Montréal et au Québec ... Un bon resultat. Faut dire que es anglophones « plateausard » sont pas si militant pour le droit d'anglais que ceux du West Island. Les partis politiques provinciaux devraient pas avoir peur des anglos du Plateau. En fait, il faut nous mobiliser en tant qu'une source abondante de votes. There are tens of thousands of anglos in the Plateau and environs.

I voted for Amir Khadir or whatever his name is last time. I'm in a different circonscription now and it's the lady with the moustache.

fields of salmon, Sunday, 26 August 2012 23:12 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.