The only person who can really help her out is Saul, and he looks like he's reaching that point himself.
Also lol @ Mike and Hywel yesterday.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 15:36 (thirteen years ago)
ha yes
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 15:45 (thirteen years ago)
what if she wants to turn state's evs and walt finds out and decides he has to kill her, how fucked would that be
― joaquin haus-partizan (s1ocki), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 16:02 (thirteen years ago)
Really curious how exactly Walt poisoned Brock now.
This remains the show's most aggravatingly-unanswered plot point in recent memory. It kinda prevented the end of last season (awesome as it was) from hanging together for me, if only because it seemed a little logistically sketchy in a show where the details are usually meticulously laid out. Hopefully, it'll eventually be addressed.
― Old Lunch, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 17:00 (thirteen years ago)
I watched S2E1 last night. It was fun to watch Walt make ricin, knowing what we know now.
― pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 17:13 (thirteen years ago)
i realized i had been w/o really thinking abt it imagining walt in disguise offering brock candy
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 18:00 (thirteen years ago)
How much you wanna bet it turns out that the Heisenberg hat has magical mind-clouding abilities
― mythical mickey rourke jacket (latebloomer), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 18:08 (thirteen years ago)
up until the premier of this season, I had thought that it had been an accident, but considering the ominous looks, i was obviously wrong about that
― sarahell, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 18:09 (thirteen years ago)
wait waht
― vincent black shadow giallo (Edward III), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 18:10 (thirteen years ago)
I'm ok with never finding out how he poisoned Brock. We don't need a flashback for everything.
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 18:12 (thirteen years ago)
my wrong thinking: in a stroke of irony, it turns out that brock was accidentally poisoned, but because the source was something in walt's garden, jesse will eventually put two and two together and accuse walt of doing it intentionally, and it will mirror the demise of junkie jane.
― sarahell, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 18:13 (thirteen years ago)
I have a feeling it could be a really interesting story tho!
(xpost)
― heated debate over derpy hooves (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 18:14 (thirteen years ago)
the important fact is that he did it, not how. matt armstrong otm.
― dmr, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 18:14 (thirteen years ago)
right.
― sarahell, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 18:16 (thirteen years ago)
yeah i think it's safe to assume that saul has tight-lipped goons who can get stuff done.
― Merdeyeux, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 18:17 (thirteen years ago)
like cripple ted.
that was an accident
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 18:18 (thirteen years ago)
saul's g∞ns
― vincent black shadow giallo (Edward III), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 18:24 (thirteen years ago)
walt likes to do his dirty work himself ime
― vincent black shadow giallo (Edward III), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 18:25 (thirteen years ago)
Yeah, don't thing he'd entrust something like that to anyone.
― I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 18:28 (thirteen years ago)
weren't his movements severely constrained at several points? he might not have had a choice?
― sarahell, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 18:31 (thirteen years ago)
iirc walt had all day to run around while jesse was doing the cook, he kicked in saul's glas door and bribed the secretary with $$ he had to get from his house where gus' hitmen were hanging out
after jesse got off work he had 5 increasingly frantic messages from saul to come see him (so saul could get the ricin cigarette ASAP)
― vincent black shadow giallo (Edward III), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 18:37 (thirteen years ago)
still hoping for a badger spinoff
― I dont even know that I think this sucks per se (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 20:05 (thirteen years ago)
I dunno, unless someone can scrape together a satisfying two-beat explanation of how Walt managed to poison a stranger's kid on the sly (what, did he steal an ice cream truck and cram the juniper berries in Brock's Choco Taco?), it's a pretty glaring plot point and it bothers me. I'd probably let it slide on a lesser show but the lack of explanation feels uncharacteristically sloppy here. I'm not asking for an episode devoted to it, but a brief flashback to the act would be nice.
― Old Lunch, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 20:06 (thirteen years ago)
it doesnt bother me really. the berries on the plant are supposed to be enticing for kids to eat, brock's kinda chunky, they probably just put a potted plant where he could see it and he started snackin.
― Hungry4Ass, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 20:27 (thirteen years ago)
I think it's only sloppy if they never explain it.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 20:27 (thirteen years ago)
I feel like they already explained it, even if it seems implausible. Having a scene where they show exactly how it went down is unlikely to move the current narrative forward. It would just be fan service at this point.
― pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 20:30 (thirteen years ago)
it happened man. let's all just deal
― I dont even know that I think this sucks per se (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 20:32 (thirteen years ago)
"I feel like they already explained it, even if it seems implausible."
I don't think they explained exactly how Brock was poisoned.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 20:33 (thirteen years ago)
he ordered the berries as a topping on a pizza from a place that doesn't slice their slices
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 20:33 (thirteen years ago)
then he threw the pizza into the distance, the berries flew off the pizza and into that kids mouth somehow I dont really know how they got from the pizza to the kid I hope they explain it
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 20:34 (thirteen years ago)
The smoke monster did it.
― pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 20:35 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOBGwS4Aot4
― I dont even know that I think this sucks per se (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 20:36 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqaoL6Phf5k&feature=related
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 20:38 (thirteen years ago)
now that walt's transformation into evil incarnate is complete, he's the least interesting character
also seems like cranston is on auto-pilot, letting the scripts do all the work
― vincent black shadow giallo (Edward III), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 20:52 (thirteen years ago)
ya he's terrible in this show
― joaquin haus-partizan (s1ocki), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 21:05 (thirteen years ago)
turn the berries into a serum, inject it into a caprisun, bingobango you got yourself a sick Brock
― Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 21:08 (thirteen years ago)
I know, right
xp
― vincent black shadow giallo (Edward III), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 21:08 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lo_P2QDXrwI&feature=player_embedded
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 21:20 (thirteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7r7pcqXGlU&feature=player_embedded
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 21:22 (thirteen years ago)
What is that? Is it pretending to be real?
― I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 22:52 (thirteen years ago)
It's from a documentary about Coffeemate.
― pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 22:56 (thirteen years ago)
lol
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 23:01 (thirteen years ago)
I can't quite figure it out, but it looks like a forgotten TV series from the early '80s? Don't get if it's supposed to seem real or not.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 23:24 (thirteen years ago)
click though to utube and all will be known
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 23:27 (thirteen years ago)
"Crisis Counselor" is a mix between a fictionalized Jerry Springer-esque talk show scenario and televised intervention. In this clip from an episode entitled, "Bisexual Husband," which originally aired in 1982, Cranston plays a bisexual man named Sam who goes to a "family crisis counselor" to try to save his marriage after admitting to having an affair with a male lover.
― pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 23:29 (thirteen years ago)
it seems to me that a big thing for walt now is for people to believe in him, to take his word as gospel, to have faith in him. with saul, with mike, with sky - with each of them - he has had moments where he is essentially saying "how do you know this will work? because i say so" with the implied but unsaid "now shut the fuck up because your doubts are undermining my fragile ego"
if we're going to get into predictions i wouldn't be surprised to see some sort of confrontation with one or all of these people that hinges on walt's word not being good enough, or, more typically, walt's suspicion that one of them thinks his word is not good enough
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 2 August 2012 11:42 (thirteen years ago)
"Crisis Counselor" and "Bisexual Husband" both sound like the name of Prince b-sides.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 2 August 2012 12:00 (thirteen years ago)
I think the 'because I say so' attitude quite interesting- as a scientist and someone who cares/cared about analysing in detail the best methods for everything he does, it's unlikely that previously he'd ever have settled for 'because I say so' as a reason for doing anything. It shows how much he prizes power vs careful logic now, I guess. Also maybe he's fed up of trying to explain things to idiots cf that time he and Jesse were stuck in the desert in the crystal ship
― kinder, Thursday, 2 August 2012 12:32 (thirteen years ago)
no, i thought the same thing - walt usually LOVES explaining in detail exactly why he's right
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 2 August 2012 12:34 (thirteen years ago)