Shall we anticipate the FIFTH SEASON of the AMC series "Breaking Bad"? I think I may.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (9757 of them)

it doesn't seem like it would be a craaaaazy leap to say that the same time they were filming a show to air this season that they might be programming for that season's other shows does it?

I dont even know that I think this sucks per se (forksclovetofu), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:01 (thirteen years ago)

anyway i honestly don't care either way so SAY HELLO TO MY LITTLE GUSTAVO

I dont even know that I think this sucks per se (forksclovetofu), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:01 (thirteen years ago)

Xp Not people who don't watch U.S. TV, that's for sure

kinder, Monday, 30 July 2012 21:01 (thirteen years ago)

im almost positive theyve done mob week before

johnny crunch, Monday, 30 July 2012 21:02 (thirteen years ago)

altho i guess that fact cld cut either way in this arg

johnny crunch, Monday, 30 July 2012 21:03 (thirteen years ago)

I think Skyler had a good quote this week that applies to this argument.

pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:03 (thirteen years ago)

"fuhgeddaboutit!"

joaquin haus-partizan (s1ocki), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:05 (thirteen years ago)

that's the one

pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:06 (thirteen years ago)

it doesn't seem like it would be a craaaaazy leap to say that the same time they were filming a show to air this season that they might be programming for that season's other shows does it?

the crazy leap is how you imagine this taking place - the producers of (I think) the most successful show on the network, one of the most buzz-heavy shows around, aren't probably beholden to the network about whether to put a tie-in for a thematic week of programming into an episode. even if they were, you get that how this would take place involves people's agents & managers & business managers & things they'd need (=$$$) to make this happen: not just one (the "executive producer") but directors & writers. Many of whom have creative control clauses written into their contracts as soon as they get any juice at all. And probably, unless they signed on for the entire show's run at the outset of it, the major stars: a what-I'm-shilling-for clause in a contract is p. standard afaik. Every screenwriter I know would be very insulted to be told "you have to put something in about Scarface, have them watching Scarface, the network said they're showing it that week and they want some help."

it could be, I guess - it's not unimaginable - I just get a big wasp in my nose about how people think the entertainment biz is this super-easy-to-read thing where a guy at a desk with a cigar and a wad of money in his fist calls up a screenwriter, shouts some directions into a phone & slams the phone down, and then the director adjusts his tie and sweats three fat drops of fear-sweat and barks at a nearby kid in a fedora: "Jimmy! Quick! Write in something about Scarface with this week's script or it's curtains for the show and we're all eatin' cheese sandwiches!"

steven fucking tyler (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:11 (thirteen years ago)

lol polyphonic

vincent black shadow giallo (Edward III), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:12 (thirteen years ago)

okay, i swear i don't care about this, but again I would refer you to jesse's light gun work on RAGE with prominent box placement and game exposure
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCNSF7lsoSY

I dont even know that I think this sucks per se (forksclovetofu), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:13 (thirteen years ago)

and the sequence in question makes sense with ANY gangster film. If i were a screenwriter i would WANT to use scarface; AMC has the rights to use it so why not integrate?

I dont even know that I think this sucks per se (forksclovetofu), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:15 (thirteen years ago)

the important thing is that it's a silly thing to have walt watching when skylar walks in, gimme a break

joaquin haus-partizan (s1ocki), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:17 (thirteen years ago)

AMC has the rights to use it so why not integrate?

They don't have the rights to use it. They had to contact Universal and get the rights, and get Al Pacino's okay as well.

pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:17 (thirteen years ago)

it was such a "wah-WAHHHH" moment

joaquin haus-partizan (s1ocki), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:17 (thirteen years ago)

How come he didn't watch Mr. Chips in season 1.

pun lovin criminal (polyphonic), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:18 (thirteen years ago)

Every screenwriter I know would be very insulted to be told "you have to put something in about Scarface, have them watching Scarface, the network said they're showing it that week and they want some help."

That's definitely not what I think happened. I figure somebody at AMC went to Gilligan's Island and said "We want to do a 'mob week' programming block sometime during BB Season 5.1. Is there a scene anytime during the season where characters might be watching violent shit on the tv? If so, would you consider making it one of these movies? If not, I will respectfully withdraw, O Profitable One."

Your sweet bippy is going to hell (WmC), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:18 (thirteen years ago)

How come he didn't watch Mr. Chips in season 1.

Too unrealistic. Nobody willingly watches that movie.

cue "White Rabbit" (kenan), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:26 (thirteen years ago)

And besides, he starts offing dudes in the first episode. There was no time!

cue "White Rabbit" (kenan), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:28 (thirteen years ago)

well I gotta be honest I can totally see WmC's version of this scenario happening

steven fucking tyler (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:34 (thirteen years ago)

so filled with RAGE right nwo

I dont even know that I think this sucks per se (forksclovetofu), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:36 (thirteen years ago)

http://www.vinylexchange.co.uk/images/pics/1038ministrynwo.jpg

cue "White Rabbit" (kenan), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:39 (thirteen years ago)

it was such a "wah-WAHHHH" moment

yeah it was an eye-rolling scene even without the possible tie-in

although the cut to the money-counting machine sounding like gunfire was a little more clever

dmr, Monday, 30 July 2012 21:50 (thirteen years ago)

Walt dandling baby whatsername while watching hyper violent gangster movie: LOOK HE IS EVIL NOW. First misstep so far this season.

I wish to incorporate disco into my small business (chap), Monday, 30 July 2012 21:57 (thirteen years ago)

well I gotta be honest I can totally see WmC's version of this scenario happening

And Gilligan loves to talk about this stuff ad nauseam, so I fully expect confirmation at the end of S5.2, if not 5.1.

Your sweet bippy is going to hell (WmC), Monday, 30 July 2012 23:01 (thirteen years ago)

Gilligan talks about the scene a bit here

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/29/breaking-bad-scarface_n_1716848.html

There's that great line that Bryan Cranston ad-libbed that is not in the script for the episode: "Everybody dies in this movie." Who knows if that's foreshadowing or not.

good one Cranston

Number None, Monday, 30 July 2012 23:40 (thirteen years ago)

just abt everytime i read some day after recap or piece like that it reminds me why i shouldnt read them

johnny crunch, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 00:08 (thirteen years ago)

i dont understand why they exist

joaquin haus-partizan (s1ocki), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 00:10 (thirteen years ago)

my favorite part of those things is the bulleted list of things that happened in the episode

Matt Armstrong, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 00:17 (thirteen years ago)

i dont understand why they exist

― joaquin haus-partizan (s1ocki), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 01:10 (7 minutes ago) Bookmark

they perform the exact function of this thread more or less

Number None, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 00:18 (thirteen years ago)

and at least it keeps the AV club commenters all in one place

Number None, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 00:19 (thirteen years ago)

whoever the interviewer is raving abt 'what a brill ad-lib etc' is just ¯\(°_o)/¯ 2 me
its a good show, cranstons a good actor but cmon lady

johnny crunch, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 00:25 (thirteen years ago)

Ya but no one bothers to write 1500-word summaries of each ep on this thread

joaquin haus-partizan (s1ocki), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 00:37 (thirteen years ago)

ilx has the weirdest arguments about breaking bad

High powered Texas lawyer (symsymsym), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 03:55 (thirteen years ago)

ilx has the weirdest arguments about breaking bad

heated debate over derpy hooves (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 04:02 (thirteen years ago)

ilx has the weirdest arguments about breaking bad

joaquin haus-partizan (s1ocki), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 05:27 (thirteen years ago)

Heh

mythical mickey rourke jacket (latebloomer), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 05:57 (thirteen years ago)

or something like that: "oh shit this is my mom's house" or w/e

I bet Mike's mother is fucking terrifying.

Love how just a few months ago Walt wouldn't cook with one solitary fly in the room and now they're doing it in cockroach-infested houses.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 08:35 (thirteen years ago)

loved the apple chomp of victory

i was meaning to ask even before this ep though, does everyone fully buy skyler's wigging out to this extent cos i don't really

like yes she is naive but not that she couldnt have forseen something like that happening, maybe not walt actually doing it but the eventuality of it. and given she's been shown to secretly love the power would she really have this much regard for loss of life if it's that of a drug kingpin who was out to kill her family?

not saying walt hasnt been gross since then but i do feel for him somewhat

r|t|c, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 09:17 (thirteen years ago)

There was a point last season when Skylar directly asked Walt "are we in danger?" and Walt said no. Since then, Walt has deliberately hidden everything that happened at the sharp end from Skylar, and she didn't ask any difficult questions and it was convenient for her not to think too hard about it because yay money.

So the first inkling of real danger would have come when the family were suddenly taken into police protection and I'm quite prepared to believe this and then her husband coming home a double-murderer were a genuine shock to her. But only because she was stupid and/or willfully blind.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 09:28 (thirteen years ago)

Even by Walt's standards he's being pretty fucking complacent about his wife cracking up.

Weird that at this stage Walt's the liability and Jesse seems to be the level-headed one.

Matt DC, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 09:29 (thirteen years ago)

xp I think also being responsible for Ted being in traction is maybe kinda messing her up too.

Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 12:38 (thirteen years ago)

loved the apple chomp of victory

i was meaning to ask even before this ep though, does everyone fully buy skyler's wigging out to this extent cos i don't really

like yes she is naive but not that she couldnt have forseen something like that happening, maybe not walt actually doing it but the eventuality of it. and given she's been shown to secretly love the power would she really have this much regard for loss of life if it's that of a drug kingpin who was out to kill her family?

not saying walt hasnt been gross since then but i do feel for him somewhat

― r|t|c, Tuesday, July 31, 2012 5:17 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

i buy that the cumulative effect of all this trauma would be to drive her off the rails

joaquin haus-partizan (s1ocki), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 12:54 (thirteen years ago)

i mean it's driven walt off the rails in a different way

joaquin haus-partizan (s1ocki), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 12:54 (thirteen years ago)

True. What kind of crazy person watches Scarface with an infant?

Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 12:58 (thirteen years ago)

xxp, yeah, he was Takeshi Kaga'ing the hell up, it was nice

re: Skyler - I think up until recently she's been able to convince herself that as with Walt's original justification, they were being practical about their larceny, but blowing up a nursing home + the Ted thing was just waaaaaay too far for her, i could see moving from abstract money laundering to crippling her ex-lover and murder would push her over the edge

Nhex, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 13:03 (thirteen years ago)

seeing an ex-lover crippled and terrified because of something u did is p fucked up

joaquin haus-partizan (s1ocki), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 13:07 (thirteen years ago)

after the first couple times tho its not so bad

lag∞n, Tuesday, 31 July 2012 13:08 (thirteen years ago)

Hilariously that's basically what Walt tells her.

Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 13:09 (thirteen years ago)

I buy Skyler's wigging out because she's wigging out about Walt being a murdering, creepy, "I forgive you," let me paw at you in bed while you're clearly not interested in even talking to me, terrifying person to be married to. Oh who just moves back in. Basically Skyler is terrified of Walt and powerless to escape him.

ms. cookie (carl agatha), Tuesday, 31 July 2012 13:45 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.