lmao oh no
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 24 July 2012 15:32 (thirteen years ago)
yeah i know
― goole, Tuesday, 24 July 2012 15:33 (thirteen years ago)
ahhhhhhh hahahahaha
― max, Tuesday, 24 July 2012 15:37 (thirteen years ago)
new one seem to be written in a somewhat simpler lighter mode, maybe to reflect cromwells ascension, or maybe by accident, or maybe im imagining it, anyway im gonna miss this guy when there are no more books left
― lag∞n, Monday, 30 July 2012 16:35 (thirteen years ago)
my only complaint is it wasnt nearly as long as wolf hall
― lag∞n, Sunday, 5 August 2012 12:45 (thirteen years ago)
well maybe and the third one doesnt exist yet
― lag∞n, Sunday, 5 August 2012 12:46 (thirteen years ago)
i need a new book for traveling this weekend, is this it? is the writing really great?
― 40oz of tears (Jordan), Monday, 13 August 2012 19:42 (thirteen years ago)
yes
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 14 August 2012 05:07 (thirteen years ago)
haha when i finished 'bringing up the bodies' i immediately read the wikipedia summaries of any character i vaguely cared about
― Lamp, Tuesday, 14 August 2012 05:17 (thirteen years ago)
hah I have purposely not spolierized myself which is p lol for a historical novel
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 14 August 2012 05:19 (thirteen years ago)
ok i'm about 1/4 through this and i'm all in.
― 40oz of tears (Jordan), Friday, 24 August 2012 15:19 (thirteen years ago)
damn I really want to read this now
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 24 August 2012 15:40 (thirteen years ago)
mantel profile http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/10/15/121015fa_fact_macfarquhar?currentPage=all
― --bob marley (lag∞n), Tuesday, 16 October 2012 06:51 (thirteen years ago)
Remarkable profile. Unusually bold style for the New Yorker.
― Get wolves (DL), Tuesday, 16 October 2012 09:03 (thirteen years ago)
and another booker prize
― --bob marley (lag∞n), Tuesday, 16 October 2012 21:41 (thirteen years ago)
I'm actually reading APoGS with a book on the french revolution in the other hand, to clarify as i go. ― Jesu swept (ledge), Wednesday, June 6, 2012 4:10 PM (4 months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
doing the same w/wolf hall & wikipedia
this book is brilliant
― MVP ("most viking poster") 2012 (cozen), Sunday, 21 October 2012 13:29 (thirteen years ago)
paperback of sequel not due till april 2013 wtf /gettingaheadofmyself
― MVP ("most viking poster") 2012 (cozen), Sunday, 21 October 2012 13:30 (thirteen years ago)
i've had this on my 'list:read/sublist:probably won't read' for a while but based on the enthusiasm here i'm gonna bump it up.
― Roberto Spiralli, Sunday, 21 October 2012 15:39 (thirteen years ago)
is it historical fiction like the da vinci code or like the holocaust?
its a prequel to the davinci code
― --bob marley (lag∞n), Sunday, 21 October 2012 15:54 (thirteen years ago)
Oh FINE, I'll read this. (Also bumping to top of list based mostly on max's enthusiasm if I'm being completely honest.) Usually I don't like historical fiction because it always ends badly, because no one ever writes about all the nameless people of history who DIDN'T make terrible personal choices and therefore didn't make a bad end in a dark alley (or a tower courtyard). But OKAY, JEEZ.
― purveyor of generations (in orbit), Sunday, 21 October 2012 15:57 (thirteen years ago)
can i read Bring Up The Bodies without reading Wolf Hall first?
― nostormo, Friday, 9 November 2012 16:40 (thirteen years ago)
you prob could, it does a bunch of recapping, but really its just the 2nd part of the same book, it picks up right where wolf hall left off and everything, recommend starting at the beginning
― lag∞n, Friday, 9 November 2012 16:43 (thirteen years ago)
but i understand that it's much better than Wold Hall and i don't have the patience to read 1000 pages now..
― nostormo, Friday, 9 November 2012 16:47 (thirteen years ago)
lol who said that, crazy talk
― lag∞n, Friday, 9 November 2012 16:48 (thirteen years ago)
i think maybe i liked wolf hall a lil better but really they are v v similar
― lag∞n, Friday, 9 November 2012 16:49 (thirteen years ago)
reviews..xpost
thanks for the tip anyway..
― nostormo, Friday, 9 November 2012 16:50 (thirteen years ago)
from my vantage point of being halfway thru the first book after picking it up yesterday i would say that "better" is relative to the point of irrelevance. this is excellent.
― Roberto Spiralli, Friday, 9 November 2012 17:12 (thirteen years ago)
James wood liked wolf hall better
― lag∞n, Friday, 9 November 2012 17:58 (thirteen years ago)
im reading ' a place of greater safety ' now -- her french revolution one and
yall
it
is
so
good
― max, Thursday, 31 January 2013 01:20 (thirteen years ago)
i dont want to read history anymore i just want to read hilary mantels historical novels. i want hilary mantel on the 30 yrs war
― max, Thursday, 31 January 2013 01:22 (thirteen years ago)
hilary mantel on the unification of italy
hilary mantels lenin
― max, Thursday, 31 January 2013 01:23 (thirteen years ago)
Gotta read these books
― Gukbe, Thursday, 31 January 2013 01:23 (thirteen years ago)
If someone wants to convince me what makes them so great in two sentences I might be inspired.
― Gukbe, Thursday, 31 January 2013 01:24 (thirteen years ago)
i can't imagine that anyone who is interested at all by the premise would fail to enjoy the wolf hall books
― Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 31 January 2013 01:33 (thirteen years ago)
Too many years reading academic history books has made this kind of thing hard to get into, but I love the period.
― Gukbe, Thursday, 31 January 2013 01:35 (thirteen years ago)
its a better written version of a massive fantasy epic except the people are all real and the only magic is mastery of political intrigues
― future crimes (Lamp), Thursday, 31 January 2013 08:21 (thirteen years ago)
Well done!
― Gukbe, Thursday, 31 January 2013 13:54 (thirteen years ago)
lamp hardcore otm. i was hoping no one else had noticed. i have a developing idea for kind of ripping off the style of these books but applied to a different historical era and disguised in a more fantastical setting.
― Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 31 January 2013 14:07 (thirteen years ago)
tom crom, space pirate
― Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 31 January 2013 14:08 (thirteen years ago)
not really but that might actually be better
― Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 31 January 2013 14:09 (thirteen years ago)
"better written" is of course u+k
― ledge, Thursday, 31 January 2013 14:53 (thirteen years ago)
lamp super otm
Wolf Hall rly rly reminded me of Dorothy Dunnet's Niccolo series (which is just historical fiction, no dragons or w/e), like i knew WH was more ~literary~ and shit and the Niccolo books happen like a century earlier, but the scenes in my mind all had a really similar feel to them.
― bantz a make her dance (c sharp major), Thursday, 31 January 2013 15:17 (thirteen years ago)
to which end i prefer A Place Of Greater Safety because Camille Desmoulins
― bantz a make her dance (c sharp major), Thursday, 31 January 2013 15:18 (thirteen years ago)
so dreamy
um i mean because it feels more distinct, more its own book and its own world.
― bantz a make her dance (c sharp major), Thursday, 31 January 2013 15:19 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v35/n04/hilary-mantel/royal-bodies
i read this earlier this week and was really blown away, its maybe a little ott here and there but altogether a really wonderful essay/lecture whatever
anyway i was... interested to see this
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2280780/Kate-Middleton-plastic-princess-designed-breed-Author-Hilary-Mantel-attacks-Duchess-Cambridge.html
this morning. linked to by matt drudge of all people
― max, Tuesday, 19 February 2013 12:38 (thirteen years ago)
You'll want the daily mail thread
― lance armstrong will have been delighted (darraghmac), Tuesday, 19 February 2013 12:39 (thirteen years ago)
i'll say this here rather than on the daily mail thread but this is an amazing piece of writing
― goole, Tuesday, 19 February 2013 22:53 (thirteen years ago)
Surely there were less ridiculous ways than showing the Archbishop in the crowd ...
― assert (matttkkkk), Thursday, 3 April 2025 04:46 (one year ago)
Yeah that was disappointing
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 3 April 2025 14:33 (one year ago)
Calzino, based on what you said about Richard Rich above, you might like this from Diarmaid MacCulloch’s Cromwell biography: “Few historical accounts have managed to make the tale of Rich’s career anything better than despicable in its opportunism and chameleon like profession of religious belief”
― Rocko's Modern Basilisk (Boring, Maryland), Friday, 12 September 2025 03:23 (eight months ago)
he was just basically very .. English I guess.. lol
― vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Friday, 12 September 2025 07:34 (eight months ago)