man i can't wait
― goole, Tuesday, 24 July 2012 15:12 (thirteen years ago)
the dialogue is just amazing in the first one. all his conversations with his sweet, dim (but not too dim) son are so funny and awkward
― goole, Tuesday, 24 July 2012 15:14 (thirteen years ago)
hardcovers of popular books very cheap thru' Amazon 2nd hand, got almost pristine Wolf Hall recently for <£3, will maybe read it come holiday.
― woof, Tuesday, 24 July 2012 15:14 (thirteen years ago)
that p much makes no sense
Why not? I like hardcover books when they have lots of gorgeous pictures to look at and are typically formatted larger, I don't think they are necessary for most fiction. But thats just my personal preference. FWIW, 98% of the fiction I read it in eBook format anyway.
― heated debate over derpy hooves (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 24 July 2012 15:17 (thirteen years ago)
gross
― Lamp, Tuesday, 24 July 2012 15:28 (thirteen years ago)
i think 'bringing up the bodies' was really good but i always like the parts in stories where the hero has everything going p smoothly and is coming out on top and you can feel the sympathetic flush of success
― Lamp, Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11:10 AM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
lol when more and gardiner where simultaneously marginalized i was so happy for him
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 24 July 2012 15:30 (thirteen years ago)
i had a few physical correspondences that i couldn't shake
cromwell: al swearingenanne: sasha greyhenry: tim tebow (older)
― goole, Tuesday, 24 July 2012 15:31 (thirteen years ago)
lmao oh no
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 24 July 2012 15:32 (thirteen years ago)
yeah i know
― goole, Tuesday, 24 July 2012 15:33 (thirteen years ago)
ahhhhhhh hahahahaha
― max, Tuesday, 24 July 2012 15:37 (thirteen years ago)
new one seem to be written in a somewhat simpler lighter mode, maybe to reflect cromwells ascension, or maybe by accident, or maybe im imagining it, anyway im gonna miss this guy when there are no more books left
― lag∞n, Monday, 30 July 2012 16:35 (thirteen years ago)
my only complaint is it wasnt nearly as long as wolf hall
― lag∞n, Sunday, 5 August 2012 12:45 (thirteen years ago)
well maybe and the third one doesnt exist yet
― lag∞n, Sunday, 5 August 2012 12:46 (thirteen years ago)
i need a new book for traveling this weekend, is this it? is the writing really great?
― 40oz of tears (Jordan), Monday, 13 August 2012 19:42 (thirteen years ago)
yes
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 14 August 2012 05:07 (thirteen years ago)
haha when i finished 'bringing up the bodies' i immediately read the wikipedia summaries of any character i vaguely cared about
― Lamp, Tuesday, 14 August 2012 05:17 (thirteen years ago)
hah I have purposely not spolierized myself which is p lol for a historical novel
― lag∞n, Tuesday, 14 August 2012 05:19 (thirteen years ago)
ok i'm about 1/4 through this and i'm all in.
― 40oz of tears (Jordan), Friday, 24 August 2012 15:19 (thirteen years ago)
damn I really want to read this now
― set the controls for the heart of the sun (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 24 August 2012 15:40 (thirteen years ago)
mantel profile http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/10/15/121015fa_fact_macfarquhar?currentPage=all
― --bob marley (lag∞n), Tuesday, 16 October 2012 06:51 (thirteen years ago)
Remarkable profile. Unusually bold style for the New Yorker.
― Get wolves (DL), Tuesday, 16 October 2012 09:03 (thirteen years ago)
and another booker prize
― --bob marley (lag∞n), Tuesday, 16 October 2012 21:41 (thirteen years ago)
I'm actually reading APoGS with a book on the french revolution in the other hand, to clarify as i go. ― Jesu swept (ledge), Wednesday, June 6, 2012 4:10 PM (4 months ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
doing the same w/wolf hall & wikipedia
this book is brilliant
― MVP ("most viking poster") 2012 (cozen), Sunday, 21 October 2012 13:29 (thirteen years ago)
paperback of sequel not due till april 2013 wtf /gettingaheadofmyself
― MVP ("most viking poster") 2012 (cozen), Sunday, 21 October 2012 13:30 (thirteen years ago)
i've had this on my 'list:read/sublist:probably won't read' for a while but based on the enthusiasm here i'm gonna bump it up.
― Roberto Spiralli, Sunday, 21 October 2012 15:39 (thirteen years ago)
is it historical fiction like the da vinci code or like the holocaust?
its a prequel to the davinci code
― --bob marley (lag∞n), Sunday, 21 October 2012 15:54 (thirteen years ago)
Oh FINE, I'll read this. (Also bumping to top of list based mostly on max's enthusiasm if I'm being completely honest.) Usually I don't like historical fiction because it always ends badly, because no one ever writes about all the nameless people of history who DIDN'T make terrible personal choices and therefore didn't make a bad end in a dark alley (or a tower courtyard). But OKAY, JEEZ.
― purveyor of generations (in orbit), Sunday, 21 October 2012 15:57 (thirteen years ago)
can i read Bring Up The Bodies without reading Wolf Hall first?
― nostormo, Friday, 9 November 2012 16:40 (thirteen years ago)
you prob could, it does a bunch of recapping, but really its just the 2nd part of the same book, it picks up right where wolf hall left off and everything, recommend starting at the beginning
― lag∞n, Friday, 9 November 2012 16:43 (thirteen years ago)
but i understand that it's much better than Wold Hall and i don't have the patience to read 1000 pages now..
― nostormo, Friday, 9 November 2012 16:47 (thirteen years ago)
lol who said that, crazy talk
― lag∞n, Friday, 9 November 2012 16:48 (thirteen years ago)
i think maybe i liked wolf hall a lil better but really they are v v similar
― lag∞n, Friday, 9 November 2012 16:49 (thirteen years ago)
reviews..xpost
thanks for the tip anyway..
― nostormo, Friday, 9 November 2012 16:50 (thirteen years ago)
from my vantage point of being halfway thru the first book after picking it up yesterday i would say that "better" is relative to the point of irrelevance. this is excellent.
― Roberto Spiralli, Friday, 9 November 2012 17:12 (thirteen years ago)
James wood liked wolf hall better
― lag∞n, Friday, 9 November 2012 17:58 (thirteen years ago)
im reading ' a place of greater safety ' now -- her french revolution one and
yall
it
is
so
good
― max, Thursday, 31 January 2013 01:20 (thirteen years ago)
i dont want to read history anymore i just want to read hilary mantels historical novels. i want hilary mantel on the 30 yrs war
― max, Thursday, 31 January 2013 01:22 (thirteen years ago)
hilary mantel on the unification of italy
hilary mantels lenin
― max, Thursday, 31 January 2013 01:23 (thirteen years ago)
Gotta read these books
― Gukbe, Thursday, 31 January 2013 01:23 (thirteen years ago)
If someone wants to convince me what makes them so great in two sentences I might be inspired.
― Gukbe, Thursday, 31 January 2013 01:24 (thirteen years ago)
i can't imagine that anyone who is interested at all by the premise would fail to enjoy the wolf hall books
― Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 31 January 2013 01:33 (thirteen years ago)
Too many years reading academic history books has made this kind of thing hard to get into, but I love the period.
― Gukbe, Thursday, 31 January 2013 01:35 (thirteen years ago)
its a better written version of a massive fantasy epic except the people are all real and the only magic is mastery of political intrigues
― future crimes (Lamp), Thursday, 31 January 2013 08:21 (thirteen years ago)
Well done!
― Gukbe, Thursday, 31 January 2013 13:54 (thirteen years ago)
lamp hardcore otm. i was hoping no one else had noticed. i have a developing idea for kind of ripping off the style of these books but applied to a different historical era and disguised in a more fantastical setting.
― Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 31 January 2013 14:07 (thirteen years ago)
tom crom, space pirate
― Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 31 January 2013 14:08 (thirteen years ago)
not really but that might actually be better
― Roberto Spiralli, Thursday, 31 January 2013 14:09 (thirteen years ago)
"better written" is of course u+k
― ledge, Thursday, 31 January 2013 14:53 (thirteen years ago)
Written in early pandemic https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/the-mysterious-sweating-sickness-in-hilary-mantels-wolf-hall-trilogy-and-the-private-country-of-illness
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Tuesday, 21 January 2025 04:33 (one year ago)
https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2025/jan/25/mark-rylance-took-significant-pay-cut-to-get-wolf-hall-made-director-tells-mps
― xyzzzz__, Saturday, 25 January 2025 15:36 (one year ago)
On PBS now, either to binge on Passport or watch once a week over the air like yr. grans did with “Upstairs, Downstairs”.I’m binging of course. Some thoughts:—regarding the different look to S2 discussed above, Shrewsbury Abbey is definitely recreated by CGI, at least when TC and the abbess are talking in that cloister—something very uncanny valley about it.—miss a consistently used foil throughout the series like Foy’s Anne. She was perfect. —the continuing mystery of why Cromwell didn’t remarry after his wife died. For the time, that was very unusual I understand. Im only in episode 3 of series 2 but the books never get onto that either— while we are privileged to many of his other thoughts Mantel makes no effort to explain why he didn’t. It would have saved him some trouble! Was Dorothea his only plan? Dude had plenty of other ladies on the boil for him (the show doesn’t really get into but the last book in particular has a poor widow —which he gives away to Richard—and another courtier as being portrayed as probably willing to be asked).
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 27 March 2025 17:45 (one year ago)
lol i got super-excited bcz my mum's parents lived like 40 yards from shrewsbury abbey and i know it quite well and couldn't believe i'd missed the chance to re-connect (the present-day building is easily old enough but it has no surviving cloisters and it's built of red sandstone)
however it's actually shaftsbury abbey -- which is a ruin today and so i guess had to be CGI'd?
― mark s, Thursday, 27 March 2025 18:34 (one year ago)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3w10816en3o
Peter Kosminsky told BBC Two's Newsnight they eventually opted to axe costly exterior scenes in Wolf Hall: The Mirror and The Light, meaning almost everything in the Tudor drama, screened by the BBC, became "conversations in rooms" instead.
― Please play Lou Reed's irritating guitar sounds (Tom D.), Thursday, 27 March 2025 18:59 (one year ago)
Shaftesbury not Shrewsbury, shit.
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 27 March 2025 19:08 (one year ago)
Too much soprano keening on the soundtrack, too many dreams of Dorothea, etc. all told the second series was pretty satisfying if dumbed down a little bit. Wished the beheading scene had more of his abstract stream of consciousness that the book had but I’m sure that’s tough to portray on TV.
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 3 April 2025 00:43 (one year ago)
Surely there were less ridiculous ways than showing the Archbishop in the crowd ...
― assert (matttkkkk), Thursday, 3 April 2025 04:46 (one year ago)
Yeah that was disappointing
― Crack's Addition (Boring, Maryland), Thursday, 3 April 2025 14:33 (one year ago)
Calzino, based on what you said about Richard Rich above, you might like this from Diarmaid MacCulloch’s Cromwell biography: “Few historical accounts have managed to make the tale of Rich’s career anything better than despicable in its opportunism and chameleon like profession of religious belief”
― Rocko's Modern Basilisk (Boring, Maryland), Friday, 12 September 2025 03:23 (eight months ago)
he was just basically very .. English I guess.. lol
― vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Friday, 12 September 2025 07:34 (eight months ago)