'Children of Men', the new Alfonso Cuaron sci-fi flick

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1517 of them)
Oh, and the attention to detail too--like emsk said, watching closely is very rewarding.

steal compass, drive north, disappear (tissp), Thursday, 28 September 2006 10:15 (nineteen years ago)

WHY WAS THE PIG THERE PLS? i mean i know what it's from, but was it just a joke or what?

emsk ( emsk), Thursday, 28 September 2006 11:17 (nineteen years ago)

I assumed the pig was there as a nod to any Pink Floyd fans watching - it looked suspiciously CGI-ey to me, so I guess they didn't actually recreate / borrow the original inflatable?

Bill A (Bill A), Thursday, 28 September 2006 12:16 (nineteen years ago)

WHY WAS THE PIG THERE PLS? i mean i know what it's from, but was it just a joke or what?

yeah it's a reference to the cover of pink floyd's animals LP.

http://www.thebestofwebsite.com/Photos/Music/Pink_Floyd/Animals.jpg


the reason it's such a good reference (and therefore not really a joke, as such) is that it's something you can actually imagine happening soon in the version of britain which may have immediately preceded the police state in the film, i.e. britain as it is now. it's not even a stretch to imagine it happening.

my expectations were not particularly high for this (and madchen, the trailer makes it seem like it's going to be a much worse film than it actually is) but i thought it was absolutely brilliant. packed with great moments and scenes: the kitten crawling up clive owen's trousers, him walking around in flip flops because he's left without his shoes; the scene where the five main characters in the film get ambushed after having their path blocked by a burning car; the battersea power station scene just mentioned with the young guy and his ADDish addiction to some transparent version of the internet). There are things which seem like small ideas but which actually make the whole mess seem entirely feasible: the fact that Julianne Moore offers Clive Owen £5,000, which seems a paltry amount of money for something set in the future until we see him stooping to pick up pennies from the street a few scenes later. it's a very clever touch in a very intelligent film. it's also quite thrilling to see something of this scale which is not set in america.

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 30 September 2006 16:39 (nineteen years ago)

another great touch: reaily avaiable and advertised suicide kits ("Quietness"?).

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 30 September 2006 16:43 (nineteen years ago)

also i think it very subtly and cleverly references/anticipates what i think is going to become a huge political issue in the UK in the next few years - the influx of eastern european workers.

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 30 September 2006 16:47 (nineteen years ago)

It reminded me of a lot of things, from Brazil to the more atmospheric computer games - Resident Evil 4 and very very much Halflife 2. In fact the thing that it gets from HL2 (around Bex Hill) is that it's less "What nightmare dystopia is this?" than "Ha ha you're Kosovo now".

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 30 September 2006 19:16 (nineteen years ago)

PS Michael Moore is fantastic - I laughed very loudly at the photo of his as Cartoonist of the Year. Is he supposed to be Theo's dad, or did I make that up?

Haha one of the two errors noted on IMDB is that they get into the wrong kind of fictional bus!

Me and Emsk both thought/hoped the geordie terrorist was going to be Jake from Doctor Who! But it was someone else off Byker Grove instead.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 30 September 2006 19:27 (nineteen years ago)

I think Caine's cartoons were by Steve Bell, but you saw them so briefly it was hard to tell.

chap who would dare to contain two ingredients. Tea and bags. (chap), Saturday, 30 September 2006 19:34 (nineteen years ago)

i saw in the credits that charlie hunnan from queer as folk was in it but i'm not sure who he played.

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 30 September 2006 20:01 (nineteen years ago)

hunnam.

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 30 September 2006 20:03 (nineteen years ago)

He was the geordie dread.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 30 September 2006 20:36 (nineteen years ago)

ah!

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 30 September 2006 20:41 (nineteen years ago)

with the bad breath.

jed_ (jed), Saturday, 30 September 2006 20:41 (nineteen years ago)

fucking outstanding

sean gramophone (Sean M), Saturday, 30 September 2006 23:20 (nineteen years ago)

the pig was there because the guy is a wank-off art collector

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Sunday, 1 October 2006 23:16 (nineteen years ago)

when the hell does this come out in canada???? i love a good dystopia. actually, who am i kidding, i'll pay to see ANY dystopia. "the island" etc. etc.

derrick (derrick), Monday, 2 October 2006 05:08 (nineteen years ago)

God, that was a lot more... harrowing than I was expecting. But I liked the "cheesy" ending. It had me in tears in points. I know I don't see films as often as other people, so they tend to affect me more.

It was just all too realistic, and that was what made it terrifying. (Ha ha, there was a review in Country Life that said that the London of the film was jarringly unlike real London - bloody hell, what London do you live in? Probably the posh parklike behind the gates at Admiralty Arch.) It seemed so terrifyingly... normal.

I liked the fact that the infertility was relatively unexplained, that was what kind of made it different than The Handmaid's Tale. It just... happened, and humanity was left to deal with it. Though I would have liked to see more about how the resulting gender conflict would actually have been resolved. With the genders relieved of the ability for procreation, would the balance of power changed? Would the world have stumbled towards equality (probably not, in such a dystopia) or would one gender have risen up and attempted to destroy the other? That would have been as interesting to me as the class war and "Fugee" conflicts.

I thought the Christian symbolism was a bit heavy-handed, though. (I mean, christ, the revelation in a sodding stable? Why not throw in a manger, while you're at it. And did every woman on the side of good have to be called a variant of Mary? It would have been too obvious to make the pregnant girl a Mary, I suppose.) Surprised you didn't catch that, Emsk.

But all in all, very good. Very thought-provoking, a film you really come out of feeling dazed and terrified, and you see London not quite the same way afterwards. "Britain Soliders On" - terrifying, but at least the idea that our Island/Blitz mentality would keep us soldiering on.

Virginia Plainsong (kate), Monday, 2 October 2006 08:45 (nineteen years ago)

I liked the fact that the infertility was relatively unexplained

yes! and the fact that the details of the horrible catastrophes of the recent past that left the world in the state it's in are very vague and suggested (did i imagine an image of an a-bomb going off somewhere in the film, on the tv news?) is very effective too - maybe there was no great huge calamity? maybe this is just the direction we are currently leading towards?

i am not a nugget (stevie), Monday, 2 October 2006 08:51 (nineteen years ago)

I think there was supposed to have been an A-bomb in Africa, at least according to one of the newspapers covering the Fishes' hideout, I suspect? But there was enough of a ravaged landscape to give you ideas. Lots of shots of burning piles of animals. (Foot and mouth revisted?) And that terrible, terrible scene of somewhere in Kent (actually, most of Kent would be underwater by 2027 according to "managed retreat") with dead animals, too full of chemicals to even rot, dotted across a landscape boiling with putrid green chemical waste.

Virginia Plainsong (kate), Monday, 2 October 2006 08:59 (nineteen years ago)

I think there was a brief still of an a-bomb going off in NYC, and at one point Clive Owen asked Jullianne Moore if her parents had been in New York when 'it happened'. I too like how it wasn't explained, a lesser film would have inserted some horrible clunky bit of exposition.

chap who would dare to contain two ingredients. Tea and bags. (chap), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:02 (nineteen years ago)

a lesser film would have inserted some horrible clunky bit of exposition.

OTM

i am not a nugget (stevie), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:03 (nineteen years ago)

(I mean, christ, the revelation in a sodding stable?

oh, was it a stable? i just thought it was a derelict building.

Why not throw in a manger, while you're at it. And did every woman on the side of good have to be called a variant of Mary? It would have been too obvious to make the pregnant girl a Mary, I suppose.) Surprised you didn't catch that, Emsk.

ki?

emsk ( emsk), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:15 (nineteen years ago)

With the genders relieved of the ability for procreation, would the balance of power changed?

I don't get this, you seem to be saying that a truce of fucking is the only thing holding back the Council of Men and Council Of Women from outright war? That's a pretty literal interpretation of the battle of the sexes, I think (also it implies a lack of hope, which by definition anyone who hasn't taken their Quietus has some of).

And did every woman on the side of good have to be called a variant of Mary?

But.. they aren't. Kee isn't, and Julian isn't, and Miriam and Marichka are quite obscure variants, I think you're reading more into this than there is.

"Britain Soliders On" - terrifying, but at least the idea that our Island/Blitz mentality would keep us soldiering on.

Well yeah, this seems to sit in an awkward and interesting way with her Tory nature. On the one hand clearly Clamping Down on Immigration works, and the story isn't kind to people opposed to same, but the film, possibly just by having an person you can empathise with playing Kee, seems to run against it. People who've read the book, what's it like?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:29 (nineteen years ago)

(It's not a stable)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:29 (nineteen years ago)

Ah, I missed the A Bomb on NYC. I thought the "were your parents there when it happened" was a 9/11 reference.

OK, a milking shed, not a stable, but still. It was a very overt nativity reference.

Virginia Plainsong (kate), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:34 (nineteen years ago)

oh i get it! she showed him her belly in a milking shed. i thought you meant it was born in a milking shed. ok i do think you're reading too much into it, think that was just highlighting the grossness of procedures used (i didn't catch exactly what she said as they showed shots of the equipment and cows) vs the natural.

emsk ( emsk), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:36 (nineteen years ago)

I think, in a film that paid that much attention to detail, I'm not "reading too much into it" but picking up on something you haven't been indoctrinated to see.

Virginia Plainsong (kate), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:38 (nineteen years ago)

er... surely if you've been indoctrinated you're the one picking stuff up that's not necessarily intentional? i mean, even now you've pointed it out, i still think you're wrong.

emsk ( emsk), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:43 (nineteen years ago)

For gods sake, Emsk, the scene where they walked out of the building, and all the soldiers just laid down their weapons and stared at mother and baby like there was a halo around them? You didn't see *anything* Christian in there? Oh, never mind. It's pointless to argue with atheists. They'll never see anything Christian in something they like.

Virginia Plainsong (kate), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:45 (nineteen years ago)

You saying there's no symbolism intended in their being in a stable is the same as the Country Life reviewer saying that the London of the film doesn't look anything like the "real" London.

Virginia Plainsong (kate), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:46 (nineteen years ago)

Yes, except that she's right and they're wrong :)

You don't have to be Christian to realise why it's a good idea to have a cease-fire around the first baby in 18 years.

The problem with Christians is that they don't believe that Athiests can feel awe at things.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:49 (nineteen years ago)

no i didn't! "like there was a halo" - but there WASN'T a halo! i thought that scene was pretty cheesy tbh but i didn't think it was christian - it was just - holy shit, they haven't seen a baby for 20 fucking years, bloody hell wtf! and you were the one who used the word "indoctrinated"...

emsk ( emsk), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:49 (nineteen years ago)

kate i do like some christian stuff too, like 'in the bleak midwinter' and the christingle service.

emsk ( emsk), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:50 (nineteen years ago)

I'm not saying you can't feel awe at things, I'm just saying you just refuse to acknowledge very overt symbolism because you don't like the things it symbolises.

x-post

Virginia Plainsong (kate), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:51 (nineteen years ago)

I think Kee's 'I'm a virgin' joke was a very obvious statement that the film WASN'T going to be a Christian allegory.

chap who would dare to contain two ingredients. Tea and bags. (chap), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:53 (nineteen years ago)

if i thought it was there i would acknowledge it, but i honestly don't think it was there! they were in a barn because they were on a bloody farm, and where else is there to go to be private when there's a big bloody meeting going on in the farmhouse and it's raining outside? nice touch of gruesomeness with the cows.

emsk ( emsk), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:55 (nineteen years ago)

It's pointless to argue with atheists.

!

sean gramophone (Sean M), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:55 (nineteen years ago)

I haven't read it, but I was told that in the book it's Julianne Moore's character who is pregnant, interestingly.

I also loved this movie for all the reasons stated above, but it must be said that this is some of the best actual nuts-and-bolts filmmaking I have seen in a long time. Some incredibly memorable images - the explosions going off in the distance through the fog as Theo and Ki sit in the rowboat were so haunting. And this should be the number one film cited in any defense of CGI work, which I usually hate with a passion.

Tiki Theater Xymposium (Bent Over at the Arclight), Monday, 2 October 2006 10:07 (nineteen years ago)

But I liked the "cheesy" ending.

was it that cheesy though? there were cheesier bits. i dunno, i didn't leave with much of a feeling of hope, even once she'd been picked up. who are these human project people? they might be just as bad as the fish. or they might just be useless.

It had me in tears in points. I know I don't see films as often as other people, so they tend to affect me more.

i dunno if it's anything to do with seeing less films... i see quite a lot and i was in tears pretty much the whole way through! i think it's just that it's an incredibly well-made, timely, insightful, powerful film that chimes with modern fears and is realistic enough to upset us in a non-escapist way.

emsk ( emsk), Monday, 2 October 2006 10:25 (nineteen years ago)

I thought others were saying that it was cheesy? Or maybe they were referring to that "escaping from the gunfight" bit. It did leave me with a sense of hope, that the Human Project were going to be decent folks, or at least a better life for Kee than the Fishes or the Government. Or, at least that they were *real* when there was so much fear that they weren't. But now you've stripped me of that hope... waaahhh!

Virginia Plainsong (kate), Monday, 2 October 2006 10:28 (nineteen years ago)

there were some very clear references to christ's birth throughout the film, it's just obtuse to say otherwise.

jed_ (jed), Monday, 2 October 2006 10:55 (nineteen years ago)

the only defense of cgi you will ever need = the ping pong ball! (it HAD to be, rite???)

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 2 October 2006 11:00 (nineteen years ago)

the concept of the future salvation of humanity being born amid muck and violence and war has a history, to say the least, but i don't think the film went much beyond that

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 2 October 2006 11:04 (nineteen years ago)

the ping pong ball was great.

jed_ (jed), Monday, 2 October 2006 11:09 (nineteen years ago)

ok, i thought the meeting bit was cheesy (in that the acting was, it was a bit stagey) and the laying down their arms was (sure, the ones that saw them would prob have stopped firing, but the ones who couldn't see and they yelled "ceasefire!" at and they just did? no fucking chance), but that was it really... i liked the end, that it was quite murky.

emsk ( emsk), Monday, 2 October 2006 11:23 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, actually that's one thing that's maybe not been said yet, how completely convincing Julianne Moore and Clive Owen are as exes.

xpost - soldiers be following orders.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 2 October 2006 11:26 (nineteen years ago)

the one huge plot hole was that there would have been no chance whatsoever of them escaping after the baby had been revealed.

also it's not been said yet how totally hott Owen is in this.

jed_ (jed), Monday, 2 October 2006 11:28 (nineteen years ago)

did anybody else see the banksy stencil in richy-cousin's battersea fortress? it looked as though an entire wall had been removed and relocated - i think that and the guernica overloaded my little brain with danger levels of mirth

Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 2 October 2006 11:30 (nineteen years ago)

I, too, wondered how they managed to get away after the baby had been revealed. I thought Syd's reaction was far more natural than the soldiers'. That was a rather terrible plothole. Especially as it was the baby that they were all supposed to be fighting over!

Err, yeah. I didn't want to be the one to mention it, though. I was watching the whole film going "err, is it me, or is Clive Owen really hott in this? Coz I didn't think he was all that in King Arthur, but errr, hottt."

x-post yes, I laughed out loud at the Banksy in the Tate. (And it was the Tate for that sequence, weirdly, even though the outside was Battersea Power Station.)

Virginia Plainsong (kate), Monday, 2 October 2006 11:33 (nineteen years ago)

This and AI are two big budget/big swing early '00s sci-fi that can reduce me to puddles just thinking about them. I have to be judicious with rewatches.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 February 2025 00:33 (one year ago)

Thanks, phone. This is the future we are living in.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 February 2025 00:34 (one year ago)

one month passes...

her monologue in the abandoned school gives her character so much dignity

i randomly put on 28 Days Later and early on there's a scene shortly after Murphy's character gets out of the hospital, where a woman is telling him about the events that had occurred while he was in a coma and they did the same slow pan over to her while she spoke as that scene. feel like CoM had to have been directly inspired by 28 Days for that monologue scene.
not being a film school student, i realize there's a good chance this kind of thing has been done 1000 times before and since - but the similarities did jump out at me

FRAUDULENT STEAKS (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Monday, 24 March 2025 02:09 (one year ago)

three weeks pass...

And is that tai-chi she's doing outside the school?

Outside Jasper's, but yeah - I think she's drawn as "well-spoken but a bit of a hippie", which is definitely some type - when she's taken off the bus she's praying to 'the Lord' to take care of Kee - not sure how much weight to put on whether the loud exhortation to 'St Gabriel' is just acting a a distraction. She's quite well dressed when Theo first gets into the car with her - the crusty look for the rest of the film is because those clothes end up with Julian's blood on them.

Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 19 April 2025 15:54 (one year ago)

Best dystopian movie

treeship 2, Saturday, 19 April 2025 15:55 (one year ago)

i agree. I can’t think of one that bests it.

completely suited to the horny decadence (Capitaine Jay Vee), Saturday, 19 April 2025 18:31 (one year ago)

Yeah, the coolest thing about that bit -- thematically, visually, generally -- was that the guy sits and eats lunch with Guernica hanging over the table.

― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 18 January 2007 22:41 (eighteen years ago) link

Absurd update to this: I was recently walking past an apartment I used to live in, and was shocked to see through the window that whoever lives there now has a gigantic print of Guernica over the dining area. Imagine my surprise reading an 18-year-old thread and seeing that I once found this deranged enough in fiction

ን (nabisco), Monday, 21 April 2025 16:03 (one year ago)

It all comes true in the end. (Also hi there!)

Ned Raggett, Monday, 21 April 2025 17:16 (one year ago)

eleven months pass...

context:

‪Brooke‬
✧@brooklynma✧✧✧.b✧✧✧.soc✧✧✧‬
· 6h
This is driven by a huge drop in 13-17 year olds getting knocked up with no recourse so just take that into consideration

Serfin' USA (sleeve), Friday, 10 April 2026 03:22 (two months ago)

one thing that I think the movie gets right is the absolute over the top obsession with pets/animals, nearly everyone has an emotional support animal on a plane or in the grocery store/restaurant these days.

imperial frfr (Steve Shasta), Friday, 10 April 2026 03:49 (two months ago)

Falling birth rates correlate with rising living standards literally everywhere in the world throughout history iirc so I'm not sure what the problem is here

Tracer Hand, Friday, 10 April 2026 08:48 (two months ago)

You'd think so. But in the United States at least, one immediate prediction is that any number of small to moderate sized colleges and schools will not have enough enrollment and struggle to stay open. I've heard it termed the demographic cliff, as far as higher education goes. Iirc the drop in birth rate began around the 2007 financial crises and hasn't recovered, and starting around last year or so (when that peak birth-year class of 2007 began applying to colleges, in record numbers) the enrollment numbers have begun cycling down, already starting with shrinking kindergarten classes. It's (potentially) going to especially affect public education here.

I think the broader global concern is that as people live longer, there won't be enough young people to support them financially, through taxes and work. Iirc this has been a real worry in countries like Italy and Japan, places that have tried to incentivize having kids, through advertising campaigns and even through payments. Like this graf from some study I just skimmed:

The nation’s aging population has become a persistent issue that threatens to perpetually stunt their economy. Japan is currently the nation with the highest old-age dependency ratio, -a statistic that relates the number of retired people to the working age population- with a proportion of 48.6 seniors for every 100 working adults. (Keulen, 2024) Additionally, this metric is projected to increase 79/100 by 2050 (Keulen, 2024). Among economists, a diminishing population is often linked to a weakening economic growth. The economic growth slows when a population ages due to pressure on the national social security system. There is less income tax to collect from individuals as the workforce gets smaller and as the need for elderly care, health care, pensions and health care workers increases, so does the amount of necessary public funding.

There's a solution hovering in there, of course - spend less on bullshit like wars and more on families/health care/etc. - but no country seems to have figured it out yet. And any campaign to have more kids has been tainted by the right-wing nativists with their own cuckoo sexist/racists agendas.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 April 2026 12:39 (two months ago)

I guess diaper manufacturers might see a dip too..

But that broader picture of "not enough workers to fund retirees" has been debunked pretty comprehensively. The main guy I think of for this is Dean Baker. The core of the argument is that even modest annual productivity gains swamp the demographic issue. But there are other positives in a declining population.

https://cepr.net/publications/aging-populations-and-great-power-politics-the-problem-is-for-the-elites-not-the-masses/

Tracer Hand, Friday, 10 April 2026 23:16 (two months ago)

one immediate prediction is that any number of small to moderate sized colleges

…an “immediate” prediction is that there will be no other changes to the US economy, population, demographics, government or social structure, such that the raw numbers of births 18 years earlier will be a notable peril for university operations?

uploading this content requires perseveration (sic), Saturday, 11 April 2026 08:40 (two months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.