― steal compass, drive north, disappear (tissp), Thursday, 28 September 2006 10:15 (nineteen years ago)
― emsk ( emsk), Thursday, 28 September 2006 11:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Bill A (Bill A), Thursday, 28 September 2006 12:16 (nineteen years ago)
yeah it's a reference to the cover of pink floyd's animals LP.
http://www.thebestofwebsite.com/Photos/Music/Pink_Floyd/Animals.jpg
the reason it's such a good reference (and therefore not really a joke, as such) is that it's something you can actually imagine happening soon in the version of britain which may have immediately preceded the police state in the film, i.e. britain as it is now. it's not even a stretch to imagine it happening.
my expectations were not particularly high for this (and madchen, the trailer makes it seem like it's going to be a much worse film than it actually is) but i thought it was absolutely brilliant. packed with great moments and scenes: the kitten crawling up clive owen's trousers, him walking around in flip flops because he's left without his shoes; the scene where the five main characters in the film get ambushed after having their path blocked by a burning car; the battersea power station scene just mentioned with the young guy and his ADDish addiction to some transparent version of the internet). There are things which seem like small ideas but which actually make the whole mess seem entirely feasible: the fact that Julianne Moore offers Clive Owen £5,000, which seems a paltry amount of money for something set in the future until we see him stooping to pick up pennies from the street a few scenes later. it's a very clever touch in a very intelligent film. it's also quite thrilling to see something of this scale which is not set in america.
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 30 September 2006 16:39 (nineteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 30 September 2006 16:43 (nineteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 30 September 2006 16:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 30 September 2006 19:16 (nineteen years ago)
Haha one of the two errors noted on IMDB is that they get into the wrong kind of fictional bus!
Me and Emsk both thought/hoped the geordie terrorist was going to be Jake from Doctor Who! But it was someone else off Byker Grove instead.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 30 September 2006 19:27 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to contain two ingredients. Tea and bags. (chap), Saturday, 30 September 2006 19:34 (nineteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 30 September 2006 20:01 (nineteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 30 September 2006 20:03 (nineteen years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Saturday, 30 September 2006 20:36 (nineteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Saturday, 30 September 2006 20:41 (nineteen years ago)
― sean gramophone (Sean M), Saturday, 30 September 2006 23:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Sunday, 1 October 2006 23:16 (nineteen years ago)
― derrick (derrick), Monday, 2 October 2006 05:08 (nineteen years ago)
It was just all too realistic, and that was what made it terrifying. (Ha ha, there was a review in Country Life that said that the London of the film was jarringly unlike real London - bloody hell, what London do you live in? Probably the posh parklike behind the gates at Admiralty Arch.) It seemed so terrifyingly... normal.
I liked the fact that the infertility was relatively unexplained, that was what kind of made it different than The Handmaid's Tale. It just... happened, and humanity was left to deal with it. Though I would have liked to see more about how the resulting gender conflict would actually have been resolved. With the genders relieved of the ability for procreation, would the balance of power changed? Would the world have stumbled towards equality (probably not, in such a dystopia) or would one gender have risen up and attempted to destroy the other? That would have been as interesting to me as the class war and "Fugee" conflicts.
I thought the Christian symbolism was a bit heavy-handed, though. (I mean, christ, the revelation in a sodding stable? Why not throw in a manger, while you're at it. And did every woman on the side of good have to be called a variant of Mary? It would have been too obvious to make the pregnant girl a Mary, I suppose.) Surprised you didn't catch that, Emsk.
But all in all, very good. Very thought-provoking, a film you really come out of feeling dazed and terrified, and you see London not quite the same way afterwards. "Britain Soliders On" - terrifying, but at least the idea that our Island/Blitz mentality would keep us soldiering on.
― Virginia Plainsong (kate), Monday, 2 October 2006 08:45 (nineteen years ago)
yes! and the fact that the details of the horrible catastrophes of the recent past that left the world in the state it's in are very vague and suggested (did i imagine an image of an a-bomb going off somewhere in the film, on the tv news?) is very effective too - maybe there was no great huge calamity? maybe this is just the direction we are currently leading towards?
― i am not a nugget (stevie), Monday, 2 October 2006 08:51 (nineteen years ago)
― Virginia Plainsong (kate), Monday, 2 October 2006 08:59 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to contain two ingredients. Tea and bags. (chap), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:02 (nineteen years ago)
OTM
― i am not a nugget (stevie), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:03 (nineteen years ago)
oh, was it a stable? i just thought it was a derelict building.
Why not throw in a manger, while you're at it. And did every woman on the side of good have to be called a variant of Mary? It would have been too obvious to make the pregnant girl a Mary, I suppose.) Surprised you didn't catch that, Emsk.
ki?
― emsk ( emsk), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:15 (nineteen years ago)
I don't get this, you seem to be saying that a truce of fucking is the only thing holding back the Council of Men and Council Of Women from outright war? That's a pretty literal interpretation of the battle of the sexes, I think (also it implies a lack of hope, which by definition anyone who hasn't taken their Quietus has some of).
And did every woman on the side of good have to be called a variant of Mary?
But.. they aren't. Kee isn't, and Julian isn't, and Miriam and Marichka are quite obscure variants, I think you're reading more into this than there is.
"Britain Soliders On" - terrifying, but at least the idea that our Island/Blitz mentality would keep us soldiering on.
Well yeah, this seems to sit in an awkward and interesting way with her Tory nature. On the one hand clearly Clamping Down on Immigration works, and the story isn't kind to people opposed to same, but the film, possibly just by having an person you can empathise with playing Kee, seems to run against it. People who've read the book, what's it like?
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:29 (nineteen years ago)
OK, a milking shed, not a stable, but still. It was a very overt nativity reference.
― Virginia Plainsong (kate), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:34 (nineteen years ago)
― emsk ( emsk), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Virginia Plainsong (kate), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:38 (nineteen years ago)
― emsk ( emsk), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Virginia Plainsong (kate), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:45 (nineteen years ago)
― Virginia Plainsong (kate), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:46 (nineteen years ago)
You don't have to be Christian to realise why it's a good idea to have a cease-fire around the first baby in 18 years.
The problem with Christians is that they don't believe that Athiests can feel awe at things.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:49 (nineteen years ago)
― emsk ( emsk), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:49 (nineteen years ago)
― emsk ( emsk), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:50 (nineteen years ago)
x-post
― Virginia Plainsong (kate), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:51 (nineteen years ago)
― chap who would dare to contain two ingredients. Tea and bags. (chap), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:53 (nineteen years ago)
― emsk ( emsk), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:55 (nineteen years ago)
!
― sean gramophone (Sean M), Monday, 2 October 2006 09:55 (nineteen years ago)
I also loved this movie for all the reasons stated above, but it must be said that this is some of the best actual nuts-and-bolts filmmaking I have seen in a long time. Some incredibly memorable images - the explosions going off in the distance through the fog as Theo and Ki sit in the rowboat were so haunting. And this should be the number one film cited in any defense of CGI work, which I usually hate with a passion.
― Tiki Theater Xymposium (Bent Over at the Arclight), Monday, 2 October 2006 10:07 (nineteen years ago)
was it that cheesy though? there were cheesier bits. i dunno, i didn't leave with much of a feeling of hope, even once she'd been picked up. who are these human project people? they might be just as bad as the fish. or they might just be useless.
It had me in tears in points. I know I don't see films as often as other people, so they tend to affect me more.
i dunno if it's anything to do with seeing less films... i see quite a lot and i was in tears pretty much the whole way through! i think it's just that it's an incredibly well-made, timely, insightful, powerful film that chimes with modern fears and is realistic enough to upset us in a non-escapist way.
― emsk ( emsk), Monday, 2 October 2006 10:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Virginia Plainsong (kate), Monday, 2 October 2006 10:28 (nineteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Monday, 2 October 2006 10:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 2 October 2006 11:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 2 October 2006 11:04 (nineteen years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Monday, 2 October 2006 11:09 (nineteen years ago)
― emsk ( emsk), Monday, 2 October 2006 11:23 (nineteen years ago)
xpost - soldiers be following orders.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Monday, 2 October 2006 11:26 (nineteen years ago)
also it's not been said yet how totally hott Owen is in this.
― jed_ (jed), Monday, 2 October 2006 11:28 (nineteen years ago)
― Euai Kapaui (tracerhand), Monday, 2 October 2006 11:30 (nineteen years ago)
Err, yeah. I didn't want to be the one to mention it, though. I was watching the whole film going "err, is it me, or is Clive Owen really hott in this? Coz I didn't think he was all that in King Arthur, but errr, hottt."
x-post yes, I laughed out loud at the Banksy in the Tate. (And it was the Tate for that sequence, weirdly, even though the outside was Battersea Power Station.)
― Virginia Plainsong (kate), Monday, 2 October 2006 11:33 (nineteen years ago)
This and AI are two big budget/big swing early '00s sci-fi that can reduce me to puddles just thinking about them. I have to be judicious with rewatches.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 February 2025 00:33 (one year ago)
Thanks, phone. This is the future we are living in.
― Josh in Chicago, Monday, 17 February 2025 00:34 (one year ago)
her monologue in the abandoned school gives her character so much dignity
i randomly put on 28 Days Later and early on there's a scene shortly after Murphy's character gets out of the hospital, where a woman is telling him about the events that had occurred while he was in a coma and they did the same slow pan over to her while she spoke as that scene. feel like CoM had to have been directly inspired by 28 Days for that monologue scene. not being a film school student, i realize there's a good chance this kind of thing has been done 1000 times before and since - but the similarities did jump out at me
― FRAUDULENT STEAKS (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Monday, 24 March 2025 02:09 (one year ago)
And is that tai-chi she's doing outside the school?
Outside Jasper's, but yeah - I think she's drawn as "well-spoken but a bit of a hippie", which is definitely some type - when she's taken off the bus she's praying to 'the Lord' to take care of Kee - not sure how much weight to put on whether the loud exhortation to 'St Gabriel' is just acting a a distraction. She's quite well dressed when Theo first gets into the car with her - the crusty look for the rest of the film is because those clothes end up with Julian's blood on them.
― Andrew Farrell, Saturday, 19 April 2025 15:54 (one year ago)
Best dystopian movie
― treeship 2, Saturday, 19 April 2025 15:55 (one year ago)
i agree. I can’t think of one that bests it.
― completely suited to the horny decadence (Capitaine Jay Vee), Saturday, 19 April 2025 18:31 (one year ago)
Yeah, the coolest thing about that bit -- thematically, visually, generally -- was that the guy sits and eats lunch with Guernica hanging over the table.― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 18 January 2007 22:41 (eighteen years ago) link
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 18 January 2007 22:41 (eighteen years ago) link
Absurd update to this: I was recently walking past an apartment I used to live in, and was shocked to see through the window that whoever lives there now has a gigantic print of Guernica over the dining area. Imagine my surprise reading an 18-year-old thread and seeing that I once found this deranged enough in fiction
― ን (nabisco), Monday, 21 April 2025 16:03 (one year ago)
It all comes true in the end. (Also hi there!)
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 21 April 2025 17:16 (one year ago)
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/9/us-fertility-rate-drops-to-all-time-low-continuing-a-two-decade-decline
― Serfin' USA (sleeve), Friday, 10 April 2026 00:30 (two months ago)
context:
Brooke ✧@brooklynma✧✧✧.b✧✧✧.soc✧✧✧· 6hThis is driven by a huge drop in 13-17 year olds getting knocked up with no recourse so just take that into consideration
― Serfin' USA (sleeve), Friday, 10 April 2026 03:22 (two months ago)
one thing that I think the movie gets right is the absolute over the top obsession with pets/animals, nearly everyone has an emotional support animal on a plane or in the grocery store/restaurant these days.
― imperial frfr (Steve Shasta), Friday, 10 April 2026 03:49 (two months ago)
Falling birth rates correlate with rising living standards literally everywhere in the world throughout history iirc so I'm not sure what the problem is here
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 10 April 2026 08:48 (two months ago)
You'd think so. But in the United States at least, one immediate prediction is that any number of small to moderate sized colleges and schools will not have enough enrollment and struggle to stay open. I've heard it termed the demographic cliff, as far as higher education goes. Iirc the drop in birth rate began around the 2007 financial crises and hasn't recovered, and starting around last year or so (when that peak birth-year class of 2007 began applying to colleges, in record numbers) the enrollment numbers have begun cycling down, already starting with shrinking kindergarten classes. It's (potentially) going to especially affect public education here.
I think the broader global concern is that as people live longer, there won't be enough young people to support them financially, through taxes and work. Iirc this has been a real worry in countries like Italy and Japan, places that have tried to incentivize having kids, through advertising campaigns and even through payments. Like this graf from some study I just skimmed:
The nation’s aging population has become a persistent issue that threatens to perpetually stunt their economy. Japan is currently the nation with the highest old-age dependency ratio, -a statistic that relates the number of retired people to the working age population- with a proportion of 48.6 seniors for every 100 working adults. (Keulen, 2024) Additionally, this metric is projected to increase 79/100 by 2050 (Keulen, 2024). Among economists, a diminishing population is often linked to a weakening economic growth. The economic growth slows when a population ages due to pressure on the national social security system. There is less income tax to collect from individuals as the workforce gets smaller and as the need for elderly care, health care, pensions and health care workers increases, so does the amount of necessary public funding.
There's a solution hovering in there, of course - spend less on bullshit like wars and more on families/health care/etc. - but no country seems to have figured it out yet. And any campaign to have more kids has been tainted by the right-wing nativists with their own cuckoo sexist/racists agendas.
― Josh in Chicago, Friday, 10 April 2026 12:39 (two months ago)
I guess diaper manufacturers might see a dip too..
But that broader picture of "not enough workers to fund retirees" has been debunked pretty comprehensively. The main guy I think of for this is Dean Baker. The core of the argument is that even modest annual productivity gains swamp the demographic issue. But there are other positives in a declining population.
https://cepr.net/publications/aging-populations-and-great-power-politics-the-problem-is-for-the-elites-not-the-masses/
― Tracer Hand, Friday, 10 April 2026 23:16 (two months ago)
one immediate prediction is that any number of small to moderate sized colleges
…an “immediate” prediction is that there will be no other changes to the US economy, population, demographics, government or social structure, such that the raw numbers of births 18 years earlier will be a notable peril for university operations?
― uploading this content requires perseveration (sic), Saturday, 11 April 2026 08:40 (two months ago)