The Great ILX Gun Control Debate

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (3246 of them)

OH and this is another the interesting anecdote: three weeks later on a friday night a 15 year old was shot and killed in the street. the cousin of the SHOOTER was caught at his high school (which is in our neighborhood) with a handgun in his backpack on monday - he had brought the gun to school for HIS OWN protection, since he was fearing retaliation.

interstingly enough, in this case, roger's attitude of

Shooting back - and effectively neutralizing a threat - DOES stop someone shooting at you.

-- Manalishi, Monday, April 16, 2007 6:54 PM (Yesterday)

leads to MORE CRIME in this instance (unless what, we make it legal for 9th graders to carry handguns to school?)

― moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 20:46 (nineteen years ago)

~~then~~ than

plus a bunch of other illiterate shit

GAH

(xpost to me)

― Fluffy Bear Hearts Rainbows, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 20:52 (nineteen years ago)

geez don't skip a beat or anything, NRA-lobby whore.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/virginia_tech_gun_control

― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 21:10 (nineteen years ago)

v4h1d u rock

― Tracer Hand, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 21:35 (nineteen years ago)

cosign

― deej, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 21:39 (nineteen years ago)

yeah vahid is killing it basically

i forget who said this, but:

can we just agree that some people think hunting is barbaric and unnecessary

these people are just wrong, frankly. depends on the species. there's no danger of environmental damage or self-harming populations with say black rhino or american buffalo, but deer? yeah, there is.

― gff, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 21:42 (nineteen years ago)

The problem we run into with hunting is that a lot of gun control advocates see a pretty clear line between hunting weapons and people-killing weapons -- as insinuated just upthread. (I don't even consider myself a big gun control advocate, and I don't know a ton about hunting, but I'm fairly confident that no one's hunting elk with semi-automatic handguns and such.) So you wind up with a debate where some people are comfortable with government deciding which guns go in which category, and some people are very uncomfortable with how those distinctions might be made. (Part of why the NRA seems totally nuts to most people is that it's inevitably their mission to support practically ANY kind of arms, even insane ones, on principle -- kinda the equivalent of the ACLU looking bad for defending NAMBLA or whoever.)

Two things here that I have to admit bug me. One is the way that any time someone expresses concern about the availability of powerful weapons, there's this belligerent assumption that they're advocating gun control; I think there's room to fret about psychos having access to guns without necessarily wanting to legislate a gun-free society. Another is all the lame "you pussy city-dwellers" rhetoric that crops up, insinuating that anyone who doesn't feel comfortable with guns is either a weakling or ignorant of the hard facts of life: I understand the reasonable impulses that lead to this, but we should mostly spot them all kinda bullshit. I said on the other thread that I don't know a ton about guns and don't really want to, and Manalishi sarcastically urged me to "remain ignorant": and yes, it's true, I hope that I and all my loved ones never experience being on either end of a gun. I would think people who support guns as a form of crime prevention would hope the same thing, really -- sort of the same way I'm glad there are oncologists in the world but hope never to have to see much of them professionally.

― nabisco, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 22:12 (nineteen years ago)

insinuating that anyone who doesn't feel comfortable with guns is either a weakling or ignorant of the hard facts of life

Thing is, I totally cop to both of those charges, and I'm mostly OK with it.

― jaymc, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

pussy

― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

One of the things I'm curious about, incidentally, is how much people's ideas about guns relate to how much they trust other people to use them wisely. The life-and-death stakes of a gun are a lot higher than most of the other objects non-professional people can be licensed to use (cars seem like the only competition), and I'll admit flat-out that I have trouble trusting a lot of people to hold that power; that doesn't mean I want to outlaw them, just that I'm uncomfortable with the situation.

And that's not just about lack of familiarity: I went to a high school where we got the first day of hunting season off, and I've spent weeks in a third-world country where groups of guys with AK-47s jump into the back of your truck and tell you to drive them somewhere. But I've also gone to the funeral of a kid who got shot in the face by a friend who said "hahaha it's not loaded," and no matter how much gun-friendly folks say "c'mon, basic gun safety, it's the parents' fault for not securing the gun better," we just come back to that original trust issue: how much do we trust people on this? And as far as the law goes, at what point of accident, murder, or death do we say there are legitimate public-health reasons to act? (Keeping in mind that there are countless objects and substances NOT covered by the 2nd amendment where the government doesn't even begin to defer to people's good judgment -- I'd much rather be in a bar where everyone had unprescribed Ambien in his pockets than one where everyone had a concealed weapon.)

― nabisco, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 22:29 (nineteen years ago)

You worried about killing machines ended up in the wrong hands. Don't worry about guns, let's raise the driving age to 25, that's what I say.

― sexyDancer, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 22:34 (nineteen years ago)

Best. Logic. Ever.

― Noodle Vague, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 22:35 (nineteen years ago)

cars aren't a great comparison, are they? unlike guns, their primary purpose isn't to be lethal.

but yeh, i suppose the fact i'm a world-weary cynic who thinks an awful lot of people are very fucking stupid means i'd be happier if i thought these people weren't going around packing heat.

still, i'm cheered by the fact that, of the pro-gun posters on this thread, only manalishi conforms to the penis-waving stereotype. i've very much enjoyed reading milo and river wolf's comments: i still can't imagine any situation in which i'm ever going to believe private gun ownership is anything other than a social aberration, but their arguments have, if nothing else, made me think about the issue.

shakey mo OTM, really. we just have to hope for the best.

― grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 22:44 (nineteen years ago)

cars aren't a great comparison, are they? unlike guns, their primary purpose isn't to be lethal.

lol, come to Boston sometime

― HI DERE, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 22:50 (nineteen years ago)

zing zang bing bang

but yeah, guns are purpose built to kill things. comparing them to things used to move other things/people around doesn't REALLY fly.

― river wolf, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 22:55 (nineteen years ago)

Haha, dudes, I said cars were the only competition just so no one could come along and say "cars are really dangerous too and we totally trust people with them."

Ha, I was also going to point out that car deaths have gotta be like 98% accidental, probably because most of the ways you can actively try to kill someone with a car would totally screw up your ride. (This is like that whole Chris Rock "just make the bullets really expensive" thing.) Nobody weilds a car in anger! I mean, hunting aside, I'd be interested to magically get statistics on how often guns are weilded in response to a legitimate crime threat versus how often they're pulled out in arguments, to threaten people, for revenge, etc. (Obviously it'd be impossible to separate "serious argument" from "legitimate threat," but the difficulty of separating those things is precisely why I worry about people's judgment on this front!)

― nabisco, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:04 (nineteen years ago)

"Mom, Dad, I'm taking Becky to the movies tonight. Can I borrow the gun?"

― HI DERE, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:04 (nineteen years ago)

vroom vroom!

http://pluto.fcla.edu/%7Efcldem/pics/2003/canada/Newfoundland_030609/MVC-892S.JPG

― grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:07 (nineteen years ago)

"It depends what movie."

― nabisco, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:07 (nineteen years ago)

"As long as you don't go up to Stake-Out Point."

― Noodle Vague, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:11 (nineteen years ago)

This is like that whole Chris Rock "just make the bullets really expensive" thing

chris rock? wasn't it daniel moynihan who pushed a federal 10000% tax on hollow-point ammo?

― moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:19 (nineteen years ago)

RIP danny boy

― moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:19 (nineteen years ago)

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=980CE3DC1F3CF937A35752C1A965958260

Mike Jordan, manager of marketing technical services for the Winchester Ammunition Division of the Olin Corporation, said, "I wish the Congress people would attack crime as zealously as they do guns and ammunition."

― moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:20 (nineteen years ago)

The Chris Rock reference is in "Bring The Pain".

― HI DERE, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:20 (nineteen years ago)

The thing I used to dwell on, back when John Lott was in my orbit, was the weirdness of how much the Goetzification of society he advocates would actually lead to a bunch of things conservatives could love (not least of which being that young minority men would have to start wearing bow ties everywhere and steering clear of all middle-aged white people after 10pm). And just think how it would clear up the courts to have all potential subjects dead!

xpost Ha, I don't remember that from Moynihan, just some Rock bit where he's like "if bullets cost $2,000 each, you'd have to think really hard about whether it was really worth killing someone!"

― nabisco, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:23 (nineteen years ago)

young minority men would have to start wearing bow ties everywhere

http://www.islamfortoday.com/NOI_members.jpg

― moonship journey to baja, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:28 (nineteen years ago)

Oh jeez I saw the remake of 12 Angry Men the other day.

― Noodle Vague, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:29 (nineteen years ago)

Maybe add a propellor beanie and keep having fake conversations about Maria Bartiromo, just to be sure.

― nabisco, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:29 (nineteen years ago)

haha i love that chris rock bit. and yeah, nabisco, the whole messing up yr ride thing is an argument i had to pull out against my roommate this morning. like, you COULD try and mow people down with yr car but eventually the thing just wouldn't go anymore

― river wolf, Tuesday, 17 April 2007 23:37 (nineteen years ago)

Gun industry response also makes for a good reminder to us lefty gun-owners - no matter how much you want to 'support gun rights' (or want to keep shooting things) just remember that the people responsible for making them are, by and large, evil corporate douchebags with no real conscience.

― milo z, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:51 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, that always makes me feel bad about breweries and tobacco companies too.

― Noodle Vague, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 00:54 (nineteen years ago)

Not that literature is good evidence in favor of gun control, but there's a very resonant bit in Billy Bathgate about how holding a gun actually makes you feel angry. True or not, having a gun makes you think a lot more about ways to use a gun, and I don' think that's a very good thing.

― Hurting 2, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 02:25 (nineteen years ago)

So does having a belt-sander.

― river wolf, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 02:45 (nineteen years ago)

Right. Your point?

― Hurting 2, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 02:51 (nineteen years ago)

Having a gun makes you think of situations in which you could threaten/shoot people vs. having a juicer makes you think of different kinds of juices you could make

Parallel in the abstract, but not in terms of danger posed

― Hurting 2, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 02:52 (nineteen years ago)

I have to admit that there are very few things that I have touched where I haven't tried to formulate a way that I could kill someone with it. Including juicers and belt sanders.

― HI DERE, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 02:54 (nineteen years ago)

Killing someone with a little manual juicer would be pretty impressive - like stuffing their face in it and "juicing" them

― Hurting 2, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 02:55 (nineteen years ago)

I know, right????

― HI DERE, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 02:55 (nineteen years ago)

I think I was actually more prone to abstract fantasies of killing with small objects before I started shooting. A basic desire not to go to pound-me-in-the-ass prison (exponentially more likely if you do something stupid with a gun than something stupid with a juicer) goes a long way.

― milo z, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 02:59 (nineteen years ago)

With a gun, you might also think about how you can start a bonfire.

Q: Now that I have a gun, how can I start this here bonfire?
A: Easy! Take a beer can, fill it with gasoline, place gently on top of bonfire. Step back about 50 feet, shoot can with handgun. Instant bonfire! Hope you brought marshmallows ;)

Pulled from the pages of real life!

― river wolf, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 03:19 (nineteen years ago)

On top of an already in-progress bonfire?

― Jesse, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 03:28 (nineteen years ago)

we're talking about starting a bonfire here, Jesse

― river wolf, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 03:30 (nineteen years ago)

so you say now

― Hurting 2, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 03:32 (nineteen years ago)

Q: How can I start a bonfire on top of an already in-progress bonfire?
A: RECURSIVE FIRE, OH NOES

― HI DERE, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 03:40 (nineteen years ago)

guys, the can explodes

― river wolf, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 03:41 (nineteen years ago)

NO WAI

― HI DERE, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 03:50 (nineteen years ago)

dude.

― river wolf, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 03:55 (nineteen years ago)

way.

― river wolf, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 03:55 (nineteen years ago)

the gun is just for show

― Curt1s Stephens, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 04:06 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.bigjohnson.com/assetts/images/allimages/sj7963a.jpg

― am0n, Wednesday, 18 April 2007 04:09 (nineteen years ago)

Skipping 3146 messages at this point... Click here if you want to load them all.

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.