Which of the Indiana Jones sequels is the best?

lol @ refrigerator perry references upthread

I dunno why everyone singles the opening sequence out as evidence of Crystal Skull's awfulness. The whole nuclear test site sequence was imo the most salvageable part of the movie, whereas like the monkey chase scene or those GODDAM CHEESY LOOKING CGI ANTS, or basically any scene w/ Shia Thebeef opening his damn mouth were just like (facepalm, weeps a bit).

shhh, don't think about it, it's not worth the pain

add 'Lover of SMART Superman Movies' to Matt Armstrong's CV

― Pangborn to be Wilde (Dr Morbius), Sunday, June 17, 2012 2:20 AM (54 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

"less stupid" /= "SMART"

Superman has lyrical, classic images like baby Supe lifting the car, superman outrunning the train, the kansas countryside etc; II has people being thrown into pinball machines.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eG3isfUKPb0

As someone who actually likes terrible brainless action movies, Shia and The Monkeys was precisely where all of the goodwill I had towards the movie ran out and I just wanted to punch it in the dick

I enjoyed a lot of the rest of it, because I'm the type of dude who enjoyed Catwoman

also the palpable sense of "I am some hot shit right here" exuding off of TheBeef in every single fucking frame was probably the most off-putting cinematic experience I've had aside from a little dog Transformer humping Megan Fox's leg

Automatic thread bump. This poll's results are now in.

And here was me worried it was going to be close.

still too close tbh

I brought this on myself. And now, let us never speak of Indiana Jones ever again.

moranz

2 jokesters

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5z6jgefNi1r4qlp5o1_500.jpg

what an awkward still to put on the cover

"So wait, are we expected to go see a film staring some Nazi?"

I'm the type of dude who enjoyed Catwoman

― Victory Chainsaw! (DJP), Sunday, June 17, 2012 5:28 PM (4 days ago) Bookmark

dude, really

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNlmRId2FVQ

one on one! one on one!

http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/530000_10151330144679988_1421059142_n.jpg

agh... so wrong

there are 11 star trek films and seven planet of the apes films!

five superman movies too

i thought die hard 2 was universally (and correctly) reviled

Jurassic Park III was quite a bit better than The Lost World imo

also wow they sure love their rocky movies

JP3 much better than JP2.

i thought die hard 2 was universally (and correctly) reviled

― adam, Thursday, August 2, 2012 9:44 PM (9 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

Huh?

yes, all the Lord of the Rings movies are pretty much perfect

apparently i need to see blade 2

mad max fans need a good talking to. DEATH TO THUNDERDOME

Mad Max lacked ZOD!

who in the world thinks Rocky 2 is just as good as 3

Matrix 2 nowhere near as bad as Matrix 3.

apparently i need to see blade 2

― da croupier, Thursday, August 2, 2012 6:05 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

u dont imo

matrix 2 and 3 are both so bad that you shouldn't be able to see either at this scale

matrix 2 was so bad that I've still not seen Matrix 3 and I see a lot of awful shit

I think they love Star Trek 1 & 3 way too much, other than that they seem pretty on the mark regarding films I've seen (everything except the Rockies, the second and third Planet of the Apes, and the first Mad Max)

Matrix 2 had a lot of defensible scenes, stuff that was interesting to watch. Matrix 3 had nothing.

yes, all the Lord of the Rings movies are pretty much perfect

If you like Lord of the Rings, you'll love Lord of the Rings! They look like they're given an 80% rating, anyway?

da croupier - if you enjoyed Blade, then run don't walk to uh Netflix or whatever.

If you like Lord of the Rings, you'll love Lord of the Rings!

nah. it goes 1st >>>> 2nd >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3rd

Blade 2 is p. dope

all i remember about Blade 2 is that Luke Goss was in it

I'm not saying Matrix 2 was as good as the first, but the drop in quality from 2 to 3 was WAY bigger than the drop from 1 to 2.

they kind of blended together for me. I guess the third one did have about ten hours of shitty cgi sentinel battles

wow another nutjob who thinks Doom is better than Crusade: http://www.vulture.com/2012/11/vulture-ranks-all-28-steven-spielberg-films-worst-best.html?mid=twitter_vulture

Rankings all over the place, but that's one of the bright spots.

Tho I do admire the salt it takes to rank War of the Worlds above Close Encounters.

yeah brass balls

And turns out agreeing on Spielberg's worst isn't that difficult. I've never seen anyone not choose one of those last four films.

Caught the episode of South Park recently which deals with the topic of the last film pretty well.

agree that Amistad is better than I thought at the time and how good Hanks is in SPR.

I had bugs for lunch.