They're Remaking 'Alien' -- the 'Prometheus' thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (5004 of them)

me too. maybe because it was one of the precious few moments of actual humanity in the film.

Jesu swept (ledge), Thursday, 14 June 2012 16:09 (fourteen years ago)

despite (or because) one of the lines being delivered by a potentially psychopathic android.

Jesu swept (ledge), Thursday, 14 June 2012 16:11 (fourteen years ago)

I liked that bit, it reminded me of going bowling.

Zaireeka Badu (NickB), Thursday, 14 June 2012 16:12 (fourteen years ago)

kind of feel like the android got a bad rap, half of what he was doing seemed to be the beginnings of a personality and the other half was just doing whatever horrible shit Weyland told him to

mh, Thursday, 14 June 2012 16:13 (fourteen years ago)

Like there was more Blade Runner stuff in this than Alien.

Which is fine. After all, they had to find new planets for the off-world colonies. And apparently there's a Weyland-Yutani logo in the phone booth in BR.

Also, just found this EW promo shot, which makes everything better:

http://www.ineedmyfix.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Charlize-Theron-Michael-Fassbender-Noomi-Rapace.jpg

Fiendish Doctor Wu! (kingfish), Thursday, 14 June 2012 16:25 (fourteen years ago)

I don't think David is evil so much as "curious."

Tho I think it's funny that both our creations and our creators have contempt for us in the movie.

ryan, Thursday, 14 June 2012 16:54 (fourteen years ago)

not to mention the film's creators

brony ver (s1ocki), Thursday, 14 June 2012 16:59 (fourteen years ago)

Ooooh snAP!

Chewshabadoo, Thursday, 14 June 2012 17:06 (fourteen years ago)

A friend on FB:

So the problem with Prometheus is that it was a decent film that could've been wonderful had it not fallen into science fiction traps like flat characters who only exist to service the plot and unscientific (yet plausible) premises that provide succor for creationists? I take it these people despise Butler's early Patternist novels as well?

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 14 June 2012 17:44 (fourteen years ago)

...

brony ver (s1ocki), Thursday, 14 June 2012 17:47 (fourteen years ago)

Because I know you're always talking about those novels, s1ocki.

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 14 June 2012 17:54 (fourteen years ago)

If you want to tell an interesting story about humans, engineers, xenomorphs and androids, you start with the parallels between the first two and the last two. humans and engineers are creators of terrible things. any other weapon created by either race pales in comparison to the potential of the xenomorph or the android.

You should, perhaps, actually compose a fucking story where an outbreak of the parasitic xenomorph species is pitted directly against the terrifying cleverness and fearlessness of a single android. that could be interesting above and beyond the cinematographical future-gothic playfair excess that has typified the Alien whatchamasaga to date.

You might, if you gave a shit, consider the possibility that humans resemble a god figure admired by a species that do not resemble humans - say if the engineers created humans in the image of "god" and as such we ourselves are simulacra, like our own androids. You might bother to explore this concept in a couple of dialogues such as those that take place in any given wachowskis movie (speed racer even has one. for fuck's sake!)

You could even use one of such dialogues to explore the need to create extraordinary, self-directing weapons - and you could let the audience revel in the irony of how "our" androids are not so different from the space jockeys' monster race. You could even spin a pretty healthy narrative about how a creator can lose control of their own creation - and throw a few loose ends out there with implications about who created who (back to the whole "god looks like us, god made space jockeys, space jockeys made us in the image of their god" thing).

Or you could make this film. Hey, we all gotta get paid and even the rich and established have deadlines. For my part, let me know when I can see it for free (legally).

El Tomboto, Friday, 15 June 2012 03:28 (fourteen years ago)

btw I looked under the formatting help for how to mark up my post as "pompous" but there wasn't one so you will all just have to suck it.

El Tomboto, Friday, 15 June 2012 03:31 (fourteen years ago)

summary, if I may:

the second most interesting contrast available in the alien mythos is between the space jockeys and weyland-yutani et al. only one of these allows for human interest storylines, so ok, we'll go with that.

the most interesting contrast is between the androids and the xenomorphs. this narrative doesn't really allow for humanity at all, except via the magic of bullshit, so ok, that can take the back burner.

to me, the absolutely most fascinating question available - and presented, in this film, but never explored - is who created who and for what purpose. I love the concept of intelligent design in science fiction. I think it's one of the reasons sci-fi succeeds, because it's not afraid to talk about who made Jehovah (ok, frankly, other types of genre lit probably aren't afraid either, they're just more concerned with shooting, stabbing and/or fucking, which is fine and perhaps healthier overall). If we think we were created by something else, why wouldn't that something else believe the same? Would they try to re-create their creator? Having tried and being disappointed, would they also feel the need to hit delete, many times, as hard as possible, cursing all the way?

El Tomboto, Friday, 15 June 2012 03:46 (fourteen years ago)

You might, if you gave a shit, consider the possibility that humans resemble a god figure admired by a species that do not resemble humans -
― El Tomboto, Friday, 15 June 2012 03:28 (1 hour ago) Permalink

But they do look like humans. Hell, they have "identical DNA."

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 15 June 2012 04:48 (fourteen years ago)

yeah i think the tombowt is imagining an alternate, "not completely shit" version of this movie

contenderizer, Friday, 15 June 2012 05:16 (fourteen years ago)

wherein space jockeys have elephant trunks

the late great, Friday, 15 June 2012 05:22 (fourteen years ago)

far as i'm concerned, they do

contenderizer, Friday, 15 June 2012 05:34 (fourteen years ago)

i'm with you

tombot you should probably get cracking on that script

ALIEN vs SMALL WONDER

the late great, Friday, 15 June 2012 05:51 (fourteen years ago)

alien vs roy beatty

alien vs data

alien vs terminator ... oh wait already exists

the late great, Friday, 15 June 2012 05:53 (fourteen years ago)

alien vs ananova

Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 15 June 2012 05:59 (fourteen years ago)

alien vs babar the elephant

Number None, Friday, 15 June 2012 06:40 (fourteen years ago)

alien vs lily allen

diamanda ram dass (Edward III), Friday, 15 June 2012 06:51 (fourteen years ago)

alien vs ALF

Fiendish Doctor Wu! (kingfish), Friday, 15 June 2012 07:37 (fourteen years ago)

I'm actually encouraged that this movie has great images in it and actually "works" as a movie in a lot of ways. Hopefully Ridley gets a better script for the Blade Runner sequel.

Matt Armstrong, Friday, 15 June 2012 10:40 (fourteen years ago)

Blade Runner sequel.

Maybe I've been blind dumb deaf but NOOOOOO

BC Forgbs (Ówen P.), Friday, 15 June 2012 12:35 (fourteen years ago)

Yeah, it's been in the works for a while. A hopeful sign, though: Hampton Fancher on board for the script, and since he cowrote the original, who knows? I've no doubt Dan O'Bannon is swearing loudly at Prometheus from the great beyond.

Ned Raggett, Friday, 15 June 2012 13:03 (fourteen years ago)

Hampton Fancher on board for the script, and since he cowrote the original, who knows? I've no doubt Dan O'Bannon is swearing loudly at Prometheus from the great beyond.

I have this nightmare of Lindelof being called in to rewrite it. Just leave Blade Runner alone please, tyvm.

I found him in a Bon Ton ad (Nicole), Friday, 15 June 2012 13:11 (fourteen years ago)

i feel the need to say this morning how much i love that this thread, originally just They're Remaking 'Alien', starts with

psych

― latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, February 11, 2005 10:16 AM (7 years ago) Bookmark

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Friday, 15 June 2012 13:14 (fourteen years ago)

it's just so perfect considering where we find ourselves now

obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Friday, 15 June 2012 13:15 (fourteen years ago)

Waiting for the speculative fiction universe version of the avengers where all the robots form gangs and do battle, destroying most of humanity in the process.

Data and R2D2 vs Weyland bots & the Replicants; etc

Harrison Ford could stab R2D2 with a sword, Hylander style

nuts spats (Austerity Ponies), Friday, 15 June 2012 13:15 (fourteen years ago)

Highlander

nuts spats (Austerity Ponies), Friday, 15 June 2012 13:15 (fourteen years ago)

Prometheus was in the works for a while - is there any actual talk from Ridley Scott about "next year when I'm shooting the Blade Runner sequel"?

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 15 June 2012 13:16 (fourteen years ago)

idk if Prometheus will ever become my "I am drunk and want to eat salty foods and watch a movie before sleep" movie, thank god we still have Highlander

mh, Friday, 15 June 2012 14:05 (fourteen years ago)

You know what we're missing in 2012? Science fiction/fantasy with music that has vocals. By Queen.

mh, Friday, 15 June 2012 14:06 (fourteen years ago)

cant even imagine how badly dude is gonna screw up bladeruntheus

brony ver (s1ocki), Friday, 15 June 2012 14:30 (fourteen years ago)

;_;

mh, Friday, 15 June 2012 14:33 (fourteen years ago)

Did I tell you guys about my plan to watch recent Ridley Scott films in the run up to Prometheus so I wouldn't get my hopes up? I ended up only having time for that Robin Hood one before I went on vacation. I watched the theatrical release, but apparently the thing with his recent films is that the theater version gets all the exposition cut because he can't make a movie of any reasonable length

mh, Friday, 15 June 2012 14:34 (fourteen years ago)

Hmm and everyone else. I'm at a loss as to why Scott lacks the juice to push through 3 hour epics like Cameron and Nolan get away with.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 15 June 2012 14:53 (fourteen years ago)

one thing about prometheus at least it was only 2 hrs long

brony ver (s1ocki), Friday, 15 June 2012 14:57 (fourteen years ago)

Yeah, I mentioned above that that in many ways is the biggest red flag that tons of stuff was cut.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 15 June 2012 15:01 (fourteen years ago)

A 2 hour sci-fi epic ... how quaint.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 15 June 2012 15:01 (fourteen years ago)

xp - I'm guessing the lack of billion-dollar grosses in his resume?

Andrew Farrell, Friday, 15 June 2012 15:02 (fourteen years ago)

Billion dollar grosses are a totally contemporary thing. I bet 90% of Scott's films were hits.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 15 June 2012 15:04 (fourteen years ago)

the secret is that Ridley's 3 hour versions aren't any better, they just flesh out some unnecessary plot threads or show back story for boring characters

mh, Friday, 15 June 2012 15:20 (fourteen years ago)

Only "Kingdom of Heaven" has gotten the superzize treatment, no? "Blade Runner" and "Legend" both gets director cuts, "Alien" and "Gladiator" reluctant director cuts.

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 15 June 2012 15:27 (fourteen years ago)

Robin Hood had an extended cut, too

mh, Friday, 15 June 2012 15:34 (fourteen years ago)

lotta people must have watched that

brony ver (s1ocki), Friday, 15 June 2012 15:34 (fourteen years ago)

lol

mh, Friday, 15 June 2012 15:35 (fourteen years ago)

Eh, it's like 15 minutes more or something.

That movie made money. Cost $150, made $350? Something like that?

Josh in Chicago, Friday, 15 June 2012 15:43 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.