They're Remaking 'Alien' -- the 'Prometheus' thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (5004 of them)

not making any moves till I hear from armond

diamanda ram dass (Edward III), Saturday, 2 June 2012 03:14 (fourteen years ago)

he hates ridley scott, so i can't imagine he'll pick this one to fall in love with

spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Saturday, 2 June 2012 04:23 (fourteen years ago)

That's So Armond!

Brony! Broni! Broné! (Phil D.), Saturday, 2 June 2012 12:43 (fourteen years ago)

This was... OK. Worse than cubed. Better than Resurrection. Much stupidity, which I can't really go into without spoilers. For all that Ridley Scott has been playing down the idea that this is a prequel to Alien, the film goes out of its way to set up that movie - some of which I found satisfying. But it also raises lots of questions (so I'll come back and ask them when a few more people have seen). Main gripe though is that there is too much plot; a vaguely interesting premise meets blockbuster movie requirements = aagggh no one would really do that IRL.

Fassbender is great until he too is undone by the script's stupidity. Rapace is bearable. Most everyone else is wasted. The 3D is mostly unflashy but I suspect you lose nothing by seeing it in 2D.

Jeff W, Saturday, 2 June 2012 13:53 (fourteen years ago)

Plot

In the distant past, the spacecraft of an advanced humanoid alien race arrives on Earth. One of the aliens consumes a dark liquid, causing its body to disintegrate and fall into a nearby waterfall—seeding Earth with the building blocks of life.

thomp, Saturday, 2 June 2012 13:54 (fourteen years ago)

xpost Thank you! 1 out of 1 StanMs found the previous review helpful

StanM, Saturday, 2 June 2012 13:55 (fourteen years ago)

all fair, jeff, tho without going into the details it's hard to see where you'd bump it up as high as 'ok'

The first maybe 40 mins are good tension/premise building, imo everything after the first expedition was incoherent hackneyed cliche- and the incoherence is by far the greater problem than the cliche.

pet tommy & the barkhaters (darraghmac), Saturday, 2 June 2012 14:08 (fourteen years ago)

just heard the end of a polite panning on radio 4

this film is beginning to sound so awful i think i'll have to see it

DG, Saturday, 2 June 2012 18:29 (fourteen years ago)

i think you may be onto something there

i have spent most of the last 24 hours talking about this movie and how dreadful it was- in a way that makes it better value than a movie i saw, liked and forgot.

pet tommy & the barkhaters (darraghmac), Saturday, 2 June 2012 19:47 (fourteen years ago)

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/s720x720/562542_285921241503363_150837808345041_570669_2001826621_n.jpg

Dreaming in Infrared (kingfish), Sunday, 3 June 2012 00:02 (fourteen years ago)

I love that!

Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Sunday, 3 June 2012 00:42 (fourteen years ago)

having just watched alien i'm looking forward to seeing these space jockey guys running around, esp. as they quite clearly have no legs and are glued to the chair

DG, Sunday, 3 June 2012 00:44 (fourteen years ago)

Y'all are bringing me down.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 3 June 2012 01:56 (fourteen years ago)

Worse than cubed. Better than Resurrection.

this is impossible?

goole, Sunday, 3 June 2012 06:00 (fourteen years ago)

But... the trailers...

http://i.imgur.com/9k3fE.jpg

StanM, Sunday, 3 June 2012 07:21 (fourteen years ago)

*hangs head*

Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Sunday, 3 June 2012 07:24 (fourteen years ago)

Having watched Alien last night I'm not sure I want to see this any more.

I must be old, I recognise nobody in ITV2 idents (aldo), Sunday, 3 June 2012 09:36 (fourteen years ago)

imo watch the trailers slowed down to 160 mins, imagine the rest. You'll remember it more fondly

pet tommy & the barkhaters (darraghmac), Sunday, 3 June 2012 10:04 (fourteen years ago)

Alien: it busts at your chest!

StanM, Sunday, 3 June 2012 11:37 (fourteen years ago)

I thought this was terrific. I'm no fanboy and went in with lower expectations after reading some of the comments and was pleasantly surprised. There's some parts of the plot which frankly need explanation or at least a re watching, which I'll pass on to avoid spoilers, but the second act on is such a blast I was happy to leave that aside.

fun loving and xtremely tolrant (Billy Dods), Sunday, 3 June 2012 22:57 (fourteen years ago)

And Kate Dickie of 'Red Road as a doctor made me smile.

fun loving and xtremely tolrant (Billy Dods), Sunday, 3 June 2012 22:58 (fourteen years ago)

SyFy is running Aliens on the pub flatscreen here. I had forgotten that the entire Rescue Newt sequence is all orange-and-teal.com

Also, that there is _no_ music during the search part. This is back when James Cameron knew what he was doing.

Dreaming in Infrared (kingfish), Sunday, 3 June 2012 23:12 (fourteen years ago)

fwiw my sister texted me this evening, said she and her husband loved it.

PSOD (Ste), Sunday, 3 June 2012 23:51 (fourteen years ago)

this film is getting the most divided reviews i've seen for a very long time.

piscesx, Monday, 4 June 2012 01:35 (fourteen years ago)

I wish filmmakers would start releasing different versions of their films, like, versions that are different by 20% or so, and not tell anyone. Them someone would see this and tell their friend, hey, I loved the part when such and such happened, and their friend would be all, huh? And then they would say they didn't like the such and such, and the first friend would be all, what? And then they'd each have to see it again to figure out what's going on. And then they'd compare notes and be all, oohhhhh, now I get it!!!

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 4 June 2012 03:21 (fourteen years ago)

Pulling that on a mass-scale release would be fantastic.

Björk lied (Eric H.), Monday, 4 June 2012 03:24 (fourteen years ago)

that would've been cool a couple decades or more ago, but you know the internet would suck all the fun and excitement out of that in about a day now (xpost)

kel ler/pharmacists (some dude), Monday, 4 June 2012 03:24 (fourteen years ago)

wld rate this abt as highly as The Thing prequel

Ward Fowler, Monday, 4 June 2012 16:08 (fourteen years ago)

Would it still be bad if it were not a sequel to alien, if there was no first alien movie to compare it to?

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 4 June 2012 16:18 (fourteen years ago)

yes

Number None, Monday, 4 June 2012 16:20 (fourteen years ago)

So, is it:

Alien > Aliens > Prometheus > Alien 3 > Alien Resurrection?

or

Alien > Aliens > Alien 3 > Prometheus > Alien Resurrection?

or *gasp*

Alien > Aliens > Alien 3 > Alien Resurrection > Prometheus?

StanM, Monday, 4 June 2012 16:27 (fourteen years ago)

everything i have seen indicates it will be ridiculous

i sort of started tuning out when i saw the doughnut-shaped alien ship bearing down on noomi like a wagon wheel

the late great, Monday, 4 June 2012 16:48 (fourteen years ago)

i am gonna set an arbitrary deadline at 50 ballots

"50 ballotz stands for 1 ballot from every state of the USA, all them ballotz would be stronger than every weapon, if they would be united - THUG LIFE"

the late great, Monday, 4 June 2012 16:49 (fourteen years ago)

oops

the late great, Monday, 4 June 2012 16:51 (fourteen years ago)

it works here, too

WHEY AHR MAH DREGUNS? (DJP), Monday, 4 June 2012 16:57 (fourteen years ago)

I thought for sure this had opened in the US already. Hype Machine must be blown up.

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Monday, 4 June 2012 16:59 (fourteen years ago)

Alien Resurrection is great, fuiud

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Monday, 4 June 2012 17:24 (fourteen years ago)

ok, switch Alien 3 and Alien Resurrection around if you're that way inclined, I don't mind. :-)

StanM, Monday, 4 June 2012 17:26 (fourteen years ago)

Now I'm curious how this movie can be so terrible. Is it Transformers terrible, or just terrible because of missed potential? Like, is it inept or just too ambitious?

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 4 June 2012 17:50 (fourteen years ago)

What was the deal w guy pearce's makeup in this movie

just sayin, Monday, 4 June 2012 18:07 (fourteen years ago)

He was cheaper than an actual old guy I suppose.

StanM, Monday, 4 June 2012 18:17 (fourteen years ago)

resurrection was better than this, because it was just dumb and played dumb. might help answer your question too josh.

agree with number none on this- this movie doesn't work at all independently of hype or relation to any other movies, it just doesn't make any sense in and of itself

pet tommy & the barkhaters (darraghmac), Monday, 4 June 2012 19:22 (fourteen years ago)

Again, I'm finding myself in the same boat as I was with Dark Shadows. This isn't bad enough to earn the glory of being a great bad movie.

Björk lied (Eric H.), Monday, 4 June 2012 19:23 (fourteen years ago)

I really liked this, although I've only seen Aliens (years ago and wasn't moved). There are some majorly daft rmde moments but by the end it's just rollicking great fun.

Scary Move 4 (dog latin), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 01:47 (fourteen years ago)

this was ok i guess. my first 3D film!

+ one particular scene is can't-turn-away-even-though-every-instinct-is-recoiling gripping, and if i was a female it might have actually traumatised me
+ one line from the captain is v amusing
+ michael fassbender is amazing
+ the charlize theron character is interesting
+ blah blah blah impressive cgi stops you falling asleep at least though i think i don't really "get" special effects as a replacement for plot and dialogue and characterisation

- almost nothing of consequence actually happens. there are setpieces but even i, who am not that familiar w/the alien series and have not been following the prometheus hype much, was not actually surprised by a single thing about it
- it doesn't engage with big or deep questions lol. i mean you can say the actual words "who are we and where do we come from" but that doesn't make it deep
- noomi rapace character way less interesting than charlize theron
- as per every blockbuster it misses a ton of tricks that could've made it more interesting or tense in more then a basic way. the two final survivors having to talk to each other and work together, for instance
- characterisation didn't go anywhere deep enough - the android is the most complex character ffs, for all that it purported to ask "why?" about everything nothing is ACTUALLY EXPLAINED EVER, half the characters' motivation may as well be completely random

just a really average film basically

kanye kardashian (lex pretend), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 08:25 (fourteen years ago)

you should see alien, the first one, it is lean and wicked

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 13:16 (fourteen years ago)

^ speaketh the gospel.

Porto for Pyros (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 14:19 (fourteen years ago)

- it doesn't engage with big or deep questions lol. i mean you can say the actual words "who are we and where do we come from" but that doesn't make it deep
- or all that it purported to ask "why?" about everything nothing is ACTUALLY EXPLAINED EVER, half the characters' motivation may as well be completely random

LINDELOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOF!

all yoga attacks are fire based (rogermexico.), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 15:43 (fourteen years ago)

I don't regret my time watching it, but it is mostly bobbins. A friend made the interesting point that a lot of the set up is very similar to Aliens vs Predators, which is odd not least because this was put on hold (while still a twinkle in HR Giger's eye) so AvP could be made.

Lex hugely OTM about nothing consequential or surprising happening. Also the dialogue went out of its way to ensure this (drinking at the space-billiard table probably the worst of this), and the last scene (might be after the credits, I don't remember) seems to have been hammered in to underline certain connections for the really dim.

But yeah - I would recommend people to go see it EG cheap at the Prince Charles in 2D.

Andrew Farrell, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 15:45 (fourteen years ago)

it doesn't engage with big or deep questions lol. i mean you can say the actual words "who are we and where do we come from" but that doesn't make it deep

tempted to put this post above my writing/drawing desk in perpetuo

but he go's to a resturang and then die in a toilet (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 15:48 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.