agreed, but there's a nice little blind where I don't have to see the people I work with looking at standard porn and all day long they're walking around with their noses in 50 Shades
― nerds being macho (remy bean), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 21:40 (fourteen years ago)
yeah, i don't see anything particularly objectionable about this book, its audience or its success. as a "phenomenon" it's strange and a bit surprising, but no more so than any other internet enabled pile-on.
― spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 21:42 (fourteen years ago)
plus people like porn
Thanks for the insight
― mh, Tuesday, 29 May 2012 21:43 (fourteen years ago)
and for the sarcasm
― spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 21:45 (fourteen years ago)
I know it's not the same thing, but: I read all of the Twilight books. And hated them. My best friend was read them too...and while she mostly hated them, there was something about that world that she kind of liked...and she ended up joining an online community for Twilight fans, started reading all kinds of horrible fanfic, and made a few online friends. It didn't change her intrinisically except this was now a thing she liked, that she talked about with other people who liked it too. She was still the same person I was friends with before. You know? People can absorb themselves in really crappy things and not be horrible people for it.
It's a Twinkie. You're not eating it because of its nutritional benefits. I'm sure half the people who read the dumb book know how bad it is. I don't know that we should assume that we're the only ones who know better.
Sorry I'm journalling now, I'll shut up
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 21:54 (fourteen years ago)
Still really thrilled that estela mentioned me.
― mh, Tuesday, 29 May 2012 21:55 (fourteen years ago)
No, that's a good point. I doubt very many people think that 50 Shades is good, but they read it, nevertheless. I'm only turned off by its cultural ubiquity – I find its popularity mildly distasteful in the same way I'd find public Penthouse oogling distasteful. That probably marks me as a prude, and so be it.
― nerds being macho (remy bean), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:00 (fourteen years ago)
i wasn't being snide towards you, i hope you know, i'm just enthralled by the all terrible similes in this book. xp
― estela, Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:01 (fourteen years ago)
I doubt very many people think that 50 Shades is good
Now, see, I've seen multiple people on my FB timeline post that they do indeed find it "good" and, in some cases, "the best book they've ever read", unironically. Those people are out there. And, y'know, I don't begrudge my friends for liking what they like, but if one of them told me, in complete sincerity, that this was the "best book they'd ever read" - well, I'd have some thinking to do about how much I'd ever trust them again wrt to book/music/film recommendations.
― heated debate over derpy hooves (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:09 (fourteen years ago)
I know it's not the same thing, but: I read all of the Twilight books. And hated them.
It IS the same thing, and I read those books, too, and I hated them, and so did p much everyone I knew, even though we all read them because lol publishing and being in the children's lit world and etc.
They also gave me outsider rage b/c of a lot of things, but majorly because of the reinforcement of mainstream/safe/approved values (in the original case a lot of sexual mores and religiously based conservative ideas) in the guise of giving you an "out" from those exact values. It's a bait & switch, and to me a really offensive one, profiting financially from an other, a forbidden world or bunch of ideas that might result in actual change if they were shared with any honesty, which they won't be, and also the profit of strengthening the stranglehold of the mainstream position because consumers of the media think they've glimpsed an "outside" and now they know what's there, when really they were just shown another scene painting.
I'm not putting this very well.
― how did I get here? why am I in the whiskey aisle? this is all so (Laurel), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:10 (fourteen years ago)
kinky fuckery for dummies
― judas, a homo (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:12 (fourteen years ago)
laurel I hear you loud and clear and you are v much OTM imho
― judas, a homo (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:14 (fourteen years ago)
why do you guys read things you hate? idgi
― Roger Barfing (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:15 (fourteen years ago)
wait, I thought the point of these books being shit wasnt really about the validity or otherwise of the sexual dynamics, but THE TERRIBLE GODAWFUL INSANELY CHILDISH WRITING SKILL ON DISPLAY.
― Pureed Moods (Trayce), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:16 (fourteen years ago)
Well, I'm not going to read this one, but I had other reasons for reason the other series.
― how did I get here? why am I in the whiskey aisle? this is all so (Laurel), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:17 (fourteen years ago)
*for reading
lol shakey, surely you among all ilxors know the ego-gratifying qualities of hate
― judas, a homo (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:17 (fourteen years ago)
I mean from what I have read on this thread, I couldnt get turned on by this book even if it described my perfect fantasy, because the minute I got to an "ack" or "cripes" or "icecream dropped in my belly icecream" I'd be laughing too hard.
― Pureed Moods (Trayce), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:17 (fourteen years ago)
it's also kinda lol that so many people (especially dudes) are really getting high and mighty about how women have been flocking to some crude and artless erotica because, y'know, we're over here watching porn that has serious cinematic merit
― some dude, Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:20 (fourteen years ago)
Yeah tbh I couldnt care less about people finding the book a kinky read, for that reason. I *do* care about a completely not-edited, shitty fanfiction book getting published and selling like this because I hate fanfiction and the fanfic scene and want to set it all on fire.
― Pureed Moods (Trayce), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:22 (fourteen years ago)
yeah the mainstreaming of it is in and of itself pretty noteworthy and awful, just saying
― some dude, Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:23 (fourteen years ago)
we're over here watching porn that has serious cinematic merit
I only watch it for the interviews
― Roger Barfing (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:24 (fourteen years ago)
amazing angles iirc
― Peppermint Patty Hearst (VegemiteGrrl), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:25 (fourteen years ago)
Yeah see I think if people want erotica there is already A HUGE AMOUNT of it out there (and lots of it is awesome!) and likewise if they want power-play or BDSM or to experiment with pain in certain contexts or w/e there is a lot of ground already broken for them by people who had to go outside mainstream thought and/or media and/or boundaries to create it or legitimize it or whatever. But the fandom around THESE books doesn't cognitively lead to discovering the real material, it just shoves junk food in the part of the self that was starting to have some ideas about maybe looking for something different.
If I dig down a couple more layers of logical complication, I think that is basically evil--boring, banal evil, redirecting people away from wanting anything they're not already being offered for someone else's profit.
― how did I get here? why am I in the whiskey aisle? this is all so (Laurel), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:26 (fourteen years ago)
some dude, it's the mainstream, bookstore-display, talkshow popularity & acceptance that's remarkable, not its shoddy sexiness per se.
p.s. i'll have you know i have downloaded some very artful porn in my time, thanks a bunch
― judas, a homo (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:26 (fourteen years ago)
the solution is obv to rid the world of soccer
― puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:28 (fourteen years ago)
soccer and hfcs
But the fandom around THESE books doesn't cognitively lead to discovering the real material, it just shoves junk food in the part of the self that was starting to have some ideas about maybe looking for something different.
― how did I get here? why am I in the whiskey aisle? this is all so (Laurel), Tuesday, May 29, 2012 3:26 PM (6 minutes ago)
eh, i see it as the sale of junk food to people who really, really like and want junk food. somebody's just managed to find a good way to inject some "racy" kink-sex into the equation. i imagine that if this book were different in any appreciable way, it'd be a good deal less popular. most books are a good deal less popular, after all, and it's not like there isn't other, more genuinely subversive erotica available out there.
― spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:37 (fourteen years ago)
Well, yes, there is that. Which is the best argument for pretty much dropping people who are really into junk food imo.
― how did I get here? why am I in the whiskey aisle? this is all so (Laurel), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:39 (fourteen years ago)
i keep trying to say this but idk if it really matters: the phenomenon of the books' sudden popularity is more complicated than it looks.
the media meta-analysis is "what is with this bdsm stuff being so huge now?!" but that's not really accurate. this is not "actual bdsm" emerging into barnes&noble, it's slash fiction
i'm sort of waiting for a salon article about for-real bdsm ppl rolling their eyes or getting huffy at all this, if it hasn't already been written.
― goole, Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:43 (fourteen years ago)
It's the Pachelbel's Canon in D of erotica
― nerds being macho (remy bean), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:47 (fourteen years ago)
ha that's great
― goole, Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:47 (fourteen years ago)
the mainstream is the worst
― Euler, Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:47 (fourteen years ago)
the "debeers diamond song"
― goole, Tuesday, 29 May 2012 22:48 (fourteen years ago)
more like the taco bell canon mirit
― jump them into a gang - into the absurd (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 23:10 (fourteen years ago)
cannot tell you how much i love pachelbel's canon in D
― spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 23:11 (fourteen years ago)
Which is the best argument for pretty much dropping people who are really into junk food imo.
let them have junk
― spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 23:12 (fourteen years ago)
Canon in Deeznuts
― Pureed Moods (Trayce), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 23:13 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iZn__5dT7qw
if ilx had avatars, i think 1:00-1:05 would be a popular choice.
― producer / dj / humanitarian (reddening), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 23:19 (fourteen years ago)
SPLASH fiction
― spextor vs bextor (contenderizer), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 23:21 (fourteen years ago)
could SPLASH be the new *plop*
― jump them into a gang - into the absurd (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 29 May 2012 23:26 (fourteen years ago)
I'm half expecting this to be revealed as James Frey's latest project. Maybe this writer shouldn't write again, but she should be put in charge of the romance segment of a major publisher. However it happened, she felt, desired, and ultimately put her finger on the product that the pro's hadn't felt for her yet. Her solution was to give away the merchandise, build the interest, step 3, and then make a cover without a photo Photoshopped to look like a painting that resembled the cover of a romance book in the traditional sense.
My store has been setting record sales, but to Hunger Games fans. We don't have a good hand-sale for the next. We're weeks away. It's been fun, I'm drunk at the moment. I can't get it up anymore. When they ask for it, I always tell them they're already soaking in it.
― warren harding (Zachary Taylor), Wednesday, 30 May 2012 06:50 (fourteen years ago)
I'm half expected the last post to be revealed as E. L. James's latest project.
― some dude, Wednesday, 30 May 2012 13:00 (fourteen years ago)
Guys, I was standing next to this burly/fat mid 30s slightly smelly hispanic dude on the subway this morning, and I glimpsed, over his shoulder, on his iphone, a page of text with the word "jeez" and further down the word "Christian."
― this guy's a gangsta? his real name's mittens. (Hurting 2), Wednesday, 30 May 2012 20:11 (fourteen years ago)
I find the entire concept of "subversive erotica" baffling
― Roger Barfing (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 30 May 2012 20:14 (fourteen years ago)
cumminists
― Love Max Ophüls of us all (Michael White), Wednesday, 30 May 2012 20:17 (fourteen years ago)
stop right there
― that is a weird thing to bring up over lean cuisine (DJP), Wednesday, 30 May 2012 20:18 (fourteen years ago)
From each according to his ability, to each according to his need ...
― Love Max Ophüls of us all (Michael White), Wednesday, 30 May 2012 20:23 (fourteen years ago)
the man said stop right there
― jump them into a gang - into the absurd (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 30 May 2012 20:29 (fourteen years ago)