Gay Marriage to Alfred: Your Thoughts

More passionate than most marriages, I'm sure.

I imagine Obama wants to seduce a 2nd term more than most husbands/wives want to touch their spouse.

< / humorous fatalism about everything >

Gay Conservatives
By Mona Charen
May 9, 2012 3:29 P.M.
Comments
0

Dennis Prager (as usual) makes a good point about gay people. The Left tries to insinuate that being opposed to same-sex marriage amounts to anti-gay bigotry. We know that isn’t the case. It’s also important to remember that not all gay people support the Left’s agenda. And so, a true story. My husband ran into a gay friend he hadn’t seen in a number of years. They got together for lunch, and when the subject turned to the friend’s long-time partner, Bob asked whether they planned to take advantage of the District of Columbia’s law permitting same-sex marriage. The friend shook his head no. Why? “I guess I’m a traditionalist about these things.”

Mona and her gay friends

"We don't want to be as boring as you fuxxors."

here's the production btw:

http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs/president-obama-affirms-his-support-for-same-sex-marriage.html

future gay friend of Mona: table is the table

Pretty sure traditionalism isn't his motive.

It's mine! Queers need to remain polyamorous and disreputable.

http://nation.foxnews.com/

Wow

I appreciate the gentleman's personal choice, Mona - many of my gay friends have made it but I still don't see why anyone would want to deny another gay couple the chance to have their union recognized by the State if that's their choice.

OK, I misinterpreted. I thought "traditionalism" in Mona's friend's eyes meant "marriage should remain an institution raising heterosexuals above me/us."

But if you mean traditionalism in the sense that homosexuality should still remain something that would raise parents' concern should they start to suspect their children are gay, then that makes sense.

"Obama says obesity bigger threat than al Qaeda"

I think the Fox headline is as valid as any stupid headline but at least he's flip-flopped in the right direction.

YouTube drops Upton string bikini ban

"Obama says obesity bigger threat than al Qaeda"

and car accidents. True fact. Let's all freak out about why fat ppl in cars hate our freedoms.

YouTube drops Upton string bikini ban

Would watch

whoa wait a minute, that headline changed

this is what it was:

http://static.rateyourmusic.com/lk/l/w/418ef31d3810de2440c13c02276c309b/4201736.jpg

If I clicked on Fox News headlines I'd opt for the one that factors "primordial ooze" into this issue, but then in a month I'd be reading The Corner, and have to be killed.

war on marriage: the secret of the ooze

Have any of you seen the Adam and Eve marriage photos?

*Shocking*

Fox is 'news' for ppl who played too much football in hs/college

Football or soccer? College or university?

to use the LBJ line about Jerry Ford, "without a helmet"

this is a very cynical election year ploy to shore up his credentials with younger voters - the GOP has no option but to look bad by comparison, Obama gets to look like the reasonable adult in the room etc.

― Roger Barfing (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, May 9, 2012 2:37 PM (36 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

so are you saying that a politician had political motives for doing something?

What is going to be the gay equivalent of the shotgun wedding?

Fox is 'news' for ppl who played too much football in hs/college

― Love Max Ophüls of us all (Michael White), Wednesday, May 9, 2012 3:07 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

yeah TOTALLY come over and join us on ILNFL it's basically a klan meeting with funny pictures of eli manning

totally psyched for the war on marriage, you guys

man the torpedoes

full w33d ahead

Marriage army general Dan Savage:

"But the president also supports the 'concept' of states 'deciding the issue on their own.' (States like, say, North Carolina, which yesterday banned any recognition of same-sex relationships in reality, not in concept.) So the president supports same-sex marriage while also supporting the right of states to ban the same-sex marriages that he supports. Which means, of course, that once the dust settles... everyone is going to be upset, supporters of marriage equality and opponents alike.

"...Forgive me for being Debbie Downer about this. But if a politician came out for legal interracial marriage and then said in the very next breath that he also supported the right of states to ban interracial marriage, well, I can't imagine that supporters of legal interracial marriage would let pass without comment."

http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2012/05/09/obama-comes-out-for-same-sex-marriagebut-his-evolution-is-incomplete

it's basically a klan meeting with funny pictures of eli manning

I played some football in middle school. I think your use of funny may be superfluous, though.

gonna crash a church wedding and pants the groom during vows

When people admit they're being Debbie Downer and ask for forgiveness, it's an even bigger Debbie Downer than whatever Debbie Downerism made them feel like Debbie Downer in the first place.

O_o

You could make an argument that the 'laboratory of states' theory behind federalism should allow states some leeway about something as fundamental in western/xtian culture as homophobia and sex-negativity (fornicators!) to figure it out out at their own speed. They'll lose tourism dollars and inhabitants and then they can decide whether it was worth it to increasingly be a pariah.

looking fwd to Utah and Alabama being emptied

http://static.rateyourmusic.com/lk/l/w/418ef31d3810de2440c13c02276c309b/4201736.jpg

― frogbs, Wednesday, May 9, 2012 4:03 PM (27 minutes ago)

http://oi45.tinypic.com/2udz0k6.jpg

just to be clear here, Dan Savage's end goal is a federal law declaring the rights of gays and lesbians to marry...?

I think so, yes.

I'd put the odds on that as being at least a decade out. The SC might strike down DOMA, but that doesn't mean they'll enshrine the right to marry in their ruling. Hitting Obama for not aggressively lobbying for a nonexistent law that has no chance of passing seems a bit shortsighted to me.

nonexistent BILL, that should say

Greenwald applauds, bcz only politicians' actions matter:

I’ve had zero tolerance over the last three years for people who pop up to justify all the horrible things Obama has done by claiming that he is forced to do them out of political necessity or in cowardly deference to public opinion; that’s because horrible acts don’t become less horrible because they’re driven by some rational, self-interested political motive rather than conviction. That’s equally true of positive acts: they don’t become less commendable because they were the by-product of political pressure or self-preservation; when a politician takes the right course of action, as Obama did today, credit is merited, regardless of motive.

http://www.salon.com/2012/05/09/e_3/

I think that's true - however this is not really an "action", it has zero effect on policy

On his Fox News show, Smith played the tape of Obama speaking, and then said, "the president of the United States, now in the 21st century."

A couple of minutes later, Smith was speaking to his colleague Bret Baier. He asked Baier if the GOP would campaign against same-sex marriage "while sitting very firmly, without much question, on the wrong side of history on it."

I wonder if Shep Smith's position at Fox is so secure that he can get away with twitting Fox's target demo, or if he's angling for a high-profile firing.

they won't fire him

Thing is, plenty of people would happily stay on the wrong side of it. Buckley's comment has it built in to the mentality, which I think that NRO types have reffed, that they feel they're helping slow the march of history/progress/whatever. so what I'm saying is, the romanticism of Lost Causes is vitally important for a certain kind of retrograde fuckhead.

it has zero effect on policy

but it is a relatively rare "bully pulpit" moment from Obama.