V For Vendetta: The Movie

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (674 of them)
ilx, help me decide: should i go see this or "she's the man"?

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Sunday, 19 March 2006 02:23 (twenty years ago)

I didn't like it at all, except for Fry and Rea. Politically, I found it pretty suspicious. It's like a Y2K-bunker-mentalist's fantasy movie ("The government are poisoning our water supply!").

-- Chuck_Tatum (sappy_papp...), March 18th, 2006.

um, you do know that the US gov't has experimented on unwitting citizens many times in the past, right? do the tuskeegee experiments ring a bell? the radiation experiments that clinton belatedly apologised for? or the cloud of bacteria sprayed over san francisco by the navy? MK-ULtra experiments?

but you're right, the movie was kinda "meh" though

latebloomer is a belly with a guy pierce in it (latebloomer), Sunday, 19 March 2006 02:28 (twenty years ago)

vahid, quit clownsteppin.

chaki (chaki), Sunday, 19 March 2006 02:29 (twenty years ago)

(btw i'm not implying that "y2k bunker-mentalists" are right about anything, just that the idea of the gov't doing horrible shit to innocent people isn't at all crazy talk)

latebloomer is a belly with a guy pierce in it (latebloomer), Sunday, 19 March 2006 02:32 (twenty years ago)

And these are Nazis, after all.


ilx, help me decide: should i go see this or "she's the man"?
That's a tough one. "She's The Man" is being called this generation's "Mean Girls," so...

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Sunday, 19 March 2006 02:34 (twenty years ago)

isn't that basically a remake of Just One of the Guys?

latebloomer is a belly with a guy pierce in it (latebloomer), Sunday, 19 March 2006 02:50 (twenty years ago)

ilx, help me decide: should i go see this or "she's the man"?

She's the man, obv.

My Psychic Friends Are Strangely Silent (Ex Leon), Sunday, 19 March 2006 02:53 (twenty years ago)

it was an especially good hollywood superhero fantasy

-- vahid (vfoz...), March 18th, 2006 9:10 PM. (vahid) (later) (link)

That's the problem, though--IT WASN'T. It should have been, and it could have been, but it wasn't. Batman Begins was easily FAR superior. In fact, as a hollywood comic book movie, it was decidedly mediocre. The direction, cinematography, production design, and most of the acting (Stepehen Fry, Stephen Rea being the notible exceptions, Hugo Weaving gets points for trying VERY HARD) was decidedly uninteresting. Especially the directing. CLOSE-UPS ON FACES MEANS IT'S SERIOUS BUSINESS.

As for film vs. comic books, it was as good as adaptation as one could expect, they just didn't focus on what *I* would have liked to have seen a focus on--namely, the questionable morality of V's actions (most notably changed in his broadcast to the populace, where he sided with the people instead of blaming them for their government) and the "it could happen IN YOUR COUNTRY" air of the government in the comic. I felt the "OMG A CONSPIRACY" explanation was in place to make it seem less of an all-too-real threat of elected fascism and simply the well-planned coup of a few people. Honestly, all those reviewers bitching about the "anti-US/UK sentiment" are really hypersensitive and should never be allowed to read the comic lest their poor little brains explode for being so offended. I felt that the absence of Rose Almond was SORELY missed, as it kind of took all the emotional strength out of the "this government sucks" argument. Also making her parents into "activists" instead of just people with "the wrong kind of past" made the government less scary.

In conclusion, Stephen Fry stole the fucking movie away from everyone else and ran with it, I am mad V didn't show Delia his face, and that whole "love story" thing was gross.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Sunday, 19 March 2006 06:03 (twenty years ago)

I loved it tho I am kind of y2k-bunkerish.

adam (adam), Sunday, 19 March 2006 06:04 (twenty years ago)

well ... i'm a big fan of both "batman begins" and alan moore's book. i def liked the book better (how can the film compete?) but i thought the high points of "v" were better than the high points of "batman begins", though.

i got bored w/ "batman begins" about 2/3rd of the way through. let's stop acting like "batman begins" is the "citizen kane" of superhero movies. there was a bunch of garbage in that film, too.

"v for vendetta" = "darkman" done right!

vahid (vahid), Sunday, 19 March 2006 06:15 (twenty years ago)

i didn't even read adam's message. YES! BROS!

vahid (vahid), Sunday, 19 March 2006 06:15 (twenty years ago)

Batman Begins was pretty much crap.

The best superhero movie thus far (haven't seen V yet) is Hellboy. Even that wasn't as good the second time around, it lost a lot going from big-screen to DVD.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Sunday, 19 March 2006 06:22 (twenty years ago)

let's stop acting like "batman begins" is the "citizen kane" of superhero movies.

b-b-b-b-but...he was a NINJA. :(((((

Oh and props to Hellboy! So underrated.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Sunday, 19 March 2006 06:22 (twenty years ago)

Batman Begins gets a free pass due to ninjas. V is not my favorite Moore book largely because of the way it's dated and all the stupid anarchy stuff--movie fixed a lot of that. My friends disliked the slo-mo knife porn. I dug it.

adam (adam), Sunday, 19 March 2006 06:23 (twenty years ago)

and best superhero movie = blade 2

adam (adam), Sunday, 19 March 2006 06:24 (twenty years ago)

I always forget Blade started out as a comic book, so yeah that's definitely in the running.

And, of course, Howard the Duck (or did the comic book come after?).

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Sunday, 19 March 2006 06:25 (twenty years ago)

I'm on page 70 of the graphic novel, and most of it so far has been kind of sad. The pop-cult references, the whining, the overt Phantom of the Opera symbolism, the pedophile Bishop (yo, they're Episcopalians not Catholics!), etc..

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Sunday, 19 March 2006 06:28 (twenty years ago)

best superhero movie = buckaroo banzai

vahid (vahid), Sunday, 19 March 2006 07:34 (twenty years ago)

WHAT BOUT BLANKMAN

chaki (chaki), Sunday, 19 March 2006 08:04 (twenty years ago)

hahaha you read my mind chaki you read my mind

latebloomer is a belly with a guy pierce in it (latebloomer), Sunday, 19 March 2006 11:47 (twenty years ago)

http://www.internationalhero.co.uk/b/blankman.jpg

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 19 March 2006 16:52 (twenty years ago)

I saw it today and thought it was very good.

DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 19 March 2006 18:46 (twenty years ago)

And, of course, Howard the Duck (or did the comic book come after?).

It predates the film by about a decade or so. My cousin Alan drew a few issues in the mid-70s.

phil d. (Phil D.), Sunday, 19 March 2006 20:12 (twenty years ago)

Just One Of The Guys isn't the flick about the chick who magically changes gender, is it?

Hal! Jordan! HAL! JORDAN! (Barima), Sunday, 19 March 2006 20:36 (twenty years ago)

most notably changed in his broadcast to the populace, where he sided with the people instead of blaming them for their government

Okay, I accept the likely possibility that that speech is worded differently in the book (which I haven't read) but what part of "if you want to know who to blame, you should look in a mirror" was ambiguous in that speech?

Seriously, do some of you EVER pay attention to ANYTHING you watch or hear????

Dan (Wow) Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 19 March 2006 21:08 (twenty years ago)

Just One Of The Guys isn't the flick about the chick who magically changes gender, is it?

-- Hal! Jordan! HAL! JORDAN! (b4rim4_...), March 19th, 2006.

oh in this one she magically changes instead of dressing up?

latebloomer is a belly with a guy pierce in it (latebloomer), Sunday, 19 March 2006 21:10 (twenty years ago)

"She's The One" is a remake/based on "Twelfth Night", hence comparisons to "Clueless" and "10 Things I Hate About You".

Dan (And "O", Heh) Perry (Dan Perry), Sunday, 19 March 2006 21:18 (twenty years ago)

Anyone else think the guy playing the ranting TV journalist had modelled his look and mannerisms rather closely on Christopher Hitchens?

HA HA! Big time! I knew he seemed familiar.

DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 19 March 2006 21:20 (twenty years ago)

It was good, but I thought a lot of the cod-anarchist philosophizing and (most especially) Evey's closing speech/voiceover ("he was... ALL OF US") were completely unnecessary. In their stead, it could have used a little more definition on the events leading up to 'the present' (the timeline of bio-experiment concentration camps to taking power to more resettlement camps etc. was confusing in the movie, but not what I've seen in the book). Evey's family backstory didn't make sense either - they became political after the St. Mary's massacre - but against whom (the fascists presumably, but they weren't in power - and why?). How did that fit into the timeline?

The sequence with Evey's torture and the note and everything was terrific, and I loved all the scenes with the crusty, disinterested cop (who is never revealed to have a heart of gold or anything).

(Also noted that despite the 30-year time difference and apparent destruction of continental Europe or somesuch, they were still making 2006 BMWs. Fascist cops drive like this...)

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Sunday, 19 March 2006 21:45 (twenty years ago)

Okay, I accept the likely possibility that that speech is worded differently in the book (which I haven't read) but what part of "if you want to know who to blame, you should look in a mirror" was ambiguous in that speech?

Seriously, do some of you EVER pay attention to ANYTHING you watch or hear????

-- Dan (Wow) Perry ([email protected]), March 19th, 2006 4:08 PM. (Dan Perry) (later) (link)

I DID hear that line, but the overall tone of the speech was drastically different in the book, which had a much more scathing indictment of the populace. I didn't mean to say he let the population off entirely, just that the general focus of the speech had changed from an indictment/warning to a call for an uprising.

Jessie the Monster (scarymonsterrr), Sunday, 19 March 2006 21:55 (twenty years ago)

i just hungoverly watched batman begins this afternoon... it holds up pretty well on video. although the first hour, before he's batman, is way way better than the second hour, when he is.

anyway like i said above i liked that movie V avoided some of the really shitty stuff in the original, but overall... i dunno. despite really liking a lot of it, the way they went with the ending still bothers me.

and the best superhero movies are:

superman
blade ONE

s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 19 March 2006 22:56 (twenty years ago)

you know maybe it wasn't Lucas' writing and directing that made the Star Wars redos so horrible it might have all been down to Portman. She's dreadful. I could hear the gears grinding in her head while she was trying to think of which stiff line to deliver next. The whole thing was a mess but she stood out as especially awful.

keyth (keyth), Sunday, 19 March 2006 23:23 (twenty years ago)

Yes, she was awful. Everything else about this film I'm not sure about. It's bad. It's good. It's one of those.

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 19 March 2006 23:48 (twenty years ago)

(The "whoever you are, I love you" thing made sense to me, but then I'm a sap)

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 19 March 2006 23:49 (twenty years ago)

For someone so beautiful, Portman seems oddly asexual (or maybe just cold in general, which is what makes her performance here kind of meh).

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Sunday, 19 March 2006 23:54 (twenty years ago)

otm i wish this side would come out more in movies:

http://img23.imagevenue.com/loc24/th_87460_sey_12.jpg

latebloomer is a belly with a guy pierce in it (latebloomer), Sunday, 19 March 2006 23:58 (twenty years ago)

I think she's just a bad actress, or at least she is here, and in The Phantom Menace, which are the only two things I've ever seen her in, I think. I wouldn't like to make assumptions about her as a person. Her accent was good, though.

The thing about that Valerie letter, and some of V's speeches, was that they dangled profundity in front of you, which didn't sit very well with the hokum of the rest of it. It was frustrating. Easier just to write it all off as enjoyable exploitation flick, as Mark Kermode did, but I couldn't quite do that.


Alba (Alba), Monday, 20 March 2006 00:00 (twenty years ago)

Oh, I've just checked her credits and realise I must have seen her in Everyone Says I Love You and Heat, but I can't remember her in either.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 20 March 2006 00:02 (twenty years ago)

The Valerie letter was the most effective sequence in damning the New World Order and explaining (to some degree) how they reached this point.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Monday, 20 March 2006 00:02 (twenty years ago)

And I don't mean to suggest anything about her as an individual, but it's pretty much a recurring theme in her performances, she always seems ridiculously tightly wound and not exactly inhabiting the same universe as the rest of humanity (or the other characters). (one exception: Where The Heart Is which was teh bomb)

Anna Paquin would have made a good Evey, I think.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Monday, 20 March 2006 00:05 (twenty years ago)

The letter was also pushing you, with the "I don't know who you are. Or whether you're a man or a woman / I may never see you or cry with you or get drunk with you / But I love you" lines towards some kind of universal humanism, faith in love, that tied in with Evey's words at the end to V. And I felt like it was supposed to tie in with V's philosophy, but didn't really.

I don't mind the idea of V being mad and not a hero, and he suggested as much himself when he said that for every reaction there was an opposite reaction, that he was a monster born of their monstrosity. But there's accepting that idea in principle, and then there's feeling like a film coherently conveys it, and I don't think it did. It cast him as the clear-thinking, righteous crusader too often. It's not a problem if V himself is incoherent – but the film shouldn't be.

Alba (Alba), Monday, 20 March 2006 00:13 (twenty years ago)

this was #1 at the box office

kingfish, Monday, 20 March 2006 00:14 (twenty years ago)

i dunno. despite really liking a lot of it, the way they went with the ending still bothers me.
-- s1ocki (slytus...) (webmail), March 19th, 2006 2:56 PM. (slutsky)

who was it who said every superhero movie is really about the moment the main character goes from being a "normal" to being a superhero?

i think every superhero movie is sort of a let-down after the "becoming a superhero" scene. def for me, the climax (and best part of this film) was evey in the rain, and just like "batman begins" once that point had passed the movie wasn't so great anymore.

it's too bad that the cop's imagined ending (the girl getting shot, brixtoners retaliating, riots starting, etc) was so much more exciting than the actual ending.

as for the poster who asked what and how had made the family political after st mary's ... i think they showed the little girl (evey) passing out biohazard-marked fliers. i guess the family just became hardline greens or something. or maybe the turned into "us gov't did 9.11" type crazies.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 20 March 2006 01:55 (twenty years ago)

anyway niggling on details sort of defeats the point of superhero movies, yeah?

or, do we need to know EXACTLY HOW bruce wayne ends up in rural tibet? and how the the league of shadows tracked him to rural tibet? etc etc.

if you measure v for vendetta by the superhero yardstick it makes good sense. if you try to treat it like a police procedural, you're being unfair.

But there's accepting that idea in principle, and then there's feeling like a film coherently conveys it, and I don't think it did. It cast him as the clear-thinking, righteous crusader too often

you can say what you want about bin laden, but you can't argue with "clear-thinking" and "righteous". why should he not be clear-thinking? i mean, part of what makes him the particular superhero that he is is his singleminded doggedness about his revenge. he's a moral juggernaut! and anyway i think that "monstrous" doesn't need to mean "confused and wrong". you can be "clear-thinking, righteous" and still be monstrous! (see: bin laden, bush, etc)

vahid (vahid), Monday, 20 March 2006 02:03 (twenty years ago)

I don't think the cop's ending was imagined - those were the actual events leading up to the Guy Fawkes, uh, gathering (it wasn't a riot or demonstration). That's why the Chancellor had to call out the military to surround Parliament - we see the girl in the crowd at the end, but we also see Valerie and her girlfriend and (I think) Evey's parents.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Monday, 20 March 2006 02:04 (twenty years ago)

... lines towards some kind of universal humanism, faith in love, that tied in with Evey's words at the end to V. And I felt like it was supposed to tie in with V's philosophy, but didn't really.-- Alba (albab...) (webmail), March 19th, 2006 4:13 PM. (Alba)

well. v never said "i'm out to spread valerie's message of love". he wanted bloody revenge for her death (and his own mutilation) and that was it. there's no reason why v shouldn't be the inverse of valerie's ideal (every action produces it's opposite, right?). the person who really ended up picking up that thread and going with it was evey, who lived out valerie's happy ending in real life: shaved-headed but safely underground (in the fake ID sense), doing her own thing, watching old movies.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 20 March 2006 02:08 (twenty years ago)

xpost - oh, that makes better sense.

does it make me a bad person that i was disappointed that the soldiers stood down?

vahid (vahid), Monday, 20 March 2006 02:09 (twenty years ago)

It would have been more fitting with V's world - the people would have to take back the state by force, etc.. But in the end, he got killed, and Evey won out with peace, love and understanding, so the fascist military had to suddenly find its conscience.

Erick Dampier is better than Shaq (miloaukerman), Monday, 20 March 2006 02:13 (twenty years ago)

who was it who said every superhero movie is really about the moment the main character goes from being a "normal" to being a superhero?

i think every superhero movie is sort of a let-down after the "becoming a superhero" scene. def for me, the climax (and best part of this film) was evey in the rain, and just like "batman begins" once that point had passed the movie wasn't so great anymore.

oh yeah, i was thinking the exact same thing about BB today... i was loving it up to the point where he becomes batman, then i fell asleep. but i think i already said that exact thing upthread so never mind!

i don't understand why they didn't have the scene of evey putting on the v mask! and i was NOT onboard for the crowd of "V"s. i hate crowd/mob scenes in movies, they're always so corny no matter what.

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 20 March 2006 05:00 (twenty years ago)

yeah, the ending was disappointing.

kingfish da notorious teletabby (kingfish 2.0), Monday, 20 March 2006 06:07 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.