when will a conservative media outlet publish a style guide for minority youths on how to not be mistaken for criminals?
― i think this is serious (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 13:42 (fourteen years ago)
daily show had a good bit on that last night
― max, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 13:51 (fourteen years ago)
if you want to avoid getting shot by white people you should dress nicely, like these folks
http://nicedeb.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/fruitofislam.jpg
― max, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 13:53 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.highsnobiety.com/news/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/kanye-west-entourage-fashion-week-paris.jpg
― stan this sick bunt (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 13:56 (fourteen years ago)
there it is
― i think this is serious (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 13:58 (fourteen years ago)
but i suppose the right would argue that those cases could only be used to carry burglary tools
― stan this sick bunt (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 14:00 (fourteen years ago)
Also, why the hats? What are they trying to hide? Clearly they are up to something.
― Respectfully, Tyrese Gibson (Nicole), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 14:00 (fourteen years ago)
leopard print pants are clearly for camoflauge as they commit illicit crimes in urban paris
― dayo, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 14:01 (fourteen years ago)
morning tv talk shows were dominated by the current Zimmerman defense arguments (Martin attacked Zimmerman, broke his nose), and the appearance of George Oliver, Zimmerman's (African-American) friend. The CNN Headline News anchor did not bother to ask Zimmerman's pal why Zimmerman did not listen to the police on the phone telling him not to follow Martin.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 14:08 (fourteen years ago)
The police claim to have witnesses (plural) that back up much of Zimmerman's account. And yet, per the Sentinal piece: "There is about a one-minute gap during which police say they're not sure what happened." I believe this one minute, conveniently, is the point at which Trayvon allegedly hit him first.
I still want to know how long the girlfriend was supposedly listening in, at what point she signed off and missed out, because a lot of this story so far is a jumble of her account and the police/Zimmerman account, with these new "witnesses" leaning toward the cop/Zimmerman account (ie, he followed but was jumped, Zimmerman was the one yelling for help/getting beat up, etc.).
According to that same story (http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-03-26/news/os-trayvon-martin-zimmerman-account-20120326_1_miami-schools-punch-unarmed-black-teenager), Zimmerman was coming back from the store in his SUV when he saw Trayvon, then supposedly called 911, left his car and followed him on foot. So I guess he wasn't just lurking in his living room, peeking out the blinds. He was out and about, which I suppose (in vigilante logic) means keeping an eye on his fantasy perp.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 14:19 (fourteen years ago)
Yeah, this should all serve to set race relations in this country back a couple decades or so.
― Michael J. Fuxxx (Deric W. Haircare), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 14:26 (fourteen years ago)
Zimmerman outweighed him by 50 pounds, his neighborhood watch group was not properly registered, he had a history of calling 911 pretty often, and he has his own documented past history regarding physical altercations.
I heard someone suggesting on a news program that they wrestled over the gun and they were implying that Martin somehow shot himself. Are their fingerprints? Did they ever find Martin's cellphone?
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 14:30 (fourteen years ago)
there
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 14:31 (fourteen years ago)
people people stop making shit up
the only eyewitness that saw trayvon attack george is george
― the late great, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 14:34 (fourteen years ago)
anyway doesn't trayvon have a right to stand his ground? for all he knew zimmerman was gonna put him in his backyard sex dungeon
― the late great, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 14:36 (fourteen years ago)
there is a not so fine line between testimony which is "consistent" with zimmerman's story and testimony that "corroborates" his story, but that distinction seems lost on a few people.
― the late great, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 14:42 (fourteen years ago)
^ xpost exactly
― TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 14:42 (fourteen years ago)
Wanting to play lawyer when there is no case -- NO CHARGES FILED AGAINST ANYONE -- is dumber than failing to see that distinction.
― Three Word Username, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 14:55 (fourteen years ago)
Yeah, totes. There has been no under oath stuff in this entire mess yet.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 14:58 (fourteen years ago)
pithy or no, this fake Will Smith tweet actually does say a lot about america in 2012:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-bE-dRCKHeXM/T3BOhfbfg8I/AAAAAAAADwM/QzfKquTNcYo/s1600/Trayvon_WillSmith.jpg
― stan this sick bunt (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 15:02 (fourteen years ago)
x-postA month has gone by since the incident, and the grand jury is not empaneled until April 10, and there's lots of history and related issues and emotion, so the fact that people want to play lawyer now seems very human and understandable to me
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 15:03 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2012/03/new_orleans_cop_suspended_inde.html
new orleans cop that instigated an iffy traffic stop (in which two cops were shot and a young black man killed) makes some ill-advised and super racist online comments. under his own name.
two bits of context: a NO-based federal prosecutor resigned the other week after being exposed as a vehement and voluminous online commenter and the nopd shot another young black man (unarmed) during a "drug raid" (read: minor pot bust).
― adam, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 15:11 (fourteen years ago)
http://media.nola.com/crime_impact/photo/jason-giriorjpg-9a3ba54c5898648d.jpg
Have hair like a douchenozzle, act like one.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 15:14 (fourteen years ago)
OK, come, only one racist shooting controversy at a time, please.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 15:16 (fourteen years ago)
ugh yes, there is this awful blog run by a Chicago cop that has a comments section rife with racist cops and they are up in arms over that NOLA case, defending the douche
― stan this sick bunt (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 15:19 (fourteen years ago)
sorry, should have made clear: made some ill-advised and super racist online comments about trayvon martin.
― adam, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 15:20 (fourteen years ago)
If you can't be racist against a pot-smoking, hoodie-wearing, allegedly window-jimmying, up to no good goon who beats up innocent neighborhood watch folks who are just trying to keep their children safe, who can you be racist against?
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 15:30 (fourteen years ago)
Next thing you know you'll be telling me it's OK to stare longingly at white women. Which Trayvon might have been doing! At least, no one has suggested otherwise, and if you give me enough time I'm sure I can find a witness to back me up.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 15:32 (fourteen years ago)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/26/craig-sonner-interview-lawrence-odonnell_n_1381578.html?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmaing5%7Cdl1%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D146809
― Jean-Luc Poncey (lpz), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 15:37 (fourteen years ago)
bottom line is racism will keep continuing because daddies tell their kids that racism was something that happened in 1950s-60s but magically ended after Martin Luther King died so they grow up and they still see people decrying racism and they ask their parents why, if racism ended, and the dad says something ironic like "it's cos black ppl like to complain and want us to nanny them" and dude grows up and then subsequently has a kid (unplanned at age 22) and then 7-8 years later teaches his kid the same thing.
― Bo Jackson Overdrive, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:02 (fourteen years ago)
^^ a scene that is played out exactly like this in hundreds of households every year, no doubt
― Aimless, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:04 (fourteen years ago)
well for one it's the main reason I was critical of Affirmative Action when I was in high school. and I only had passively-prejudiced parents.
― Bo Jackson Overdrive, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:10 (fourteen years ago)
ohhhh, so that's the bottom line. got it.
― i think this is serious (elmo argonaut), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:10 (fourteen years ago)
excuse dumb question but am I right that Zimmerman still hasn't been arrested?
― kinder, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15 (fourteen years ago)
xpost rmde
― Bo Jackson Overdrive, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:15 (fourteen years ago)
kinder - yes not arrested and no indication that it will happen either
it isn't going to happen
― the sir edmund hillary of sitting through pauly shore films (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:17 (fourteen years ago)
unless the feds can build a hate crime case
If all that comes of this is "Stand Your Ground" getting repealed and Zimmerman being hounded absolutely everywhere he goes for the rest of his life, I guess I can accept that. I'll probably have to.
― Michael J. Fuxxx (Deric W. Haircare), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:20 (fourteen years ago)
Thanks, got a bit confused with all the shitstorm when I encountered someone on facebook bringing in all that school suspension stuff into it and "it's become a highly one-sided story". smh.
― kinder, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:21 (fourteen years ago)
Zimmerman not even arrested is going to embolden a hella large number of haters with guns in states with this stupid Stand Your Ground law. BWH (black with hoodie) is now a capital crime.
― Aimless, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:21 (fourteen years ago)
I keep thinking about this (amazing) novel: http://www.upne.com/1555533965.html
― s.clover, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:28 (fourteen years ago)
I do not see a Republican Florida legislature repealing "Stand Your Ground" or any of the other largely conservative states doing so either. Some conservatives have said that Zimmerman's behavior as first described was not a proper use of "Stand Your Ground," but that does not mean they oppose the use of "Stand Your Ground" as they interpret it.
― curmudgeon, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:33 (fourteen years ago)
Is it bad to hope that this dude's life gets ruined so bad that he just eats his gun?
― jpattzlovevampz 2 hours ago (Phil D.), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:36 (fourteen years ago)
(I know, I know, it is bad, but god damnit.)
yeah, "refinement" more likely than appeal, if that
xps
― Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:36 (fourteen years ago)
appeal repeal
― Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:37 (fourteen years ago)
also, action against police & prosecutors seems more likely than murder or even manslaughter charges against zimmerman at this point, but i'm not holding my breath for either
― Fozzy Osbourne (contenderizer), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:38 (fourteen years ago)
I'd be vaguely surprised if there's any real repercussions for Zimmerman or anyone in law enforcement at this point.
― Respectfully, Tyrese Gibson (Nicole), Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:39 (fourteen years ago)
It's splitting hairs, but while Zimmerman has not been arrested, he is most certainly not a free man, and I suspect is in fact is probably in police custody one way or the other.
― Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:40 (fourteen years ago)