2012 republican presidential nominee IV: NEEDS MORE BOOING

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1267 of them)

I think she has this core conviction that she was going to be the first female president

this is a weird claim

tempestuous alaskan nites! (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Thursday, 22 March 2012 12:53 (fourteen years ago)

I said "I think"--an opinion. And really, I don't see what's so weird about it at all.

clemenza, Thursday, 22 March 2012 12:58 (fourteen years ago)

The popular caricature of Biden as either a simpleton (late-night talk shows) or a party animal (The Onion) probably doesn't do him any favors were he to contemplate a presidential run in 2016. Also he would be (slightly) older than Dole was in '96.

Cuba Pudding, Jr. (jaymc), Thursday, 22 March 2012 13:04 (fourteen years ago)

xp Don't most presidential hopefuls have a keen sense of their potential historical significance and - in order to keep them going through the long, brutal slog - a certain sense that they are destined for it?

And I have been called "The Appetite" (DL), Thursday, 22 March 2012 13:07 (fourteen years ago)

I am sort of hoping the first female president isn't, y'know, the wife of one of the previous presidents.

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 22 March 2012 13:14 (fourteen years ago)

One huge difference between Hillary and Biden is that I imagine the core of Hillary's support still feels that 2008 was an unfinished story--if she ever did jump in, they'd be there. The core of Biden's support from 2008...well, I can't even finish that sentence.

clemenza, Thursday, 22 March 2012 13:19 (fourteen years ago)

ION, I am hoping that the Romney team are actively trolling his rivals with this shit, and that they will exploit the standard Republican enthusiasm for / ineptitude with joeks to turn them further to the side of prop comics. Look for one of Mitt's staff to make an exploitable remark involving a flaming bag of dogpoop!

Andrew Farrell, Thursday, 22 March 2012 13:19 (fourteen years ago)

Naive question from britisher: Is there any ladies in US Politics who could potentially run and win in the next 3 elections?

Thoughts? You must have loads. (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:29 (fourteen years ago)

Potentially? I think Elizabeth Warren might have a way outside shot, but she'd have to win her Senate race first...

Mordy, Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:30 (fourteen years ago)

Is there any ladies in US Politics who could potentially run and win in the next 3 elections?

for President? Hillary's the only real national figure with the necessary party backing. As noted, Warren hasn't even won an election yet. I don't think Sebelius or Feinstein or whoever has any interest in being president.

I would vote for Barbara Mikulski though

the sir edmund hillary of sitting through pauly shore films (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:38 (fourteen years ago)

3 elections (assuming you're not counting 2012) is a long time tho -- someone totally off the radar today could show up in 2023.

Mordy, Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:47 (fourteen years ago)

OTM. 12 years ago Obama was a state senator.

o. nate, Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:50 (fourteen years ago)

yeah no arguing there

the sir edmund hillary of sitting through pauly shore films (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:53 (fourteen years ago)

I can't even think of a male who could run and win the next 3 elections.

pplains, Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:53 (fourteen years ago)

I'm just saying that at the moment nobody really fits the bill besides Hillary

xp

the sir edmund hillary of sitting through pauly shore films (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:54 (fourteen years ago)

'the bill'

iatee, Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:55 (fourteen years ago)

Sarah Palin has a chance, and if you don't think so, you give voters way too much credit.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:56 (fourteen years ago)

lol pp

THIS TRADE SERVES ZERO FOOTBALL PURPOSE (DJP), Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:56 (fourteen years ago)

nah even the crazy people are sick of sarah palin

iatee, Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:57 (fourteen years ago)

no matter who the voters are, sarah palin doesn't stand a chance bc she lacks the discipline, intelligence, etc, to mount a presidential campaign. she just couldn't make it throughout the entire run

Mordy, Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:57 (fourteen years ago)

looooool

xxxposts

TracerHandVEVO (Tracer Hand), Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:59 (fourteen years ago)

also everyone h8s her

lag∞n, Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:59 (fourteen years ago)

except me

lag∞n, Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:59 (fourteen years ago)

Palin cannot attract any of the moderate voters she would need to win. She can blather to the base all she wants, but so can Newt.

GOP might have thought they had something with Nikki Haley for a minute there, but no.

On the sidelines in a trash can grumping (Dan Peterson), Thursday, 22 March 2012 15:59 (fourteen years ago)

Don't drag intelligence into this.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:00 (fourteen years ago)

someone as crazy as sarah palin who had decent handlers coulda won this year

iatee, Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:00 (fourteen years ago)

i think the lesson of the mccain campaign is that there aren't handlers good enough to handle sarah

Mordy, Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:01 (fourteen years ago)

yah handlers are overrated, you need a candidate who wants to be handled, even then you end up w/romney

lag∞n, Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:03 (fourteen years ago)

how exactly do you run a campaign for someone determined to take everything in their line of vision with the grace and charm of an aggressive toddler?

THIS TRADE SERVES ZERO FOOTBALL PURPOSE (DJP), Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:04 (fourteen years ago)

agressive toddler '12

lag∞n, Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:06 (fourteen years ago)

well you can't really, which is why none of the crazies were able to ride their momentum longer than 3 minutes xp

iatee, Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:09 (fourteen years ago)

This Etch-a-Sketch nonsense is exactly why politics is so dull.

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:25 (fourteen years ago)

"Need to shake things up first and then change things by only going left-right, left-right, left-right…"

pplains, Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:28 (fourteen years ago)

just own it, mitt. own it.

pplains, Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:28 (fourteen years ago)

If we can get Santorum talking about using the Konami Code I would consider it a great victory.

jpattzlovevampz 2 hours ago (Phil D.), Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:29 (fourteen years ago)

loooool pp

the sir edmund hillary of sitting through pauly shore films (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:30 (fourteen years ago)

"Need to shake things up first and then change things by only going left-right, left-right, left-right…"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXHoYVEOFqs

clemenza, Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:34 (fourteen years ago)

Song's amazing...apologies for the video, which I hadn't looked at.

clemenza, Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:38 (fourteen years ago)

haha, did you even see the screen cap?

It's okay, this is the republican thread after all.

pplains, Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:39 (fourteen years ago)

oh lord, clemenza. It gets much worse.

pplains, Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:40 (fourteen years ago)

^^^ suggested new thread title

Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:42 (fourteen years ago)

I got through 30 seconds...my heart sank. I see now there are other "Shombalor" videos I could have gone with.

clemenza, Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:43 (fourteen years ago)

what the hell is wrong with you

THIS TRADE SERVES ZERO FOOTBALL PURPOSE (DJP), Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:44 (fourteen years ago)

Moderators encouraged to substitute:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9xnqMZQltA

clemenza, Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:44 (fourteen years ago)

DJP: sincere apologies. Posting at work, not screening beforehand, etc.

clemenza, Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:46 (fourteen years ago)

Read through the GOP budget yesterday as printed in the Times. Only at the very end of the article did they point out that they want to reform corporate taxes so only money made in the US is taxed, which has to be the stupidest idea ever. Wouldn't that basically encourage and speed up outsourcing everything that hasn't already been outsourced?

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 22 March 2012 16:54 (fourteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e08JikyZrjY

lag∞n, Friday, 23 March 2012 14:16 (fourteen years ago)

http://www.cnn.com/video/?hpt=hp_t2#/video/politics/2012/03/23/sot-santorum-stick-with-obama.cnn

here's an interesting strategy; tell your party not to vote for your nominee unless it's you

THIS TRADE SERVES ZERO FOOTBALL PURPOSE (DJP), Friday, 23 March 2012 16:57 (fourteen years ago)

can't believe that etch a sketch thing is a thing

brokering (pimping) (stevie), Friday, 23 March 2012 17:30 (fourteen years ago)

whoa so Tebow drew #KONY on Romney's Etch-A-Sketch?

Euler, Friday, 23 March 2012 17:30 (fourteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.