DEM not gonna CON dis NATION: Rolling UK politics in the short-lived post-Murdoch era

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (6314 of them)

who are these people that can only do their shopping in that one-to-three hour window on a Sunday anyway? Not saying they don't exist but I doubt they exist in massive numbers.

anyone who works six days a week? or has a saturday job and weekday commitments? or a weekday job and saturday commitments? or religious people whose day of rest is a Saturday? Or, y'know, loads of people essentially. it's still not a positive argument for the sunday trading laws, anyway.

I think there *are* societal benefits to days where people are encouraged to slow down, rest, spend time with their families, whatever.

That may be, but Sunday trading laws don't achieve those things. Some Scottish islands shut down p. much entirely on Sundays and they're not idylls of close-knit family life, nor are they havens of restful existence. They're just shitty places to be on Sundays.

(Ignoring too that shopping is how some families slow down, rest and spend time with one another, for better or worse)

stet, Monday, 19 March 2012 09:47 (fourteen years ago)

Thing is:

Peope have only so much to spend on their shopping.

If shop is only open Saturday, everyone goes then.

If shop open Sat&Sun, some people go Sat, some go Sun. It doesn't mean the shops get more revenue.

That's why they don't want to pay more to staff. (It's not the only reason, obv).

Mark G, Monday, 19 March 2012 09:58 (fourteen years ago)

mm, it's weird, in the town where I live people often complain that cafés all seem to shut at 5/6, so if you want to go out and meet someone or w/e there's no option but the pub, but every time a café decides to change its hours and stay open late it gets so little traffic that it gives up after about a month.

Small shops are allowed to be open all day Sunday, right? but plenty don't because there's not the demand.

uh oh i'm having an emotion (c sharp major), Monday, 19 March 2012 10:47 (fourteen years ago)

I think there *are* societal benefits to days where people are encouraged to slow down, rest, spend time with their families, whatever.

possibly but (1) i don't see any evidence that sunday trading laws do this (2) is "encouraging people to slow down" really a matter for the law? the job of government?

caek, Monday, 19 March 2012 10:48 (fourteen years ago)

the avenue which i live off is a shopping street, lots of small independent businesses plus a Tesco and a Sainsbury overpriced convenience store. i think maybe a quarter of the indies open on a sunday.

xp

as i say i don't think the law shd tell people when they can open their shop but there has been an eating into people's leisure time as a result of sunday opening. we legislate for bank holidays so i don't think an enforced day of rest is ethically much different.

Kony Montana: "Say hello to my invisible friend" (Noodle Vague), Monday, 19 March 2012 10:51 (fourteen years ago)

but there has been an eating into people's leisure time as a result of sunday opening

depends on the people. there's totally been an eating into my leisure time as a result of not being able to go shopping on Sunday evenings like I used to.

(Conversely, when I worked in a shop, being able to pull a double on Sundays was a major win when I needed extra cash. On both sides of the deal I am pro-Sunday opening)

stet, Monday, 19 March 2012 11:08 (fourteen years ago)

haha we have a fan https://twitter.com/#!/challopz/status/181700096734400512

caek, Monday, 19 March 2012 11:17 (fourteen years ago)

kudos, they got a butthurt indie jab in about M People too

Kony Montana: "Say hello to my invisible friend" (Noodle Vague), Monday, 19 March 2012 11:19 (fourteen years ago)

I realised today why I've been subconsciously avoiding the news these last few weeks. Man... I'm depressed.

Scary Move 4 (dog latin), Monday, 19 March 2012 13:40 (fourteen years ago)

i had no problem working sundays back when i worked in shops, but they had to pay me double rate to do it. i'm guessing shops don't do that anymore? PROGRESS!!

― brokering (pimping) (stevie), Monday, 19 March 2012 09:05 (5 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

lol as a tesco employee @ double pay. i dont even get that for overtime or bank holidays.

(seriously, the union or whoever is so shit at its job. i used to work for tesco 9 years ago and we got double pay overtime/time and a half sundays/sick pay and now all of that has gone.)

let people have the fucking half day off from being consumers or fucking zombie shop workers. it is not going to help do a fucking lick of good to the economy in the long run except beat down the working mans soul and hurt small businesses even more (corner shops will still be open till 10).

---

can i just say i don't understand the 50p tax rate drop? i mean can someone explain it to me in the tory way of thinking? 'we need to pay off our debts, you know how we'll do that is by having less money to spend let alone use to save up to pay the debt off'? are they expecting every person it relates to to go and employ 10 people now they have a unnoticable amount added to the millions they already have sat in the bank not being used to employ people?

a hoy hoy, Monday, 19 March 2012 15:03 (fourteen years ago)

according to the radio the 50p rate slows the economy down because people will actually refuse extra income if it gets taxed! this makes zero sense to me, you're still going to have more money in the bank.

ledge, Monday, 19 March 2012 15:08 (fourteen years ago)

those people should go back to making under £5k or whatever it is if they hate paying taxes

a hoy hoy, Monday, 19 March 2012 15:21 (fourteen years ago)

it's a "disincentive" for "wealth-creators" and makes it harder for the UK to attract "top talent"

Doch! (seandalai), Monday, 19 March 2012 15:51 (fourteen years ago)

Of all the stupid and hateful right-wing euphemisms I think I hate "wealth creators" more than any except "hardworking families".

Doch! (seandalai), Monday, 19 March 2012 15:53 (fourteen years ago)

The difference between the two is that it's not even true: Wealth does not get 'created', it has to come from somewhere.

Mark G, Monday, 19 March 2012 16:01 (fourteen years ago)

"Hardworking families" doesn't exactly mean what it says either. Anyway, they're both intentionally divisive terms that tell you that you're "deserving" and others aren't.

Doch! (seandalai), Monday, 19 March 2012 16:11 (fourteen years ago)

The idea/justification is also that it stimulates the economy by giving them more money to spend, although it doesn't really work out like that because the bigger your income the more you're likely to be saving rather than spending. Actually a straight tax cut for people on much lower incomes does more to stimulate the economy because it goes straight to people who by and large are not in a position to save and therefore immediately gets spent. The same is true for most benefits payments but of course they don't really want you to know that.

Homosexual Satan Wasp (Matt DC), Monday, 19 March 2012 16:27 (fourteen years ago)

How does the 50p tax rate affect "wealth creators" anyway? Aren't "wealth creators" taking their incomes from business profits rather than wages and thus on a completely different tax system?

And does anyone really use the term "wealth creator" outside the American Republican party?

Upt0eleven, Monday, 19 March 2012 16:50 (fourteen years ago)

Yeah I don't really think there's much thought behind the rhetoric. The one fact that people use to attack the 50p rate is that it may be bringing in less income than was expected when first introduced (hundreds of millions rather than billions iirc).

And does anyone really use the term "wealth creator" outside the American Republican party?

Sadly it's made its way across the ocean; couple of hits from a quick Google:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-business-17221941
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/chancellor-hopes-to-secure-cut-in-50p-tax-rate-7574720.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2116856/The-Budget-2012-Britain-Lib-Dems.html

Doch! (seandalai), Monday, 19 March 2012 17:00 (fourteen years ago)

entry #2 of this fine cracked list is a good answer to all the 'wealth creator' rhetoric http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-things-rich-people-need-to-stop-saying_p2/?wa_user1=1&wa_user2=News&wa_user3=blog&wa_user4=trending_now

brokering (pimping) (stevie), Monday, 19 March 2012 17:06 (fourteen years ago)

Love that article.

Homosexual Satan Wasp (Matt DC), Monday, 19 March 2012 17:07 (fourteen years ago)

it's really good, isn't it?

brokering (pimping) (stevie), Monday, 19 March 2012 17:34 (fourteen years ago)

At some point Britain is going to regret sitting by and letting the govt basically give up democratic accountability for seemingly every single public service imaginable and even the widespread low-level moaning from all quarters won't be enough to persuade any politician to do anything other than go "it's out of our hands now". For gas and railways read NHS and school system, what joy.

Homosexual Satan Wasp (Matt DC), Monday, 19 March 2012 18:17 (fourteen years ago)

since the companies that essentially run the country aren't accountable, it wd be remiss of the Tories to leave out whatever they leave of the welfare state

red is hungry green is jawless (Noodle Vague), Monday, 19 March 2012 18:21 (fourteen years ago)

What are we supposed to do, though? I mean, what do we do now? Yes, that's a rhetorical question, but it's like... I voted the best option I could. I wrote to my MP. I adopted a lord and wrote to her, too. I went and marched politely on little demos. I signed half a dozen different petitions, I did many of the things 38degrees recommended. What the fuck else are we supposed to do? It's just the sense of utter powerlessness in all this that's not just frustrating but utterly dispiriting. How do you make people accountable?

White Chocolate Cheesecake, Monday, 19 March 2012 18:33 (fourteen years ago)

Have the unformed notion that answer lies somewhere along the path of following the money.

On that note, just saw this on the twitter http://socialinvestigations.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/nhs-privatisation-compilation-of.html?m=1

stet, Monday, 19 March 2012 19:21 (fourteen years ago)

enshrining the wkend a bit is a good thing imo. working sundays makes yr social life wither & as compensation you get an exciting empty tuesday to enjoy w/ no one else you know.

ogmor, Monday, 19 March 2012 19:51 (fourteen years ago)

The budget will usher in major changes to the way UK-based multinationals are taxed on profits from their overseas subsidiaries, as well as huge cuts in corporation tax. Over the lifetime of this parliament, about £20bn will be lost in tax receipts as a result, according to the Treasury's own estimates.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/mar/19/britains-tax-rules-written-by-multinationals

James Mitchell, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 07:06 (fourteen years ago)

lmao that is just horrific

a hoy hoy, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 11:51 (fourteen years ago)

james, do you think you could start a separate thread to post links to outrageous national newspaper articles/outrageous comments on national newspaper articles/outrageous tweets?

caek, Tuesday, 20 March 2012 12:00 (fourteen years ago)

20bn lost in tax receipts as a direct result, with nothing gained? what an amazing decision by the govt, they must rly h8 money.

less of the same (darraghmac), Tuesday, 20 March 2012 16:36 (fourteen years ago)

It's bad news for the quiz machines NV:

A new machine games duty to be introduced.

Valéry Giscard d'Staind (NickB), Wednesday, 21 March 2012 13:17 (fourteen years ago)

20 percent? wankers

red is hungry green is jawless (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 21 March 2012 13:23 (fourteen years ago)

otoh no change on alcohol duty, encouraging you to stay at the bar instead

red is hungry green is jawless (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 21 March 2012 13:23 (fourteen years ago)

From midnight tonight, new stamp duty level of 7% for homes worth more than £2 million.

oh thank fuck something for hard-working families

red is hungry green is jawless (Noodle Vague), Wednesday, 21 March 2012 13:25 (fourteen years ago)

osborne's face during miliband is picture of petulance

stet, Wednesday, 21 March 2012 13:47 (fourteen years ago)

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/59219000/jpg/_59219185_014317284-1.jpg

Homosexual Satan Wasp (Matt DC), Wednesday, 21 March 2012 14:12 (fourteen years ago)

leave it gripper! 'e ain't wurf it!

ledge, Wednesday, 21 March 2012 14:13 (fourteen years ago)

PASTY TAX?!?!?!?

http://robscornishblog.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/osbornes-pasty-tax-hidden-in-budget.html

That's it, I'm joining Mebyon Kernow, I fully support secession over this.

Masonic Boom, Thursday, 22 March 2012 09:38 (fourteen years ago)

Brutal Sun front page today, I'd assumed they'd carry on cheering Osborne no matter what he did. The whole 'granny tax' thing is a pretty stupid blunder all things considered.

Homosexual Satan Wasp (Matt DC), Thursday, 22 March 2012 09:44 (fourteen years ago)

A warning shot I guess, the tories have racked up a good deal of 'debt' with Murdoch, and haven't been able to pay back in favours nearly as much as was planned. Levenson inquiry may put them in a still more awkward spot.

Bananaman Begins, Thursday, 22 March 2012 10:14 (fourteen years ago)

It makes me wonder why I voted for this lot — Sun cabbie Grant Davis's disgust at the Budget

Because you're easily led and The Sun lied to you and told you to vote in these clueless fucks who are clearly and avariciously at odds with your best interests.

brokering (pimping) (stevie), Thursday, 22 March 2012 10:33 (fourteen years ago)

nice to see the sun not doing anything until after the budget was sorted. kudos to them on absolutely ignoring it when they could have been drumming up some good old fashioned community outrage at something they totally disagree with.

Thoughts? You must have loads. (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 22 March 2012 10:51 (fourteen years ago)

if yr community gets its outrage from the sun, move

less of the same (darraghmac), Thursday, 22 March 2012 10:58 (fourteen years ago)

its part of how the tories made it there in the first place to fuck shit up

Thoughts? You must have loads. (a hoy hoy), Thursday, 22 March 2012 11:01 (fourteen years ago)

just think, tho, if Sun cabbie Grant Davis pursued the sapling of thought above to its logical end... "I wonder why I voted Tory? Is it because the Sun told me to? I wonder what else they've been wrong about? I wonder why it's in their interest to facilitate a Tory government?"

brokering (pimping) (stevie), Thursday, 22 March 2012 11:07 (fourteen years ago)

by your logic dmac we should all live in merseyside. i've only been there twice, but i do like it.

brokering (pimping) (stevie), Thursday, 22 March 2012 11:08 (fourteen years ago)

part, sure, not sure tbh how big a part. nulab had come to the end of the line regardless of bottom level media political discourse. blame blair, brown, libdems, voters before you pick the sun as the embodiment of political leverage.

less of the same (darraghmac), Thursday, 22 March 2012 11:10 (fourteen years ago)

xp you've rumbled me, i am a scouse expansionist

less of the same (darraghmac), Thursday, 22 March 2012 11:12 (fourteen years ago)

Just seen that Scum front page and, well, it's a bit strained, no?

Bananaman Begins, Thursday, 22 March 2012 11:19 (fourteen years ago)


This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.