Mel Gibson's APOCALYPTO!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (242 of them)

I mean really why try to be all kill bill fancy ninja sword shit when there's free mud and stingmaster bug bombs all over the place

TOMBOT, Saturday, 10 January 2009 07:30 (seventeen years ago)

pretty dope movie imo

and what, Saturday, 10 January 2009 07:33 (seventeen years ago)

how long do you think you have to spend running around and hunting in forests before you learn how to pluck your own dud arrows out of tree trunks on the jog?

TOMBOT, Saturday, 10 January 2009 07:37 (seventeen years ago)

the army is a pretty bullshit institution if u cant get some funding to answer that very question

Lamp, Saturday, 10 January 2009 07:40 (seventeen years ago)

haha lamp I almost added a line about how I think that exact kind of thing is why nugent-flavored white guys always seem to fill the ranks of delta, seals et al.

TOMBOT, Saturday, 10 January 2009 07:42 (seventeen years ago)

if I started a thread devoted to the discussion of films wherein the protag is basically a schmo who must use resourcefulness and luck to evade a pursuing cadre of elite(s) killers through foreign territory, would it get any posts

TOMBOT, Saturday, 10 January 2009 07:46 (seventeen years ago)

Might degenerate into arguments about that genre v schmo who turns tables on his assailants (Straw Dogs, 28 Days Later, etc...)

Gukbe, Saturday, 10 January 2009 09:15 (seventeen years ago)

if I started a thread devoted to the discussion of films wherein the protag is basically a schmo who must use resourcefulness and luck to evade a pursuing cadre of elite(s) killers through foreign territory, would it get any posts

― TOMBOT, Saturday, January 10, 2009 7:46 AM (9 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i'd hit it

s1ocki, Saturday, 10 January 2009 16:57 (seventeen years ago)

I admit I find it hard to think of the title character in Predator as a schmo.

Ned Raggett, Saturday, 10 January 2009 17:00 (seventeen years ago)

he's probably a schmo to the other predators... that's why he's stuck hunting humans and doesn't even win

s1ocki, Saturday, 10 January 2009 17:06 (seventeen years ago)

if I started a thread devoted to the discussion of films wherein the protag is basically a schmo who must use resourcefulness and luck to evade a pursuing cadre of elite(s) killers through foreign territory, would it get any posts

― TOMBOT, Saturday, January 10, 2009 7:46 AM (9 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i'd hit it

― s1ocki, Saturday, January 10, 2009 11:57 AM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yah im w/this

ice cr?m, Saturday, 10 January 2009 17:09 (seventeen years ago)

btw <3 apocalypto

ice cr?m, Saturday, 10 January 2009 17:10 (seventeen years ago)

the movie i hate to love!

― s1ocki, Tuesday, October 16, 2007 2:00 AM (1 year ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

s1ocki, Saturday, 10 January 2009 17:21 (seventeen years ago)

im sort of proud of my iconoclastic love for this movie tbh

ice cr?m, Saturday, 10 January 2009 17:23 (seventeen years ago)

ˆˆi never got past 30 minutes of watching this tbh.

csa, Saturday, 10 January 2009 17:27 (seventeen years ago)

i love the scene going through the different mayan neighbourhoods

s1ocki, Saturday, 10 January 2009 17:31 (seventeen years ago)

I watched Gladiator last night for the first time and the whole asshole-royalty-appeasing-the-masses-in-CGI sure looks the same in every movie.

•--• --- --- •--• (Pleasant Plains), Saturday, 10 January 2009 19:22 (seventeen years ago)

man i hate gladiator

tired (latebloomer), Sunday, 11 January 2009 04:02 (seventeen years ago)

such a boring, ugly movie.

tired (latebloomer), Sunday, 11 January 2009 04:03 (seventeen years ago)

Apocalypto however was way better than it should have been

tired (latebloomer), Sunday, 11 January 2009 04:07 (seventeen years ago)

otm otm otm

s1ocki, Sunday, 11 January 2009 04:28 (seventeen years ago)

gladiator rules u guys r crazy

ice cr?m, Monday, 12 January 2009 04:16 (seventeen years ago)

if I started a thread devoted to the discussion of films wherein the protag is basically a schmo who must use resourcefulness and luck to evade a pursuing cadre of elite(s) killers through foreign territory, would it get any posts

― TOMBOT, Saturday, January 10, 2009 2:46 AM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

this is basically the only kind of movie i watch so i would be down

゙(゚、 。 7 (cankles), Monday, 12 January 2009 04:18 (seventeen years ago)

eleven months pass...

http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118012680.html?categoryid=13&cs=1

krampus activities (latebloomer), Monday, 14 December 2009 11:09 (sixteen years ago)

i had an argument about apocalypto at a party with a bunch of drunk classical archaeologists a few days ago. we had to go find a mesoamericanist to answer our questions about human sacrifice. however if he made a movie about vikings i could be THE party expert! ("period drama about viking culture" hahaha)

Maria, Monday, 14 December 2009 13:01 (sixteen years ago)

So what's happening is

Mel Gibson's RAGNAROK!

Ned Raggett, Monday, 14 December 2009 14:07 (sixteen years ago)

are they gonna be talking Viking in this?

I regret choosing this bland user name (peter in montreal), Monday, 14 December 2009 17:29 (sixteen years ago)

one month passes...

could have lost most of the first 45 minutes, but the prisoner march onwards this was a thrill!

caek, Monday, 1 February 2010 10:20 (sixteen years ago)

I still have not seen this, but it sounds great.

I know it has been said before, but it is great the way every Mel Gibson film ends with main character being sadistically killed.

The New Dirty Vicar, Monday, 1 February 2010 15:46 (sixteen years ago)

ya it was a bit shocking in "what women want" tho

brews before HOOS (s1ocki), Monday, 1 February 2010 15:46 (sixteen years ago)

haha, i like how all his great films are really just 2 hour chase sequences: mad max 2, apocalypto, passion of the christ

caek, Monday, 1 February 2010 15:47 (sixteen years ago)

is this worth watching on bbc2 at 10, y or n?

80085 (a hoy hoy), Sunday, 14 February 2010 21:18 (sixteen years ago)

yes

snoocki (s1ocki), Sunday, 14 February 2010 21:18 (sixteen years ago)

most definitely. V-Day counterprogramming (people literally have their hearts cut out!).

Freddy 'The Wonder Chicken' (Gukbe), Sunday, 14 February 2010 21:19 (sixteen years ago)

so why is it COUNTER programming then

snoocki (s1ocki), Sunday, 14 February 2010 21:19 (sixteen years ago)

lollllll @ passion of the christ being a 2 hour chase sequence

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 14 February 2010 21:22 (sixteen years ago)

I do think it's funny how so many of Mel Gibson's flicks feature him as the (literally) tortured protagonist and then, when he gets a little too old to play the role, he moves behind the camera and hires proxy tortured protagonists. Sort of like Woody Allen and his own alter-ego leads.

Anyway, as a Mayan "First Blood" this wasn't bad.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 14 February 2010 21:35 (sixteen years ago)

a thousand times yes, sam

caek, Sunday, 14 February 2010 21:39 (sixteen years ago)

uel

caek, Sunday, 14 February 2010 21:41 (sixteen years ago)

lol

and so i will.

was thinking of starting a bullshit free rolling 'should i watch this film y or n' thread but then realised that no ilx film thread would ever be bullshit free.

80085 (a hoy hoy), Sunday, 14 February 2010 21:43 (sixteen years ago)

wait so this movie is actually just peen joeks?

80085 (a hoy hoy), Sunday, 14 February 2010 22:22 (sixteen years ago)

that sets the tone. think of the opening as an amouz bouche.

Freddy 'The Wonder Chicken' (Gukbe), Sunday, 14 February 2010 22:29 (sixteen years ago)

on iplayer for the next week, uk people!

caek, Monday, 15 February 2010 09:44 (sixteen years ago)

watched it last night, pretty great IMO, if gory. Mel Gibson is obv. a weird guy, but this kind of suited the batshit craziness of this. I'm sure this has been said upthread already, but it reminded me of Aguirre quite a lot.

Neil S, Monday, 15 February 2010 10:47 (sixteen years ago)

they are both movies set in the jungle, yes

da Wesley CRUSHER (latebloomer), Monday, 15 February 2010 12:57 (sixteen years ago)

sorry if that came across as snarky. wasn't meant that way.

da Wesley CRUSHER (latebloomer), Monday, 15 February 2010 13:09 (sixteen years ago)

Similar aesthetics, I thought. Obviously they are stories told from very different perspectives. It's more an atmosphere thing I suppose, and I did also think of Aronofsky's The Fountain too, so it may well be just a matter of them all being set in the jungle!

Neil S, Monday, 15 February 2010 13:51 (sixteen years ago)

this movie kind of reminds me of "george of the jungle" for some reason - similar vibe i guess?

amuse-douche (s1ocki), Monday, 15 February 2010 15:03 (sixteen years ago)

Very much reminded me of Avatar.

No, YOU'RE a disgusting savage (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 15 February 2010 15:05 (sixteen years ago)

was v. surprised about how this turned into a tarzan remake w/ added peen joeks.

80085 (a hoy hoy), Monday, 15 February 2010 15:13 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.